[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Keith Mohlenhoff [krm@nj | 21 | Proper opeeration of Coolant system on IIA 2.25 petrol |
2 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 22 | Re: Proper opeeration of Coolant system on IIA 2.25 petrol |
3 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 12 | Re: Proper opeeration of Coolant system on IIA 2.25 petrol |
4 | Chuque Henry [ChuqueH@is | 16 | Zenith or Webber? |
5 | Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lo | 13 | Re: Zenith or Webber? |
6 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 19 | Re: Zenith or Webber? |
7 | Iwan Vosloo [ivosloo@cs. | 30 | SER: Darn, battery not charging |
8 | Iwan Vosloo [ivosloo@cs. | 23 | Re: HELP-need torque setting |
9 | "Christopher H. Dow" [do | 38 | Re: SER: Darn, battery not charging |
10 | "DAN PRASADARAO, AIR-7.4 | 32 | 109 frames/ Salisbury axles for sale |
11 | mtooze@tan.unl.edu (Marc | 21 | importing to US |
12 | mtooze@tan.unl.edu (Marc | 29 | more import |
13 | Michael Carradine [cs@cr | 34 | Re: importing to US |
14 | Eric Zipkin [ericz@cloud | 8 | Test-do not open |
15 | "Adams, Bill" [badams@us | 15 | Re: 109 frames/ Salisbury axles for sale |
16 | debrown@srp.gov | 96 | Re: Need Rover V-8 Advice! :-) |
17 | robot1@juno.com | 29 | d ynamo |
18 | William Caloccia [calocc | 43 | [not specified] |
19 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 37 | Any Computer experts out there? |
20 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@nr | 14 | Re: Test-do not open |
21 | "Clinton D. Coates" [Cli | 16 | Parabolic Springs |
22 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 28 | RE: Aussie army coils? |
23 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 13 | Re: Need Rover V-8 Advice! :-) |
24 | Jim Holmes [jrh@hooked.n | 25 | Temp. Gauge Install |
25 | "Shaun Fisher" [FISHERS@ | 12 | R6 front diff |
26 | "Huub Pennings" [penning | 23 | Re: Minerva or what????? |
27 | philippe.carchon@rug.ac. | 21 | Minerva |
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 08:49:05 -0400 From: Keith Mohlenhoff <krm@nj.paradyne.com> Subject: Proper opeeration of Coolant system on IIA 2.25 petrol Hello; My question is, Should the coolant forced into the overflow bottle be drawn back into the radiator when the engine cools down? The radiator will need topping up after getting stuck in traffic on real hot days. The temp guage has never hit red. There is coolant in the overflow bottle, but it hasn"t overflowed. I usually pour it back into the radiator. I have an air compressor and want to pressure test the system, what max. pressure should I use or should I let my mechannic do this. He won't touch either of my Rovers, but I think he would do this. Also, there is some chaff(hay) in the radiator, I tried to blow it out with air and water, can I brush out the rest with a scrub brush? Keith R. Mohlenhoff ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Proper opeeration of Coolant system on IIA 2.25 petrol Date: Mon, 30 Jun 97 13:54:44 BST > Hello; > My question is, > Should the coolant forced into the overflow bottle be drawn back into the radiator when the engine > cools down? Yep, if its connected to the hole on the bottle. One of the holes on the top, goes all the way down to the base. This should be connected to the radiator. The other is the overflow. > The radiator will need topping up after getting stuck in traffic on real hot days. The temp guage > has never hit red. There is coolant in the overflow bottle, but it hasn"t overflowed. I usually > pour it back into the radiator. Sounds okay. I always have a little in the overflow. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 08:59:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Proper opeeration of Coolant system on IIA 2.25 petrol If the coolant's not being drawn back, check the tube from the tank to the radiator for cracks. Typicallly these will dry-rot and seep, allowing the radiator to blow off under pressure, but the vacuum isn't enough to draw the coolant and it sucks air through the hose instead. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Chuque Henry <ChuqueH@isco.com> Subject: Zenith or Webber? Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 08:51:32 -0500 Quick question. I'm driving about 5 hours to go camping this 4th of July weekend. My Solex has crapped out on me. I want to switch carbs, but have to order here this morning so I can get them in time to switch and tune. Would you opt for a Zenith or a single barrel Webber? -Q "Where Did I Go Today?" 