[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | eheite@dmv.com | 22 | Oil in gearboxes |
2 | "Bobeck, David R." [dbob | 29 | Re: Oil in gearboxes |
3 | JDolan2109@aol.com | 31 | Re: Frame Dimentions... |
4 | Lloyd Allison [lloyd@cs. | 18 | Royal Rovers, and also 6x6 |
5 | DANIEL OPPENHEIM [daniel | 20 | Insurance for your truck |
6 | Michel Bertrand [mbertra | 31 | Re: Royal Rovers, and also 6x6 |
7 | Dion Mikkelsen [mikkelsd | 44 | Softtop LR's |
8 | ricky@drift.demon.co.uk | 20 | Speedo troubles |
9 | "Deanna D. Sitter" [lani | 52 | Electronic Ignitions |
10 | Solihull@aol.com | 10 | Re: Speedo woes from darkest BC |
From: eheite@dmv.com Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 08:16:38 -0400 Subject: Oil in gearboxes Larry Magpanty's comment on the lack of oil in his overdrive led me to thinking about my recent experience with my transfer box. Like Larry, I decided to change the ninety-weight, so I bought a really fine pump and went to it. By the way, Forestry Suppliers has an excellent hand piston pump for less than $25. Anyway, I opened the transfer box and some disgusting black glop fell out. After wrestling off the drain plugs, I pumped ninety-weight into all the working parts underneath. Next day, there was a rectangular spot of oil on the driveway, exactly the size and shape of the cover under the transfer box. This persisted for several days, until the oil level in the transfer box was down way below the fill hole. I know it is supposed to leak oil. The official manual says you protect the starter with oil leaking from the rear main bearing! But did I damage the transfer gearbox by draining off the glop? ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 96 08:57:08 EST From: "Bobeck, David R." <dbobeck@inetgate.ushmm.org> Subject: Re: Oil in gearboxes Larry Magpanty's comment on the lack of oil in his overdrive led me to thinking about my recent experience with my transfer box. Like Larry, I decided to change the ninety-weight, so I bought a really fine pump and went to it. By the way, Forestry Suppliers has an excellent hand piston pump for less than $25. Anyway, I opened the transfer box and some disgusting black glop fell out. After wrestling off the drain plugs, I pumped ninety-weight into all the working parts underneath. Next day, there was a rectangular spot of oil on the driveway, exactly the size and shape of the cover under the transfer box. ..snip.. I know it is supposed to leak oil. The official manual says you protect the starter with oil leaking from the rear main bearing! But did I damage the transfer gearbox by draining off the glop? Sounds to me like the goop was in there so long it turned into a goopy mess that was too thick to leak out. Try tightening up the screws on the x-fer box pan. Mine were very loose once when I checked them. If that doesn't work then you may need to take it off and redo the gasket. Make sure if you use gasket sealer that it goes inside of the bolt holes, otherwise it'll just seep around the bolts... Cheers Dave "or just let it leak" B. ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: JDolan2109@aol.com Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 09:01:42 -0400 Subject: Re: Frame Dimentions... Thanks for the input about the rear frame/bushing mount for springs on a 88". I replaced the springs not too long ago (maybe 2 years?), as they seemed to be sagged out, but the new ones assumed the same profile in very little time, and the shackle was again in near proximity to the crossmember. The new springs ("genuine parts") might have actually been weaker than the ones that were replaced which were also most likely "genuine parts". Is there any feedback available on domestic vs. British/genuine parts springs? My strongest suspicion is that during a rear crossmember replacement, by a PO, the required dimensions were deviated from, and the bushings are not correctly placed. I guess I'll have to lift it up and measure it to know definately; right now the axle case obscures getting an accurate measurement as it sits on the ground. 'Nicky' does get regularly overloaded with 6' logs and then driven (sometimes very 'offroad') out of the woodlot, but the problem existed before those conditions/loads were applied. I realize it must aggravate any existing problems, and I usually remove the load as soon as possible, but I don't tend to get very frantic about it. It's looking like it's going to take an afternoon with the electric wrench to put things right. I was becoming optomistic when I saw the mention of bushing differences for the different frames... Now it's sounding like a good project for say, maybe next year?... Might the longer shackles help(I know that's hard to say without seeing the situation), and what are the deleterious effects of their prolonged use? see 'ya on the old road... Jim '61 LR 88" SW w/ 16's, OD 1 Bbl weber (econobox?) "Nicky" LR...quite possibly one of the best machines yet devised! ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:51:12 +1000 (EST) From: Lloyd Allison <lloyd@cs.monash.edu.au> Subject: Royal Rovers, and also 6x6 1. re oz 6x6 There is a picture of the rear suspension of a 6x6 at <URL:http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeLand-Rover/Perentie/> it is quite cunning. 2. Richard Hughes (he of Minerva's) is researching Royal and Parade Rovers and is seeking more information about them ... 100601.506@CompuServe.COM 3. re the S1 stn wgns - the 107 sw (Meccano kit) continued for a while after the SII models came in Lloyd ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 07:37:20 -0700 From: DANIEL OPPENHEIM <daniel5@best.com> Subject: Insurance for your truck Help! I'm trying to go through AAA (American Automobile Assn.) to get insurance for Kermit, my '65 Ser IIA 88" Station Wagon. They claim the "gold book" value is a maximum of $3500. I need no insure it for significantly more than that. They said in the event of an accident,IF I can provide proof of its actual value, they'll reimburse me for same. They also mentioned that I might need to find a specialty carrier that covers antiques or fully restored cars. It's way expensive and I also loose all the advantages of my AAA membership (2nd car discount, road service, maps, etc.) What are you all doing to get appropriate coverage for the actual value, or true value of your trucks? Please advise. Thanks a ton... Daniel J. Oppenheim Oppenheim Associates - A Managment Consulting Firm based in San Fransisco daniel@mgmtconsult.com phone: (415) 282-5500 fax: (415) 282-5005 1965 Ser IIA 88", "Kermit" ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 12:05:39 -0400 From: Michel Bertrand <mbertran@InterLinx.qc.ca> Subject: Re: Royal Rovers, and also 6x6 >2. Richard Hughes (he of Minerva's) is researching Royal and Parade > Rovers and is seeking more information about them ... > 100601.506@CompuServe.COM The only Royal Rover that I know of in Canada is is the Eastern Townships. It is a 1964 (I think) 109 SW that was used by Prince Philip in 1965 or so on a fishing trip in the Northern Quebec. It is now owned by somebody in Montreal and is currently under a complete restoration. The vehicle was brought in over there and stayed there everafter, until it was brought back south. No salt in that area,(actually, nothing except trees and lakes), the frame is very good. Personnally, I think it looks cool with the royal emblems on the front doors. I could try to get the serial number, if somebody is interested. If I have a good memory, it had a few add-ons, such as fishing-rod racks and nicer seats. I'll have to check. Take care, Michel Bertrand Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, 1963 109 PU (Rudolph) 1968 109 SW (in the works) 1973 88 SW (21st century project) mbertran@interlinx.qc.ca <<---- Note new address! ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 00:28:28 +1100 From: Dion Mikkelsen <mikkelsd@topaz.cqu.edu.au> Subject: Softtop LR's Hi everyone. I'll skip the usual lines about this being my first post etc, and get to the meat of the question. :) Basically, I was wondering how everyone who owns a softop LR finds them as everyday transport (if they get used fo that reason). This is for two reasons. The road noise. Yes I have experienced a "vintage" LR at full flight, but was wondering if it gets any worse with a softop. Also, how stable are the tops. Majoirty of use at 70 kph but occasionally on the open highway at 110kph. Secondly, how about security ? I know you can get lock boxes, lock the seats down and remove the master key, but security for oddments in the cabin as well as "silly vandalism" such as pointless ripping of the top, ripping seats and breaking stuff in general. Or is it not as bad as I envisage. I would be using it everyday and it would be left sitting at the university for long periods as well as at a busy shopping centre. Any help would be greatly appreciated, either to the list or via email. I know that a hard top would be more practical, but the soft top has a lot of appeal. And I don't really want to have to change them over all the time. The soft top is idea for our climate :) Again, thanks for any help. Dion Mikkelsen. -------------------------------------------------------------------- A friend of mine once sent me a postcard with a picture of the entire earth taken from space. On the back it said " ... wish you were here .... " -------------------------------------------------------------------- Dion Mikkelsen 2nd year B. Electrical Engineering email me at mikkelsd@topaz.cqu.edu.au URL http://cq-pan.cqu.edu.au/students/dionm1/index.