[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "Beckett, Ron" [rbeckett | 25 | More pix to come. |
2 | QROVER80@aol.com | 13 | Sighting old d 110 |
3 | car4doc [car4doc@concent | 18 | Re: D-110 doors |
4 | David Place [dplace@mb.s | 21 | Re: Spring lift |
5 | David Place [dplace@mb.s | 25 | Re: 2.25L Engine Questions (Crank) |
6 | David Place [dplace@mb.s | 20 | Re: Spring lift |
7 | "Mark Gehlhausen" [Gehl@ | 16 | Brake Flaring Question |
8 | Paul Oxley [paul@adventu | 17 | Re: Spring lift |
9 | NADdMD@aol.com | 16 | Blue Brick: No longer for sale |
10 | "S. Vels" [S.Vels> | 63 | Re: Help!!! SOLEX 361V advice? |
11 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 21 | Re: Spring lift |
12 | twakeman@scruznet.com (T | 22 | Re: Spring lift |
13 | lopezba@atnet.at | 59 | Re: Suspension |
14 | rhodesia@juno.com (Chris | 11 | [not specified] |
15 | Erik van Dyck [erikvandy | 23 | Re: Tow Bars |
16 | Zophy@aol.com | 7 | Re: resend of suspension question |
17 | hstin@cts.com (Henry Sti | 18 | Series IIa 109 Ambulance |
18 | Donald Abbot [donald@bat | 20 | re: Help, I'm rolling and I can't stop! |
19 | Lloyd Allison [lloyd@cs. | 9 | Austins |
From: "Beckett, Ron" <rbeckett@nibupad.telstra.com.au> Subject: More pix to come. Date: Sat, 08 Mar 97 22:42:00 EST I've got rid of the scanner I bought 2 weeks ago and bought a new Hewlett Packard. 5p scanner. Hopefully it will last longer and do better scans. I 'll redo the ones I did last week and I'get them up somewhere. Dixon Kenner has offered to post them on the LR FAQ site. I 'll get them to you real soon now, Dixon. And for those who need to know what the Austin Gypsy and Champs are, I'm sure I can scan somehting that will show the difference 8->. (These should not be confused with the New Zealand made vehicle that looks awfully like a LR and Gypsy. Jeez, what was it called? Dave Nalder, do you know? I know, now you all want me to find a pix of that to scan as well! No?? Regards, Ron Beckett ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: QROVER80@aol.com Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 07:58:20 -0500 (EST) Subject: Sighting old d 110 Sighting On our way up to Boston on I 84 yesterday we passed a Defender 110 5-door county with Connecticut plates. It was NOT a NADA ! Probably about a 1985 or so. Might be a diesel (we passed it in a diesel rabbit :-) Even Flo liked it. Anybody on the list? Rgds Quintin Can I have one please, I promise to feed it........ :-) ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 08:01:58 -0600 From: car4doc <car4doc@concentric.net> Subject: Re: D-110 doors Hi All, I have a question about 110 doors fitting on a 109. It is my understanding that the 110 windshield is taller & the front of the roof differant. Doesn't this change the door height as well or did the 110 just have a taller roof. Rollup windows would be so nice that I have been thinking about this since I saw a complete set of 110 ten doors in the used parts of Rn's page. (there is a lot of 24v stuff cheap as well if anyone needs that) I have seen the d90 door tops on series doors & I am guessing the door latch is the only reason you could not change the door bottom. Can those latches fit the series door frame? Regards Rob Davis_chicago ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 09:28:17 -0800 From: David Place <dplace@mb.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Spring lift TeriAnn Wakeman wrote: > At 9:40 PM 3/6/97 -0800, David Place wrote: > > Is this just a common way to raise the [ truncated by list-digester (was 17 lines)] > Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and > twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" Well it took TeriAnn to make me realize that of course she is right. Well then what were these blocks doing? Someone went to a lot of trouble to put them in with longer shackle bolts and all. The vehicle had 15" tyres when I bought it and it hadn't been beaten up like it had been an industrial model but more likely someones everyday driver. I had a good laugh on myself when I finally thought this problem out. Glad I wasn't the one who made the blocks, installed them and THEN found out that the laws of physics hadn't been recinded. Was he related? Must be the long cold winter :-) :-) Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 09:34:21 -0800 From: David Place <dplace@mb.