[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 07:08:08 EST Subject: Re: 6cyl pisons in a four? In a message dated 11/4/98 9:37:18 PM, you wrote: into one of the the IOE four cylinder engines. Unless the stroke is different they would not fit the 2 liter but isn't there a 1.7 or something?>> Even farther off the mark, as I understand it. The original theory was the interchangeability of parts between the *santana-6* and the *lr-2.25-4* which Teriann pointed out have the same bore & stroke. hmmm. If she found one of those sixes, parts availability may not be too bad if there's a bit of cross-over from the 4... .02 I don't know which six Frank was talking about in his funny-racer's-story but I assume it was the santana 6 for the same reason. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 09:00:29 -0400 Subject: Re: Trimming the Bulkhead Paul Quin wrote: > Very wet day here in S.W. BC. Parked beside Sussex's '69 SIIA and we stood > by our vehicles, comparing the size of our two oil slicks in all their > rainbow glory. I think that my Rover is letting more water in than oil > out... > Since overhauling my bulkhead last winter, it has never sat quite right on > the frame. I think that the problem is the new footwells that I had welded > in. They seem to stick a little too far forward and thus cause the bulkhead [ truncated by list-digester (was 19 lines)] > pillars to the frame, will this give me some more adjustment room to pull > the bulkhead forward? I only need about 1/2 an inch... Yes it probably will, but Landrovers being what they are that adjustment may be all used up. John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; ] From: "Lee Dunkelberg" <lee_dunkelberg@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 07:17:53 -0600 Subject: Bill's Freelander Pix charset="iso-8859-1" Well, all that Camel Trophy gear certainly makes the Freelander LOOK like an off-road machine. But, would a Beetle look the same with winches at both ends and a few lights on top? Lee & Clare Dunkelberg 94 D-90 #1584 (AA yellow - what else?) 98 Discovery (white - okay, so white's good, too) San Antonio, Texas ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01BE088C.67D97220 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; ] [Attachment removed, was 42 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@ushmm.org Date: Wed, 04 Nov 98 22:54:51 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Wanted: stuff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 08:48:53 EST Subject: Re: Bill's Freelander Pix In a message dated 11/5/98 9:19:57 AM, you wrote: <<Well, all that Camel Trophy gear certainly makes the Freelander LOOK like an off-road machine. But, would a Beetle look the same with winches at both ends and a few lights on top?>> Beetles (the old ones, at least) have made very competent off-road desert racers... I haven't seen a winch on one, but the few lights on top are necessary for seeing rocks, dunes and ditches when running at high speeds at night... I'd say a well-equipped-and-built baja bug could give a Freelander a run for its money in the Baja1000... I know, it is like comparing apples & oranges, but the venerable beetle can go places... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard" <cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:02:23 -0500 Subject: Re: Bill's Freelander Pix Lee, Just in case your still interested in the Brush bar and running boards the guy (seller) to cantact is listed below. Good luck. Christopher Dillard Dba (seller) Chuck Pace Land Rover Greenville ServiceManager 864-232-7493 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard" <cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:04:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Bill's Freelander Pix NO LR (SORRY) Woops, Sorry to post to the list!!!! Brain Fart!!! Cheers, Christopher Dillard Dba Ahold USA (BI-LO Inc) 95 Discovery V8i (Rusty II) cdillard@aholdusa.com 55 Series I (???) Greenville, SC USA 55 Series I (The Green Hornet) 1989 Thoroughbred Racehorse (the other Rusty!!) SoLaRos #136 _________ |_|_|_|_| {|__|__ \ {|__|__|__\___ |_ - ____ - _|} (_) (_) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Fred Dushin <fadushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:59:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines /* * Subject: Santanna 6 cyl engines * * Anyone know anything about them?? * * They are supposed to be a LR four cylinder with two added cylinders. * Rumor has it that they take LR four cylinder engine parts. */ Gee I don't know, TeriAnn, I think you are starting to haul too much camping equiptment in that doormobile of yours for your 4 cyclinder to carry. Maybe you should consider an RV for your Portland excursions ;) At least you wouldn't have to wax the aluminum siding... Cheers, Fred"oh no, not another"Dushin -- Fred Dushin mailto:fadushin@top.cis.syr.edu PGP public key available at http://www.cis.syr.edu/~fadushin/pgp - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 10:01:17 -0500 Subject: gettin belted Bill Rice Jarvis64@aol.com wrote: >I need some brackets for mounting the top of a inertia mount system. Bren >tells me that all SIIIs have these, even tho' on models w/o inertial belts >they're covered up by the trim. >They're RN part # 348874 and 348873. Is he right--are there hundreds of >these lurking under trim panels? I ordered those parts when fitting the inertia belts to the 88. Went to remove the fascia panel, and lo and behold, the bracket was already there with the same thread (captive) nut welded in place. Mine's one of the earliest Series III's (built 5/72) so I imagine all would have this mod. BTW, I remember the bracket as welded in place, rather than bolted. RN took 'em back since I didn't need 'em. The only problem I had was in ordering. Wasn't sure if it would fit at first, so I only ordered one...the "driver's side". Guess what? When I saw that it would fit, I ordered the "passenger side" for myself. Cheers *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 10:01:15 -0500 Subject: Lethal springs Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com wrote: >The spring won't be an issue, as the shaft is happily anchored still by the >upper arm. It won't come out. Really? I've had the seals (and a spare spring) in the kit for many years, but was always reluctant to fool with it with all the warnings in the shop manual about a spring removing various body parts and attempting to enter orbit once give its freedom. Might just do it this weekend. If you're wrong, my next of kin will be contacting you Monday. ;-) *----jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:31:07 -0500 Subject: Re: Lethal springs Sandy, If you want to do the full overhaul then yes, you WILL be dealing with the spring. For simply swapping the seals the spring and shaft will happily stay in place all by themselves, thank'ee. If you look at the design, the tapered bushings are pushing down/out against the machined cones on the shaft - unless the bushings are completely fragged, the spring can't escape unlees you shove the shaft out of the housing. I will warn you, though, that the shaft running surfaces are most likely scored - they didn't harden the running surfaces to prevent seal wear, and most of them got grooved (not unlike LR engine front pulleys). If you want to have a look at http://www.fourfold.org/LR_FAQ/Series/FAQ.S.steering_relay.html, you'll find the article I wrote on overhauling steering relays in the chassis. I've come up with further data since then, so give me a yell before you attempt it. Alan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 11:08:37 EST Subject: Any other vehicles which came with Lucas Dizzy? Hi all, About to go to the junkyard (auto recyclers) to look for a "new style" Lucas 4 cylinder distributor to get dizzy