[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | yoshio@osak.ac.jp, agc03 | 195 | AOIS Approved News Release: World's *Cheapest* Way to get USA Magazine |
2 | Brian Neill Tiedemann [s | 10 | trivia... |
3 | "William L. Leacock" [75 | 13 | Welcome Home |
4 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 13 | Re: Series III/ Diesel Questions |
5 | Tom Stevenson [gbfv08@ud | 19 | Disco woes |
6 | a-robw@microsoft.com | 5 | RE: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids |
7 | David Dodell [david@warp | 31 | Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? |
8 | Wdcockey@aol.com | 9 | No Mail |
9 | wassili@AMC.UVA.NL (Roy | 19 | Mail in 2-fold or 3-fold. Why? |
10 | "Kerry Jones ext 4717 (N | 11 | Series III Diesel - What engine Oil? |
11 | lopezba@atnet.at | 131 | Re: Blocked rear brake November 6, 1995 |
12 | jjbpears@ix.netcom.com ( | 19 | 109 Fuel Tank Replacement |
13 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 30 | Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery |
14 | jjbpears@ix.netcom.com ( | 17 | Fuel Sender Units pos. vs. neg. |
15 | Wes Newman [newmanpp@cor | 13 | 109 and 88 Differentials |
16 | RICKCRIDER@aol.com | 26 | C'mon folks, buy a Sun Visor. |
17 | Lloyd Allison [lloyd@cs. | 31 | Rover cycle |
18 | Sekerere@aol.com | 29 | Range Rover?Discovery? |
19 | jcwhite3@well.com (John | 28 | Re: RR fuel economy - why so bad? |
20 | jcwhite3@well.com (John | 30 | Re: Disco Woes |
21 | Alan Smedley [alans@mpx. | 24 | Re: RR fuel economy - why so bad? |
22 | Mark Ritter [70472.1130@ | 22 | Disco Reliability |
23 | jpappa01@interserv.com | 91 | Re: Tired of Consumer Digest |
24 | Inkornoink@aol.com | 13 | Re: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids |
25 | "William L. Leacock" [75 | 12 | Diesel idle adjust |
26 | Inkornoink@aol.com | 23 | Re: RR fuel economy - why so bad? |
27 | KKelly6788@aol.com | 9 | Defender 90 |
28 | "William L. Leacock" [75 | 31 | Broken half shafts. |
29 | Doug.Forehand@Eng.Sun.CO | 23 | Snow chains for Discos |
30 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 22 | Re: Exterior Sun-Visors |
31 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 43 | Re: Yoshio Koseki/magazine subscriptions |
32 | wilsonhb@ctrvax.Vanderbi | 25 | Disco duning; 4wd systems |
33 | wilsonhb@ctrvax.Vanderbi | 24 | side steps on Series or Defender |
34 | KKelly6788@aol.com | 13 | Range Rover Drag Coefficient |
35 | wilsonhb@ctrvax.Vanderbi | 29 | Re: D-110 on blocks. |
36 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 15 | Re: Series III Diesel - What engine Oil? |
37 | Danny Phillips [danny@tl | 8 | bicycles |
38 | Gary Mitchelson [garym@c | 37 | [not specified] |
39 | Trefor Delve [delve1t@ne | 16 | Diff Locks |
40 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 15 | Land Rover Bicycle |
41 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 19 | They don't make 'em like they used to |
42 | "David McKain" [MCKAIN@c | 22 | Unique Sighting |
43 | Brian Neill Tiedemann [s | 12 | where are you?? |
44 | chrisste@clark.net (Chri | 24 | Shuddering In Second |
45 | rvirzi@gte.com (Robert A | 21 | Re: Vulnerable Disco |
46 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 14 | Movie sightings |
47 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 24 | Re: C'mon folks, buy a Sun Visor. |
48 | jcwhite3@well.com (John | 11 | HELLO...Hello...hello... |
49 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 27 | Re: Mail in 2-fold or 3-fold. Why? |
50 | Doug.Forehand@Eng.Sun.CO | 23 | Snow chains for Discos |
51 | David Dodell [david@dent | 20 | Re: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids |
52 | David Dodell [david@dent | 18 | RE: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids |
53 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 19 | Re: Welcome Home |
54 | a-robw@microsoft.com | 145 | FW: Isuzu/Landie contest |
55 | sreddock@VNET.IBM.COM | 34 | Hippie trail to India |
56 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 39 | Re: Head rebuilt. |
57 | brutus@jurassic-45.Eng.S | 45 | Re: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? |
58 | "T.F. Mills" [tomills@du | 30 | Re: Unique Sighting (Ace Ventura) |
59 | [Chris_Browne@us014-bost | 31 | re Airbags and safety of children |
60 | matts@cacilj.caciasl.com | 18 | Diff lock light |
61 | "Soren Vels Christensen" | 29 | Re: Blocked rear brake November 6, 1995 |
62 | asmith@BayNetworks.COM ( | 22 | Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery |
63 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 9 | WHyinhell is it a BREAKFAST, of all things? |
64 | JWootton@eworld.com | 25 | Land Rover Parts in London |
65 | sm095re@unidui.uni-duisb | 14 | Probs with the list |
