John,
Thanks for your suggstions on the Rochester. I did buy a local paper filter
here but it was noisier than I liked so I went back to the oil bath. I did
make the cutout for the vacuum port in the base so I don't think that it the
cause of the lower than normal gas mileage. I would love to improve it. The
motor is otherwise in very good shape, spot on compression and no oil loss. I
have heard that a 49 is right for sea level and it currently has a 51
installed, now much of a difference might that make?
John
Bangkok
1975 SIII 109 2.25 Petrol
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 06:53:32 EST