LRO: RE: RE: Engine Balancing

From: Ford Stephen CFMETR FORN (StephenF@kpt.nuwc.navy.mil)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:26:08 EDT

  • Next message: Faure, Marin: "LRO: Re: LR drive or destination?"

    Just asked my machine shop (that has quite a good reputation) this very
    question, and they said that the cost to balance is significant and in a low
    power, low revving engine like the 2.25, I would be better off spending my
    money elswhere.
    So I am...and am...and am...

    Stephen Ford
    Ocean Operations
    C/511 Nanoose

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Tackley, John [mailto:jtackley@dit.state.va.us]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:00 AM
    To: 'lro@works.team.net'
    Subject: LRO: RE: Engine Balancing

    Peter asked...
    "But seriously. Is it a good idea to get the crank and con rods balanced
    for
    a 1970 2.25petrol lump when doing a rebuild?"

    Depends...if you need to get the crank magnefluxed for cracks and the
    journals machined anyway, why not have the machinist/shop balance it too,
    cost is just a few more dollars, and while he's at it, why not "lighten" it
    up a bit and knife edge the counter-weights as well?...only a few 'more'
    dollars and the benefits are quite obvious, even in a tractor engine like
    the LR 2.25 and you will not ever have a better opportunity for these modest
    but beneficial improvements.
    ...but if you are doing your own journal inspection and deem them
    acceptable, then just simply replace the bearings...no need to take it to
    the machinist's shop and spend any dollars.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:47:39 EDT