LRO: Re: power

From: Faure, Marin (Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 21:34:49 EDT

  • Next message: Perrone Ford: "LRO: RE: Re: Newly-acquired NAS SIII"

    Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:14:00 -0700
    From: SJH <SHARDING@SCHULTE-LAW.COM>
    Subject: LRO: re: power

    >And yeah, I do know how to use my delete button, but the non LR stuff is
    getting a tad thick lately dontchy'all think?

    So what would you like to talk about? The torque settings for a
    Series door hinge bolt? There is nothing stopping anyone from
    posting "legitimate" Land Rover messages to this forum, however
    you define those. Someone's comment on nuclear power does
    not automatically delete someone else's comment on clutch
    bleeding. If we followed your rules and posted strictly Land
    Rover messages, I suspect this group would soon be as boring as
    the ones supporting other makes that I've looked at occasionally.

    I get the digest and scroll down the list of posts scanning the subject lines.
    I read what looks interesting and ignore the rest. Sometimes there's nothing
    on the list that looks interesting to me, so I've spent what, 30 seconds? Other
    times there are things that appear interesting, so I spend more time.

    But maybe all e-mail systems don't work like the ones I have at work and
    at home. Maybe having a lot of messages in a digest bogs your computer
    down something fierce. I know people who were on systems in the UK awhile
    back that had this problem with a canalboat digest. So if that's what's prompted
    your complaint about the content of the list, I don't have an answer but I
    sympathize with your software frustration.
    ___________________________
    C. Marin Faure
      (original owner)
      1973 Land Rover Series III-88
      1991 Range Rover Vogue SE
      Seattle



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 05 2001 - 22:53:59 EDT