Re: [lro] Low range (really long)

From: Kirk Hillman (hillman88@telus.net)
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 02:13:50 EST

  • Next message: David Scheidt: "Re: [lro] Machine Screws"

    > It's reassuring to read these comments, as I have my chev
    > 250, sm465, and series tc (not sure how this is going to
    > mate up yet) and salisbury/rover(front) 3.54's ready for my
    > 109. My 1st gear low range final drive will be 54.4 to 1.
    > On the upper end I should be able to maintain 70 below 3000
    > rpm. 60mph will be something like 2500 rpm. It's just a lot
    > of time and money away from completion.

        And that's on 750R16's! If you put the suffix 'b' gears in the t-case
    and 900R16's you would have a smashing setup!!! In all my playing around
    with number I kind of forgot to look at the 3.54. Sure I knew they were
    there and even have them on my spreadsheet but not once did I try it out in
    that combination. What a beautiful spread.
        I too have to say it's a little refreshing to get a wake up call saying
    that 70:1 is REALLY low. When I think I want more I try and recall climbing
    one particular long and steep grade in B.C. With stock gears my LR idled up
    that slope at 500 RPM about as fast as I would have climbed it casually on
    foot. That's with only ~40:1. Now I have almost 50:1. I guess I will just
    have to try it and see. (TAW- ever since I can remember you were a strong
    voice of reason... thanks.)

    Kirk
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 02:11:44 EST