Actually, if the DMV took a long, hard look at my Landie, they might have a
different opinion...
;-)
My bank thinks of it as a menace to all the cars it owns out there.
J-L
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Peckham <matt@onexchange.com>
To: <lro@Works.Team.Net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: LRO: RE: Parts availability vs. bulletproofing
> So does that make my Xterra not an Xterra because I am having a custom
> expedition roofrack installed as the original one (which many think gives
it
> it's personality) is less useful than many originally believed? and the
> step rails, which were made out of paper thin aluminum alloy, are being
> replaced with a set of rock sliders. Does this not make it an Xterra?
>
> My definition of what makes a vehicle this or that.
>
> What does your bank think it is?
>
> What does the DMV classify it as?
>
> If either of these are Land Rover, then you got a Land Rover. There are
> different classifications, creampuff, well used, expedition, trail rig,
etc.
> But when all is said and done, it's still a land rover to the DMV, DOT,
MOT,
> whoever.
>
> Matt Peckham
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Oxley [mailto:paul@adventures.co.za]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:10 PM
> To: lro@Works.Team.Net
> Subject: Re: LRO: RE: Parts availability vs. bulletproofing
>
>
> "Faure, Marin" wrote:
>
> > Technically, my own SIII is not a Land Rover because I
> > put my own instrument panel in it. But it's a hell of a lot
> > more of a Land Rover than one that's had the engine, drivetrain,
> > etc. changed.
>
> Ahhh! So it's not all black and white anymore. Now we have shades of
> gray.
>
> I kind of hoped you'd see the light Marin :-{)}
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Oxley
> AfricanAdrenalin.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 03 2001 - 17:37:09 EDT