66 | Bennett Leeds [bennett@m | 98 | Re: Tired of Consumer Digest |
67 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 18 | Re: WHyinhell is it a BREAKFAST, of all things? |
68 | RICKCRIDER@aol.com | 32 | RE: Sun Visors / Hoof in Mouth |
69 | "Francis J. Twarog" [ftw | 15 | Trivia etc. |
70 | Harincar@mooregs.com (Ti | 21 | Washer Systems? |
71 | Benjamin Allan Smith [be | 16 | [not specified] |
72 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 27 | Re: Disco woes |
73 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 23 | RE: RR fuel economy |
74 | asmith@BayNetworks.COM ( | 70 | '96 Discovery catalogue .... |
75 | John Brabyn [brabyn@skiv | 23 | Re: Subject: buying 87 90 RR |
76 | "Steven Swiger (LIS)" [s | 30 | Kudos to FTP Site |
77 | John Brabyn [brabyn@skiv | 25 | Re: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? |
78 | philr@ozemail.com.au (Ph | 25 | timing belt actual lifetimes on 200 tdi defender |
79 | "Gerald" [g@ix.netcom.co | 23 | Re: Chelmsford, USA |
80 | "Gerald" [g@ix.netcom.co | 17 | Automatic electric aerial |
81 | CpaulP@aol.com | 8 | Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
82 | Bill R Parks [74200.240 | 6 | subscribe |
83 | Matt Neibaur [matt@jax.g | 19 | Disco |
84 | "John C. White, III" [jc | 16 | Was: Snow chains for Discos, Now: Echo |
85 | "John C. White, III" [jc | 37 | Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery |
86 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 23 | Re: Unique Sighting |
87 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 31 | Re: Fuel Sender Units pos. vs. neg. |
88 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 33 | Re: Washer Systems? |
89 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 45 | Re: Blocked rear brake November 6, 1 |
90 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 19 | Re: Washer Systems? |
91 | Benjamin Allan Smith [be | 32 | [not specified] |
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 18:05:30 +0900 From: yoshio@osak.ac.jp, agc03255@niftyserv.or.jp, agc03895@niftyserv.or.jp, Subject: AOIS Approved News Release: World's *Cheapest* Way to get USA Magazine -----> NOTE: Please first read my note which appears below the "Request for more info Form." Then, to get more info, just fill out the "Request for More Info" form completely and email it back to the company. To make it easier for you to reply, I have put their address in the "Reply-To" field, which means you can just use your email software to reply to this message in order to get that address to pop-up in your "To:" field. <----- *------------cut here-----------------------------------------------* REQUEST FOR MORE INFO: please return *only* this section only via internet email to: FREE-magazine-subscription-offer@0.5.5.1.7.6.9.8.1.7.1.tpc.int Sorry, but incomplete forms *will not* be acknowledged. If you do not have an email address, or access to one, they will not be able to help you until you do have one. If you saw this message, then you should have one. :) Name: Internet email address: Smail home address: City-State-Zip: Country: Work Tel. #: Work Fax #: Home Tel. #: Home Fax #: How did you hear about us (name of person who referred you or the area of the internet that you saw us mentioned in): Referral by Yoshio Koseki. 111195-l Name of USA mags you currently get on the newstand or in the store: Name of USA mags you currently get on the newstand or in the store: Name of USA mags you currently get on a subscription basis, through the mail: Name of USA mags you would like price quotes on when we call you: Catalogue format desired (list "1," "2," "3" or "4"): *------------cut here-----------------------------------------------* Catalogue Options: 1. 19-Part email- can be read by EVERYONE (~525 K Total). 2. For more advanced computer users: attached text file ~525K - you must know how to download an attached text file and then be able to open it with your word processor. If in doubt, don't ask for this version. This isn't for internet *newbies.* Better to order option 1 and spend a few minutes pasting them into one whole text document with your word processor, than to waste hours trying to figure how to deal with this option. 