[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: caloccia@senie.com Date: 3 Mar 1998 04:38:27 -0000 Subject: Re: Who is 'owner-lro'... To the list subscribers: I would much appreciate it if you would take a few moments to read this post, so that you do know the correct answer to this query.... -B ---- There was recently a post to the LRO list, which mistakenly gave credit for the operation of the lists. Original Post: On 3/2/98, K. John Wood wrote, (re that "owner-lro@..." address): >from the likes of Kevin Gerling, Carl Rodgerson etc... LRO names and faces! >At least that's what I've experienced! >John This post is the correction for that errant information. Pat 'spyders@aol.com' writes: > Who *is* owner-lro@... To which K. John Wood <jwrover@colo-net.com> mistakenly replied > "The address is the company list for Land Rover Owner > [International Magazine]." The answer to this question is found near the bottom of the web page describing the lists lro-info.html and in the informative message (which you all received upon subscribing to the list): "Disclaimer: Please note that the Land Rover Owner mailing list is in no way associated with the similarly named _Land_Rover_Owner_ _International_ magazine, nor are we associed with _Land_Rover_World_ magazine, (both published by some LR anoraks in the UK), nor do we have any association with the Land Rover (tm) company." A bit of history: The numerous lists for Land Rover, Range Rover, British, Aussies & Kiwis, South Africans, Danish Land Rover Owners, and the UK Rights of Way are distributed from 'Land-Rover.Team.Net' (also known as 'playground.sun.com'). The Land Rover e-mail list itself is approaching it's 8th anniversary. These lists are part of a group of automotive special interest mailing lists whose origins can be traced back ten to fifteen years on the internet or usenet, to usenet news groups such as rec.autos and rec.autos.sports, the Road Rally, British Cars, and Autocross mailing lists (the latter two are now hosted at AutoX.Team.Net). Fifteen years is back to a time when classmates of mine were coding an interactive gaming technology, Playnet, whose ruin was the basis of AOL's interactive services. There were no internet or dial-up service providers, except for 'bulliten boards', and the network back bone for the entire country was based on links with line speeds no faster than the 56Kbps modems shipped in today's PCs. Our current host: The computing and networking resources supporting these mailing lists (which delivers hundreds of messages to 2200 people daily), is graciously provided by the Internet Engineering group of SunSoft, a division of Sun Microsystems, Inc. SunSoft and SMI have no particular interest in Land Rovers, per se, but an employee there who owns a Discovery does, the lists are hosted there in part because it is their job to test networking stuff, and, basically, the lists facilitate a 'live' load on. In addition to the mailing list distribution, there is also a web server, http://www.land-rover.team.net which provides access to the archives of the lists and a number of pages of interest to Land Rover folks, including photos of interesting Rovers from the British Motor Industry Heritage Trust Centre at Gaydon, in the UK, as well photos and stories of Land Rover competitions in the UK, and 'green lane' trips and Land Rover gatherings from around the globe (UK, US, CA, AU). The web server is also hosted on playground, and serves over 25,000 page requests per month. As for Why you see messages from 'owner-lro@'... There are a number of fields in the e-mail message 'header' as it is called, the first is 'From User@...' there is also another field 'From: user@...' and possibly 'Sender: User@', typically the three would say the same thing, however when the message is forwarded to the list server, the outtermost one is re-written to be the owner of the list, this is done for a number of reasons. In theory, your mail reading program should use one of the other header fields than the outermost 'From '. In any event the sender of the message would appear in the other bits of the header (you may be able to display them in your mail reader), and, of course, the signature would be that of the sender... As for 'Who?' is 'owner-lro@' Technically that would be me, list administrator (& founder), and web master for http://www.land-rover.team.net Co-conspirator Empire Rover Owners Society Empire Member Pennine LRC, Series II Club, Range Rover Register, ROAV, OVLR Cheers, Bill Caloccia wpc@Caloccia.Net http://www.Caloccia.Net/wpc/ R http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ R 1 3 2wd H OD D +--|--| o | | L 3 Land Rovers First 2 4 4wd L N | 2 because '63 SII RHD 88" H 1 Land Rovers Last 793-PTA '90 RR County ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 07:54:14 EST Subject: Re: military wiring, etc. In a message dated 3/2/98 5:08:28 AM, Richard wrote: >The LRO Shop used to sell it (this is where I got mine), but I notice they >don't seem to list it anymore. In the latest issue, I see they have a >little advert asking for all mil. parts catalogues. I wonder who's out of >stock? One would have thought they'd keep at least one copy for reference, photocopies, etc., and not sell the whole lot. One good copy can even be licensed for reprints in some cases... Perhaps there's a frendly sort at a local Military Vehicle Preservation Society who can help exmil owners out there. pat 93 110 For SUV owners: http://poseur.4x4.org/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 08:57:13 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: generator-alternator switch David and Cynthia Walker wrote: > You will need to isolate the alternator from the engine block and mount. A > difficult but not impossible task. If you want details, contact me. > wahooadv@earthlink.net It is a good time to change from + ground when changing to an alternator thus avoiding the need to isolate the alternator. a simple job which alot of hassles in the future. John and muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ron Beckett" <hillman@bigpond.com> Subject: Series 3 2.25 L diesel - should I buy Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:54:57 +1000 John Dillingham wrote: >No, you'll never be satisfied after a 4.6. So forget it! I'm afraid my wife doesn't understand why I want it, so I won't be getting it. And it looked OK too. She can't see why anyone would want an 1975 SWB diesel LR when one already has a 4WD and a Rangie at that. As I said to her, I can't explain it and even if I could she wouldn't understand. She says I have to get rid of some of my other unused hobby stuff e.g., my scuba gear, my model planes, model helicopters, model boats, the Hillman Gazelles et al. >One other thing, If I send ya a check right now, could you pick it up for >me, and I'll drive down next weekend and tow it home. ;-) Hmm, It'd be a wet old drive - it's in Oz. You'd need a bloody long snorkel 8-) Ron ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 09:11:42 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Series 3 2.25 L diesel - should I buy Ron Beckett wrote: > John Dillingham wrote: > >No, you'll never be satisfied after a 4.6. So forget it! > I'm afraid my wife doesn't understand why I want it, so I won't be getting > it. And it looked OK too. She can't see why anyone would want an 1975 SWB > diesel LR when one already has a 4WD and a Rangie at that. > As I said to her, I can't explain it and even if I could she wouldn't > understand. [ truncated by list-digester (was 20 lines)] > 8-) > Ron Come on Ron you know what (who) really has to go!!! Remember Trigger John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Steve Mace <steve@solwise.demon.co.uk> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:37:13 +0000 Subject: +ve earth (was generator-alternator switch) > It is a good time to change from + ground when changing to an > alternator thus avoiding the need to isolate the alternator. a simple > job which alot of hassles in the future. Could anybody please explain why +ve earth was ever first used! It would seem that -ve earth is much better all round so one wonders why +ve earth was ever used. Is it something to do with the dynamo's used on early cars rather than alternaters? Steve Mace 1972 SIII LtWt 1993 D90 In the UK ------------------------------------- Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.demon.co.uk www: http://www.demon.co.uk/solwise/ Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:57:53 +0000 Subject: Re: +ve earth (was generator-alternator switch) There's no real reason for either way! With the huge market in accessories, it does make sense for all to be the same, though! Like which side of the road you should drive on in the 20th Century - it doesn't matter, but it helps if everyone is the same! :-) Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) steve@solwise.demon.co.uk on 03/02/98 01:37:13 PM Please respond to lro@playground.sun.com cc: (bcc: Richard Marsden/EAME/VDGC) Subject: +ve earth (was generator-alternator switch) > It is a good time to change from + ground when changing to an > alternator thus avoiding the need to isolate the alternator. a simple > job which alot of hassles in the future. Could anybody please explain why +ve earth was ever first used! It would seem that -ve earth is much better all round so one wonders why +ve earth was ever used. Is it something to do with the dynamo's used on early cars rather than alternaters? Steve Mace 1972 SIII