[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Trevor_Easton@dofasco.ca | 12 | Bear Country, GPS, No LR content |
2 | kerryscott@usa.net | 13 | Help? |
3 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 25 | Re: Help? |
4 | "Richard Marsden"[rmarsd | 14 | Re: Help? |
5 | john cranfield [john.cra | 18 | Re: Help? |
6 | ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za | 20 | Re: Rear Main Seal |
7 | "David and Cynthia Walke | 15 | Re: Help? |
8 | john hess [jfhess@dcn.da | 37 | Re: Marvel Mystery Oil |
9 | "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" | 25 | MMO |
10 | john hess [jfhess@dcn.da | 42 | marvel oil again |
11 | "David and Cynthia Walke | 27 | About your seal question... |
12 | john cranfield [john.cra | 17 | Re: marvel oil again |
13 | Peter [nosimport@mailbag | 14 | Re: marvel oil again |
14 | dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.o | 27 | Re: Bearing and seal. |
15 | "Chris Dillard"[cdillard | 15 | Re: marvel oil again |
16 | nelsml73@snyoneva.cc.one | 23 | Re: MMO |
17 | Keith Mohlenhoff [krm@nj | 27 | Diesel Information and noise |
18 | "David and Cynthia Walke | 11 | Re:106 |
19 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 14 | RE: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatment. |
20 | jimallen@onlinecol.com ( | 204 | Diesel Performance |
21 | "David and Cynthia Walke | 8 | Re: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatment. |
22 | dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.o | 15 | Re[2]: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatmen |
23 | "David and Cynthia Walke | 12 | Re: Re[2]: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatmen |
24 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 19 | Re: Bearing and seal. |
25 | dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.o | 11 | Re[2]: Bearing and seal. |
26 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 14 | Re: Help? |
27 | debrown@srp.gov | 22 | Stainless steel gauze under carb. |
28 | debrown@srp.gov | 20 | OOPS!!! (Was: "Stainless steel...") |
29 | "Eyres, Richard RP" [Eyr | 10 | RE: Diesel Performance |
30 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 88 | Re: In response to Jim's reply about diesels... |
31 | "Faure, Marin" [Marin.Fa | 72 | Kellogg inquiry |
32 | Paul Quin [Paul_Quin@pml | 20 | RE: Kellogg inquiry |
33 | SPYDERS@aol.com | 38 | Re: Kellogg inquiry |
34 | Marijn van der Himst [ma | 17 | 109-FFR wiring |
35 | Kevin Sellitti [Kevinsel | 5 | RE: Marvel Mystery Oil and SS Mesh |
From: Trevor_Easton@dofasco.ca Subject: Bear Country, GPS, No LR content Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:35:00 -0500 The comments about bear country coincided with the chapter I read last night in "Heartbreaks and Heros", a new book about the Canadian Parachute Rescue (SAR). To quote "When they found seven boots with the feet still in them, they knew the grizzlies had got there first" . Watch the bush as well as your GPS display. ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: kerryscott@usa.net Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 05:56:05 Subject: Help? What am I doing wrong? I keep coming to the list for help and get no response. Well that's not quite right; I did get fussed at when I made the mistake of sending my first request in all caps. Most recently I asked for help on rear main seal and clutch issues and seem to be being ignored. What gives? ____________________________________________________________________ Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 08:00:21 EST Subject: Re: Help? In a message dated 2/25/98 7:56:25 AM, you wrote: >Most recently I asked for help on rear main seal and clutch issues and seem to >be being ignored. What gives? I've read all sorts of replies re: rear main seals. Now I know, if I ever get one, that on a Series rig, it is easier to pull the engine to do the rear main seal, and that if it is just a dime sized spot to ignore it and wait till something else has to be done, etc., etc... I would check your old mail or the archived digests as I've definitely seen lots of postings on the topic. Also discussed were Sii vs Siii clutches, horizontal & vertical and some other things I glossed over. pat 93 110 ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Richard Marsden"<rmarsden@digicon-egr.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:02:43 +0000 Subject: Re: Help? There was a whole discussion about rear seals in the past few days. I skipped over it, 'cos I knew nothing about them. Maybe there's something up with the major or your ISP. I'm CCing this directly to you, so you should get 2 copies... Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:25:26 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Help? kerryscott@usa.net wrote: > What am I doing wrong? I keep coming to the list for help and get no response. Well that's not quite right; I did get fussed at when I made the mistake of sending my first request in all caps. Most recently I asked for help on rear main seal and clutch issues and seem to be being ignored. What gives? I think you must have missed some posts there has been a lot of discussion on main seals, It was not address to you personally because very often thats how this list seems to work ie. a question will spark a discussion rather than a direct reply. Don't give up thereis lots useful info and helpful folks out there. John and Muddy ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 21:22:59 +0000 Subject: Re: Rear Main Seal Christopher, >Hilarious... I guess I should consider myself lucky and sit tight >with the leak I've got... I'm sorry to be the one who has to break the news. But. It is a well-known fact that if you are in a position to consider yourself lucky, you should keep it a secret - now that you've told us, the suspicions of the gods of Girling, Lucas himself or some other mongrel has been roused and will surely take action to help you be more normal (successful? ;-). - Iwan Vosloo ( 1975 SIII 88" Diesel ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Help? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:48:08 -0800 This is the first time I've "seen" you. I only give sincere answers Cheers David 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" Ural Motorcycle Ingrid 38, ketch ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:43:49 -0800 From: john hess <jfhess@dcn.davis.ca.us> Subject: Re: Marvel Mystery Oil Actually, the marvel oil company is still around and still sells a top cylinder oiler. I bought one an installed it on the domrie just last week as part of a keep the newly rebuilt engine operating forever policy. The don't take plastic; mail them a chcek for $89 and they mail you a container for the oil plus some tubing. The tubing hooks into your PCV system or any other vacuum hose that goes into the carb. 1000 miles per quart is what they recommend. Marvel Oil Co. 331 N. Main St. Port Chester NY 914 937 4000 fax 914 937 4004 The containers come in smaller sizes (but they're glass!) as well as a 2 quart and 4 quart which are aluminum. I got the two quart model. BTW, in a throw-back to days past, they actually include a quart of the oil with purchase! And they ship as soon as they get your check, no waiting around for it to clear. If you contact them, tell 'em you have Land Rover, I'm trying to get them interested in Rovers! John F Hess jfhess@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us Land Rover Dormobile web pages: http://wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us/~jfhess/homepage.html 1968 Land Rover Dormobile "Elvis" 1960 swb pu "Stubby" (actually Katherine's), 1960 swb roadster "Slug" (Alex's) Slug needs everything, donations accepted ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:47:32 -0500 From: "A. P. \"Sandy\" Grice" <rover@pinn.net> Subject: MMO Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: >I'll have to get a can next trip to the US. Help me with some stiff >joints and a sore arse after unfolding myself from the 88. Hmmm, maybe I >should reword that... Mmmmm...Marvel Mystery Oil smells good enough to be a desert topping...or a linament. Who knows what else it'll do? (Kinda like reading the label on Dr. Bonner's soap....) The stuff really does *seem* to work, though; I use it in the Ampco vapor lubricator to off-set the deleterious effects of unleaded on my non-stellite exhaust valves. Cheers *----jeep may be famous, LAND-Rover is Legendary----* | | | A. P. ("Sandy") Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | Association of North American Rover Clubs | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | |(O)757-622-7054, (H)757-423-4898, FAX 757-622-7056 | *----1972 Series III------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)----* ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:52:49 -0800 From: john hess <jfhess@dcn.davis.ca.us> Subject: marvel oil again someone wrote: Last year we were looking for Marvel Mystery Oil, they do not have a website, they do have an e-mail address: Marvel Mystery Oil CORLISSBS@aol.com Brad E. Smith I just got an email from them and here's the info. David Troy Marketing Operations Manager E-Mail: dtroy@marveloil.com Marvel Oil Company, Inc. Maybe they do have a web site now. PS. Marvel by the gallon is $10. Use 4 ounces per tank. Less than the $3-4 mr adams mentioned. also, ren-ching must be very similar to the zen of engine installation. as in: We could get the 2.6 to line up with the tranny out and slide in. lifting, tilting, twisting, pushing, it wouldn't go. Loren, my rebuilder, says lets's take a break to contemplate the zen of the engine. we had coffee and taosted home-made bread with gobs of butter. Came back out, did the same gyrations and were rewarded with a satisfying sound as the engine engaged the shaft of the tranny and slid down all the way , mating the bell housing holes with the studs coming off the flywheel housing. Zen is good. John F Hess jfhess@wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us Land Rover Dormobile web pages: http://wheel.dcn.davis.ca.us/~jfhess/homepage.html 1968 Land Rover Dormobile "Elvis" 1960 swb pu "Stubby" (actually Katherine's), 1960 swb roadster "Slug" (Alex's) Slug needs everything, donations accepted ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Subject: About your seal question... Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:10:08 -0800 I saw a pile of answers to this topic, and they could be summed up as: 77% - against pulling the engine or tranny to correct the problem 12% - dead against it because they tried it and it did not help 11% - thought you should go through the agony of replacing it Of those against, the bulk of the people chose prudent monitoring of the oil level. My land Rover also marks its territory...from a variety of places (except the rear main seal). I roll under every 600-1000 miles to add a bit of gear oil to the RFH, LFH, Trans and RD - I know what is leaking and it is only a little. I prefer to keep an eye on things. I have had loads of older vehicles and have made the mistake a few times of changing out seals, when the worn seal was quite happy with all the rest of the worn parts. Cheers David 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" Ural Motorcycle Ingrid 38, ketch ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:56:21 -0400 From: john cranfield <john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: marvel oil again john hess wrote: > someone wrote: > Last year we were looking for Marvel Mystery Oil, they do not have a > website, they do have an e-mail address: > Marvel Mystery Oil > CORLISSBS@aol.com Brad E. Smith [ truncated by list-digester (was 31 lines)] > engaged the shaft of the tranny and slid down all the way , mating the bell > housing holes with the studs coming off the flywheel housing. Zen is good. Vould zat be "zen ve put zee engine in zee car"? John ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:05:53 -0800 From: Peter <nosimport@mailbag.com> Subject: Re: marvel oil again john hess wrote: Loren, my rebuilder, says > lets's take a break to contemplate the zen of the engine. we had coffee > and taosted home-made bread with gobs of butter. Perhaps it's not just the Zen...Perhaps its the "Tao"sted that did it! Cheers Peter 60-109+64-88+70-88+73-88 = ? -- http://www.mailbag.com/users/nosimport/ ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Wed, 25 Feb 98 11:06:17 EST Subject: Re: Bearing and seal. >I found the Half Shaft bearing to be toast. I've got one if you want it > What i'm after is if there is a major part number for this bearing >and seal so I can cross ref it at the local bearing house instead >of overnighting one for BP or RN. or I could just get the # off it >Also, Does the race for that bearing have to be pressed on? any >tricks o the trade. I imagine I can cold chisel the old one off if >need be. Not sure here, mine were ok, so I didn't use the ones what came with the kit. There's a tool for splitting these things off, but it aint worth buying one just for one use. Doubt you'll be able to break it with a chisel, its bound to be pretty hard stuff. I suppose it might shatter, but I kinda doubt it. The new one could be tapped on with a *long* piece of pipe. later DaveB ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Chris Dillard"<cdillard@Aholdusa.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:09:52 -0500 Subject: Re: marvel oil again -106 ???? I don't get it????? Or is it jut me? Chris Dillard 91 RR County Ahold USA (Bi-LO Inc.) cdillard@aholdusa.com Greenville SC USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:19:54 -0400 (EDT) From: nelsml73@snyoneva.cc.oneonta.edu Subject: Re: MMO I've used Marvel a number of times and have found many older mechanics who swear by it, It smells good because among other things it has oil of peppermint in it which was an OLD OLD cure for stuck valves and cleaning carbon deposits, in fact thats all I've really used MMO for is freeing stuck valves and occaisonally set up engines. I'v enever had to use it in My LRs but in some old Flathead willys that had set for decades as well as some other cars I've fooled around with its really done a good job. Some people claim that plain old ATF fluid would do the same thing for stuck valves... but I've always stuck with MMO and I've been happy with the results, I have to admit though I've never used it for anything other than reviving engines that sat around for ages but for stuck valves dump a bit in the Carb while its running and let it run the engine will usually pick up the valve shortly, if not try again...As for set up engines just dump a bit in the cylinders and wait, I usually do this in preparation for starting any engine that has sat around in a lot or barn for years... Good lock, Matt Nelson ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:35:27 -0500 From: Keith Mohlenhoff <krm@nj.paradyne.com> Subject: Diesel Information and noise To combat noise in my diesel I have attached 1/2" foilfaced insulation purchased at PepBoys to the underside of my bonnet and to the bulkhead on the engine side. I also put weather stripping along the two side edges of the bonnet. This has helped a bit with the noise and to some degree with heat(PI). The changes above made more of a difference from the outside of the vehicle than inside, but there was a noticable difference inside. Either that or I've lost even more of my hearing. I also used some of the same material under the transmission hump mat to silence some of the gear whine. Little wads balled up and shoved in your ears helps too(Animal tested so you know it's safe - we are animals aren't we) This last bit is is not true. On the issue of Diesel additives and other small ways to gain performance or fuel mileage or engine life, I think information is always helpful and allows us to make informed decisions in all aspects of our lives. Keep the info coming Jim. Keith R. Mohlenhoff 63 IIA 5 door 2.25D 71 IIA 3 door 2.25P ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Subject: Re:106 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:06:22 -0800 That is a 109 with three inches pushed in from an impact. Or is it a 109 with three inches removed in a parkade? Or it was built in 106, October, 6th or is it the 10th of June - I always forget which comes first. Or it could be a tyypo, with fast flying fingers. ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: RE: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatment. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:04:40 -0800 Thanks David, I have cleaned & primed the outside of most of my frame. When the car is rolling again (soon I hope) I plan to have the inside of the frame steam cleaned, then I will waxoil the cr*p out of it! And then park it somewhere safe & let it drip for a week! Paul. ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:11:23 -0800 (PST) From: jimallen@onlinecol.com (Jim Allen) Subject: Diesel Performance Here are some general tips I learned on the chassis dyno while building up a project vehicle for FOUR WHEELER. I am not including basic diagnostics. I have just started into the final stage, which is turbocharging. This is a non-Rover vehicle, and while the principles will apply, the results on Rovers will be more modest due to the differences in displacement (140cid vs 380cid). I have been working with Stanadyne, who built the fuel injection system for my rig, as well as Central Motive Power in Denver and Northwest Fuel Injection in Columbus Grove, Ohio. These two independant outfits both are highly impressive organizations, both in terms of their customer service and their knowledge. I learned a great deal from them! They EARNED this plug from me! Step By Step 1) Engine Compression Run a compression test first and compare it with factory specs. Since compression ratio is the vital element in a diesel, you must be up to spec if you want to get the whole enchilada (or the enchilada-and-a-half). A quick look through all my books could not find a compression test spec for these engines (if someone has this, let me know the page # and the manual, I have most of them from 2.25-200TDI but couldn't find it). I will make an EDUCATED GUESS based on reviews of several other diesel test specs consulted from engines with similar compression ratios. After ahout 6 "pumps" you want to be over 300 psi and reletively even, with an ultimate high of about 400 psi after about 10-12 pumps (wahtch your battery and starter doing the test).You need a special testor with adaptors for the glow or "heater" plugs in the head. The above specs are at sea level, readings at altitude will be lower. 2) Injectors and Injection Pump These are the second key to diesel operation. Since diesels seem to chug along year after year with little fiddling, performance degrades gradually as these parts wear and it isn't noticed until you are outrun by derelict cars without engines. The biggest lesson for me was to leave these items in the hands of pros. I would suggest that step two of a performance setup is to get these bits tested by an authorized dealer for the type of pump installed (CAV into the 2.5L engines). If anyone says they can "set you up" by ear or other esoteric means, run for the door. Many tight specs here that are not "eyeball" measurements. With injector opening pressure critical to just a few PSI, you need the test bench to dial it in. In my case, the pump was reasonably OK (it was rebuilt at some point previously) but the injectors terrible (a typical scenario). The dyno showed a 12hp increase after my pump and injectors were rebuilt. That was really gaining back what I had lost (about 12%) due to the innefficiency. If we take the 2.25s rated 62 bhp and drop it 12%, that's 54.5hp, an 8hp drop. In some cases, there may be upgrades available for your pump to improve operation. The adjustments (timing advance, fuel rate, etc) are different for turbo diesels, so if you plan this mod the rebuilder may be able to set your pump and injectors to this spec. You may need a more modern 2.5TD pump, I really don't know on the Rover diesels. My pump was able to be set up for future tubocharging, with just a few new tuning adjustments needed at the time the turbo is installed. 3) Air, Fuel and Exhaust. The diesel is an unthrottled engine. The column of air over the earth (14.7psi) forces air into the cylinders.There is no throttle butterfly. The injection pump is calibrated to inject the right amount of fuel for the amount of air the engine can bring in as assorted speeds. Any more fuel than that is a waste and just results in more black smoke. Some late emissions calibrated diesels can benefit from the fuel rate being "cranked up" but I think the olden engines are about as fat as they can be - until you give them more air. Obviously, forced induction is the answer but you can make improvements in NA diesels also. I picked up 2hp on my bone stock diesel with a K&N filter designed to fit in the stock application. Intake system restrictions really cost power on diesels, so anything you can do to free up the airflow will help (bigger intake manifolds, free flow air filters, etc) because with more air, you can give it a touch more fuel and the result is more power. If you see a big jump in performance with air filter improvements, without a fuel rate increase, this means that you were too rich already. As with any engine, the diesel will benefit from exhaust improvments. What works for NA gas engines also worked for diesels (do the petrol headers fit on diesels?), but like the intake system, the fuel rate must increase to realize the benefits. I used a Banks "Stinger" kit for my non-Rover 6.2L diesel and this kit consisted of a big 3" single exhaust and a free flow air filter kit (w/ an improved air horn & cool air duct). This improvment yielded 20hp on the dyno after the pump was dialed in for it. I don't know the method for adjusting the fuel rate on a CAV pump - it may or may not be adjustable by normal