3. For more advanced Macintosh computer users: compressed attached text file, created with a Stuffit(tm) self-extracting archive (.sea), ~133K. Can be decompressed by any Macintosh computer user; no special expansion software or knowledge of Stuffit (tm) needed. You just double-click on the file icon and it automatically expands (unstuffs). This is for more advanced mac computer users only, as you still have to know how to deal with an attached file. It will cut your download time by 75%. Expands out to the same ~525K file in option #2. See option #2 for more info on what you will need to be able to do. 4. For expert computer users: compressed attached text file, created with Stuffit(tm), ~114K. Can be decompressed by any computer user who has expansion software to decompress (expand) Stuffit(tm) (.sit) files. This is for more advanced computer users only and will cut your download time by 78%. Expands out to the same ~525K file in option #2. See option #2 for more info on what you will need to be able to do. Hi fellow 'netters, My name is Yoshio Koseki and I recently started using a magazine subscription club in the USA that has a FREE 1 yr. magazine subscription deal with your first paid order- and I have been very pleased with them. They have over 1,500 different USA titles that they can ship to any country on a subscription basis. As for computer magazines from the USA, they more of a selection than I ever knew even existed. They have magazines for most every area of interest in their list of 1,500 titles. Within the USA, for their USA members, they are cheaper than all their competitors and even the publishers themselves. This is their price guarantee. Overseas, on the average, they are generally around one-fourth to one-half of what the newstands overseas charge locally for USA magazines. On some titles they are as little as one-tenth of what the newstands charge. They feel that mgazines should not be a luxury overseas. In the USA, people buy magazines and then toss them after reading them for just a few minutes or hours. They are so cheap in the USA! Well, this company would like to make it the same way for their overseas members. They are also cheaper than all their competitors in the USA and overseas, including the publishers themselves! This is their price guarantee. Around one-half their business comes from overseas, so they are very patient with new members who only speak limited English as a 2nd language. Their prices are so cheap because they deal direct with each publisher and cut-out all the middlemen. They will send you their DELUXE EMAIL CATALOGUE (around 525K-big and juicey) !)...if you completely fill out the form above. It has lists of all the freebies, lists of all the titles they sell, titles broken down by categories and detailed descriptions on nearly 1,200 of the titles that they sell. Please do not email me as I am just a happy customer and a *busy* student. I don't have time to even complete my thesis in time, let alone run my part-time software business! Please fill out the below form and email to them at: FREE-magazine-subscription-offer@0.5.5.1.7.6.9.8.1.7.1.tpc.int *NOTE: to make it easier for you to reply, I have put their address in the "Reply-To" field, which means you can just use your email software to reply to this message in order to get that address to pop-up in your "To:" field.* They guarantee to beat all their competitors' prices. Sometimes they are less than half of the next best deal I have been able to find and other times, just a little cheaper - but I have never found a lower rate yet. They assured me that if I ever do, they will beat it. They have been very helpful and helped me change my address from the USA to Finland and then back again when I moved last month. They are very knowledgeable about addressing mags worldwide. They have a deal where you can get a free 1 yr. sub to a new magazine from a special list of over 300 popular titles published in the USA. They will give you this free 1 yr. sub when you place your first paid order with them to a renewal or new subscription to any of the over 1,500 different popular USA titles they sell. They can arrange delivery to virtually any country and I think they have clients in around 35 or 36 countries now. Outside the USA there is a charge for foreign postage and handling (on both paid and freebie subs) that varies from magazine to magazine. I have found their staff to be very friendly and courteous. They even helped me with an address change when I moved from one country to another. The owner thinks of his service as a "club" and his clients as "members" automatically makes you a member) and he is real picky about who he accepts as a new member. When he sets you up as a new member, he himself calls you personally on the phone to explain how he works his deal, or sometimes he has one of his assistants call. He is kind of quirky sometimes - he insists on setting up new members by phone so he can say hi to everyone (I sure wouldn't want to have his phone bills!), but you can place future orders (after your first order) via E-mail. He has some really friendly young ladies working for him, who seem to know just as much as he does about this magazine stuff. If you live overseas, he will even call you there, as long as you are