LtWt 1993 D90 In the UK ------------------------------------- Name: Dr Steve Mace E-mail: steve@solwise.demon.co.uk www: http://www.demon.co.uk/solwise/ Tel: +44 1482 473899 Fax: +44 1482 472245 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 10:05:49 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: +ve earth (was generator-alternator switch) Steve Mace wrote: > > It is a good time to change from + ground when changing to an > > alternator thus avoiding the need to isolate the alternator. a simple > > job which alot of hassles in the future. > Could anybody please explain why +ve earth was ever first used! It > would seem that -ve earth is much better all round so one wonders why > +ve earth was ever used. Is it something to do with the dynamo's > used on early cars rather than alternaters? [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > used on early cars rather than alternaters? > Steve Mace It has to do with the flow of electrons which is infact - to + . For all practical purposes it makes no difference. John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 15:48:38 +0100 From: Bernd Jonas <Bernd.Jonas@munich.netsurf.de> Subject: [Fwd: LR 88 SIII for sale] [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------289F83FD458FBA4E27008A5D" ] --------------289F83FD458FBA4E27008A5D [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: message/rfc822 ] Hi There! My 88 SIII 2,25l diesel 1972 is for sale now. At now i´m overhauling the gearbox. So you can get him as a short project or wait till the overhauling is done. Interested? Just drop me a line and you can get nearer information, pictures..... Bye Bernd Jonas Bernd.Jonas@munich.netsurf.de --------------289F83FD458FBA4E27008A5D-- ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 16:56:41 +0200 From: wrm@ccii.co.za (Wouter de Waal) Subject: Re: Tell us your Name. Hi all >but WHAT IS YOUR ROVERS NAME?. Spikkels the 1959 Rand-Lover is now officially road-worthy (SA equivalent to MOT, I guess, except that since it's been privatised, and since the first return visit is free, I passed the road-worthy even though the brakes are not set quite right and apparently some U bolts are loose too.) So, it looks as if I'll make the 50th anniversary tour (leaving next week Tuesday) Wouter ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 17:08:52 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: Tell us your Name. Wouter de Waal wrote: I passed the road-worthy even though the brakes are > not set quite right and apparently some U bolts are loose too.) > So, it looks as if I'll make the 50th anniversary tour (leaving next week Ahh! But will you make it BACK? Regards Paul Oxley http://AfricanAdrenalin.co.za http://Adventures.co.za http://AfricanAdrenalin.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "K. John Wood" <jwrover@colo-net.com> Subject: Re: 2/26/98 owner-lro@playgr Re: Observations (no good content) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 15:08:06 -0700 The address is the company list for Land Rover Owner. You'll recieve mail from the likes of Kevin Gerling, Carl Rodgerson etc... LRO names and faces! At least that's what I've experienced! John ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David Hope" <davidjhope@email.msn.com> Subject: Source for rebuilt llA gearbox Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 10:24:34 -0600 My transmission is rapidly disintegrating and based on experience of other Land Rover owners, a professionally rebuilt box is probably the way for me to go. Expensive yes. Problems include: 1. cannot engage 2nd gear 2. have lost at least 7 small teeth 3. a 2 inch dia ring has broken and fallen out 4. oil has rich bronze streaks in it after just a few miles For comparable price I can get a box from Rovers North or from DAP. The DAP box is available now and is rebuilt here in the US. I am leaning towards DAP. Anyone have any comments or warnings for me? David Hope 64 llA ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ron Franklin" <oldhaven@mail.biddeford.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 11:34:19 -0500 Subject: Ford adapter for sale Posting this for a non computer LR owner I met. I have no info other than the below: B&H or Sierra Autosport Ford v-8 to Land Rover ZF auto adapter ring, spigot and motor mount kit. Never used and asking less than the $800 price he got it for. Located in New Hampshire. Mike 603-356-9606. He might be interested in trading partially for a Series project. Disclaimers: usual Ron Franklin Bowdoin, Maine, USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Subject: Re:Tricks with toys and your Spouse Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:44:48 -0800 I am going to put in my two bits worth (inflation). So that I don't get any "back lash", my trick was to get my wife involved. No, she doesn't much care about my Land Rover - it's "a nice vehicle" to her. What I got her into is the philosophy: You can drive a masses type of car or you can get something you are happy with, says something about you and your character.... and is a bit fun to boot. She picked out a 72 Suburban - nice round wheel arches, last year of the three door, rides high and has power. Her current quest is for a 2CV - she drove one after falling for them and wants one more than ever. For those who need to think about it a different way - every 100,000 miles = 3,000 hours. 