means in the home shop. My 6.2L can be adjusted fairly easily, but again this is best left to the pros in most cases. There is a corrolation between exhaust temperature (I recommend a pyrometer in diesels, especially turbos) and fuel rate, but it gets tricky. Banks recommends cranking the fuel rate screw in a certain specified amount (for the at home insto of their kit) and then verifying by making a full throttle run up a hill and monitoring that the exhaust temp does not exceed 1100 degrees for the 6.2L (mine will go almost to 1200 but at stock specs, it would only go to 900 degrees). No, I don't think an older Rover diesel will tolerate 1100 degrees. I'd measure the stock engine in perfect stock and original tune and go from there (mount the probe in the ex. pipe as near the head or collector as possible). I'm not going to guess how hot you could go. Try it and tell me! 4) Intake Air Temp & Power. As with any engine, cooler air is more dense (more oxygen molecules), so cooler intake air results in more power. Not much happens until you exceed 90 degrees. After this, performance starts to drop. I demostrated this on the dyno, after getting measured 94hp runs at 88 degrees intake air (as cool as I could get it there). I ducted hot air off the exhaust manifold to the engine. At 115 degrees intake air temp, power dropped to 87hp. At 134 degrees, power dropped to 84hp. At 155 degrees it plummeted to 79hp. Obviously, cool outside air is answer, though you want to make sure you won't be sucking up river water or make the intake system so torturous that you lose what you gained. 5) Pump Timing A critical element. A lot of "tune by ear" guys want to advance timing (on petrol or diesel) without investigating the nouances. There are benefits in certain cases, but great harm can also be wrought. I recommend setting it exactly to spec on a diesel unless you KNOW via objective means. Before I learned this, I stumbled on the right method if you happen to have a dyno at home. Bear in mind that this is DIESEL stuff that doesn't necessarily apply to gas engines. I started playing with the timing and measuring the results on the dyno. I made the baseline tests with the pump at the factory setting. I started advancing it in small increments and the power levels rose gradually. At one point, the power started to drop off. I left the engine set at the peak power setting, and combined with the aforementioned stock replacement K&N air filter, I was getting a measured 102.5hp, 8.5hp over baseline. It turns out that when Central Motive Power checked the timing with their equipment, I was at the ideal "power" setting listed in their specs. This is an electronic timing light for diesels that's very accurate. I don't know if there is a light that will fit on the Rover (I suspect there is, because the tech made an offhand remark about having a light for "everything" in their shop). A well equipped diesel injection shop would be the best bet and I'd advise getting the timing set this way as it elimnates the possible error of the static methods and compensates for timing chain wear. 6) Forced Induction Don't have the turbo on the project yet, but some general research yields tha tfact that this is the way to go. I have a 3/4 ton 6.9L diesel PU with an aftermarket turbo kit on it and Yowza - 500lb-ft of torque from an engine that made 340 in NA form! Hills do not exist for this truck! Diesels are prime candidates for forced inductionas menstioned above, more air= more fuel= more power. On an old Rover, I'd be careful on the amount of boost. 5.5psi boost will make the engine run like sea level at 10,000 feet and it's well within the engine's tolerance (if it's not worn out and you don't drive like a moron). After the 6.2L gets fitted (next on th elist) I'll let you know how it went. 7) Fuel Good fuel is vital. The Cetane rating of fuel (equivalent to the octane rating of petrol) has gradually dropped since low sulpher fuel was adopted in 1992. It used to be rated as high as 60, but now 50 cetane is about the best you can find. BTW, Total Petroleum (western USA for sure) have the highest Cetane (50) rated fuel in Colorado right now according to Central Motive Power. Generally, if the pump says "Premium" diesel, it's probably 50 cetane or higher. Standard grades may only be 45 or so. Unlike a petrol engine that will voice displeasure by pinging when given low grade, diesels just deliver less power, unless it's really terrible fuel. Better fuel = more power. Lubricity is an issue also. Lubricity is the ability of the fuel to lubricate the inner workings of the pump and injectors. Better lubrication offers longer life to these expensive parts. The new fuels don't lubricate as well as the old but while there is a wear issue for all pumps, it isn't a major problem with all pumps. Some seem to do fine, others do not. I do not know how the Rover pumps fare. You can add stuff to the fuel to help. The Stanadyne Performance Formula does a great job in the tests I've seen and offers a cetane boost as well (I picked up 8hp on the 6.2L with this additive as well as less smoke as measured by a opacity meter). They also have a lubricity only formula. Adding ATF, Marvel Mystery Oil and motor oil to the fuel does not help much according the the tests I saw. Probably the easiest to find lubricity additive I saw on the test list was STP Diesel Formula. It wasn't the best by far but it dropped the wear down to just a hair above the 450 micron test limit. They run a new pump X number of hours on the fuel or fuel/additive mix and measure the wear on internal componants. According the the SAE, scratches under 450 microns are OK, but over that is an indicator of inadequte lubrication and can cause early wear. STP was 460 microns, Performance Formula was 357 microns. 