[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Christopher D. Van Deca | 15 | Calif emmsions |
2 | Mike Gaines [106220.1234 | 50 | RE:UK Ex-MoD LR Dealers |
3 | The Big Guy [guru@manhol | 104 | Re: WARNING to potential ......... |
4 | Mike Gaines [106220.1234 | 17 | NON LR CONTENT:LRO NEEDS USA HELP PLEASE |
5 | Mike Gaines [106220.1234 | 34 | Washing and CDs in Series |
6 | David Cockey [dcockey@ti | 37 | Re: WARNING to potential SIII buyers and Importers |
7 | lndrvr@ldd.net (BRIAN WI | 13 | Values on used Range Rovers |
8 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 20 | Series III U-Joints |
9 | b.boehlers@olsy.dk (Bent | 19 | engine swap |
10 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 20 | Exporting....was Warning!... |
11 | "Clinton D. Coates" [Cli | 14 | tippity tappity... |
12 | "Clinton D. Coates" [Cli | 18 | Truck type again |
13 | "Clinton D. Coates" [Cli | 9 | 3.5 l rover motors |
14 | "T. F. Mills" [tomills@o | 22 | Re: Values on used Range Rovers |
15 | Adrian Redmond [channel6 | 46 | Re: engine swap |
16 | "Clinton D. Coates" [Cli | 16 | folding sidestep |
17 | Floris Houniet [houniet@ | 43 | removing hi-lo gearbox |
18 | Greg Moore [gmoore@islan | 12 | Re: folding sidestep |
19 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 21 | Re: Values on used Range Rovers |
20 | Michael Carradine [cs@cr | 23 | Re: Exporting....was Warning!... |
21 | CIrvin1258@aol.com | 35 | Re:Importing pre-74 LR to Ca... |
22 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 38 | Carbs and Nigel's Disease |
23 | rover@pinn.net (Alexande | 32 | Customs |
24 | "C. Marin Faure" [faurec | 37 | Re: Zenith 361V popping noises |
25 | karlsson@edgenet.net (ka | 16 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
26 | Brett Storey [brstore@ib | 19 | Re: Series III U-Joints |
27 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 20 | Re: Series III U-Joints |
28 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 19 | Re: Exporting....was Warning!... |
29 | torque@pacific.net.sg (L | 24 | Re: Maximum Tyre Size |
30 | David Russell [David_R@m | 25 | IIA door tops/109 4-sale |
31 | Chris Dow [dow@thelen.or | 19 | Please don't flame me, but.... |
32 | b.boehlers@olsy.dk (Bent | 31 | RE: Series III U-Joints |
33 | Jeremy John Bartlett [ba | 18 | Re: folding sidestep |
34 | b.boehlers@olsy.dk (Bent | 36 | RE: engine swap |
35 | Michael Carradine [cs@cr | 18 | CB40 may not be sold in US |
36 | Alan DuBoff [aland@ibm.n | 35 | Re: CB40 may not be sold in US |
37 | "T. F. Mills" [tomills@o | 27 | Re: CB40 may not be sold in US |
38 | marsden@digicon-egr.co.u | 21 | Re: Zenith 361V popping noises |
39 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 24 | Queen's Birthday Long Weekend Trip - Brindabella |
40 | Terje Krogdahl [terje@mu | 44 | Re: removing hi-lo gearbox |
41 | "Con P. Seitl" [seitl@ns | 19 | Re: removing hi-lo gearbox |
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 12:56:04 -0700 From: "Christopher D. Van Decar" <vandy@mail.enterprise.net> Subject: Calif emmsions Does anybody know if California allows the importing (UK)of Rovers that are 25 years or older into the state? I'm wondering about the emmisions laws there since a 25 year old Series would be a '72, the begining of the real emmisions stuff like air pumps converters etc. All help appreciated and thanks in advance Cheers Chris Van Decar '94 D90 SloMo-Shun VII ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:30:59 -0400 From: Mike Gaines <106220.1234@compuserve.com> Subject: RE:UK Ex-MoD LR Dealers Hi All, Norm lewis asked about the apparent lack of replies fromn the above. I had the same problem about two years ago. having decided my budget and what I wanted (low mileage Slll LtWt) I fax= ed a 'request for proposals' letter to about 6 or 8 , all regular advertiser= s in LRO/LRW. Only Crook Brothers, Brooklyn and the then Lightweight Cent= re bothered to even reply. Crooks got the order two weeks later, a year late= r my other half, Maureen, got a Defender in very nice nick from Brooklyns.= Give Eric or Graham Crook a call, alternatively, the guy to talk to at Brooklyns is Mike, (sorry can't remember his name.he is a great bloke tho= ). When we went in the LtWt to collect Maureen's new toy he said " Seems a shame to take yours back empty" and filled the back with two tow ropes wi= th four D- shackles, 3Jerry cans and four assorted-size ammo boxes. hell of = a guy. Re Camo for Paul Wakefield = Another advantage is that if you get fed up with the truck, increase the insured value and leave it in Kilburn overnight 8>) I have noticed that ex-RAF and RN camo schemes are usually spray applied whereas a lot of army ones appear to be brush painted. While aircraft cam= o schemes are carefully deisgned vehicle schemes appear to be ad-lib. = BTW I've found that its safer to keep your headlights on at all times on country roads to avoid getting head-on overtakers as bonnet mascots, messy. Re my alternator problem, Thanks for the advice but pressure of work (Paris Airshow upcoming) has s= o far prevented further investigation, hopefully tomorrow I'll have a dig about and let you know the outcome. = Cheers, Mike Gaines Slll Lightweight 'Wicked Wanda' ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 11:13:08 +0100 From: The Big Guy <guru@manhole.ow.nl> Subject: Re: WARNING to potential ......... Greetings, The following is in response to the "tongue lashing" I recieved from Mr. Carradine: ::While in the process of getting my SIII ready to be imported into the US, ::my broker spoke with DOT about any problems I may encounter. .... ::So, how did this affect me? I now have to import my 72 109 (with letter ::from LR stating it is indeed a 72) through a "Registered Importer" adding ::2-300$us to