3,000 hours equals 1.5 years of eight hours a day at a 5 day a week job. Select your "point A to B" vehicle with this criteria, like the chair/job that you are going to spend the next 1.5 years in. The only problem with this is with selecting who's vehicle gets those needed parts. I solved this by doing one at a time....Land Rover (Me), Suburban (Her), Moose (Us), Ural (Me), Kalakala (Us) and the soon to be purchased 2CV (Her). There is more to life than Land Rovers or cars. Get her into it for herself (not you) and you will both have fun. Oh, and about those "rough ride " complaints. I made my Land Rover ride smooth enough to be comfortable to my wife when she was eight months pregnant.. We only had the Land Rover when we returned from cruising. Cheers David Stay at Home Father 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" Ural Motorcycle - S/V KALAKALA, Ingrid 38, ketch ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 13:29:20 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Source for rebuilt llA gearbox David Hope wrote: > My transmission is rapidly disintegrating and based on experience of other > Land Rover owners, a professionally rebuilt box is probably the way for me > to go. Expensive yes. > Problems include: > 1. cannot engage 2nd gear > 2. have lost at least 7 small teeth [ truncated by list-digester (was 15 lines)] > box is available now and is rebuilt here in the US. I am leaning towards > DAP. Anyone have any comments or warnings for me? If the DAP is rebuilt inhouse then you won't get any better as Chris their service manager is the best in the business. John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Velardi" <tchris@freewwweb.com> Subject: sighting Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 14:04:14 -0500 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ] charset="iso-8859-1" A close friend of mine tried to catch up to "MY" yellow D90 when she = discovered that it was not my D90 but someone else's with nice blue eyes = and mud all over their truck and another black D90 with so much mud on = it she could barely tell that the plate said it was from Oregon on = Sunday in Hamden CT on the Merit Parkway at exit 62 , any body on the = list ? You got one hot little blond in a red Mazda Miata awful excited. Chris "V" ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BD45E4.15FFFD40 [ Original post was HTML ] charset="iso-8859-1" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=3DGENERATOR> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>A close friend of mine tried to = catch up to "MY" yellow D90 when she discovered that it was not my D90 but = someone else's with nice blue eyes and mud all over their truck and another = black D90 with so much mud on it she could barely tell that the plate said it was = from Oregon on Sunday in Hamden CT on the Merit Parkway at exit 62 , any body = on the list ? You got one hot little blond in a red Mazda Miata awful excited.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Chris "V" </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BD45E4.15FFFD40-- ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Mon, 02 Mar 98 10:07:47 EST Subject: Re: daveb/AAAA update >> Gee, I'd think you want *want* to. grumble grumble. I like to take credit for my work...it's an art form! sort of like ren-ching... >>>any new modifications to the AAAA? >>>The Antichrist Anti Animal Attachment for you people who hate acronyms. no, but there's a new one, its the PTOPITAPBL... that's the Power Take Off Pain In The Ass Panty-Bunch Loosener... its basically a big flamethrower run off a cut-out on the exhaust...takes out list whiners with a single burst... get outta my way...hahahahahahahaha laughing all the way to the gas pump, DaveB PS good to have you back Tom. ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:33:04 EST Subject: Re: owner-lro@playgr... In a message dated 3/2/98 11:18:47 AM, John wrote, re that "owner-lro@..." address: >The address is the company list for Land Rover Owner. You'll recieve mail >from the likes of Kevin Gerling, Carl Rodgerson etc... LRO names and faces! >At least that's what I've experienced! >John Actually, I've seen e-mails from three other people who weren't with LRO MagazineAFAIK)... I got two from Sandy Grice, one from "MM" and forgot who the third member was. Oh well. Thanks anyway. pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Steve Irwin" <irwin@fred.ifas.ufl.edu> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:37:37 EST Subject: Wierd Idle ....Fixed Hello All! Many thanks to all who offered suggestions about the idle problems and stalling that I and my Zenith were having when stopping at lights. The culprit: Based on this morning's performance, not the carb at all, but pitted points and shaky condenser, coupled with erratic timing. After replacing points and condenser, and re-timing this morning, Fezzik runs like a charm. And, in seemingly typical Lucas fashion, the ground wire that attaches to the condensor prefers to be on top of the condenser tongue; there was no powere throught eh system when grounded under the condenser tongue. Neither I, nor my Rover-owning PhD physicist advisor could think of any solid reason for this. Any ideas? Steve Irwin Fezzik, SIII 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: trowe@cdr.wisc.edu Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 08:23:23 -0600 From: Tom Rowe@CDR on 03-02-98 08:23 AM cc: Subject: >have it pretty well situated in place of the generator but i don't know how >to wire it. the truck is positive ground and the alternator is negative. >what do i need to do? First thing is to convert it to negative ground. A pretty simple process, especially since you're getting rid of your original gen and regulator. Be sure to reverse the wiring for your coil, and dash plug. Some instruments may need to be reversed also, depending on what you have. I think there's a FAQ around somewhere on doing this reversal. And the Alt conversion also. Cheers. Tom Rowe Network Systems Administrator WI Center for Dairy Research Madison, WI 608-265-6194 Fax: 608-262-1578 trowe@cdr.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Mon, 02 Mar 98 15:33:22 EST Subject: Re: Tell us your Name. >>WHAT IS YOUR ROVERS NAME?. Green HELL DaveB ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Subject: Re: Series 3 2.25 L diesel - should I buy Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 08:44:38 -0800 From: "Ron Beckett" <hillman@bigpond.com> Subject: Series 3 2.25 L diesel - should I buy Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 07:54:46 +1100 >I'm considering the purchase of S III with a 2.25L diesel (reconditioned motor) and overdrive - price A$1750 (US$1200). How much of a slug are these? Will I be satisfied after a 4.6L Rangie? It's apples and oranges. The 4.6 Range Rover bears no resemblance whatsoever to the Series III diesel as far as driving is concerned other than the fact that you aim both of them with a steering wheel. The 2.25 diesel Series III is one of the few vehicles in the world that is actually outperformed by the 2.25 petrol Series III except in torque. The 2.25 diesel (from which the 2.25 petrol engine was derived) is a good off-road engine as it has lots of low-end torque which is what you want at times. It's fuel consumption is marginally better than the 2.25 petrol engine. The acceleration of a petrol 2.25 Land Rover is best measured in minutes; the diesel versions are even slower if acceleration is something you care about (I don't except in traffic). Unlike the current generation of Rover diesels, the 2.25 is not a particularly long-lived engine. The experience of people I know who have owned Series III diesels is that the engine needs major work every 80K-100K miles. Properly maintained and conservatively driven, the petrol engine will go much longer. While the diesel Series IIIs I've driven were good off-road machines, they were slow, fairly unresponsive, and noisier than my petrol model. Handling and braking were no different from the petrol model. Another thing to consider is that unless you are experienced with diesels, they aren't as easy to troubleshoot and work on as a petrol engine. Items like the distributor pump and fuel injectors have to be just right or they won't work correctly. Diesels are very picky about clean fuel and air. Given the petrol engine's good availability of parts and the ease of maintaining and repairing it, I would go for a petrol Series III as opposed to the diesel version. Everything I have said applies only to the old 2.25 diesel as used in the Series Land Rovers. The current Tdi engine used in the Defender and Discovery is a whole different deal. I've driven Land Rovers powered by this engine on numerous occasions in the UK and they are responsive, fuel efficient, and relatively quiet. I would love to have one in my Series III, but the cost of doing so (it's possible to fit the engine to a Series according to the people I've talked to in Solihull) is very, very high. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Michael Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> Subject: tire size equivalence Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 14:07:54 -0800 (PST) Hi kids, Can anyone give the metric size for a 900-16 tire. The 101 uses them, and the Continental bar treads are not exactly awe inspiring on the road. Very noisy, terrible handling on dry pavement, downright scary on wet with poor braking being the biggest gotcha at any speed above 40mph. I'd like to replace them with Mich XCL's, but they are impossible to find in this 900x16 size, or any size for that matter here in Oregon. Anyone got a source? I'm sure I'll end up with an off the shelf tire which is why I need a metric size equivalant for it. Rgds Mike Fredette Portland, Or 101FC ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 17:17:19 -0800 From: "M. Tompkins" <mmglass@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Names My Land Rover is a 1966 109" SW and is named 'No Chance'. The registration in the UK for my Rover is 'NCH 170E'. The short story is my wife came up with the name using NCH in the registration as her guide. Cheers - Mike Land Rover Owner DoD Program Manager Chief Designer, M&M Stained Glass Soccer Referee ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 18:25:08 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Wierd Idle ....Fixed Steve Irwin wrote: > Hello All! > Many thanks to all who offered suggestions about the idle problems > and stalling that I and my Zenith were having when stopping at > lights. > The culprit: Based on this morning's performance, not the carb at > all, but pitted points and shaky condenser, coupled with erratic [ truncated by list-digester (was 16 lines)] > Rover-owning PhD physicist advisor could think of any solid reason > for this. Any ideas? Yes this is not a ground wire. It is the power to the points where it IS grounded through the distributor body. I expect what was happening was the terminal was contacting the post and shorting direct to ground. John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD <NADdMD@aol.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:58:31 EST Subject: Re: In a message dated 98-03-02 17:56:01 EST, you write: << First thing is to convert it to negative ground. A pretty simple process, especially since you're getting rid of your original gen and regulator. Be sure to reverse the wiring for your coil, and dash plug. Some instruments may need to be reversed also, depending on what you have. I think there's a FAQ around somewhere on doing this reversal. And the Alt conversion also. >> Adding to this, I think somewhere in the fuzziness of my mind I remember that you will have to get a negative ground fuel level sender. Something about a different set up so that it cannot be converted to negative earth. Others? Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 06:42:27 -0500 From: "d.h.lowe" <dhlowe@idirect.com> Subject: Re: Series 3 2.25 L diesel - should I buy Series III 2.25 Diesel vehicles do NOT accelerate. They gain momentum. Just thought I would share that thought. Faure, Marin wrote: > From: "Ron Beckett" <hillman@bigpond.com> > Subject: Series 3 2.25 L diesel - should I buy > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 07:54:46 +1100 > >I'm considering the purchase of S III with a 2.25L diesel > (reconditioned > motor) and overdrive - price A$1750 (US$1200). How much of a slug are > these? Will I be satisfied after a 4.6L Rangie? [ truncated by list-digester (was 53 lines)] > 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 > 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 15:48:39 -0800 From: Jeremy Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Re: - Ground & Fuel Sender NADdMD wrote: > Adding to this, I think somewhere in the fuzziness of my mind I remember that > you will have to get a negative ground fuel level sender. Something about a > different set up so that it cannot be converted to negative earth. Others? Nope. I converted from + and didn't have to change the sender. I don't recall if I had to reverse the connections or not. ...I don't belive so since the circuit is just a variable resistor.. lot of good I am eh? :) cheers Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 19:10:23 -0500 (EST) From: David Scheidt <david@infocom.com> Subject: point set screw pitch? Anyone know what the point gap set screw's pitch is? The part isn't in the manual. David Btw, I retract any nasty things that I might have said about Joe Lucas. I am amazed that the points I just took off worked at all. Half of the moving point was missing! ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 19:15:12 From: David Kurzman <kurzman@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Military Wiring: Users Handbook I've just resubscribed to the list and saw someone is maybe looking for a 109 military users handbook with the wiring diagrams. I no longer have a military L-R but I still have my Users Handbook (Truck Utility 3/4 ton, 4X4; Army Code #22230; Air Publication 5049B; Issued March 1982. Produced to the requirement of THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE etc, etc.) This has the fold out circuit diagrams in the back, the destruction instructions, and is about 190 pages long. The person that wants it can email me and we'll talk about it. Pete in Va. '66 88 Ragtop (804) 233-1341 (Richmond) PS...I still have an 88 hardtop with a liftgate and a safari skin than that I want to sell. No alpine lights, vents or headlining. Nice shape- $500. As long as I'm selling stuff...I've also got 2 extra 109 ragtops- $200 and $100. ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS <SPYDERS@aol.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 19:47:46 EST Subject: Re: Names / No Chance / UK tags In a message dated 3/2/98 6:31:38 PM, you wrote: >My Land Rover is a 1966 109" SW and is named 'No Chance'. >The registration in the UK for my Rover is 'NCH 170E'. Yer lucky it was from the UK, if it came from Wales (that dingleberry place), it could be called "Fred" using the same registration letters... ;-) The English seem to really stretch it when it comes to "vanity tags" on their vehicles. I saw a reference to that in a recent LRW: RO6ER & 5ARAH... Do *all* UK tags need a number in them, or can you put all letters? Just curious... PqiyAexbT (Welsh for "patrick") 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "K. John Wood" <jwrover@colo-net.com> Subject: Re: Source for rebuilt llA gearbox Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:51:53 -0700 David, Contact Ron Pedderson in Nederald, CO he is a Silihull trained Rover Tech who has recently imported two complete SIIa tranny's.., He can be reached at 303-258-7836 (Auto Technica) He's a great guy with lots of knowledge on Series vehicles. Good lUck John Wood ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 20:08:25 -0500 (EST) From: PETER KASKAN <PKASKAN@clarku.edu> Subject: Re: Military Wiring: Users Handbook Hi there I'm interested in you military LR manual. You said it was published in '82 - does that mean it won't cover a 1965 IIA? How much are you asking? Peter Kaskan pkaskan@clarku.edu ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:10:34 +0800 From: torque@pacific.net.sg (Lawrence Lee) Subject: Tell us your Name. Hi all, Mine's called "Kerbau". Kerbau is Malay for water buffalo, a nickname my offroad buddies coined due to its tendencies to stay in the mud every opportunity it could. Kerbau is also a name used to describe anything large and clumsy. The only 109" among the 88"s and airportables, "Kerbau" definitely is the name for me. Lawrence Lee '81 Ser III 109 2.6l Lawrence Lee, Art Director Torque Class Magazine, The Only Motor Magazine You Have to be Seen In MPH Trade Publications (S) Pte Ltd, 12 Tagore Drive, Singapore 787621 Tel: 453 8200 DID: 450 6005 Fax: 453 8600 ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 20:55:47 -0500 From: Robert M McCullough <dieselbob@erols.com> Subject: Re: 109-FFR wiring i have perhaps an interesting manual if someone needs it. an illustrated spare parts list, 1970, army code no.20873, part no.607307, for car, utility and truck,utility. chassis for ambulance, 2/4 stretcher and truck, fire fighting. truck, utility for test station, guided missle, truck mounted [landrovers 6, 8, 8/2, 9, 9/1]. it also has the amendments with it. it is manila with a red spine. if anyone is interested, e-mail me directly. i am in the usa. ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 20:37:10 -1000 From: Faye and Peter Ogilvie <ogilvi@hgea.org> Subject: Re: conversion to negative earth Rovers North Bulletin Board has the procedure on their tech tips. Involves cha nging a wire or two in the dash and repolarizing the generator after changing the connections to the battery. A piece of cake, at least it was on my '65. NO NO NO >Adding to this, I think somewhere in the fuzziness of my mind I remember that >you will have to get a negative ground fuel level sender. >Nate ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 37 lines 1718 [forwarded 177 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1164 [content 1004 forwarded 102 (cut 75) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980303 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|