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: 2.25L Engine Questions (Crank) David Cockey wrote: > > Crankshaft > > - I've heard of using 2.25 Diesel cranks in Petrol engines. What are [ truncated by list-digester (was 11 lines)] > Regards, > David Cockey I did the conversion in my 88 when I rebuilt it. I did it because my original was scored. I phoned one of the Land Rover suppliers, I thing Atlantic British since I bought most of my stuff from them and was told it was a stronger crank and it fit so go ahead and use it. I have about 4000 miles on it and it works fine. One thing I tried and didn't like was I used the heavier bull nose crank pully. I eventually took it off. I thought it just didn't run the same with it on and after changing it I seemed to think it was a better match. I changed a few other things like putting the longer oil fill pipe on with the pressureized cap. The old one pused on and this one is flatter and you twist it to lock it on. I don't know that it makes any difference but I feed the little hose back into the engine so I have a bit of polution control to make me fee better. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 09:23:14 -0800 From: David Place <dplace@mb.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: Spring lift Paul Oxley wrote: > David Place wrote: > > John Ousterhout asked an interesting question. I posted an E-mail in [ truncated by list-digester (was 18 lines)] > Paul Oxley > http://www.adventures.co.za Well, the whole axle is being lifted toward the body while the connection point is staying down at its usual level. The dif whould then be higher in relation to the ground. The problem however is you are cutting down on the size of tyre you could put on. I have full 16" ones on and it worked fine with the blocks in. The only difference I have noticed is that the tyre doesn't hit my aux. heater hoses which enter through the wheel arch into the seat box. Driving isn't any different. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mark Gehlhausen" <Gehl@sphinx.crane.navy.mil> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 23:01:58 -500 Subject: Brake Flaring Question Thanks for the brake flare tool responses. I have a couple of kits sighted. In past years, I have just purchased the nearest size tube and made it fit. Works, but does not look factory. On the bench, I believe I can competently make a double flare, but are the ready-made ends inherently superior to any hand-made flare? Should I just buy a good coiler and creatively loop the excess in ready-made lines? I could make LR loopy pipe art! All comments invited. Mark PS. What and where used are ISO flares? Are these AKA "bubble flares"? ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 18:05:22 +0200 From: Paul Oxley <paul@adventures.co.za> Subject: Re: Spring lift David Place wrote: > I had a good laugh on myself when I finally thought this problem out. > Glad I wasn't the one who made the blocks, installed them and THEN found > out that the laws of physics hadn't been recinded. Was he related? > Must be the long cold winter :-) :-) Dave VE4PN Glad you're back with us David, you had us worried there for awhile. Regards Paul Oxley http://www.adventures.co.za ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: NADdMD@aol.com Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 12:07:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: Blue Brick: No longer for sale Hi all, The Brick is off the market. He's staying home. There was an issue of conflicting family philosophy over how (or how much) spare time should be spent on various endeavors. When the wife saw my "solution" she was horrified. Therefore, the Brick gets to stay! : ) Sorry for the bandwidth Nate NADdMD ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "S. Vels" <S.Vels> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 19:15:30 +0000 Subject: Re: Help!!! SOLEX 361V advice? > From: Adrian Redmond <channel6@post2.tele.dk> > According to the manual (danish) there should be an electrical cutoff on > The manual refers to a charcoal filter - I cannot find it! where should > Above the inlet manifold, on the lower casting of the carb. there is a > "nozzle" which appears to be a connection for a rubber tube - it is All the above mentioned gadgets are all part of the emission control scheme forced upon some markets. Eqipment like this is very rare on Danish landies. > There is a metal pipe running from the distributor to the carb - > what does this do? It is the tube for the vacuum advance in the distributor. It uses the vacuum in the carbrettor to adjust timing relative to RPM. >How does one correctly adjust the advance/retard screw on > the distributor? You turn the whole distributor to set the timing. Then you use this vernier for the final fine adjustments. It can also be used if you refuel with different octane fuel from time to time. If you can't turn it, it might be corroded in place. If you turn it and timing doesn't change, the spring that retains the plate might be broken. I drove around with a broken spring for some time when i had a Lucas dist. > How long (at 8-12 =A6C) do you normally have to have the choke pulled to > prevent stalling? When the choke on this