the cost of importing my beloved. : There is *no* US law that requires you to use a "Registered Importer" : for a 1972 and earlier vehicle. Due to their age of 25+ years, these : vehicles are exempt from DOT and EPA regulations. The Customs officer : will exempt and clear these vehicles provided you have some (any!) : documentation such as title papers, a bill of sale (easy), or a shipping : manifest with the model, year, and VIN number on it. Besides, *YOU* will : be making a declaration by signing the application forms with your name You are correct about the paperwork needed and the +25yr exemption. You are also correct about importing being easy (I never stated otherwise). Let me reinterate for some who may have misunderstood me: IMPORTING A VEHICLE 25+ YEARS OLD INTO THE US IS A VERY EASY TASK WITH THE PROPER PAPERWORK. The only point I was trying to make is to be sure that the vehicle you're importing is in fact 25+ years old and otherwise CYA with the nessisary contracts. I am not REQUIRED to "IMPORT" the vehicle through an RI. Where is RI comes in is that in this case, they are required to VERIFY that the serial numbers are correct for the vehicle as a knowledgeable agent of the US Gov't. As someone else pointed out, DOT (or EPA for that matter), wouldnt know the difference between a SI and a Defender but an RI would (should). In this case, DOT suspects that there could be a case of fraud based on thier past experiances. They are simply using thier agents to verify that this is not the case, only problem is that I have to pay thier agents in addition to mine. : manifest with the model, year, and VIN number on it. Besides, *YOU* will : be making a declaration by signing the application forms with your name : and address all over them. If the Fed's want, they'll know where to find : you! You are correct, I do make the declaration, and they do know where to find me, BUT they are simply verifying that my declaration is correct before the vehicle leaves port. They could also do this a year from now in which case I would have to bring the vehicl to an RI (thier technical agents in this case) and then maybe find out that the dealer in the UK (had this been the case) had switched numbers in which case I had better exercise my thumb to get home ;-). ::You can heed my advice or not, its up to you. I have experiance importing ::and exporting vehicles so I do know what Im talking about and not just ::repeating what "a friend of a friend" said. : You've just managed to scare the beans out of most everyone! Importing : a 25+ year vehicle into the US is a piece of cake and an entitlement to : every American. Get a spine! The Customs officers we deal with are very : serious about the word "service" in "US Custom's Service", and extremely : friendly yet professional. Where is your "importing/exporting experience" : from, the Netherlands?? My intention is not to scare, IT IS TO PROVIDE TIMELY INFORMATION TO ANYONE CONTEMPLATING IMPORTING A LR THAT MAY HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH AND HAVING THEM LOOSE THIER INVESTMENT WITH NO RECOARSE. What if someone here had unknowingly imported a LR and had it siezed by DOT because they decided to do a "spot check" (which, bottom line, is what is happening here) and found that the numbers had been tampered with? What would your advice be then? You are correct when you say that importing a 25+ vehicle into the US is a piece of cake! I am simply saying that you need to ENSURE that the vehicle is indeed 25+ years old or at least insure that you have some recoarse should it be found otherwise. Mine is simply a word of warning to be careful, and that, at least, DOT is watching specifically the LR community, base on thier past experiance with people who decided to "push the envelope". Now would you rather I had kept my mouth shut so that everyone could live on in "blissful ignorance" until they import one that the dealer ensured them that "customs doesnt know the difference between a 84 and 71 SIII" and then see it siezed at the port!? Bottom line is that it is a "service" to have them verify my vehicle in the port, before its imported and not 6 months down the road. My only complaint is that I have to pay to have this "service" performed. In my case, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that I do indeed have a 72 SIII, others may have been told that "customs never checks, and anyhow wouldnt know the difference anyway". I'm simply warning anyone who wants to listen that customs DOES occasionally check, and they DO know the difference so CYA! What you do with this info is your own business. : Regards, ______ : Michael Carradine [__[__\== 72-88, 89-RR Land Rovers Despite what you may think this is not ment as a flame on Mr. Carradine, he is correct when he says importing is easy. I'm just saying to be careful out there as they ARE watching us. Cheers, Todd ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:24:26 -0400 From: Mike Gaines <106220.1234@compuserve.com> Subject: NON LR CONTENT:LRO NEEDS USA HELP PLEASE Hi All, For business reasons my wife Maureen needs urgently some contac= t names/numbers and any background info you may have [age/size/reliability etc] on a US trucking/hire/freight company called Penske. If anybody can help, please Email Maureen dirct with details on: Maureen.Gaines@RBI.co.uk Many thanks and apologies for the non LR stuff. Cheers Mike Gaines Slll Lightweight `Wicked Wanda' Maurs, TDi Defender `Deffy' [puke] 8>) ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:24:18 -0400 From: Mike Gaines <106220.1234@compuserve.com> Subject: Washing and CDs in Series YoTeriAnn, Cheer up luv, there are, I am sure, several bloody-knuckled engrimed Series owners still on the list. Compared with y= ou lot, I'm