Re: LRO: Re: Parts availability vs. bulletproofing

From: Michael Hatton (mhatton@compt.com)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 01:21:34 EDT

  • Next message: Hope Peter: "LRO: RE: Re: RE: Re: LRs in WWII movies"

    Perhaps "Land Rover" and especially Series vehicles, could more be
    considered a philosophy. If what one does to a Land Rover falls within
    "the philosophy", then it still remains a Land Rover. In other words,
    consider the dynamic design of the philosphy, rather than the static
    physical construction that rolls off the production line.

    .......Damn, I promised myself I'd stop using big words like "marmalade"

    I have also always been cynical, I work in commercial television ( perhaps
    not long enough , but I know what Marin means), but I still believe in
    everyone.
    Marin, do you really know what is "going on"? If you do I would really
    like to know :)

    Waste time on the young, so that they will waste their time on you, when
    you are old...

    Michael "somewhere between punk and fart" Hatton

    Michael Hatton

    Tim Czajka wrote:

    > Marin Faure wrote:
    > >It may be a great vehicle for your own uses, but to someone genuinely
    > >interested in true Land Rovers, it ain't one.
    > >
    > You are falling into the trap of using a narrow concourse
    > definition as a litmus test for what is Land Rover. The
    > Series was not defined by concourse competition.
    >
    > What rolled out of the factory door was a vehicle that could
    > be worked on and modified for the various tasks and adventures
    > it would support around the world. That is essential to it's
    > nature and part of why it became a 4x4 legend. Every time
    > someone makes a Series modification they are in fact reinforcing
    > that aspect of what is a Series Land Rover. One need only look
    > at the wealth of factory approved, aftermarket, and owner mods
    > over the years to understand that a Series Land Rover is more
    > than a date stamped build spec sheet.
    >
    > History has defined the Series and Land Rover. You knocked
    > young people for failing to acknowledging history - so don't
    > knock off a big chunk of history yourself. As so often happens
    > with attempts at narrow definition - the definition ends up
    > losing that which it tried to define.
    >
    > Your definition works fine at a concourse car show - but fails
    > when you hit the trail.
    >
    > Tim Czajka
    > 1972 Series III 88
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 02:48:36 EDT