cap clips from. Are there any other makes that used this? I assume later Triumphs and MG's did, true? Any others? Thanks, Nate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 12:32:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Any other vehicles which came with Lucas Dizzy? NADdMD@aol.com wrote: > Hi all, > About to go to the junkyard (auto recyclers) to look for a "new style" Lucas 4 > cylinder distributor to get dizzy cap clips from. Are there any other makes > that used this? I assume later Triumphs and MG's did, true? Any others? this true so did Minis , Austin Americas and English Fords of the 60s and 70s and maybe some Volvos John and Muddy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 16:39:18 +0000 Subject: Re: Any other vehicles which came with Lucas Dizzy? I assume later Triumphs and MG's did, true? Any others? Beware of the slant four Triumphs (Dolomites) Nate.They had AC Delco dizzy's. Only damned dizzy I ever had trouble with."Cant rebush Delcos sir".Yes you bloody well can if you make your own....What with that and French Ducellier wiring,long live Lucas,say I. Cheers Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Wilson, Scott" <wilsons@msmail.vislab.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 11:45 -0500 Subject: RE: Little Nash Rambler(No LR Content) > I didn't follow this thread so I apologize if I am wrong. > The line from the song is about a a person driving a Cadillac and the > "Little Nash Rambler" is behind the Caddie going "Beep Beep." Thanks... nice to know that I'm not going crazy... used to hear that song on Dr Demento... I only brought it up cause someone mentioned a british car company named Nash, and I didn't know if that is what they were referring to. -Scott - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Michael Carradine <cs@landrover.net> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:10:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Sikkens paint codes needed At 10:11 PM 11/4/98 -0500, you wrote: >I am in need of the Sikkens code numbers for pastel Green and Limestone >Checked the FAQ but found no Sikkens codes >Anyone have this info? >Rgds >Steve Bradke Some manufacturers are able to use or cross-reference codes. See the codes at www.landrover.net/paint -Michael - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: GElam30092@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:12:01 EST Subject: Re: Lethal springs <<Really? I've had the seals (and a spare spring) in the kit for many years, but was always reluctant to fool with it with all the warnings in the shop manual about a spring removing various body parts and attempting to enter orbit once give its freedom. Might just do it this weekend. If you're wrong, my next of kin will be contacting you Monday. ;-)>> It's probably of no value knowing this but I recently replaced the bottom seal on the SIII also. Piece of cake. The finger reattachment was more difficult though. Just kidding of course! Gerry Elam PHX AZ USA '73 Series III Soft top "Tigger" (daily driver until it hits 110 F / 43 C) '63 Series IIA " Soldado Sangrando" '64 Series IIA Dormobile "Humpty Dumpty" (interior currently in pieces) '95 Disco "Great White" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 17:15:37 +0000 Subject: RE: Little Nash Rambler(No LR Content) >I only brought it up cause someone mentioned a british car company >named Nash, and I didn't know if that is what they were referring to. *Frazer*-Nash Scott.Built sports cars with chain drive in the twenties (and thirties??) "Frazer-Nash did not like cogs, So they built a car with chains and dogs" ..As the saying went..:-) Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 07:19:59 Subject: RE: Little Nash Rambler(No LR Content) Nash was also an American Car Company. Made autos for many years and eventually got blended into American Motors. If you remember the old "Boston Blackie" tv series, the cop cars were all Nashs. My parents had one, had the annoying habit of not starting whenever temperature dropped below freezing. Not a popular problem in Michigan. Anyway, they had a foray into the small car field called the Rambler in the 50's. Notorious for being slow and not especially reliable. Hence the humor in the song, like a Geo Metro pushing a Porsche at 150 mph. Another historical note, those were the days of three speed on the column manual transmissions. The linkage was rather complicated and notorious for getting stuck in one gear after a little wear set in. Aloha Peter At 11:45 AM 11/5/98 -0500, you wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 07:23:40 Subject: Re: Beep Beep and other Nash Rambler History. Nash was also an American Car Company. Made autos for many years and eventually got blended into American Motors. If you remember the old "Boston Blackie" tv series, the cop cars were all Nashs. My parents had one, had the annoying habit of not starting whenever temperature dropped below freezing. Not a popular problem in Michigan. Anyway, they had a foray into the small car field called the Rambler in the 50's. Notorious for being slow and not especially reliable. Hence the humor in the song, like a Geo Metro pushing a Porsche at 150 mph. Another historical note, those were the days of three speed on the column manual transmissions. The linkage was rather complicated and notorious for getting stuck in one gear after a little wear set in. Aloha Peter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard" <cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:26:09 -0500 Subject: Springs (SORRY fot DOUBLR POST) SORRY FOR THE DOUBLE POST BUT...... With the thread on springs going around, I though that I woudl throw in an unrelated question. I was at the dealership the other day and they happen to have the Camel Trophy Mundo Maya Disco (Daphne Green and Jim Swett) and I was crawling around under it and noticed that the rear springs were aet up with an outer spring and a smaller diameter inner spring. I have never seen or heard of this set-up before and was wondering if anyone had any info or specs on this spring set-up. Thanks for the info (if anyone knows) (cause' I don't) Cheers, Christopher Dillard Dba Ahold USA (BI-LO Inc) 95 Discovery V8i (Rusty II) cdillard@aholdusa.com 55 Series I (???) Greenville, SC USA 55 Series I (The Green Hornet) 1989 Thoroughbred Racehorse (the other Rusty!!) SoLaRos #136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Thorsten Klein <kleit001@mail.Uni-Mainz.de> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 18:33:16 +0100 Subject: Re: Springs (SORRY fot DOUBLR POST) Chris Dillard schrieb: > I was crawling around under it and noticed that the rear springs were aet > up with an outer spring and a smaller diameter inner spring. I have never > seen or heard of this set-up before and was wondering if anyone had any > info or specs on this spring set-up. Thanks for the info (if anyone knows) It is a heavy duty setup. The standard Defender130's have this setup, and the Camel Trophy 110s also (I had to replace a gearbox on one a year ago). Bye, Thorsten Thorsten Klein Mainz, Germany kleit001@mail.uni-mainz.de SIII Lightweight (almost sold) Defender 110 (ordered, Tdi or Td5, I do not know) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:21:58 -0500 Subject: Overweight Rovers - was Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines Y'know, Fred's comment on the weight of a Dormobile interior on a 4-cylinder 109 got me to thinking. I wonder if a lot of the complaints and suggestions of alternate power plants for Rovers are simply bad weight management on the part of owners adding accessories? The 4-cylinder 109 was never meant to haul a 6000-pound vehicle - by that weight you're getting into serious Range Rover territory and a V8 or the like is starting to look mandatory. For myself and