8) The Final Word Read and follow #1, 2 and #5 before you even try any diesel mods. No kidding, a good "tune-up" from a QUALIFIED shop may make more difference than anything short of a turbo. Petrol engines have a lot of flexibility when it comes to tuning - diesels do not. A partly educated grunt in a grungy, dark diesel shop with a 50 year old test bench (that hasn't been calibrated in 40 years), if he has a test bench at all, cannot do the job well. Again, I mention that the above are general commments based on my 6.2L diesel experiences. I make no claim to be a Rover diesel "expert", though I'd like to find one to pick brains with. That it for now, gotta get back to the book! Jim Allen ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatment. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:35:12 -0800 Park it on slope, then turn it around after three days! David ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Wed, 25 Feb 98 12:10:05 EST Subject: Re[2]: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatmen >In the winter, when they salt the roads, I use about a litre of used motor >oil and squirt it into the frame holes, everywhere. >It does mess up you backside a bit for a couple of days, but I have an >original RUST FREE frame! It is cheaper and easier than galvanizing. try gear oil. CW says used motor oil is corrosive. later DaveB who has done nothing to rustproof his frame 'cept for painting it. ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David and Cynthia Walker" <wahooadv@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Re[2]: PS....Grounding vs Insuation :WAS: Anti Rust Treatmen Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:52:52 -0800 Naaa, I left all the corrosive stuff behind in the engine Cheers David 1970 Land Rover IIA, 88" - "BEAN TOAD" Ural Motorcycle - Ingrid 38, ketch ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:44:39 -0800 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Bearing and seal. dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org wrote: > Not sure here, mine were ok, so I didn't use the ones what came with the kit. > There's a tool for splitting these things off, but it aint worth buying one > just for one use. Doubt you'll be able to break it with a chisel, its bound to > be pretty hard stuff. I suppose it might shatter, but I kinda doubt it. I would suspect that if the bearing was toast, the race will be as well. After all, it runs in it. Even if it's just scarred a bit it should be replaced. And yes, it will come off with a chisel. It'll crack it, thereby loosening its hold on the shaft and slipping off, just like snot on a hens...... Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org Date: Wed, 25 Feb 98 13:08:17 EST Subject: Re[2]: Bearing and seal. >>just like snot on a hens...... I aint gonna TOUCH that one, Con... DaveB ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:20:33 EST Subject: Re: Help? Could be the mail server that your "internet provider" uses. For example - the TRUE Prince of Darkness, or Evil Empire, or whatever you want to call America Online, has the occasional bad habit of sending my email to me backwards (meaning, I'll get the responses before the questions), sometimes days go by before I find out what the question was! Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 25 Feb 98 12:02:11 MST Subject: Stainless steel gauze under carb. From: <debrown@srp.gov> PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 Pers. E-mail: rovernut@hotmail.com Most likely true... back in the 70's (gas "shortages" the US) there used to be a device similar to this, and the theory was that it atomized the fuel so it could be burned more fully. Thus, better milage, and performance. Never tried one though, but it makes sense... Dave Brown Never give up your life for #=======# _____l___ anything that death can take away. |__|__|__\___ //__|__|__\___ -anonymous | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 25 Feb 98 12:27:41 MST Subject: OOPS!!! (Was: "Stainless steel...") From: <debrown@srp.gov> PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 Pers. E-mail: rovernut@hotmail.com OOPS!!! I have fallen behind in reading the digests lately, and didn't realize that this had already been disclaimed. As I said, I never tried it, it only made sense. "Dave B" (not the obnoxious one!) ;-) Never give up your life for #=======# _____l___ anything that death can take away. |__|__|__\___ //__|__|__\___ -anonymous | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Eyres, Richard RP" <Eyres.Richard.RP@bhp.com.au> Subject: RE: Diesel Performance Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:02:00 +1100 Thanks for the info Jim, much appreciated. Richard 1973 S3 SWB New Zealand ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Subject: Re: In response to Jim's reply about diesels... Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:12:32 -0800 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:08:15 -0800 From: Clayton Kirkwood <kirkwood@kirkwood-desk.fm.intel.com> Subject: Re: In response to Jim's reply about diesels... At 04:35 PM 2/24/98 -0500, Adams, Bill wrote: >As a Series Rover owner, and I think I speak for all on this list, I care >little for preventive maintenance issues 'cept for oil changes and such. >I just drive the sh*t out of the truck until something fails and then the >truck sits until I fix it. Well, you don't speak for me. I bought my Series III-88 new in 1973 and still drive it today. For the first ten years of its life it was my only vehicle and was driven every single day. It never once failed to start except when the original battery went and I had to start it on the hand crank for a few days. It never quit on the road, and the engine runs as smoothly and quietly today as it did the day I bought it. I would have to say it's been the most reliable vehicle I've ever owned other than my Range Rover, and that includes a VW Beetle, an Austin Healey 3000, a Ford F-250 pickup, and a BMW 6-Series. But this reliability does not come without a bit of effort. Series Land Rovers don't go very long without needing something adjusted. Maintenance is extremely easy, in my opinion, and ignoring the little things that crop up will lead to big expensive things in a fairly short time. While I may let things go a little longer today because I don't depend on the Land Rover for daily transportation, when I did I adjusted, fixed, or replaced anything that needed it immediately. The payoff has been a vehicle that has never once let me down mechanically in 25 years. (I've gotten it stuck a few times, but that was my fault.) The only "major" problem I've had in 25 years of ownership was a pair of burned exhaust valves at about 125K miles. In addition to rebuilding the head we also took the opportunity to hone the cylinders and fit new pistons, rings, and bearings, although they were all in excellent condition. However, the cylinder walls had enough normal wear to raise the issue of blow-by with the rebuilt head. I also had the transmission overhauled a few years ago, but that was prompted only by the joint gaskets finally wearing out and leaking oil at a pretty fair clip; the transmission and transfer case have always functioned perfectly. I've replaced the radiator and the exhaust system once. I replaced the springs with 109 springs. Clutch cylinders, brake cylinders and shoes, and wheel hub seals have needed replacing from time to time. But the rest of the running gear is all original and has never needed repair or replacement. The vehicle still has its original swivel balls and seals with no signs of pitting or leaking. The only two mechanical problems right now are both oil leaks, one from the steering relay (original unit) and one from the crankshaft oil seal in the timing chain cover (original seal). Throughout the vehicle's life, I've replaced points and plugs regularly and overhauled or adjusted the Zenith carburetor when it seemed to need it. (I switched to a Rochester carb for awhile but then went back to the Zenith.) The valve clearances get checked a couple of times a year. Outside of the engine and transmission overhaul, none of the maintenance jobs on the Series take very long or are very difficult if you have any mechanical ability at all. As far as I'm concerned, spending money to buy a vehicle and then ignoring its maintenance is dumb, and leads to people saying things like "My (fill in name of vehicle here) is the most unreliable car I've ever had." I treat my 1991 Range Rover the same as the Land Rover, and while I've had to rebuild a seat switch, fix a power door lock, overhaul the front brake calipers, plus a few other minor maintenance jobs, for 90K miles the reliability of the vehicle has been outstanding. But nothing lasts forever and I'm fully aware that things will start to conk out pretty soon now. By replacing or repairing them as they wear out I expect to get every bit as much service life from the Range Rover as I have from the Series. Ignoring maintenance is far more expensive in the long run than keeping a vehicle running right all the time. This has been proven to me time and again in the de Havilland Beaver floatplanes I fly; vehicles are no different. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Faure, Marin" <Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> Subject: Kellogg inquiry Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 09:11:55 -0800 From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:41:00 EST Subject: Re: re: 110 prices (was Re: Observations ...) In a message dated 2/23/98 8:06:13 PM, you wrote: >>Kellogg." Is he connected with Land Rovers in some way in the Seattle >>area? >Are you kidding or are you serious? He has received quite a bit of negative flack on this list for his business practices and his high prices; both of which have apparently made people turn away from their rovers or just not get one. I bought my Series III-88 new in 1973 while living in Hawaii. As there was no dealership in Hawaii at the time (I ordered my vehicle through a California dealer), I bought the parts and accessories I needed from the original Atlantic British Parts, Tom Gannon, who started in LA and then moved to Lewiston, California. I used Tom for parts until the early 1990s when he closed his business. In 1979 I moved to Seattle where I live today. In 1991 I bought a new Range Rover Vogue SE, but when Tom went out of business I started buying parts for both my Land Rovers from the current Atlantic British and Rovers North. As first Tom and now Atlantic British and Rovers North have provided excellent service and response I've had no reason to search any farther for parts distributors. But the only