a newbie (c 6 months) but I've noticed that in the last six week= s or so there seems to be some leakage from the car owners (Should I wax polish the in- built manicure kit? Who cares?) on the other lists. Maybe = this is a strange phase when everybody's Series LR is actually running s= o they're out enjoying it? (Hah!) = For Jeremy, the best CD for an SI seriuosly is probably a Sony Discman = or similar, hang round neck & plug into head. I just sing out loud as its th= e only place no-one (including me) can hear me. For the correct period = rearlight -- candle in a jamjar? Keep the faith TeriAnn, our Series trucks will still be rovering from crisis to crisis when the cars are a useful source of spares (dip in mud before fitting). See you at Billing. Cheers Mike Gaines Slll Lightweight `Wicked Wanda' ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 12:39:08 -0400 From: David Cockey <dcockey@tir.com> Subject: Re: WARNING to potential SIII buyers and Importers Words, such as "import", occassionally make a difference: > It's probably okay to import > a post-74 LR to other parts of the country, but good 'ol Ca. won't hear of > anything post '74. (as far as Ca. is concerned - if it was sold here during > the year your truck was manufactured, it had better comply with Ca.'s regs, > and if it wasn't, forget it! > Does anybody know if California allows the importing (UK)of Rovers that > are 25 years or older into the state? An individual state has a lot of control over what you do in that state, but none over what you can import into the state unless possesion is illegal. Import control is a federal function. So you should be able to import (physically bring into the state) a LR which you cannot register to drive on public roads in a particular. And you may be able to register a vehicle in a state which you could not import into the US.(An example is a car assembled with recent components by an individual can be registered in Michigan but couldn't be imported as a highway vehicle into the US.) So anyone thinking about importing a LR has two areas of concern: 1) Can I legally import it into the US? Relevant requirements include both emissions and safety. This is a federal government function, and the basic rule is 25 years old. 2) Can I (title and) register it in the desired state? This is a state function, and requirements vary greatly by state, and sometimes by county. If you just want to keep it on display in your house then the state isn't a concern, other than zoning. Regards, David Cockey ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: lndrvr@ldd.net (BRIAN WILLOUGHBY) Subject: Values on used Range Rovers Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 11:11:01 -0500 I found an '87 Range Rover with 97,000 miles on the clock for an even $10,000. I'm unsure of the value of a RR of this vintage and would appreciate any comments. It's in good condition and seems to have been well maintained. I didn't drive it though might if this is a good deal. My '60 Series II is lonely and complains of the language barrier between it and my '63 Volvo PV544. I figure that an RR would make it a nice companion. Thanks for the advice, Brian. ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 03:45:32 -0700 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Series III U-Joints Well the time had come. Took ole Pig out for another run up. Never missed a beat, new engine ran as smooth as silk. Actually had to go up to it to hear if it was still running when I stopped on the road to get smokes. Now listening to the stereo and driving at the same time is easy. Aside from a visit from Mr. Lucas in the stop lights, the only thing bothersome is the vibrations from the drive train ....somewhere. Lock in the front hubs and it's worse, or is it worser(?). I'm thinking u-joints, never replaced any of the four in the last 12 years, so I'm on borrowed time I think. What is a good u-joint replacement? I remeber someone saying that the joints for a 1977 6cyl Blazer will fit nicely. Anyone got better ideas? I'm going to replace all of them, hopefully that will take care of the vibration. Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: b.boehlers@olsy.dk (Bent Boehlers) Subject: engine swap Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:59:07 +0200 Hello! This is send for a freind of me. He have a 110 inch from 87, with a 2,5 litre turbo diesel. He have got his hands on a 300TDI from a Discovery, and would like to put that in his truck. Have anyone tried that before ?? Is there a discription, drawings, photos somewhere on the net ? Happy Rovering Bent Boehlers bent@boehlers-dk.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 04:05:24 -0700 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Exporting....was Warning!... David Cockey wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > Words, such as "import", occassionally make a difference: [ truncated by list-digester (was 32 lines)] > Regards, > David Cockey I'm going to be exporting to the US a 1950 LR Series I. It is not running, so do I have to meet certain requirements, or can I just say it's for parts? Maybe I should tell them I'm having someone rebuild it for me? There are no papers for it as well. Going to tow it behind "Pig" to get it across the border. Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 13:42:19 -0700 From: "Clinton D. Coates" <Clinton_Coates@bc.sympatico.ca> Subject: tippity tappity... Thanks to all for the help on the tapping problems in my truck. I am going to check the tappet clearances one more time, then assume that everything is ok. If the timing gear and chain are ok, and the valve clearances are ok, and the rockers are solid, and the .... it must be ok and I am just being paranoid. It all dates back to when I put the soundproofing in the truck.... Clinton ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 13:49:53 -0700 From: "Clinton D. Coates" <Clinton_Coates@bc.sympatico.ca> Subject: Truck type again Truck type. year: 1961 type: 3 door hard top size: 109" engine: 2.25 7:1 petrol (3 brg) with crane ignition name: Emerson colour: Blue bottom, tatty limestone top current location: Kamloops British Columbia country: Canada shape: Really good (knock on wood) e-mail: Clinton_Coates@BC.Sympatico.CA notes: I really like my truck, really, no, I mean it, honestly... ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 13:51:29 -0700 From: "Clinton D. Coates" <Clinton_Coates@bc.sympatico.ca> Subject: 3.5 l rover motors Is it possible to detune the rover V8 to: a) get better mileage b) not snap series half shafts with merry abandon? c) forget it and drop in the chevy 4cyl instead? ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T. F. Mills" <tomills@odin.cair.du.edu> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 16:07:22 +0000 Subject: Re: Values on used Range Rovers Brian writes: > I found an '87 Range Rover with 97,000 miles on the clock for an even > $10,000. I'm unsure of the value of a RR of this vintage and would > appreciate any comments. It's in good condition and seems to have been > well maintained. An '87 RR with 97,000 just sold in Colorado Springs a couple of weeks ago for about $8,500. (At least that was asking price.) Could this be the same one? It belonged to Air Force Academy cadet who just graduated. T.F. Mills tomills@du.edu http://www.du.edu/~tomills University of Denver Library, Denver, Colorado 80208, USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 01:00:21 -0700 From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> Subject: Re: engine swap Bent Boehlers wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > Hello! [ truncated by list-digester (was 16 lines)] > Bent Boehlers > bent@boehlers-dk.com Dear Bent! I hope your friend is either very anonymous or well paid - the Customs and Taxes (Told & Skat) will love the idea of a new 300tdi in a defender - rumour here in Jutland has it that the going rate for such an upgrade is around 30,000 kroner - but maybe that's just a rumour. Of course it could be that you say "a friend" because of the above factors :-) I have "a friend" who would love to put a 300 TDi into a series 3 - but the cost ! wow good luck - if your friend does have to pay the tax on this one, I'd love to hear what the going rate is - just for "a friend" of mine you understand! Roverlige hilsener, Adrian Redmond --------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL 6 TELEVISION DENMARK (Adrian Redmond) Foerlevvej 6 Mesing DK-8660 Skanderborg Denmark --------------------------------------------------- telephone (office) +45 86 57 22 66 telephone (home) +45 86 57 22 64 telefacsimile / data +45 76 57 24 46 mobile GSM (EFP unit) +45 40 74 75 64 mobile GSM (admin) +45 40 50 22 66 mobile NMT +45 30 86 75 66 e-mail channel6@post2.tele.dk HoTMaiL (www.e-mail) channel6denmark@hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 16:27:23 -0700 From: "Clinton D. Coates" <Clinton_Coates@bc.sympatico.ca> Subject: folding sidestep Has anyone tried to install one of those folding sidesteps to the passenger side of an 88 or 109 that has the passenger under the seat gas tank (this is for a lhd rig)? Or have a truck with such on it? I have mine and a picture from the parts catalogue and after sitting under my truck for about an hour cannot figure out the bracketing. I guess two holes have to be drilled in the sill support. Didn't someone post something on this a year ago or so? Clinton "anyone wanna buy a new folding sidestep?" Coates ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 02:06:40 +0200 From: Floris Houniet <houniet@xs4all.nl> Subject: removing hi-lo gearbox Hi all, I've had a bit of a problem, and I think it is the transfer box that is acting up. I was driving across sand with some steepish inclines when I got stuck in some sand that shouldn't really have posed a problem. I decided to go down the way I came and so selected reverse. (in low). I let the clutch come up but the L-R didn't budge. I expected the wheels would be churning, but they were not moving an inch. Not good for the clutch. Depressed the clutch again only to find the gearbox locked. I stopped the engine and managed to ram the hi-low gear stick into neutral, started the engine, let the clutch come up and this unlocked the main gearbox. I selected High reverse and chugged down the hill with no problems. The whole way home I expected to hear the gearbox disintegrate but it seems fine. I even tried low for a few meters on level ground; no strange noises. Yesterday I changed the oil of the gearboxes, and recovered two 5x4 mm pieces of metal in the transfer oil. Gulp. They look like bendover tabs, this because they are exactly identical and have the thickness of a washer. about 1.5mm. I will probably try to remove the transfer box from the gearbox in the car, any tips? my list so far: 1. remove drive shaft. 2. remove speedo cable and shift levers. 3. read e-mail to find out what to do next.... 3a. remove hand brake ? 3b. remove intermediate gear ? 3c . get to bolts holding the whole thing to the main box? Any tips will be appreciated, Floris, Ser IIa '69 P.s. The sortout in nieuwegein was great, bought far to much, ate to many chips, and got a sun burn. What more do you want! ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 17:29:55 -0700 From: Greg Moore <gmoore@island.net> Subject: Re: folding sidestep Clinton D. Coates wrote: > Has anyone tried to install one of those folding sidesteps... Sounds like something else to grease. Greg 'what's wrong with an overturned bucket, or....' ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 20:51:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Values on used Range Rovers Here in California, people seem to think that, just because they paid upwards of $40,000 for their RR's in 1987, that they can still get $10,000-20,000 for them now - regardless of how many miles they have on them. Granted, in the USA, Range Rovers are not quite as common as they are in the U.K., but, come on people, get real! You won't see anybody pay that much for a Ferrari 308 with that many miles on it! I personally wouldn't pay a dime over $5,000 for one that old, and even then, I would try to talk the price down - it's not like they're collectable or anything. And besides, most of them have NEVER been off-road here - which means that, if you decide to have fun with it, I Guarantee that you'll soon be replacing bushings that have never travelled so far in their life. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 17:52:32 -0700 From: Michael Carradine <cs@crl.com> Subject: Re: Exporting....was Warning!... At 04:05 AM 6/1/97 -0700, Con P. Seitl wrote: :I'm going to be exporting to the US a 1950 LR Series I. It is not :running, so do I have to meet certain requirements, or can I just say :it's for parts? Maybe I should tell them I'm having someone rebuild it :for me? There are no papers for it as well. Going to tow it behind "Pig" :to get it across the border. If the engine is still in it, Customs may presume it is a complete vehicle, driveable or shortly driveable. There are NO import restrictions to the US for *older*than* 25 year old vehicles (or older than 15 years for Canada). For a Land Rover they will nick you 2.5% of it's value. It is not necessary to have registration papers. Lots of equipment is never registered, ie farm tractors, forestry trucks, mining equipment, trucks on farms and private property. However, do get or make up a Bill of Sale with the VIN number and price in US Dollars to establish ther title and value. -Michael ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CIrvin1258@aol.com Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:17:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re:Importing pre-74 LR to Ca... You can import a pre-74 Land Rover to California, but for 1965-1974 it must comply with Federal emissions standards (this MAY change soon, I hope). As I said in another posting, series LR's from that time, complied with all safety standards in effect, so the only thing to look out for, is emissions AND THIS APPLIES TO IMPORTATION OF ASSEMBLED, BUT NON-RUNNING VEHICLES AS WELL! Parts cars (vehicles that have no engine/drivetrain installed) of ANY year, are exempt, PROVIDED they are not re-assembled for street use (in other words, you can import a 1085 110, but once you have it running, you're on your own). About 7 years ago, Sylvester Stallone tried to import 3 Land Rovers - possibly 110's. There was something wrong with the paperwork, and they were held by Customs for 4 (FOUR) years - then re-exported! I never was able to find out exactly what the problem was, BUT, I do know, that after a certain year,(1985 I think) the full roll cage is mandated, and apparently, these trucks didn't have them, and also, there was the emissions problem - they were 4cyl. petrol, and turbo diesel powered. Since they were 110's, and these were obviously not imported at that time, nor were those engines ever imported during those years of manufacture - BANG! Back they went. There is another instance I know of, where a local lad tried to import some 101 Forward Controls, but they caught those pretty quickly, and back they went, too. As somebody else said here - know the rules, and how they're interpreted in your local BEFORE throwing the money down. Charles ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:23:04 -0400 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Carbs and Nigel's Disease Ben Nibali wrote: >Apparently there is a warpage problem which can lead to an extremely rich >mixture if a redundant air passage is not plugged. Yup, there is a warpage problem, caused by the castings *not* being annealed after manufacture. These are actually two separate problems. >I'm wondering how common this really is and if it might also cause the >popping sound I described above. Ummm...unknown. I've run with several 36IV's over the past 25 years, and I've never heard a popping sound. Sucking, grunching, sputtering and hissing, but never popping. >BTW could someone clarify the derivation of the term "Nigel's Disease?" I guess I'm responsible. Russel Dushin was one of the earlier members of this list (still out there Russel? Haven't heard from you in a while) and every time he reported that his trusty 88 - "Nigel" - had thus-and-so a fault, the very same problem would manifest itself in my Rover a week later. I mean, we were talking a perfect 1:1 ratio here. Bloody well pissed me off. ;-) Pretty soon, the phenomena began replicating itself throughout the list. Scary, isn't it? Cheers *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 21:23:08 -0400 From: rover@pinn.net (Alexander P. Grice) Subject: Customs Ned Heite wrote: >Never deal with Customs at night, on weekends, late in the day, Mondays, >or Fridays. I've always found this to be the *best* time to deal with 'em. On the vehicles that i have either imported or drove the chap over that was doing the importing - Fridays after 4 PM are the best. With "Miller Time" approaching, the official wants to send you on your way ASAP, and clearance is the fastest way to do this. Have exact change to make the customs duty and EPA/DoT fees. Last time thru, the agent reported that he takes in millions each day (Portsmouth, VA) yet doesn't have a