interested, but I think he still makes all his overseas calls on the weekends, I guess cause the long distance rates are cheaper then. He only likes to take new members from referrals from satisfied existing members and he does virtually no advertising. When I got set-up, they had a 2-3 week waiting list for new members to be called back so that they could join up. (Once you are an existing member, they help you immediately when you call. ) I think they are able to get back to prospective new members the same day or within a few days now, as they have increased their staff. I am not sure about this.........but if you email the above form to them, that is the way to get started! They will send you their DELUXE EMAIL CATALOGUE (around 525K-big and juicey) !)...if you completely fill out the form above. It has lists of all the freebies, lists of all the titles they sell, titles broken down by categories and detailed descriptions on nearly 1,200 of the titles that they sell. They then send you email that outlines how his club works and the list of free choices that you can choose from, as well as the entire list of what he sells; and then they will give you a quick (3-5 minute) friendly, no-pressure no-obligation call to explain everything to you personally and answer all your questions. Once you get in, you'll love them. I do. Sincerely, Yoshio Koseki ps. please forward a copy of this message to all your friends on the net who you think might be interested in it! It is a great deal! If you join and then they join after you, you will earn a free 1 yr. subscription for each new person you get to join after you join! If you exceed 25 referrals, they let you use them to give away as gifts, for Christmas, Chanukah or any other occasion. Please be kind enough to mention my name when you join. I will then get a free magazine for a year for referring you. Thank you. ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian Neill Tiedemann <s914440@minyos.xx.rmit.EDU.AU> Subject: trivia... Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:42:21 +1100 (EDT) Frank, I am unspeakably offended.... how could you confuse me with Dixon??? Brian. ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 11 Nov 95 20:31:55 EST From: "William L. Leacock" <75473.3572@compuserve.com> Subject: Welcome Home Majordomo Bill Thanks for all the god work you did with the Digest whilst on holiday in in the Land Rover Kingdom. Time flies when you are having fun. Welcome back to the land of the free and the home of the brave, hope you don't get Landy withdrawal symptoms too badly, when it gets bad you can always come and look at mine. and maybe eeven Trevors pair !! Regards Bill. Limey in exile. ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Series III/ Diesel Questions Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 9:24:56 GMT Idle speed on the 2.25 diesel can be altered either by moving the hand throttle,or altering the idling stop screw on the distributor pump. Cheers Mike Rooth PS Dont remember an issue of LRO that detailed FWH fitting. I think new ones come with full fitting destructions. ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Tom Stevenson <gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk> Subject: Disco woes Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:57:58 +0000 (GMT) Centre differential warning light: As I understand it, the centre diff lock warning light only illuminates with the action of the diff lock itself and not with the gearlever. Thus, if you have moved the lever across but there has been no differential slippage between front and rear axles, then the diff lock will not yet be engaged, and the light will not be lit. Conversely, the diff will remain locked and the light lit once you move the lever back again until there is relative movement between the two axles and the diff lock disengages. -- Tom Stevenson: gbfv08@udcf.gla.ac.uk University Marine Biological Station, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland Tel:(01475) 530581 Fax:(01475) 530601 ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: a-robw@microsoft.com Subject: RE: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 12:19:24 -0800 ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: David Dodell <david@warp.stat.com> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 21:23:19 MST Subject: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? I just bought a new Discovery and having problems fiquring out where to mount some ham radio and cell phone antennas. It appears that I'll use a glass mount antenna for the cell phone on the right rear lower window since the upper window will not give me enough clearance in my garage <sigh> For the ham antenna, I was thinking