vehicle is pulled, the carb is Pull the choke all the way to start. Run for about five seconds and then push the choke to stabilise slightly above normal (hot) RPM. Push the choke in gradually when driving witout stalling the engine at traffic lights. Choke should normally be used within 2 minutes from start. Running with the choke longer than nescecarry will cause wear on the cylinder walls because the petrol will clean the oil film off the walls. > Are there > any adjustments to the carb which i should make - how does one tune a > carb properly. Make sure timing is adjusted. Adjust the idle screw to stabilise the engine at 500 rpm. Adjust the mixture screw to get the highest possible rpm. Then adjust the idle screw again (500 rpm). Do his a couple of times. Then finally turn the mixture screw half a turn i and adjust rpm to a smooth idle little above where it stalls. > Can anyone offer any sound advice (other than changing the carb for a > weber?) please!!! Take the car to Marius and get a full tune-up of points, plugs, timing, mixture and idle on dynamic test equipment. Fuel savings will pay for this in no time. ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 12:23:32 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: Spring lift At 9:28 AM 3/8/97 -0800, David Place wrote: >Well then what were these blocks doing? Someone went to a lot of >trouble to put them in with longer shackle bolts and all. ; Dave Here's a thought. What if the Land Rover was just a tad too tall to fit in a PO's garage and he lowered the body slightly to get it to fit? >From listeniing to some of the discovery people. I'm almost suprised that there are not a bunch going around with a coil or two cut off their suspensions to fit garages. TeriAnn Wakeman "Large format photographers look Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 12:33:08 -0800 From: twakeman@scruznet.com (TeriAnn Wakeman) Subject: Re: Spring lift At 9:23 AM 3/8/97 -0800, David Place wrote: >Well, the whole axle is being lifted toward the body while the >connection point is staying down at its usual level. The dif whould >then be higher in relation to the ground. Ahh another person who thinks th Land Rover is the centre of the universe and that everything is attacted to it. The body is lowered to the diff which remains tHe same distance from The ground as long as you do not change tyre size, jack it up, change the tyre pressure or whatever. The tyres do not float up into the air if you decrease the distance between the axles and the LR body. TeriAnn Wakeman "Large format photographers look Santa Cruz California at the world upside down and twakeman@scruznet.com backwards" ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 21:42:10 +0100 From: lopezba@atnet.at Subject: Re: Suspension Clayton Kirkwood <kirkwood@kirkwood-desk.fm.intel.com> complained: >I sent this out several days ago, but received not one answer so let me ask >again... Maybe the reason was that nobody knows what kind of vehicle you are talking about... >Ok, so I've been replacing parts all over, and have the beasty running ok >(but still having the dickens of a time with getting the brakes to work >right). I am wanting to understand whether the suspension needs to be >replaced. So... >How does one know if the leaf springs should be replaced? Is there a certain >height some component should be above another or the ground? If this is a Series vehicle, a Rule of Thumb would be that there should be about four to five inches between the rear axle and the rubber bump on the chassis, maybe a little more in a 107 or 109 (unloaded). In the front, there should be about the same or a little more clearance between the axle and the frame. The spring leaves should not be splayed, but the ends of the shorter leaves should touch the longer springs above. Inserting graphite between the leaves makes the ride smoother, btw. Avoid grease, it captures dust and grit and grinds down the leaves. >The bottom plate under the springs, and where the shocks attach down low, is >bent, or so it seems. BP doesn't sell these bottom plates. Are they supposed >to be bent? It looks like the shocks were fully compressed in offroading, >hard!! and bent that plate. Unlikely. If the shocks had ever been fully compressed, they would not have bent the plate; had they been overcompressed, they would have broken, but still not bent the plate. It could have been hit by a rock and bent, of course. Maybe describe the suspected damage in a little more detail. The plate shold be bent downwards evenly at the front and rear, and it should be available as a spare part. >I presume that the way to determine if the shocks need to be replaced is by >the jumping on the bumper test: if it continues to undulate, then replace. >Mine aren't undulating particularly, but I