1970 Series IIa 88 Land Rover "Narnook" 1977 Series I Lotus Esprit (#118) ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 09:59:28 -0400 Subject: Re: Zenith or Webber? Weber - no doubt, especially considering the warping problems with the covers on the Zenith. Cal around to the local junkyards. Early Pintos used the Weber 34ICH - you might get lucky and find one. ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Zenith or Webber? Date: Mon, 30 Jun 97 15:04:31 BST When I asked the question, everyone said get a "Zenith"! Its got a bit more umph, is better and more maintainable,etc than your Solex. Also, being standard equipment, it meant I already had all the maintenance info,etc,etc. Richard > Weber - no doubt, especially considering the warping problems with the > covers on the Zenith. [ truncated by list-digester (was 10 lines)] > might get lucky and find one. > ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 21:43:21 +0300 From: Iwan Vosloo <ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za> Subject: SER: Darn, battery not charging Hi all, after a while of relative peace, I seem to have been struck by lucas. (And I though driving a diesel will keep me relatively safe...) Before I pluck the alternator out there--can anyone recognise these symptoms and/or tell me where to start looking? When I switch the ignition on (with the engine off), my 'charge' light comes on only dimly instead of nice and bright as normal to indicate it's working. When the engine is running, it's still dim-no change. I know for sure that the battery does not charge because after a 2 days of this it does not feel like turning the engine anymore. (And o yes, the fanbelt is fine.) What I want to know is: is this a short somewhere or should I immediately suspect the alternator itself? And: is there anyplace special where I could start my debugging? (I'm wishing for a easy fix here...I guess I should "dream on") (It'd be nice if you could cc your replies to this one to me personally since I want to start working on it before I get the next digest.) - Iwan Vosloo ( 1975 SIII 88" Diesel ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 21:29:19 +0300 From: Iwan Vosloo <ivosloo@cs.up.ac.za> Subject: Re: HELP-need torque setting > I can not find the torque setting for the special nut that goes on the > transmission output shaft. All I find in the manual is "reverse the > procedure" > Its a IIA transmission. TeriAnn, I'm not sure which one you're talking about, but my book says the "Output drive flange nut" (the castellated nut on the rear output of the transfer to which you can only get by removing the rear propshaft (!) ) should be torqued to 85 lbf ft (118 Nm). But this nut is a quite normal castellated one. There is also one with a funny shape that goes onto the rear of the mainshaft...for which I could not find the setting either (but I could not torque it anyway since I don't have anything axcept a hammer & screwdriver to tighten it with). - Iwan Vosloo ( 1975 SIII 88" Diesel ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:16:24 -0700 From: "Christopher H. Dow" <dow@thelen.org> Subject: Re: SER: Darn, battery not charging <Iwan Vosloo fears he's been struck with the Lucas Demon> I suggest you start by charging the battery. You will need a well-charged battery to perform most of the tests. The first thing to do is to short the idiot light wire on the alternator to +V, then turn on the ignition switch. If the charging light is not illuminated on the dash panel, then your alternator is not charging (evidenced by the dim light when the wire to to idiot light is connected to its rightful place on the atlernator), and it should either be rebuilt or replaced (alternators are relatively cheap here in the US, but I don't know about South Africa (.za == South Africa, right?). If the light is dim while the wire normally attached to the alternator is attached to +V, then you probably have a short to ground somewhere, and should tear apart the harness and find it. If you need a new alternator, it will take less time. If you have wiring problems, it will cost less money (unless you find other problems while you have the harness apart). If it's wiring, just trace the idiot light wire from the lamp to the alternator, and use a test lamp at various places to determine where the ground occurs. Do this by turning on the ignition, and gounding the clip of the test lamp. Then use the probe (poke it through the insulation) and check for where the voltage drop occurs. Do this with the idiot light wire shorted to +V instead of the alterator. If you do open up the harness, I'd recommend stuffing the wires into auto conduit instead of rewrapping with PVC, as the conduit allows for better access to the wires later (most modern cars use this). Good Luck, C ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 16:03:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "DAN