about using an angle bracket mount from Larsen on the driver's side front hood area, just opposite from the am/fm antenna. However, this mount acutally leans out a little and isn't flush, and I'm concerned that this will be a potential vandal problem (bend the antenna) SO what is everyone else doing? One other note, how do you get on the list format of this mailing list, I've been sending requests to majordomo@land-rover.team.net with the line subscribe lro-list discovery@stat.com without any luck. David WB7TPY --- Internet: david@warp.stat.com FAX : +1-602-451-6135 WWW : http://www.stat.com/~david ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Wdcockey@aol.com Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 18:49:33 -0500 Subject: No Mail I haven't received any lro-owner messages since 8:11 am EST yesterday, 11/11/95. Hopefully the problem is not with aol.com, and someone is probably aware of the problem, but this is to let you know. ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 11:55:34 +0001 From: wassili@AMC.UVA.NL (Roy Wassili) Subject: Mail in 2-fold or 3-fold. Why? Lately I do receive some mailings in two-fold or even worse, in three-fold :-( Are there any list-members who also do suffer from this problem? Does anyone know the reason for this malfunction? Might it be that my network is also Lucas-wired? Or are there just some members with tremor on there SEND-MAIL-ONLY-ONCE-FINGER? LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR*LR ____ | _____/|__|| Roy Wassili,<wassili@amc.uva.nl> | /(-8| \ | Avalon Green '95 Dicovery, ____|_/[]__|__\___|# scarved for live |] __=| | __ |# [|_/ \|_____|_/ \_|] ( o ) ( o ) ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 20:53:49 +1300 From: "Kerry Jones ext 4717 (NOTE NEW EXTENSION NUMBER)" Subject: Series III Diesel - What engine Oil? Hi, More questions from this guy I met on the side of the road the other night What engine oils are people out there using in their Series III diesels? Thanks Kerry. ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 20:19:20 +0100 From: lopezba@atnet.at Subject: Re: Blocked rear brake November 6, 1995 First of all thanks to everybody who sent advice about my rear brake problem= that I posted a week ago. Step-by-step procedure follows: Last sunday tried to drive my 1958 107 in SI Station Wagon out of basement= garage backwards, up a 3-in-1 ramp. Could not make it in low rear. Car would not roll down ramp, either. Dragged car into garage in low first. Judging by skidmarks I thought right-hand rear wheel had been blocked. Asked for advice here. Called my L/R guru. Got lots of advice. This sunday tried to drive out of garage again, hoping that the problem had= gone away during the week. It had not. However, found out it was right hand front wheel that did not move. Put car into low first, engaged hand brake. Loosened wheel nuts. *Tip:* If wheel nuts can not be loosened by using the crossbrace, rest end= of crossbrace on jack or axle stand and step on levers. If your breakfast= was sufficiently hearty, nuts should move. Jacked up front axle. Put two axle stands under frame. Axle sagged again= after jack was removed, barely providing enough clearance for wheel removal. *Question:* When jack goes under bottom plate for spring, where does the axle stand go? And if the jack goes under the frame, at least mine will not= lift the axle sufficiently for an axle stand. Any tricks? Undid all the nuts from wheel studs. One stud came out with the nut. Removed wheel. *Question:* Any easy way to get the stud and the nut separated? I assume having a narrow nut and counter-nut on the free end of the stud would help. = Anything easier? The three set screws that hold the drum to the hub looked extremely scarred,= but came out without a problem. Will be replaced later (on all four= wheels). Slackened off the brake drum adjusters - two of them on front wheels, behind= brake anchor plate, 3/4 in socket, turn counterclockwise to slacken. On the= right hand front one sits at 2 o clock, the other at 8 o clock looking at the brake drum. Blocked wheels on other side, kept handbrake pulled, shifted into neutral (could have gone to high first). This should let the front wheel turn freely. Tried to turn brake drum with help from a lever. Moved very sluggishly, then got stuck after not quite one turn. Turned drum in opposite direction, same thing happened. Pulled off brake drum by tapping it patiently on the protruding outer edge= with a heavy plastic mallet. Took some time, but came off in one piece. No damage to inside of drum or brake shoes apparent. A little oil over lower brake cylinder. Tried turning the remains of the wheel. Turned freely, however, lots of drag from the front drivetrain. Free