Oh, having been there when the frame was cut and having helped set the rear
tub into place to get a feel for how things are going to look and fit, i
think I can say height was not of prime consideration. A stock look is the
end goal I believe. A 4 inch body lift is what you get when you set a
series tub on the back of a ranger rover frame without doing a lot of
modification.
But I'm assuming that you have a solution to the problem seeing as you were
so quick to critisize the development of Scott's hybrid.
We await your detailed description of how to resolve the height issue
without destroying the coil sprung abilities.
Bill Fishel
bfishel@cisnet.com
wbfishel@aol.com
> Have we reached new lows. Is the prowess of an off
> road vehicle measured in how tall the truck is or how
> well it does on a variety of trails yet doesn't tip
> over on a 3 degree side slope. Taller is not
> necessarily better. Around here, taller usually does
> not equate with offroad capability or actual use
> offroad, but just the opposite.
>
> Time for a reality check.
>
> Aloha
> Peter O.
>
> > The top of the tub is
> > almost to my collar bone and I'm 5'10". Hey JL, how
> > high off the ground is
> > the top of you tub? Your truck looked pretty high
> > off the ground in the
> > pics.
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> LRO mailing list
> LRO@land-rover.team.net
> http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:21:26 EST