petty cash drawer for making change! WRT smog/pollution requirements on the 1972 models (the most recent *legal* imports), you'll need a PCV valve, a sealed fuel system and appropriate lights, safety glass and seat belts...except for California. Cheers *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"----* | A. P. (Sandy) Grice | | Rover Owners' Association of Virginia, Ltd. | | 1633 Melrose Parkway, Norfolk, VA 23508-1730 | | E-mail: rover@pinn.net Phone: 757-622-7054 (Day) | | 757-423-4898 (Evenings) FAX: 757-622-7056 | | | *---1972 Series III 88"------1996 Discovery SE-7(m)---* ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 18:46:33 -0800 From: "C. Marin Faure" <faurecm@halcyon.com> Subject: Re: Zenith 361V popping noises From: Ben Nibali <BNibali@dmtn.com> >Some P.O. has installed a Zenith 361V on my '65 SWB. Since I fixed the >exhaust problems (which were monumental) I've had a chance to listen to [ truncated by list-digester (was 9 lines)] >redundant air passage is not plugged. They say one of the symptoms of >this is that the mixture adjusting screw has no discernable effect. >I'm wondering how common this really is and if it might also cause the >popping sound I described above. I've owned a 1973 Series III-88 since new, and except for a couple of years when I ran a Rochester carburetor, it's had a Zenith 36IV. I've run into the warping problem several times, although my current Zenith has so far been okay. The problem is that when the carburetor warps, raw fuel can seep between the upper and lower halves of the carburetor when you are stopped facing uphill. The fuel then runs down a passage into the carburetor throat and causes the engine to run extremely rich. The result is a "chugging" idle at a very low rpm and black smoke from the exhaust. Under extreme conditions it can cause the engine to stop running altogether. As annoying as this is, I have never experienced any popping sound when it's happened. The only cure is to fit a new carburetor or eliminate the warp by re-surfacing the mating faces of the carburetor halves. If they had put a fifth joining bolt at the rear of the carburetor this warping problem would not occur, but they didn't. ________________________ C. Marin Faure (original owner) 1973 Land Rover Series III-88 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 21:51:04 -0400 From: karlsson@edgenet.net (karlsson) Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest >John Wrote: >>As for the rope getting hung up and the consequent mad dash for the engine >>shutoff, I always found it easier to simply disengage the winch. >Nick wrote: >Can you do that with the winch under load? In a word, yes. However, you make a good point. It is more difficult under load, but if you REALLY NEED to stop the winch, you probably won't notice the difference. John ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 21:59:01 -0400 From: Brett Storey <brstore@ibm.net> Subject: Re: Series III U-Joints Con You can get U-joints for a SIII (size 3-7/32) down at your nearest Canadian Tire store. The part # you are after is 15-2151-4. I just picked up a couple last week. Think they were about $16 each. Brett Con P. Seitl wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > Well the time had come. Took ole Pig out for another run up. Never [ truncated by list-digester (was 18 lines)] > Con Seitl > 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 10:08:27 -0700 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Series III U-Joints Brett Storey wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > Con [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 18 lines)] > > Con Seitl > > 1973 III 88 "Pig" Brett: Just the info I was looking for, Thanks. I was heading down to my Crappy Tire store tomorrow anyway to get some Armour-all for the seats. Yea, I know, but it's amazing what you can accomplish with slippery seats ;-> Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 10:16:39 -0700 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Exporting....was Warning!... Michael Carradine wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > At 04:05 AM 6/1/97 -0700, Con P. Seitl wrote: [ truncated by list-digester (was 21 lines)] > US Dollars to establish ther title and value. > -Michael That was another problem. No where is there a VIN # to be had on this beast. It only has a date on the engine that says it was rebuilt ( with the bearing specs) in 1964 from a firm in New Brunswick , Canada, that's probably now defunct. Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 11:00:56 +0800 From: torque@pacific.net.sg (Lawrence Lee, Torque Class Magazine) Subject: Re: Maximum Tyre Size Hi, Does anyone on the list have experience to share on fitting bigger (diameter) tyres? I am currently using 750-16s on the 109 and would like to have a little more ground clearance. What is the maximum size possible without affecting axle articulation and steering. Also are special offset rims needed. Thanks in advance Lawrence Lee Art Director, Torque Class Magazine, MPH Trade Publications (S) Pte Ltd, 12 Tagore Drive, Singapore 787621 Tel: 453 8200 DID: 450 6005 Fax: 453 8600 ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 23:10:06 -0400 From: David Russell <David_R@mindspring.com> Subject: IIA door tops/109 4-sale Is there a canvas door top that can be used w/hard doors? I just finished the article on Herbert Zipkin in LRO and saw his setup for removing his door tops--pretty neat! Sorry if this has been posted already (I'm behind in the digests) but my wife saw the following in The Washington Post: 1967 IIA 109" 3-door, 4 w.d., 6-cyl, winch, OD, exc cond., daily driver, RHD, $8000 obo. Must sell. 202.544.5719 I know nothing more so reply directly if interested. Does this