Mr. Churchill (who is now sporting a fresh 2.25 rebuild) we can haul a load of firewood or building materials at 65-70 on a standard motor in overdrive without having to floor the motor for moderate hills. Outside of an offensive taste for walnut in my 109 I keep the accessories and gewgaws to a minimum - or if I do add them I make damned sure that they're suitable to the vehicle and the motoring I do. This is why Mr. C hasn't been fitted with 50 gallons worth of fuel tankage, or the Carawagon top I almost bought when last in the UK - he's simply not powerful enough to lug an extra ton of structure without sacrificing the performance and fuel economy I enjoy now (18 MPG at 65 MPH is nothing to spit at!) An example of not paying attention to the big picture was in LRW last month - some bloke who should have known better had bought a Series III 2.25 that had been built-up as a camper conversion a la Winnebago - and was remarking how badly it handled, braked and went. (vulgarity mode on) NO S***, SHERLOCK! (vulgarity mode off) I think my purpose in mentioning this is perhaps to suggest that examining the entire design of a vehicle modification is a good idea before going mad with the accessories. Using camper conversions as above as an example, this might have been better off being done on a 6-cylinder base (as Martin Walther did) or on an already-modified chassis rather than subjecting a 2.25 to the slow death of hauling too much weight. I understand the principle of "do what you can with what you have", but sometimes a look at the big picture first might suggest better ideas to explore first. aj"food for thought"r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Allan Smith <smitha@candw.lc> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 14:15:23 -0500 Subject: Re: Springs I was working under an ex-Kalimantan D110 in the UK a couple of weeks ago and it had the same spring set up. If you don't get any specific info from elsewhere you could get it from the people who are doing mods on the vehicle: Paul Ridgeway, MRTS, fax + 44 1327 857917 Allan At 12:26 05/11/98 -0500, you wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BEN_NIBALI@denso-diam.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:12:54 -0500 Subject: Alternate Intake Plumbing- Another Solution Now THIS is what I was looking for: hi there so this is what you need 1 2" mechanical joint clamp go see the plumbing store guys and tell them you want a clamp for cast iron pipe. they should give you a clamp that has a neoprene sleeve with a stainless steel cover. get also a 2" ABS street elbow, 90 degrees also known as a fit elbow. you will need a short bit of 2" ABS pipe. the clamp goes on the carb the elbow goes in the clamp and the pipe goes in the elbow. there you have it new plumbing for real. if you want oil breather holes other plumbing bits can be had for that too just take the breather hose to the plumbing store with you. good luck kevin willey 73 air portable 96 disco - Edith - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:43:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Alternate Intake Plumbing- Another Solution Re: This was what I was looking for: I LIKE it! The only thing I'd be afraid of is static charge build-up on the PVC.... Cool - definitely a 3-banana bodge! Seriously - it's a nice design, if you don't have the original bit. ajr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
[digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ] From: "Kevin and Company" <willeys@cyberus.ca> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:40:11 -0500 Subject: intake,alternate charset="iso-8859-1" hi there and greetings to the list so this is what you need 1 2" mechanical joint clamp go see the plumbing store guys and tell them = you want a clamp for cast iron pipe. they should give you a clamp that = had a neoprene sleeve with a stainless steel cover . get also a 2" ABS street elbow, 90 degrees alos known as a fit elbow. you will end a short bit of 2" ABS pipe. the clamp goes on the carb the elbow goes in the clamp and the pipe goes = in the elbow. there you have it new plumbing for real. it you want oil breather holes other plumbing bits can be had for that = too just take the breather hors to the plumbing store with you. good luck kevin willey 73 air portable 96 disco - Edith ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01BE08C1.CF97E060 [ Original post was HTML ] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: text/html; ] [Attachment removed, was 52 lines.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 14:21:19 -0500 Subject: Re: Round Smiths Heater Take the old one out, toddle on over to Grainger with it and order a new one. If you can't find a Grainger in the phone book, try looking for a place that sells electric motors. These are an easy off-the-shelf item. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '69 Buick LeSabre Ragtop '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon, '81 Honda Goldwing 1100 Standard: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Casey McMullen <st93wxta@drexel.edu> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 14:51:46 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Round Smiths Heater I don't know about the round "shin burner" but the blower motor recently went in my '72 SIII. I went to a British car used parts place (mail order junk yard) they looked in the Smith's catalog and found that it shares motors with a 70-79 Sprite, so they sold me a used one. It is the same motor, I just had to disassemble it and switch the mounting flange. When I went to install it, I discovered that the basket fan spins in the wrong direction. Works ok for now, have to go back and swap fans. If you want to maintain originality maybe there is an equivalent motor for the older round type??? Glad to have some heat, it's below 32 at night here in southeastern PA, Casey M - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Luis Manuel Gutierrez" <lgutierr@jccr.co.cr> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 15:20:13 -0600 Subject: RE: Round Smiths Heater >When I went to install it, I discovered that the basket fan spins in the >wrong direction. Works ok for now, have to go back and swap fans. Isn't that just a matter of switching cables so it would spin the other way? I had to ask! :-] Lic. LUIS MANUEL GUTIERREZ CHACON Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. E-mail: lgutierr@jccr.co.cr Tel: (506) 296 2743 Fax: (506) 296 2744 >When I went to install it, I discovered that the basket fan spins in the - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Casey McMullen <st93wxta@drexel.edu> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 16:29:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Round Smiths Heater > >When I went to install it, I discovered that the basket fan spins in the > >wrong direction. Works ok for now, have to go back and swap fans. > Isn't that just a matter of switching cables so it would spin the other way? > I had to ask! :-] > Lic. LUIS MANUEL GUTIERREZ CHACON Valid question Luis, yes I did switch the cables, but the fan is designed to spin the other direction. The "blades" are shaped like little troughs push air with their concave surfaces, now they are trying to push air with a convex surface. Probably isn't quite as effective. Casey M - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Dr. Russ" <rgdushin@blackcat.cat.syr.edu> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:13:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Round Smith's Heater 'twas written: *** Valid question Luis, yes I did switch the cables, but the fan is designed to spin the other direction. The "blades" are shaped like little troughs push air with their concave surfaces, now they are trying to push air with a convex surface. Probably isn't quite as effective. *** uh, flip the blade around the other way (so's the concave blades face out) AND switch the cables around the other way? r"barely works anyhow..."d/nige - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:19:27 -0000 Subject: Re: RR low beams are dead I've always thought that the idea of dazzling the driver of a vehicle coming towards me may just be a little bit self defeating...... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 CSW "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:28:12 -0000 Subject: Re: Beep Beep and other Nash Rambler History. like I said in an earlier mail, the Metropolitan was actually built by Austin in the UK but sold in the States as a Nash. No connection with the British Frazer Nash company. BTW the song was also released in Britain but possibly because most people (not car mad like I was - very young of course) wouldn't know what a Nash was the slower car was changed to a 'bubble car'. look, my fault we started this thread, can I call it off please?? Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 CSW "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:40:59 -0000 Subject: Re: Little Nash Rambler(No LR Content) That's how I started this thread, they company is still around, I went there recently, but they no longer make cars was all I said... then we get into all this stuff..... :-)> Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 CSW "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:33:37 -0000 Subject: Re: gettin belted In the UK we didn't have the trim or the bracket. Bought a pair for my son's 71 Ser 3 the other week. bolt on...... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 CSW "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 23:27:14 -0000 Subject: Re: Overweight Rovers - was Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines Not the worst idea I have ever heard. My power plant improvements have been planned and incorporated into my budget along with my add-ons. I simply assumed everyone did the same thing..... if you build it, you gotta haul it..... Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 CSW "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russ Wilson <rwwilson@mho.net> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 05:56:31 -0700 Subject: For Sale I'm selling my 1967 RHD 88" known as "The Pig". I'm in Denver, The Pig is in Denver... Galv. Frame, Rebuilt Engine, Weber 2 bbl, Unleaded Head, Overdrive.. Tailgate/liftgate, 16" wheels, Mansfield heater etc....I have a JPEG shot for anyone interested. Asking price is $8,000 or best offer. Russ Wilson Leslie Bittner "That's just my opinion; I could be wrong...." Dennis Miller - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:21:51 EST Subject: Anchoring belts Howdy everyone, One more dumb question. I'm about to put Saab 900 belts up front (got 'em for $5 ea. at the local junkyard). The reels mounted flat on the floor in the Saab, so I ought to mount 'em flat on the floor in my 109SW. Here's the question: The chassis outrigger is directly under the floor right behind the front seats. Can I just drill right through the floor and outrigger and use grade 8 stuff to mount the reel right there, or is there too much body/chassis play for this to be a good idea? Thanks for any controversial answers, Bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:21:57 EST Subject: daveb, what did you say? Dave, You replied to my seatbelt bracket question but your message got exorcised. What were you trying to say? Bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jarvis64@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:21:40 EST Subject: Re: Re: Wanted: stuff Enzo asked what the bracket I want looks like. It's about 5 in. long and 3/4 in. across. Mounts vertically just above and behind the driver's (and passenger's) seats. On a 109SW, it's mounted in the corner formed by the rooftop and the long upright support between front and middle doors. On a SIII 88" I reckon it's mounted just forward of the sliding glass window in the roofside. Bren sez they're there, even if they're lurking behind your trim. Anyone got some? Bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:36:36 EST Subject: Re: 6cyl pisons in a four? In a message dated 98-11-05 07:11:19 EST, you write: << I don't know which six Frank was talking about in his funny-racer's-story but I assume it was the santana 6 for the same reason. ** >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:59:47 EST Subject: Re: Little Nash Rambler(No LR Content) In a message dated 98-11-05 12:05:53 EST, you write: I only brought it up cause someone mentioned a british car company named Nash, and I didn't know if that is what they were referring to. >> Frazer-Nash was a british car company with no relationship to either the american Kaiser/ Frazer or Nash companies. They specialized in limited production sports cars and built cars which were quite competetive in their class. The one eccentric feature of these cars up into the fifties was their reliance on chain drive to the rear wheels. Affectionados of these vehicles are therefore referred to as "the chain gang". Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 00:41:34 -0800 Subject: looking for oil filler cap I am looking for the oil filler cap - that fits on a Bedford.....the flip open type with the catch. I saw it put in a Series I and thought that it looked great. Any leads out there? Cheers David Full-time father of Alexander - 3.85 years old 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" S/V KALAKALA - our home, ketch rigged wahooadv@earthlink.net end of message - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Winn Bearden <wbearden@americus.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:33:07 -0500 Subject: Re: Any other vehicles which came with Lucas Dizzy? A friend of mine has a junkyard/ towing service. He has an Austin America if anyone needs some parts off of it. By the way, (main reason I'm writing), is that he gave me a catalog that caters to tow companies. This catalog has all kinds of recovery equipment (winches, straps, chains, etc) but also has gas cans AND gas can holders that some of you were asking about. Prices were fair to average. The name of the outfit was AW Direct and I think that they are out of CT. If anyone wants their number I can probably find it. john cranfield wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Winn Bearden <wbearden@americus.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:43:29 -0500 Subject: Re: Any other vehicles which came with Lucas Dizzy? A friend of mine has a junkyard/ towing service. He has an Austin America if anyone needs some parts off of it. By the way, (main reason I'm writing), is that he gave me a catalog that caters to tow companies. This catalog has all kinds of recovery equipment (winches, straps, chains, etc) but also has gas cans AND gas can holders that some of you were asking about. Prices were fair to average. The name of the outfit was AW Direct and I think that they are out of CT. If anyone wants their number I can probably find it. john cranfield wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: James Wolf <J.Wolf@worldnet.att.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 21:56:47 Subject: see below >GE Capital IT Solutions >This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, >you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. >If you have received this mail in error, please tell us >immediately by return email and delete the document. What a croc. Jim Wolf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 21:00:58 EST Subject: Re: see below In a message dated 11/5/98 9:58:50 PM, you wrote: <<What a croc.