Re: [lro] Re: Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box

• Previous message: Tim Czajka: "[lro] Re: Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box"
• In reply to: Tim Czajka: "[lro] Re: Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

It simply bolts on where all overdrives bolt on.
Mark

Tim Czajka wrote:

> Mark Pilkington wrote:
> >It is an Overdrive unit with an "H" shaped box. There will be a high side a
> >neutral side and a nasty low side. There will be something like 16 forward
> >gears and 3 reverse ...
> >
>
> Sounds interesting but will this be a box that bolts on
> like the Roverdrive, or one that sandwiches somewhere in
> the drivetrain? The latter would require a shortened
> rear driveshaft which could be a problem on the 88s.
>
> Tim Czajka
> 1972 Series III 88
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> LRO mailing list
> LRO@land-rover.team.net
> http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro

• Next message: Peter Ogilvie: "Re: [lro] Roverdrive vs. High Ratio Transfer Box"
• Previous message: Tim Czajka: "[lro] Re: Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box"
• In reply to: Tim Czajka: "[lro] Re: Roverdrive vs. High Ratio transfer Box"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:40:14 EST