belong to anyone on the list? David Russell David_R@mindspring.com 1969 Series IIA SWB (frameover begun 18 May, 1997) 1977 FJ-40 Land Cruiser (non-running) rusted-out hulk 1996 Grand Cherokee http://www.mindspring.com/~david_r ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 20:50:46 -0700 From: Chris Dow <dow@thelen.org> Subject: Please don't flame me, but.... A friend of mine who's been a great deal of help to me when fixing my Rover has asked me to send theis message, so please, no flames. I have a friend who had a '62 IIA a long time ago (actually, he went to school with Bill C at RPI, when he had his IIA). One of the things he wanted to do back then was to install an overdrive, but he never got around to it. Recently, he gave up searching for another Rover because a particularly well restored (and this is where the no-flames request comes in) FJ40. One thing he noticed wat that there is a similar spot on the gearbox the spot where a Fairy overdrive would go on a Rover. So, he now wonders if a Fairy OD will fit an FJ40. Have any of you heard of this? C ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: b.boehlers@olsy.dk (Bent Boehlers) Subject: RE: Series III U-Joints Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 08:59:45 +0200 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BC6F33.72DE0760" ] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Con P. Seitl[SMTP:seitl@ns.sympatico.ca] I'm thinking u-joints, never replaced any of the four in the last 12 years, so I'm on borrowed time I think. What is a good u-joint replacement? I remeber someone saying that the joints for a 1977 6cyl Blazer will fit nicely. Anyone got better ideas? I'm going to replace all of them, hopefully that will take care of the vibration. To get the vibration away, take care and mark everything during the dismounting. Everything in the transmission is ballanced, if You by accident connect it wrong, You might get realy much vibration, that very fast can destroy the u-joints. Happy Rovering Bent Boehlers bent@boehlers-dk.com ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC6F33.72DE0760 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: application/ms-tnef ] ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 00:02:29 -0700 From: Jeremy John Bartlett <bartlett@slip.net> Subject: Re: folding sidestep Clinton D. Coates wrote: > snip > Has anyone tried to install one of those folding sidesteps to the > passenger side of an 88 or 109 that has the passenger under the seat gas > tank (this is for a lhd rig)? snip > I guess two holes have to be drilled in the sill support. Yes you have to do some drilling. I've installed these but not on a side tank vehicle (109SW). cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: b.boehlers@olsy.dk (Bent Boehlers) Subject: RE: engine swap Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 09:14:48 +0200 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BC6F35.6CB3BE00" ] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Adrian Redmond[SMTP:channel6@post2.tele.dk] Dear Adrian! I am sorry to say, it is not me, that got that machine. But I would have loved to change my V8 to a diesel, because of the tax on petrol in Denmark. But the cost against the better km/litre is not giving enough, I am mostly doing short trips in Copenhagen. It is someone from the eastern sealand part of the Danish Land-Rover Club, and he do not have internet access. good luck - if your friend does have to pay the tax on this one, I'd love to hear what the going rate is - just for "a friend" of mine you understand! I do not think it will ever be payed, the idea is to use it for off-road competitions. Happy Rovering Bent Boehlers bent@boehlers-dk.com ------ =_NextPart_000_01BC6F35.6CB3BE00 [digester: Removing section of: Content-Type: application/ms-tnef ] ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 23:59:54 -0700 From: Michael Carradine <cs@crl.com> Subject: CB40 may not be sold in US Detroit Auto News reports on http://detnews.com/AUTOS/9612/11/talk/talk.htm "Rover executives in Britain say the new company's new Land Rover Heartland, a compact sport-ute better known by its code name CB40, may not be sold in the United States after production begins in late 1997." Could it be because Honda is making a new truck that looks just like it for around $20K, as does Toyota RAV4 and the new Kia from Korea? -Michael ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 01:44:40 -0100 From: Alan DuBoff <aland@ibm.net> Subject: Re: CB40 may not be sold in US At 11:59 PM 6/1/97 -0700, Michael Carradine wrote: > "Rover executives in Britain say the new company's new > Land Rover Heartland, a compact sport-ute better known > by its code name CB40, may not be sold in the United > States after production begins in late 1997." I have to wonder if these guys are even making $$$s. When you consider the enormous amount of warranty work along with the dropping sales, it just doesn't seem to add up. They do seem to be selling Discos, which would appear to be their bread and butter at this point. Defenders probably cost them too much time and labor to build, most likely why they don't have very many of them. > Could it be because Honda is making a new truck that looks > just like it for around $20K, as does Toyota RAV4 and the > new Kia from Korea? All the reports seemed to imply that the Freeloader was better offroad than the competition, but who knows. I'm sure the competition can eat LR for breakfast (they seem like a poorly managed company), but I expected to see better results from BMW. BMW probably figures they can build a new UTE in the same time it would take to get the Freeloader to market, so whats the point...I thought it looked nice, much like a mini Disco that is missing the aquarium windows (that don't act much like an aquarium...most seem to leak! ;-) Alan DuBoff Software Orchestration, Inc. aland@ibm.