wheeling hubs= will be mounted soon! Measured distance from outer surface of brake shoe to edge of brake anchor= plate. Distance the same all the way for rear shoe, front shoe too close= below. Wedged brake pedal down using crossbrace (having this done by a helper is much to be preferred). Both cylinders work, both shoes move out. Removed= crossbrace, shoes returned to original position. Could not move front shoe upwards. Seems there is a little notch in end of= shoe that connects with the cylinder (not the piston end). This apparently= holds shoe in position by sitting on a small ridge in cylinder. Very, very= gingerly put pressure on lower end of shoe with hydraulic jack. Shoe eventually moved upwards, snapped into place. Put brake drum back on. Put some oil on set screws, fastened them. Banged= on brake drum with soft mallet to settle it into place, fastened set screws= some more. Banged some more, fastened some more. Drum turns freely now. Put wheel back on. Put a little oil on studs. Fastened nuts. Put jack under front axle, raised it, removed axle stands, lowered front axle. Fastened nuts some more. Went on a test drive. Tested brakes on road with nobody around. They stop= the car and do not pull to one side. Drove for a few km/miles and checked= front wheel. Does not feel hot. Fastened nuts some more. Drove back to garage, parked, fastened nuts some more. Went home to write this report. If you have followed me that far, let me know whether this is of any interest to anybody. Am I wasting everybody else=B4s time, not just my own?= Still hope to get some tips as to my questions. Thanks again. Peter Hirsch SI 107in S/W P.S.: The saga is not quite complete. When I drove up the ramp in low reverse, the Green Monster could not make it. I finally managed to make it= to the street by using the handbrake, racing the engine and maltreating the= clutch. Major engine problem ahead, I thought, I should have listened to the best of all women who always told me not to get this worthless piece of= junk (her words). I decided to check the oil since the oil pressure had been pretty low when the engine was idling with the car hanging head-down on= the ramp. When I opened the hood, I saw a disconnected plug shoe. Stuck it= back on, and the engine ran much smoother, funny enough. Pretty good car, after all. ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 07:25:59 -0800 From: jjbpears@ix.netcom.com (Jeremy Bartlett) Subject: 109 Fuel Tank Replacement Well the day of reckoning has arrived and Mathilda (1965 109 SIIA SW) needs a new fuel tank :( Does anyone know if the 110 SW tanks will mount directly into the 109 SW mounts? Does anyone know if there are larger than stock (12 gal) tanks available for the 109 SW? What about galvanized aftermarket units? Thanks for you input in advance. Cheers, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery Date: Sun, 12 Nov 95 6:54:00 PST The disco is a heavy, slow off road truck. It will carry more than most pickups, and tow 7700 lbs. It is British. Weight and tires have the most impact on stopping distances. Landrovers view on off-road driving is that a tall skinny tire works well. This has an effect on stopping. If you want a real test have all the vehicles pull a non-braked trailer with equal gvw down a long steep incline and see which braking system fails. I can look at the 4 brake cylinders per caliper in the front (two per caliper in the back), 4 wheel disks, 2500psi assisted brakes, with three seperate systems, and make my choice. If you want quick stopping time, quick acceleration etc... by what consumer what ever recommends. Russ Burns 91 R-Rover 94 D-90 > To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 31 lines)] > Sincerely, > Mark Novey > Admit1Fest@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 07:30:17 -0800 From: jjbpears@ix.netcom.com (Jeremy Bartlett) Subject: Fuel Sender Units pos. vs. neg. I'm going to be converting a positive ground system to negative ground and am also currently replacing the fuel tank. In the process of doing this I though I might "update" the fuel sender. Does replacing the pos. earth sender with a neg. earth sender pose any problems? I can't think why it should, and I recall a few posts about pos to neg. conversions leading to reversal in the fuel guage. Surely replacing the sender polarity type will cure this? Thanks again, Jeremy ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Wes Newman <newmanpp@corcomsv.corcom.com> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 00:46:00 AST Subject: 109 and 88 Differentials I had the differential wheel and pinion gears go out in my 109. I have a Rover Type differential and can get a hold of a differential from a Land Rover 