>> Thanks to *lro-lite*, I didn't even have to "see below" The wonders of the digester, saving me from having to look at crocs. It is bad enough I live in Florida with all the gators around... crocs do liven things up a bit <chomp> --pat. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: john taylor <jht@easynet.on.ca> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 21:19:56 -0500 Subject: Re: d.h.and 101 Hi Dave Did you ever describe for the list your illfated trip in the dear 101? I only heard the Storey second-hand, not the full version with all the juicy details. j.t. IIa V6 bastard - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Jpslotus27@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 21:13:47 EST Subject: Help with Overdrive Installation again OK - The Toro OD is in place, but it is VERY stiff going into and out of overdrive. Will this loosen up once oil get splashed around in there or will I have to start lifting weights to be able to shift it? Thanks Enzo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 19:36:24 -0800 Subject: Re: Help with Overdrive Installation again Jpslotus27@aol.com wrote: > OK - The Toro OD is in place, but it is VERY stiff going into and out of > overdrive. Will this loosen up once oil get splashed around in there or will > I have to start lifting weights to be able to shift it? Mine was very stiff also, and then got easier, and then got harder. When I changed the oil, I put synthetic in and overfilled it a little. It now stifts out of od easier, but shifting into od requires letting off the gas quickly while shifting without the clutch. You might try adding more 90wt and see what happens. Jim Hall Elephant Chaser 1966 88" truck cab - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jimfoo@uswest.net Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 19:37:34 -0800 Subject: Re: 6cyl pisons in a four? DNDANGER@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 98-11-05 07:11:19 EST, you write: > << I don't know which six Frank was talking about in his funny-racer's-story - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Art Bitterman <artbitt@rmi.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 19:54:47 -0700 Subject: Re Alternative plumbing Hi all!! Alan Richter Commented: I LIKE it! The only thing I'd be afraid of is static charge build-up on the PVC.... Easy fix-just ground the PVC. A length of wire from the PVC to ground! Same principle as what you do when working with Computer chips. Art 1960 SII "Aardvark" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: DNDANGER@aol.com Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 22:32:22 EST Subject: Re: 6cyl pisons in a four? In a message dated 98-11-05 21:44:07 EST, you write: << I had it. It said the 2.6 Jim Hall >> Thanks Jim, that's what I thought. The displacement of four of the 2.6 liter pistons (assuming constant a stroke) is about 1.7 liters. The second range of SI engines was 1.6 liters. I suppose if the engine block was overbored the 2.6 pistons would fit. I don't know what the comparative compression ratios were but I assume the 2.6, being a more modern engine (barely), would be higher. Bill Lawrence Albq, NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Piet Fourie : pah@saao.ac.za" <pah@saao.ac.za> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 07:19:29 +0200 (SAT) Subject: Re: Any other vehicles which came with Lucas Dizzy? > About to go to the junkyard (auto recyclers) to look for a "new style" Lucas 4 > cylinder distributor to get dizzy cap clips from. Are there any other makes > that used this? I assume later Triumphs and MG's did, true? Any others? Have a look at the Mini (the car that is), they used the same distributor as a landy. Piet P.A.H. Fourie ( pah@saao.ac.za ) South African Astronomical Observatory. P.O. Box 25 Sutherland 6920 South Africa. Tel 023 5711135. Fax 023 5711413 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 98 21:51:53 -0800 Subject: Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines /* * Subject: Santana 6 cyl engines * * Anyone know anything about them?? * * They are supposed to be a LR four cylinder with two added cylinders. * Rumor has it that they take LR four cylinder engine parts. */ ;>Gee I don't know, TeriAnn, I think you are starting to haul too much ;>camping equiptment in that doormobile of yours for your 4 cyclinder to ;>carry. Maybe you should consider an RV for your Portland excursions ;) ;> ;>At least you wouldn't have to wax the aluminum siding... I agree I am hauling around too much fuel, water, parts and camping equipment for the 2-1/4L engine. I have discovered that the longer you stay out in the field the more you need. Anyone can put up with just about anything for 2 or 3 days. Longer than that minimalist camping can get very old very fast. If you are in the field two or three weeks or months at a time, being comfortable makes a big difference on morale and enjoyment. How you equip a LR depends upon how you use it. If you just tootle around town or go on weekend jaunts you don't need to equip the LR at all. However if you go out for longer trips away from civilization you need to worry about carrying quantities of fuel & water, sleeping and cooking dry and keeping food cool longer than a block of ice will last. Personally, I like to go on long trips away from people into primitive areas. I DO hope that you are not implying that an old LR does not have what it takes to become a long range expedition vehicle. I do drive to places other than Portland..at least when I have $$$ for petrol :^( Take care TeriAnn Motel 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 57 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 98 21:57:40 -0800 Subject: Re: Overweight Rovers - was Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines >Y'know, Fred's comment on the weight of a Dormobile interior on a >4-cylinder 109 got me to thinking. I wonder if a lot of the complaints ;> and suggestions of alternate power plants for Rovers are simply ;> bad weight management on the part of owners adding accessories? Martin Walters did it because the 2-1/4L engine was all that was available. I did it because it was what I had and I could not afford to purchase nor could I legally import a 110 two door with a bigger engine. I think I'm dealing with a North American problem. In Europe, Africa, Australia & New Zealand someone would just start building an expedition LR with a LR that has a more powerful engine. Since LRs are common in those areas owners wouldn't think twice about swapping in a more powerful engine if needed. LRs are common there & swapping engines is no big deal. It's kind of like Jeep owners swapping engines in North America. But in North America, they stopped importing 109s at the end of '67. This drastically limits options for LRs to modify for long range expedition. And for some reason Americans seem to think that an engine that Rover discontinued because it wasn't powerful enough is sacred. Maybe a more powerful engine is just one step in building a long range expedition out of a pre-'68 109. I hope that you are not saying that old Land Rovers do not have what it takes to be converted into long range expedition vehicles. ;>The 4-cylinder 109 was never meant to haul a 6000-pound vehicle I sure agree with that. At 5400 pounds my car is seriously slow. > I keep the accessories and gewgaws to a minimum I used to to it your way, back when my car was a working farm LR. But even then she was VERY slow pulling a loaded two horse trailer or driving through the mountains with about 1430 pounds of hay in the back(11 bales @ 130 lb ea). Back in those days my car was a short range farm car and was seldom out for longer than 3 days on a trip. You don't need much in a car if you just take short drives, Or longer drives for a weekend. But I sold the livestock and decided that I wanted to go on long trips