PRASADARAO, AIR-7.4.1, SECURITY (301)757-1479 X26" Subject: 109 frames/ Salisbury axles for sale >>Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 21:54:40 -0400 (EDT) >>From: Douglas L Boothby <boothby@nh.ultranet.com> >>Subject: 109 frames/ Salisbury axles for sale >>I have 3 109 military frames for sale @ $1200 each. They are used and >>relatively rust free. I also have 2 Salisbury axles @ $500 each. I [ truncated by list-digester (was 7 lines)] >>located in southwestern Maine just over the line from Rochester, NH. >>------------------------------ I have a '63 109 Station wagon, will the 109 Military frames work for my car? One of the rear outriggers at the front of the spring resembles swiss cheese. The current frame also has a 1 square inch hole next to the left front bump stop, plus another two or three very small rust spots/holes. Is this frame worth saving? Or could I use one of the 109 military frames with minimal modification. I can't afford a shiny new frame right now. The worst area currently is the right rear out rigger at the front of the spring. What is a reasonable price to pay for labor to have a new one welded on? I know a good welder in the Washington DC area who could do the job but I'm not sure what a reasonable price is? Thanks in advance for the help. Dan Rao '63 109 station wagon ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 15:35:33 -0500 From: mtooze@tan.unl.edu (Marcus Tooze) Subject: importing to US Is there anybody here who has actually imported a rover recently legally?? My import docs are from '94 and I have yet to call customs and order new info. In detail, are customs now running a 25 year roll around deal? i.e., can you now import a '72 without problems? Furthermore, I am actually interested in a deisel, and the customs book I have states that up to a 1975 deisel engined car can be imported. I should probably ask one of the many importers advertising in Hemmings, but I feel like I am milking them, and they are not making any money from me (losing money actually, as I am not buying one of their rovers!) Marcus ----- End Included Message ----- ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 16:07:56 -0500 From: mtooze@tan.unl.edu (Marcus Tooze) Subject: more import Found a useful web page: www.customs.ustreas.gov/imp-exp/car/car.htm#DOT Give breif details on importation. From what I can gather, the two groups you have to satisfy are DOT and EPA: DOT: Must meet bumper standards after 1973, but instructions say 'generally anything 25 years or older' is ok. So makes 1972 the max year for gas or diesel right now. EPA: Gas car or truck, subject to emmision requirement Dec. 1967 Diesel car, Dec 31 1974 Diesel light truck (rover?), dec 31, 1975. So, from this I gather that the max. year for a diesel import in 1972, while only '67 or older gas rovers should be allowed in.... Anybody experiencing anything different to this? I can'r believe there are many pre-67 gas rovers left in england!! Marcus ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 02:11:36 -0700 From: Michael Carradine <cs@crl.com> Subject: Re: importing to US At 03:35 PM 6/30/97 -0500, Marcus Tooze wrote: :Is there anybody here who has actually imported a rover recently legally?? :My import docs are from '94 and I have yet to call customs and :order new info. : :In detail, are customs now running a 25 year roll around deal? i.e., can :you now import a '72 without problems? Furthermore, I am actually interested :in a deisel, and the customs book I have states that up to a 1975 deisel :engined car can be imported. : :I should probably ask one of the many importers advertising in Hemmings, :but I feel like I am milking them, and they are not making any money :from me (losing money actually, as I am not buying one of their rovers!) Marcus, We bring in Mercedes Unimogs all the time and the 25 year rule (1972 and earlier) applies to DOT. EPA has a 21 year expiry (1976 and earlier). EPA regulates diesel fueled cars manufactured after 12/31/74 and diesel fueled light-duty trucks manufactured after 12/31/75. So, either way you're in the clear for a diesel 1975 Land Rover SUV! ;) Regards, Michael Carradine Ph/Fax 510-988-0900 Unimog Network Int'l, Box 494, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 USA <cs@crl.com> _______________________________________________________________________ Mercedes-Benz Unimog 4x4 WWW page: http://www.crl.com/~cs/unimog.