LRO: RE: RE: RE: What's a Land Rover (was Parts availability vs. bulletproofing)

From: Hope Peter (hope_peter@bah.com)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 21:55:09 EDT

Next message: RON WARD: "Re: LRO: Dynamat"

Previous message: Coates, Clinton: "LRO: Dynamat"
In reply to: Easton Trevor A: "LRO: RE: RE: What's a Land Rover (was Parts availability vs. bulletpro ofing)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Sorry to be picky but you only need to double declutch from
> second to first
> or fro third to second. Not necessary on up shifts.
>
Funny, but if I try and go from 1 to 2 with out double clutching I get a
horrendous grinding.
Pete

Next message: RON WARD: "Re: LRO: Dynamat"
Previous message: Coates, Clinton: "LRO: Dynamat"
In reply to: Easton Trevor A: "LRO: RE: RE: What's a Land Rover (was Parts availability vs. bulletpro ofing)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 23:20:40 EDT