into the outback. So my minimalist LR 109 has been built into a long range LR. Had I been in countries where newer & more powerful LRs were common I would have started with a more powerful 110 two door. Unfortunately for me US regulations prohibited me from doing this and staying legal. SO I do what I can with what I have. Yes I have a lot of gear in the car, but try to stay out in the field for months at a time without much gear. ;> Using camper conversions as above as an example, this might have :>been better off being done on a 6-cylinder base (as Martin Walter did) Martin Walters built most of their LR based Dormobile conversions onto four cylinder Land Rovers. They offered a version with 2-1/4L diesel if you want to talk about underpowered. The 6 cylinder wasn't available until '67 which was the last year 109s were imported into North America. Only a small number of the Dormobiles originally sold into North America had six cylinder engines. ;>I understand the principle of "do what you can with what you have", but ;>sometimes a look at the big picture first might suggest better ideas to ;>explore first. I reject a big picture that says I have to keep the car as a short range car that isn't suited for trips longer than 3 or 4 days. I do not believe that that is part of the original Land Rover spirit. Why is it that in North America the 2-1/4L engine considered to be the heart and soul of a LR? :> aj"food for thought"r I wonder about this a lot. TeriAnn Wakeman The Green Rover, rebuilt and Santa Cruz, California and maintained using parts from twakeman@cruzers.com British Pacific 800-554-4133 http://www.cruzers.com/~twakeman Walk in harmony with the earth and all her creatures and you will create beauty wherever you go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 58 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Franklin H. Yap" <FHYap@ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 22:21:25 -0800 Subject: Re: Overweight Rovers - was Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines TeriAnn Wakeman wrote: > >Y'know, Fred's comment on the weight of a Dormobile interior on a > >4-cylinder 109 got me to thinking. I wonder if a lot of the complaints > ;> and suggestions of alternate power plants for Rovers are simply > ;> bad weight management on the part of owners adding accessories?... > I think I'm dealing with a North American problem. I think it is a North America problem in that North America is so large you have to cover a lot of freeway miles to get from here to there. I had a diesel VW Vanagon Westfalia that I used to take long trips across the US and Canada. It was probably slower that TW's 109. I kept wishing for more power. Frank - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 59 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Joseph Broach <jbroach@selway.umt.edu> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 23:26:42 -0700 Subject: Re: Overweight Rovers - was Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines >Why is it that in North America the 2-1/4L engine considered to be the >heart and soul of a LR? Because after 31 years -without- being opened up my 2 1/4 still chugs along without burning any oil? You must admit that the 2 1/4 is as overbuilt as the rest of a Land Rover and does suit it well from that perspective. But, then again, a Land Rover's main purpose is to suit the needs of its owner, and versatility is a trademark. It really is a shame Rover never really got into the I-6 craze like so many other manufacturers of the day; maybe this is where the Santana engine could fit in? -joseph and sidney missoula, mt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 60 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 06:02:26 +1100 Subject: cheap window tracking Dr. Russ wrote: >but don't look now folks...one supplier of bits here in the NE >USA (uh, happens to "sponsor" this list) sells decent window >channel with synthetic felt (not sure what Derlin slides are?) "Derlin" is probably a spelling error. I think it should have read Delrin - a type of plastic. Ron - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 61 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 23:10:22 +1100 Subject: Series III colors >Limestone and Desert Sand were two very distinct colors. The Limestone, as you state, was a cream or off-white color while the Desert sand was a darker tan color and actually quite attractive IMHO.> Martin replied: <I never knew that. I've seen perhaps one or two Series Land Rovers in the darker tan color, but I always assumed they had been resprayed. > Desert Sand was, I think, the most common colour for Series III LR in Australia. I assume that was the colour. Check the LR advert "Wash The Car This Weekend" on my web site at http:\\www.users.bigpond.com\hillman\rover\serieads.html Regards, Ron - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 62 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "The Becketts" <hillman@bigpond.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 06:13:20 +1100 Subject: Fuel Tank Positions Bill Wrote: >I have a fundamental philosophical problem with using the >auxilliary fuel supply for a bumper. Anyone remember the Pinto? Art replied: >Yep-and also remember the Stick NBC's "Dateline" made about side mounted >gas tanks on GM pickup trucks. So familiar as to the posistion of Land >Rover Gas Tanks!! How many Landies have burst into flames when Hit? I have toyed with the idea of fitting 2 of Rangie Spares sill mounted tanks (each 40 litres capacity) to my rangie to increase the fuel capacity to 160 litres (42 US gals or 35 Imperial gals) but I can't quite convince myself that having fuel tanks under the sills is a good idea. I guess I'll go with the conventional 120 litre (32 US gal or 26 Imperial gal) replacement tank. Perhaps one of the sill tanks might get fitted for as a water tank. Regards, Ron Beckett - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 63 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:43:41 Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Positions Typical hatchet job by a tv editorial. Yes there were more fires in chevies with the saddle tanks, though not a whole lot more than ford, but the chevy trucks had a lower number of fatal accidents. Doesn't matter whether your dead fried or dead crushed, you are still no longer with us. Think its a non problem that makes good television but bad logic, like Alar (sp). Also an excuse for a runaway jury to make some poor souls relatives rich. Aloha Peter >>Yep-and also remember the Stick NBC's "Dateline" made about side mounted >>gas tanks on GM pickup trucks. S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 64 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:50:54 Subject: Re: Jade Green, any idea what paint code is for that. My 1966 or possibly 1965 109 pickup was repainted slime green, probably an imitation of pastel green. The original colour was a darker, much more attractive green, however. Somewhere along the line, I've heard it referred to as Jade Green probably because that is what it resembles. Any one have any idea if there is a paint code for that colour. Aloha Peter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 65 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:59:46 Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. Trying to get my new 5 main bearing engine into my 88 by myself. Got the engine in the bay and bell housing studs into the transmission but can't get it to go any further. It is in slightly off center as I can just barely get nuts on two of the studs on the right side. I've tried turning the engine over with a breaker bar and socket as I rock it every which way I can, tried raising and lowering the engine, moving it from side to side, putting nuts on the studs that are through