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T. F. Mills" <tomills@odin.cair.du.edu> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 02:11:16 +0000 Subject: Re: CB40 may not be sold in US Michael Carradine writes: [ Detroit Auto News reports on [ http://detnews.com/AUTOS/9612/11/talk/talk.htm [ "Rover executives in Britain say the new company's new [ Land Rover Heartland, a compact sport-ute better known [ by its code name CB40, may not be sold in the United [ States after production begins in late 1997." [ Could it be because Honda is making a new truck that looks [ just like it for around $20K, as does Toyota RAV4 and the [ new Kia from Korea? That was last December -- rather stale news. The CB40 is now officially the "Freelander". Latest news is that LRNA didn't want it in the US -- at least intially -- because it would undercut the success of the Disco. Rover Group has indicated it will do some gentle arm-twisting with LRNA. T.F. Mills tomills@du.edu http://www.du.edu/~tomills University of Denver Library, Denver, Colorado 80208, USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: marsden@digicon-egr.co.uk (Richard Marsden) Subject: Re: Zenith 361V popping noises Date: Mon, 2 Jun 97 9:13:23 BST > >Some P.O. has installed a Zenith 361V on my '65 SWB. Since I fixed the > >exhaust problems (which were monumental) I've had a chance to listen to [ truncated by list-digester (was 21 lines)] > halves. If they had put a fifth joining bolt at the rear of the carburetor > this warping problem would not occur, but they didn't. In my case, I had these symptoms (except the popping) because of faulty gaskets on the "Economy Device" - the little triangular bit. No hole was visible in the economy diaphraghm. The O-ring was replaced too, and you wouldn't believe the difference - all for 5 bits out of a 7 quid overhaul kit! UK Zeniths should have the hole blocked if bought and/or fitted by a Landy garage (both SIII parts book and Haynes show the "factory plug"). Also, mine was 6 months old, so body warping seemed unlikely. Richard (ex-Gurkha SIII 109 FFR) ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: Queen's Birthday Long Weekend Trip - Brindabella Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 17:47:00 +1000 For those Aussies who might be going to the Brindabella Range near Canberra next weekend, if you see a Caspian Blue Rangie (possibly with an odd-looking home-made jerry can holder on the back tow hitch mount) and in company with some J*panese 4WDs, it may be me. Say hello. Best Regards, Ron Beckett Editor Hillman Owners Club Of Australia Newsletter "Hillmanews" Emu Plains, Australia '87 Range Rover 4.8L auto '67 Hillman Gazelle '71 Hillman Hunter Royal 660 - for pictures see http://www.brigadoon.com/~craigb/hillman/hunter.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 12:37:36 +0200 (MET DST) From: Terje Krogdahl <terje@multix.no> Subject: Re: removing hi-lo gearbox On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Floris Houniet wrote: > Yesterday I changed the oil of the gearboxes, and recovered two 5x4 mm > pieces of metal in the transfer oil. Gulp. They look like bendover tabs, > this because they are exactly identical and have the thickness of a > washer. about 1.5mm. Hmmm... never been too far inside a IIa box, but I think this applies: On the rear end of the mainshaft (which comes out of the main box and into the transfer box) there is a big nut, held in place by a washer with tabs like the ones you describe. On my SIII gearbox, and a friends, the tabs on the washer have broken. Not the end that bends over the nut, but the two tabs that enter the gear on the shaft to keep the washer from moving. This failure causes the nut to loosen, which in turn allows the mainshaft to move a bit backwards and forwards, which in turn may lead to strange things happening inside the main box, such as two gears engaging at the same time. To check this, leave the box in the vehicle, undo the rear cover / remove overdrive (as applicable), uncrew the nut. Use a hammer and a chisel if you don't have the special tool. Remove the broken lock washer, add a new one, tighten up, replace all parts and off you go. Any IIa hacks out there, please correct me if this is different on the IIa box. Rgds, Terje Krogdahl 1972 SIII 88" 2.25 petrol telnet 144.92.240.17 666 **--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**-- Terje Krogdahl NetCenter AS Phone +47 6711 3500 E-Mail: terje@multix.no Lysaker Torg 25 Fax +47 6711 3501 N-1324, Lysaker Direct +47 6711 3657 ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 18:43:40 -0700 From: "Con P. Seitl" <seitl@ns.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: removing hi-lo gearbox Terje Krogdahl wrote: > New ! Improved ! http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/ > On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Floris Houniet wrote: [ truncated by list-digester (was 40 lines)] > E-Mail: terje@multix.no Lysaker Torg 25 Fax +47 6711 3501 > N-1324, Lysaker Direct +47 6711 3657 The tabs may also be of the longer tabed washer that should be replaced with a short tab washer when fitting the overdrive. Could the last one in the box inadvertantly left the long one instead, and these are now the tabs tha are trying to escape? Just a thought! Con Seitl 1973 III 88 "Pig" ( with Overdrive ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 41 lines 1942 [forwarded 219 whitespace 395] Output: lines 1348 [content 915 forwarded 77 (cut 142) whitespace 358][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970602 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|