Land Rover parts and service company I am aware of in this area, other than the current Seattle/Bellevue dealership, is in Olympia, Washington. It is located in a warehouse off highway 101 just west of the interchange with I-5. I drove up to the building on my way back from the beach in December. It was closed but there were several Series Land Rovers sitting outside, mostly 109s in various conditions. This company has existed for years as I recall seeing their building (it has a British flag painted on the wall facing the highway) not long after I moved to the area, although December was the first time I've actually driven up to it. In addition to the 109s there was what seemed to be a Series I beside a big pile of rusty Land Rover frame sections. The building was closed and there were no windows so I have no idea of what was inside. Shortly after I moved to Seattle, Tom Gannon mentioned a Land Rover parts and restoration company in this area that he said was notorious for having extremely high prices. I assume this is the Mr. Kellogg that has been referred to on this list. Is Mr. Kellogg's company the one I just described in the Olympia area? If it is, he's been in business an awfully long time (20 years?), so I would imagine he's either independently wealthy or he's doing something right. I don't know if the Land Rovers sitting outside the building are for sale or if they are customers' vehicles, but they represented some potentially nice machines if someone was willing to put some time and effort into fixing them up. I'm sorry if this is plowing ground that's been covered at length before. __________________ C. Marin Faure faurecm@halcyon.com marin.faure@boeing.com (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Paul Quin <Paul_Quin@pml.com> Subject: RE: Kellogg inquiry Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:16:06 -0800 I think that the shop in Olympia is British Northwest Land-Rover Co. [britishnw@land-roverco.com] I could be wrong though. Don't know if Mr. Kellogg is related to this company. Anyone? I have communicated with John McEwan at this company and he seemed to be honest and his prices weren't too out of line (quite good actually.) The only reason that I haven't bought from them is the current sh*tty Canadian/US exchange rate... Paul Quin 1961 Series II 88 Victoria, BC Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: SPYDERS@aol.com Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:03:58 EST Subject: Re: Kellogg inquiry In a message dated 2/25/98 5:18:27 PM, Marin wrote: [snip] >>Shortly after I moved to Seattle, Tom Gannon mentioned a Land Rover parts and restoration company in this area that he said was notorious for having extremely high prices. I assume this is the Mr. Kellogg that has been referred to on this list. Is Mr. Kellogg's company the one I just described in the Olympia area? If it is, he's been in business an awfully long time (20 years?), so I would imagine he's either independently wealthy or he's doing something right. I don't know if the Land Rovers sitting outside the building are for sale or if they are customers' vehicles, but they represented some potentially nice machines if someone was willing to put some time and effort into fixing them up. I think that's him, others will confirm; BTW those "good to partly running" rovers are reputed to be in the $20K range, as we saw in an unsolicited ad to the list a while back. I'm sorry if this is plowing ground that's been covered at length before.<< No need to be sorry about this kind of topic, IMHO. There are always new list members who ought to find out who the really unscrupulous traders are. I remember his unsolicited posting drew a lot of negative response, even though he (Kellogg) wasn't subscribed to the list. pat 93 110 BTW, I agree with Marin on the preventative maintenance thing. I, too, am a pilot, and rely on maintenance to keep me alive in the air and (maybe to a lesser extent) on the ground. And at sea. (Anyone have a barient 27 drum they don't need?)... ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:22:41 +0100 From: Marijn van der Himst <marijn@multiweb.net> Subject: 109-FFR wiring Thanks all for replies to my other questions..... Next one: *wanted*: a full wiring diagram for a (/my) 109'FFR ex-MOD 24 Volt (Richard Gurkha perhaps?) It's supposed to be in the one book i *did not* buy ! Anyone in The Netherlands prepared giving me a hand in order to get my rig on the road *before* import taxes increase next may? Tools & general tech know-how available, and of course the odd six-pack... Also nice trying to understand the slang used in some of the messages.. :> cheers, Marijn '74 109 awaiting MOT........ ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kevin Sellitti <Kevinsel@gte.net> Subject: RE: Marvel Mystery Oil and SS Mesh Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:54:49 -0500 ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 35 lines 0 [forwarded 66 whitespace 0] Output: lines 1160 [content 1018 forwarded 43 (cut 23) whitespace 0][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 980226 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-1999 by the original poster or/and Empire Rover Owners Society, All rights reserved. Photos & text Copyright 1990-1999 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Empire/LRO List of charges for Empire/LRO Policies
against the distribution of unsolicited commercial e-mail (aka SPAM).
|
![]() |
|||
<--Back |
HOME |
TOP |
Forward --> |
|