and then doing all the above. Cannot get the transmission splines to mate with the clutch. Any tips or ideas would be appreciated. The last time I did it, had help from my son and went right together with a little rock and roll from both of us. Do I just need more manpower??? Aloha Peter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 66 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Art Bitterman <artbitt@rmi.net> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:49:30 -0700 Subject: Fuel Tank Posistions Peter (from Hawaii) Wrote: Typical hatchet job by a tv editorial. And Think its a non problem that makes good television but bad logic, like Alar (sp). Also an excuse for a runaway jury to make some poor souls relatives rich. My point exactly!! I never knew there was a problem until "Dateline" Brought it up. Never have seen or heard of a GM pick-up, that burnt up after getting t-boned-or for that matter, a Pinto going up in Flames after getting rear ended. I was saying thet our beloved alumunum friends have the petrol tank in the same spot!! Oh NO!!! Don't tell NBC!! I can see it now--"Tonight on Dateline-The Killer British Classic" Film at 11 Art 1960 SII "Aardvark" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 67 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andy Grafton <braag@sherco.co.za> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:51:28 +0200 (SAT) Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. > Any tips or ideas would be appreciated. The last time I did it, had help > from my son and went right together with a little rock and roll from both Try removing the engine mountings - that gives you much more room to manipulate the engine vertically. All the best, Andy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 68 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Huub Pennings" <hps@fs1-kfih.azr.nl> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:30:41 +0100 Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. Hello Peter, if the transmission splines won't mate with the clutch. you better check the alignment of the clutchplate, I guess it is out of center.......... Been there. Regards, Huub Pennings (private e-mail to jpennings@worldonline.nl e-mail adress Pennings@kfih.azr.nl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 69 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 10:47:38 +0200 Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Positions Guys, guys, guys, why all the fuss? I have two Jerry cans full of high octane fitted to my FRONT bumper. They're mounted so that the actually protrude beyond the bumper by at least a third of their length. I've used this mounting position for three years now with nary a problem (I only use solid ex-military, NATO standard jerries, and figure that they're stronger than most car's petrol tanks in any case). Besides, I'm sitting way back behind the spare wheel so hopefully I will have a birds-eye view of the resulting conflagration without being intimately involved. Regards Paul (just how well-done would you like your steak sir?) Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 70 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Mace" <steve@solwise.co.uk> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 08:49:40 -0000 Subject: LR Schematics Sorry to go over old ground; I'm sure that this has been covered in the past but I just can't find the postings in question in the archive. I'm trying to obtain schematics for the dirty bits of a D90. You know the engine, axles, gearbox etc.... I'm pretty sure I remeber someone pointing to a sight which has them but I just can't find the reference (a case of wood for the trees I think). Can anyone point to the correct URL? Thanks... Steve Mace 1972 SIII LtWt 1993 D90 In the UK Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.co.uk www: http://www.solwise.co.uk Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 71 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 10:51:36 +0200 Subject: Re: Series III colors The Becketts wrote: > Check the LR advert "Wash The Car > This Weekend" > on my web site at > http:\\www.users.bigpond.com\hillman\rover\serieads.html Hey Ron, So not only are you Aussies upside-down, but also back-to-front... But never-the-less, really cool advert :-) Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 72 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Robert Tryzell <tryzell@ket.kth.se> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 10:25:57 +0100 Subject: Re: LR Schematics Steve Mace wrote: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 73 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:05:02 Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. Its in!!!!!! Decided to pull the engine out and start over. Checked the clutch alignment and it was spot on so that wasn't the problem. Did notice some fine metal pieces indicating that the clutch and splines shaft were at least getting together. Took off the engine mounts as suggested by Andy, went in the house and had something to eat, looked through a classic car magazine, then went back to it. Slipped the engine in, fiddled with it a bit, could feel the splines starting to match up, shoved on it good and hard and it was in. Taking off the engine mounts gave it a little more room to maneuver but not one whole hell of a lot. Think it just decided that it had given me enough grief and was time to play nice. Mahalo for the input Huub and Andy. My neighbors would have gotten really pissed if my compressor had gone on one more time after 11pm. One last question. I sprayed engine storage stuff in the motor when I finally admitted it wasn't going to get installed right away. The motor was freshly rebuilt and not run when I did this three years ago. Do I have to worry about this stuff causing problems with ring seating or other problems with the break in. Thought about spraying lacquer thinner in the engine and turning it over with the starter motor to dissolve the gunk before actually firing it up in earnest. I think it is basically a wax that seemed much like LPS3. Really don't want to take the head off again though I have been threatening to mill it to up compression. Aloha Peter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 74 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:16:07 Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. Its in!!!!!! Decided to pull the engine out and start over. Checked the clutch alignment and it was spot on so that wasn't the problem. Did notice some fine metal pieces indicating that the clutch and splines shaft were at least getting together. Took off the engine mounts as suggested by Andy, went in the house and had something to eat, looked through a classic car magazine, then went back to it. Slipped the engine in, fiddled with it a bit, could feel the splines starting to match up, shoved on it good and hard and it was in. Taking off the engine mounts gave it a little more room to maneuver but not one whole hell of a lot. Think it just decided that it had given me enough grief and was time to play nice. Mahalo for the input Huub and Andy. My neighbors would have gotten really pissed if my compressor had gone on one more time after 11pm. One last question. I sprayed engine storage stuff in the motor when I finally admitted it wasn't going to get installed right away. The motor was freshly rebuilt and not run when I did this three years ago. Do I have to worry about this stuff causing problems with ring seating or other problems with the break in. Thought about spraying lacquer thinner in the engine and turning it over with the starter motor to dissolve the gunk before actually firing it up in earnest. I think it is basically a wax that seemed much like LPS3. Really don't want to take the head off again though I have been threatening to mill it to up compression. Aloha Peter Is the major hijacking my posts. I posted this a little while ago but got no confirmation message. Did it go out and can I quit double posting. Seems to happen randomly but quite often. Don't know whether I should resend the messages or assume that they went through and I just didn't get a copy. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 75 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Frank Elson" <frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:17:51 -0000 Subject: Re: 6cyl pisons in a four? hey guys, I'm here... had a quick look for the actual paperwork describing the fitting of the pistons but not found it yet and I'm preparing for an off-roading trip (leaving in about ten minutes) so ain't got too much time. It was the 2.6 litre Six cylinder engine NOT from Santana but fromL/R. I'll find the complete details one day but it was at least fifteen years ago that this became one of those "secret" tips that everyone knew about, at least in the UK. Under Association Of Rover Club rules we were tied down to what we could do to a vehicle, Rover part numbers etc (not a lot better these days) for competition. I went a different route and fitted a 2.2 TC engine (out of the Rover P6 saloon so therefore a Rover part #) into my Lightweight. It flew, with Rangie diffs, but was a bit too highly geared for off-roading. Best Cheers Frank +--+--+--+ I !__| [_]|_\___ I ____|”_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV - Bronze Green 110 CSW "(o)======(o)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 76 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: M.J.Rooth@lboro.ac.uk (Mike Rooth) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:18:46 +0000 Subject: Re: Overweight Rovers - was Re: Santanna 6 cyl engines >Maybe a more powerful engine is just one step in building a long range >expedition out of a pre-'68 109. I hope that you are not saying that old >Land Rovers do not have what it takes to be converted into long range >expedition vehicles. They do,but one of the first and most frequent bits of advice from the experts in this field is *dont overload them*. . They offered a version with 2-1/4L diesel if >you want to talk about underpowered. I recall a certain young gentleman,now reappearing on this list,who took two 2 1/4 diesel 109"'s from England to S.A.I've *seen* him pull out of a carpark here with a ton aboard (most of it on the roof,if memory serves) bound for London.The roll factor was awe-inspiring,and that was in bottom gear! However,the 109" cruised at fifty *and* returned a better fuel consumption than the petrol would have done.Moral of story,dont criticise the 2 1/4 diesel until you've had one awhile. >Why is it that in North America the 2-1/4L engine considered to be the >heart and soul of a LR? >Land Rovers do not have what it takes to be converted into long range Because,probably,its a perfectly adequate power unit.If you're in a hurry buy a Ferrari,and if you want to haul gear,try a Mack. Mike Rooth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 77 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thor=E9n?= <peter.thoren@genetik.uu.se> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 11:05:58 +0100 Subject: more gearbox problems Dear friends, As I said a couple of days ago I couldn´t shift gear after I reassembled my gearbox. The obvious and easy answer was that the gearshift lever was in the wrong slot (yes, I know I am stupid...). After correcting this all gears now works nicely except the reverse. I was about to go for a testdrive and started the engine pressed the clutch, put the gearshift lever iinto reverse and released the clutch slowly and...an expensive and horrible sound told me that the gears didn´t engage properly. When moving the gearbox lever into reverse it feels allright until you release the clutch. This does not happen for gear 1-4. Here is a short resume of what I have done: Gearbox out of the car Bellhousing off the gearbox Changed primary pinion bearing and layshaft bearing Put everything back together using new seals Adjusted the reverse stop (the one which is supposed to stop you from shift to reverse instead of first gear) I have not touched anything else. I unscrewed the adjusting screw quite a bit in order to feel any stop for the reverse gear. Could this be my problem, I also noticed that the holes for the bolts holding the gearshift lever is quite large making it possible to move the whole gearshift assembly a little bit. Could it be that the gearshift lever should be moved? I would very much appreciate any help in this matter. I cant even testdrive the car because I need the reverse to get out of the outhouse where I am working with the car and no I cant push it out because the state of the ground outside is such that I need reverse in low gear and 4wd to get out... Thanks, Peter Peter Thorén, PhD Department of Genetics Uppsala University Box 7003; S-750 07 Uppsala Sweden Tel. +46 18 67 12 69 Fax +46 18 67 27 05 e-mail: Peter.Thoren@genetik.uu.se - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 78 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Huub Pennings" <hps@fs1-kfih.azr.nl> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:41:15 +0100 Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. > Thought about spraying >lacquer thinner in the engine and turning it over with the starter >motor to dissolve the gunk before actually firing it up in earnest. Don't know, the thinner might be aggressive and dissolve your oil seals? I would flush it with diesel, but it might be that I am over cautious. Regards, Huub Pennings (private e-mail to jpennings@worldonline.nl e-mail adress Pennings@kfih.azr.nl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 79 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer@motorcity2.lotus.com Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 06:44:15 -0500 Subject: Re: Getting engine to mate up with transmission. First off, make doggone sure that the plate and such actually will mate with the output shaft of the transmission. I've seen bad clutch plates new that were burred so that the splines wouldn't slide in. Second - you did line up the plates when you were assembling the clutch onto the flywheel, right? I'm sure you did, but sometimes it pays to examine the obvious. My personal favorite trick is to support the transmission's front end with a block of wood on the front crossmember (a chunk of 2x2 is perfect for this). Then, I cut 3 long 3/8" coarse-thread bolts and point the tips, then slot them with a hacksaw. These get put in place of 3 of the studs, giving you a guide path to work along. The slots are so you can use a screwdriver to remove them... After putting these in, sling the motor in and catch it on the studs, then slide it back. The trick to alignment is making sure that the engine and tranny are in the same plane in all 3 dimensions - height, tilt and lateral angle. What's probably happening in your instance is that the front or rear of the engine is tilted compared to the transmission, so the shaft will go in but the splines are too far out of angle to lock in. You may need to pop out the motor mounts to give yourself enough swing room, or shift the engine on the lift chain. It will go in, though. Lastly, a bit of grease on the splines and the pilot bearing makes things a lot easier - don't overdo, though, as you don't want it slinging all over the clutch later. Alan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[ <- Message 80 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 79 lines 3662 [forwarded 233 whitespace 0] Output: lines 2205 [content 1880 forwarded 222 (cut 11) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 981106 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|