[lro] Re: Is a Series an SUV?

From: Keith Shukait (shukait@mac.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 14:00:36 EST

  • Next message: NADdMD@aol.com: "Re: [lro] dmv woes (kinda long)"

    All,

    > A quote from Land-Rover The Unbeatable 4X4: "However, with the wisdom
    > of long experience, the management have always dug their toes in and
    > maintained that the function of the Land-Rover is well defined and
    > clear
    > cut: it is a utility vehicle, and no more than that. Too much styling
    > and softening could only detract from what has made it so universally
    > useful and successful. ... If the Land-Rover team were to bend their
    > ideas towards a more prestigious vehicle it could never be called a
    > Land-Rover, and could certainly not resemble a Land-Rover in
    > appearance."
    So what happened? The direction of the company is depressing. As soon
    as they drop the Diff-Lock the whole line will be SUV's...

    Very sad,

    Keith & Pam Shukait
    Northern California Rover Club
    Mendo-Reece List Digest Version
    Dormobile Owner Register
    1997 Land Rover Discovery XD "YLLWJKT"
    1969 Land Rover Series IIA ExMoD 109 Regular "Millie"
    1967 Land Rover Series IIA NADA 6 Cylinder Dormobile "Indiana"
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 27 2003 - 14:04:55 EST