assume they are pretty old. Shocks on most Series vehicles get very little work since the springs are so stiff that the shock does not move more than an inch or so under normal circumstances. This is also a reason why the time-honoured method of jumping on the bumper does not really work in a Series L-R; you would have to be pretty heavy to affect the compression of the springs, or the shocks, more than an eight of an inch or so. The only method for testing the shocks that I know of is removing them and compressing and expanding them by hand. Age doesn't really mean anything, mine are 39 years old and working fine. Hope this helps - please be more specific! Good Land-Rovering Peter Hirsch Vienna, Austria Series One 107in Station Wagon (in bits and pieces) ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:57:06 PST Subject: Re: subscribing From: rhodesia@juno.com (Chris R Whitehead) Please send me the info for subscribing to this list. I hava friend here who wants to subscribe and for the life of me I cannot remember how to do it. Cheers Chris W ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 18:01:12 -0500 (EST) From: Erik van Dyck <erikvandyck@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Tow Bars I've been considering using a tow bar attached to the front bumper of my '73 Series III 88" to tow the truck behind my Volvo. That way the family can join me on a trail ride four hours away without being subjected to four hours of Buzz, Moan, and Whine ("BMW" noises). Then I also won't have to drive home with muddy brakes grinding away for several hundred miles. The problem is that the center of the front bumper is 21 inches above the ground, the center of the car's hitch reciever is about 10 inches lower. Draw bars to raise or lower the towing ball a few inches higher or lower are available, but not ten inches. Anyone face this dilemma and conquer it?? I understand that the tow bar's lock is at the rear of the socket, so too much angularity will result in the lock not being secure under the rear of the ball. The trailer hitch probably wouldn't like the angled pull either. I know the answer is to get a higher tow vehicle (a Discovery?), but that's not the answer I can afford! Sincerely, erik Erik van Dyck Stone Mountain, Georgia ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Zophy@aol.com Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 18:00:12 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: resend of suspension question how do you cancel this mail? ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 23:41:45 -0800 (PST) From: hstin@cts.com (Henry Stinson) Subject: Series IIa 109 Ambulance Hello, Well my search for a Series Rover to convert to an Off-Road camper continues. I have come across a Series IIa Ambulance here in the US but have had difficulty finding any information on this model. Has the weight of the ambulance back made the vehicle impossible to handle off-road? Is the back steel or aluminum? If steel, has anyone attempted to replace these panels with aluminum? How adversly effected is the vehicles payload due to the back? What is the vehicles top speed and fuel consumption? I know nothing about this particular model. Is there an ambulance home page on the net? I realize these questions appeal more to the European members, but, any help from anywhere would be greatly appreciated! Henry Stinson ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Donald Abbot <donald@bateleur.co.za> Subject: re: Help, I'm rolling and I can't stop! Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 10:02:17 -0000 Ray, It is strange that you braking problem happened so suddenly. Was there air in the system when you bled it? If so, a complete overhaul of the system is required - replace all seals, hone every cylinder and put in new hydraulic fluid. If you didn't notice any air, take a look at the thickness of the brake shoe linings. I was, until recently, happily pumping two or three times before getting any reaction. A grinding noise from the back led me to take off the drums to find that I was grinding away at the shoes. After replacing the shoes (bonded linings) I now do not have to pump at all! Hope this helps Donald PS I hope you know about the brake shoe adjusters. ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 21:17:32 +1100 (EST) From: Lloyd Allison <lloyd@cs.monash.edu.au> Subject: Austins There are some examples of Austin Champs and Gipsies at http://www.sofcom.com.au/4WD/vehicle.html Lloyd ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF * LIST DIGEST Input: messages 19 lines 736 [forwarded 87 whitespace 158] Output: lines 560 [content 304 forwarded 53 (cut 34) whitespace 147][ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 970309 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|