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 17:45:02 -0400 From: Eric Zipkin <ericz@cloud9.net> Subject: Test-do not open New mailer, checking everything is working properly. Eric Zipkin Bedford, NY USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 17:49:50 -0400 From: "Adams, Bill" <badams@usia.gov> Subject: Re: 109 frames/ Salisbury axles for sale Hey Dan, I have the same deal on my frame. Can we get together one weekend and repair frame holes? I have a welder here and I bought an outrigger from RN for about 55 bonkers. get one for yourself and we'll make it a party. Bill Adams 3D Artist/Animator '66 Land Rover S2A 109 Diesel Station Wagon, '81 Honda Goldwing 1100 Standard: "Practicing the ancient oriental art of ren-ching" ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: debrown@srp.gov Date: 30 Jun 97 15:53:02 MST Subject: Re: Need Rover V-8 Advice! :-) FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist ~ S.R.P. ~ AM/FM - Graphic Records PAB219 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 > > From what I understand, they bore the sleeves out and re-sleeve(Australia). > They tell me there haven't been any problems....I don't want to chance it! > Seems like the cheapest way out, but why would a Rover owner take the > cheaper way out!? ;-) All too true! > I think I'll be calling Chris to talk to him and order one of his 4.6L > blocks...sounds like the easiest way to go and it's a new block to boot! > Should make the Rover move quite well! ;-) At some later date, I can > stroke the 3.5L to 3.9L and keep it for another project! ;-) That's what I thought too... not real secure putting a 30 year old crank into my RR. I still have my 3.5 short block, though without heads, oil pan, brackets, intake, valve covers, etc... it would take quite a lot to make it into something to fit a project, unless you had yet another LR V8 complete engine to work with. Besides, the new block is stronger, and has cross-bolted mains! I've heard that the Rover oil pan won't fit the Buick 215 block, so I doubt the Buick pan would fit the Rover block. (Lack of interchangable parts could make locating these parts a problem.) > So let me get this straight; you're getting the RPI block and using your > old heads? Does the ECU chip need to be replaced, or do you just change > the fuel regulator as RPI suggests? Or both!? I have two ECUs now, so I > have one to play with. Are you putting in a Crane cam, or one that RPI > suggests? Are you going to use the Cloyes timing set? If so, what part > numbers could you give me? Are you going to change the distributor to the > Mallory that RPI uses? Heheheh...so many questions! I'd really like to > have a page on our club website with all this information on it-are you > game to contribute? It would be nice to have a site where all the options > are laid out for others who want to follow suit! Correct, I'm using my old heads. According to RPI they'll work fine. I am having them ported for better flow, and am looking into having larger valves put in. RPI seems to think that the existing ECU can be used by using their variable fuel pressure regulator, but I have my doubts. At worst, I located a company in my own city that will put it on a dyno and make a chip for me for around $500. Superchips said around $200 for a mail order chip but I'm a little leary of them not having the RR on a dyno, and just sending me a chip (assuming that it will be based on the spec's that I would send them - cam info, valve size, engine size, etc.) I'm going with the cam that RPI recommended for the automatic, the "101" Piper, which has the following cam spec's: Piper 101 cam Timing v-lift v-clearance full lift lift at tdc intake: 18 - 62 .432 .000 112A 0 exhaust: 62 - 18 .432 .000 112B 0 The Cloyes true roller chain set is # 9-3132 ($74.95 P.A.W. 1.818.998.6000) Lifters: Crane # 99284-16 ($60.99 Jeg's 1.800.345.4545) No, I'm using my stock RR distributor. I'm also looking into Hedman headers #39800 and should be receiving a fax with a picture of them Today... but I think they may have forgotten me. (Hedman headers - 1.562.921.0404 - only headers AT ALL that fit the RR) I checked Jardine, JBA, L&L, Mesa, Stan's, R.V.Performance, Ultraflow, APC, and a few header distributors. I'd ABSOLUTELY LOVE for there to be a web page with all the details and options charted out. I'd be happy to share everything that I've gathered on the subject. Still, I feel like there's SO MUCH more "out there" that can be learned or modified on the Rover engine, but where??? >> > Dave (nervously awaiting the new "birth" of my RR) Brown > Let me know when I should light my cigar! ;-) You'll be the first to know (list members) IS ANYONE TAKING NOTES ON ALL THIS??? PLEASE??? Save someone all the research time!!! I copied this to the "Land Rover" list in case someone there wants to add it to a Rover web page, or start one on the Rover V8 engine. Dave (Not the V8 answer man, but learning more and more) Brown I count him braver who overcomes #=======# _____l___ his