Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?

From: John Cranfield (john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 10:18:58 EST

  • Next message: Bob & Sue Bernard: "Re: [lro] LWB Series III or IIa?"

    There may have been a hand full of 2a 109s that were fitted with the
    salisbury but generally the salisbury started with the s3 109. 88s did
    n't
    get it.
    john and muddy

    "Robert S. Cascaddan" wrote:
    >
    > > the only feature of the SIII LWB that I have not seen mentioned is the
    > > Salisbury axle (is that only the CSW ?) which is a great improvement to
    > the
    > > strength of the rear end if you are going off road and being a copy of an
    > > American design (Dana 60) has a few more options for gearing and lockers
    > > etc.
    >
    > When exactly was the Salisbury axle offered? Was it available on late
    > Series IIa's? Do all Series III's have it? Was it only available on the
    > 109's, or did the 88's have it as well?
    >
    > Robert S. Cascaddan, MBA
    > scaddan@pacifier.com
    >
    > Author of:
    > Revolutionary Changes Ahead for Motorcycling
    > http://home.pacifier.com/~scaddan/
    >
    > Articles:
    > "Disruptive Technology = Revolutionary Changes"
    > http://home.pacifier.com/~scaddan/disruptive.htm
    >
    > "Attracting a New Generation of Riders to the Sport of Motorcycling"
    > http://home.pacifier.com/~scaddan/new_riders.htm
    > _______________________________________________
    > LRO mailing list
    > LRO@land-rover.team.net
    > http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 22 2003 - 11:53:11 EST