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 18:24:51 GMT From: ricky@drift.demon.co.uk (Rick Turner) Subject: Speedo troubles Check that your speedo cable hasn't sheared - they tend to do so where the cable comes through the bulkhead, or about 5cm down from the end that fits into the speedometer itself (the rounded end is normal, by the way). Try turning the end gently while the vehicle is stationary and if it turns freely, the cable is sheared.... If the cable is intact, check that the fitting that holds the other end onto the side of the gearbox (at the back) is done up tight. If the cable is ok and the fitting is tight, undo the gearbox end and make sure that the splines on the shaft are not warn - if they are, replace the cable. BTW, this fitting is a bitch to refit correctly, especially if you have an overdrive fitted. Rick Turner (1984 109 H/top and 1979 109 Safari station wagon) ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 11:52:22 -0800 From: "Deanna D. Sitter" <lani@alaska.net> Subject: Electronic Ignitions I've beeb running an electronic Ignition for a couple years now. What I did was get rid of the Lucas distributor and fit a General Motors HEI system, which is regarded as one the best ignitions out there. It is not hard, although it does require some machine work so it will be more expensive than building your own(Unless you are friends with a machinist). Rover fit a distributor to these engines by the use of an adapter. I simply made a different adapter. The distributor to use is a mid 70's to very early 80's vacum advance HEI unit from a Oldsmobile V-8. Use the Olds unit because it is designed to turn counter clockwise, which is what we need. Most all of the other HEI units turn clockwise. Use a cap from a GM 151 4cyl engine with coil inegral to the cap, Chevy citations used these as well as others. The cap will fit the distributor body with no problems. converting the 8cyl dist. to 4cyl is easy. HEI uses a magnetic pick-up system. The shaft has 8 triangular points that line up with 8 triangular points on a ring in the distributor body. Using the 4cyl cap and a rotor it is easy to find which points are not needed. grind them off. It is best to fit a vacum advance canister from a 4cyl, or beeter yet get an adjustable unit from someone like Accell. Using the old Rover distributor and adapter as a model you will need to shorten the Olds dist. body very slightly. The Rover drive gear will fit the Olds shaft, just be careful how you orient the drive grear as it will determine how the distributor is oriented(i.e. which way the vacum canister is pointed ect.). For the adapter I started out with a triangle piece of 1/2" steel cut using the Rover dist. adapter gasket as a template. Into the middle of this is inserted a piece of tubing sized to fit the Olds dist. body. Remember to use the Rover Parts as a pattern to get the depth right. The Rover hold down can be reused, you will have to bend it open, fit it around the dist. body and then bend it closed. Drill and tap a hole in the 1/2" plate for a stud to afix the hold down. For plug wires I used a cut to fit set for HEI aplications from Jacobs, lots of people offer them. It sounds kind of complicated, but it is not to bad and a good learning experience. I know I haven't been overly detailed, but it is best to research it yourself. I just wanted to provide enough info to let people know it is possible. The advantages of the GM unit over other electronic ignitions are adapability and parts availability. All of the distributors in this family, 4-6-8 cyl share parts, this lowers production costs for GM. Most of the speed parts for the small block Chevy will work in all the HEI distributors. Adjustable vacum units, a huge selection of advance weights and springs, coils, modules, ect. Because of this, it is the most tunable ignition system out there. The disadvantages are that you have two custom pieces that reqire machine work, the adpater and the distributor body. It also takes up a lot of room as these distributors are very large. I have been very happy with mine. Tim Sitter ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Solihull@aol.com Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:39:28 -0400 Subject: Re: Speedo woes from darkest BC Clinton, maybe you should pop off the rear dirveshaft and retorque the flange. That's what holds the worm gear from turning, since it isn't keyed. And after the rebuild, isn't it time to go over the tranny and transfer case snugging up fasteners? Cheers!! John Dillingham ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 10 lines 404 [forwarded 3 whitespace 83] Output: lines 376 [content 221 forwarded 3 (cut 0) whitespace 83] Land Rover Owner Subscription Information: * All new subscription requests are via the digest. * In addition so subscribing and unsubscribing, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file and the last month of daily digests may be retrieved (by mail) from majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net Useful commands for this are 'index lro-digest' which returns a list of files available, as well as 'get lro-digest <filename>', etc. World Wide Web Sites start at http://www.Land-Rover.Team.Net/~majordom/lr/pages.html (shadow) http://www.Senie.com/billc/lr/pages.html If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@Land-Rover.Team.Net -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 960721 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|