desires than him who conquers |__|__|__\___ //__/__|__\___ his enemies; for the hardest victory | _| | |_ |} \__ - ____ - _|} is the victory over self. -Aristotle "(_)""""""(_)" (_) (_) ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: robot1@juno.com Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 18:38:14 -0500 Subject: d ynamo >Can batteries get so discharged that they can't be properly recharged by the >engine? The battery is 3 months old. I don't want to recharge it and run out >of steam someplace inconveinient. Does the dynamo need to be "initialized" >some how? If so, by what means? A dynamo(generator) needs to have a relatively fully charged battery to charge the battery (who'se bright idea was this anyway?) Probably you're voltage regulator is dying or you're not using the vehicle for long enough periods to keep the battery topped off. Simplest fix (if the voltage regulator is o.k. ) is to swap to an alternator or if originality is a major issue, get a really good pair of jumper cables. Alternately, I took a 2-cycle snowblower motor and attached it to a Delco alternator (the kind with the built in regulator) so I have a kind of 12 volt generator. Has 5' of jumper cable attached. Works like a charm. You could build it in under the driver's seat. Even wire it direct to the battery. Be a hero in cold weather! Good luck! Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: 1998 - 50th Anniversary of Land Rover ARC Int'l Rally Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 18:50:06 -0400 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@OpenMarket.com> >From A.R.C. News. Issue 14 June 1997 1998 - 50th Anniversary of Land Rover ARC Int'l Rally Following discussions with Lancs & Cheshire LRC, Eastnor Estates Ltd. and Land Rover, the [A.R.C.] Council is pleased to announce that the 1998 International Rally, celebrating 50 years of 'The Best 4 x 4 x Far' will be held at Eastnor. Provisional plans allow for a nine-day rally, from Friday 22nd May to Sunday 31st May, with all of the usual 'International' features, but many more special celebration events suitable for the whole family. Lancs and Cheshire will act as rally co-ordinators, but in view of the new location, increased scope, and duration of the rally, assistance will be sought from other clubs for running specialised events and services. A proposed programme, subject to futhre discussions and confirmation, is: Fri 22 May Site Opens Sat 23 Grand Opening 'Showroom Vehicles Competitive Event' Sun 24 Concours - Cars International CCV Trial Mon 25 Comp Safari Tue 26 Team Recovery Wed 27 Inter Club Challenge Event Thu 28 Rest Day Fri 29 Winch Recovery Sat 30 RTV Trials Sun 31 Site Closes Gymkhanae, Trailer Handling competitions, Land Rover Concours, and Senic Safaris will be ongoing through out the week. At Eastnor Castle, Ledbury Herefordshire, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 02:35:12 +0200 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Any Computer experts out there? [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------DA85295FCA2B0126FC297B69" ] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Not wishing to abuse the bandwidth I'll keep this one short! Is anyone on this list a wizard at computer configuration, especially IBM PS/2 55 Microchannel PC's. I have three which wont boot to their C drive, and yes the drives are OK, formatted, sys'ed and checked on a working PS/2! This problem has bugged me for a week, now I need help, and IBM are about as interested in a PS/2 55 as Solihull are in a Series IIA. If anyone happens to work with such "antiques", plerase contact me direct and I'll forward a more detailled fault description. I have considered a "frameover" but these were cheap, and if able to work, will do the job! Thanks! --------------DA85295FCA2B0126FC297B69 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Adrian Redmond Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Adrian Redmond n: Redmond;Adrian email;internet: channel6@post2.tele.dk x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE end: vcard --------------DA85295FCA2B0126FC297B69-- ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 23:46:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@nrn1.NRCan.gc.ca> Subject: Re: Test-do not open On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Eric Zipkin wrote: > New mailer, checking everything is working properly. This for you and the fiance together? :-) Rgds ps love those rally rumours! ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 20:56:15 -0700 From: "Clinton D. Coates" <Clinton_Coates@bc.sympatico.ca> Subject: Parabolic Springs So there has been a bit of a flurry of discussion on the BC List about the merits of parabolic springs. Does anyone on the list have first hand experience with the benefits/detractions from parabolic springs on series land rovers? McAllister springs in Surrey (BC) claims they would give "too much sway" on the highway (like an old RR perhaps?) and "had never heard of them being put on an offroad vehicle" (never heard of Santana). Also, the supplier in the UK, does he import to NA, and what are his prices if he does? Clinton ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: RE: Aussie army coils? Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 15:06:00 +1000 Sorry Ed, I don't. I've posted this back to the net - someone else may be able to help Ron ---------- From: ETMFOUR@aol.com Subject: Aussie army coils? Date: Tuesday, 1 July 1997 5:11AM Hi, One of the local parts importers here in the US has just gotten in a shipment of aftermarket coils. He doesnt have any specs on them yet, he claims they are better than old man emu, but he's only sold a couple sets, so there is no real feedback from owners yet. Suposedly the australian army chose them over the OME and just ordered 20,000 coils. Do you happen to know anything about the coils they are using? Thanks Ed Messenger 89 rr (with bad coils) ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 02:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Need Rover V-8 Advice! :-) Dave, I do know, that, according to "The Rover V-8 Engine" book by Haynes, that the existing ECU for a SD-1 is good for upto 650bhp! (possibly even 700 - I can't remember exactly) After that, you may want to make a few changes. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 23:42:28 -0700 From: Jim Holmes <jrh@hooked.net> Subject: Temp. Gauge Install I've installed a Sunpro water temperature gauge in my SII and am having difficulties getting it to function properly. The gauge uses a bourdon tube mechanism that is installed into the threaded hole on the right side of the thermostat housing. Unfortunately, even with the engine warm, the gauge refuses to come off the peg to register temperature. I thought it might be a faulty sending unit so I pulled the sending unit out and tested it in a beaker of boiling water. This caused the gauge to register the proper temperature. I put the sending unit back in the thermostat housing and it still doesn't want to register coolant temperature. The only thing I can think of is that the location of the sending in the thermostat housing doesn't allow it to come in full contact with the circulating coolant. Any ideas on what I should try next? Thanks, Jim ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Shaun Fisher" <FISHERS@natburo.kzntl.gov.za> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:53:25 Subject: R6 front diff Hi all I have a great nead of an R6 front diff or just the right-hand shaft. Mine sort of um.. just twisted off. Shaun Fisher SERIES IIA BOOZMOBILE ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Huub Pennings" <pennings@kfih.azr.nl> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 09:20:32 +0100 Subject: Re: Minerva or what????? Hellow roverists. I' still in the dark here. I went over to have another look at what appears to be military Belgium Land Rovers type "88 SIII with ragtops. The funny thing is, they have only one gear shift lever and that is why I suppose they are permanent four wheel drive with no high and low gear. (No selector) Anyone on the list familiar with this type??? (no Minerva's since they had non aluminium bodywork) Regards, Huub Pennings e-mail adress Pennings@kfih.azr.nl ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 09:47:44 +0200 From: philippe.carchon@rug.ac.be (philippe) Subject: Minerva Huub, it's easy to distinguish Minerva's from regular Series III: a Minerva looks more like a Series I. I'm also wondering that someone will be offering a lot of Minerva's, they are not so common anymore. What's really common here (Belgium) is the last series III the Belgium army used. I know some adresses where you can buy hundreds of those cars (Ternat, near Brussels). And prices range between 65 000 and 95 000 belgian francs (approx. $2000-$3000) so I think the ones you saw are really SIII Belgian army. There is however one 'tricky' thing: they are almost all 4x2 which means they don't have the 4 wheel driving. Looks very stange: a LR without transfercase, without yellow knob-lever, without red knob-lever, etc. Philippe '81 Lightweight, Ghent, Belgium ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 27 lines 1181 [forwarded 47 whitespace 307] Output: lines 917 [content 483 forwarded 38 (cut 9) whitespace 300][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970701 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|