88. Are the 109 and 88 differentials interchangable? ____________________________________________________________ Wes Anchorage, Alaska ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RICKCRIDER@aol.com Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 04:08:22 -0500 Subject: C'mon folks, buy a Sun Visor. OK all you faithful Rover owners....... especially U.S. East Coasters....... I've commited myself to buying one of the aluminum and galvanized exterior sun visors from the Rover Owners Association of Virginia. Apparently Sandy needs about four (?) more orders for a minimum order. Sandy states that they are exact duplicates of the original, but even better. Galvanized brackets and all. $70.00 each, or $60 to ROAV Club members. You all know you want one now, so go ahead and cough up the $$ and commit to one. Thanks...... Rick Crider KD4FXA Monroe NC 66 Slla 109" Hugo .........and for sale....... 73 Slll 88" Jesse 88 Range Rover .......my daily sloth...... ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 18:27:58 +1100 (EST) From: Lloyd Allison <lloyd@cs.monash.edu.au> Subject: Rover cycle I actually have a tiny picture of the 19th century cycle at tildeLand-Rover on the Rover co. history page. There have been 2WD motorcycles - hydraulic motors on an Australian one of about a decade ago. Lloyd The digester seemed to swallow the following F rom jurixsys@alaska.net Fri Nov 10 18:08:46 1995 F rom: jurixsys@alaska.net (J Ron Sutcliffe) S ubject: Re: Defender 110 More info on the elusive Grey Market 110's. We suspect they are in Canada. I had not heard any reply to my FAX so I called the "Pacific Rim Rovers" in Juneau Alaska. Last I heard they were getting Department of Transportation and Environmental Protection Agency approval to import the 110s. Alas, they have confessed to me that effort failed. I am, however, an attorney and with my trusted friend Sherman (Defender 90 owner) we will get to the bottom of this. Sherman is travelling to Juneau for the winter and will go undercover to obtain info. I have already figured out that I may be able to import grey market vehicles into Alaska without EPA approval if I get a special Alaska State DEC waiver. I then have a set period of time to bring them into compliance with EPA regulations. Which may well be impossible. I'll keep you informed. ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Sekerere@aol.com Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 01:44:03 -0500 Subject: Range Rover?Discovery? Well with a second child on its way my wife and i are in the process of evaluating our vehicles. Presently we have a Mazda sedan, Mazda Navajo (Explorer under different name) and the Beast (1966 Series IIA 88"). We are contemplating getting rid of the Navajo due to the fact that we have had continual problems with it since we bought it-transmission went out, power locks went out, power windows went out etc etc-thank goodness most of it was in warranty, but we aren't sure that it isn't going to nickel and dime us to death. We plan to keep the m\sedan for another ten years, the Beast is here to stay, and we would like another vehicle that would replace the Navajo, be able to do some 4wheeling, and take the roads to my land in Northern AZ at anytime of the year, and also be a long distance vehicle which is safe for the family. We have looked at a number of vehicles, and in the process looked at Discoveries (1996 and 1995), and a used Range Rover (1991) at the Scottsdale dealership. Now I am looking for some sage words from the net on this matter. The 1991 RR looks good, but it has 89000 miles on the clock. They want $21grand for it-is it worth it-what repairs am I looking at immediately (next 12-24 months). The new Discovery(sans sunroof, and all the bells and whistles) is about $29900. What are the pros and cons apart from new, warranty (the RR has a 12 month warranty), miles on clock???? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks folks. Chris Whitehead 1966 88" Series IIA "The Anti-Christ" (Beast for short) ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:24:00 -0800 From: jcwhite3@well.com (John C. White, III) Subject: Re: RR fuel economy - why so bad? Well, you could also say that steak costs a lot more than MacDonald's hamburgers, and if the idea is just to keep from starving, steak isn't worth the money. But, which one would you rather have? Cheers! John '95 Discovery, Steak At 17:42 10.11.95 PST, BREAKFIELD ERNEST wrote: >To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net > now i don't feel so bad about having to slog around in the Jeep! [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > 190 hp, 230 ft/lbs... and 16-23 mpg! >______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ >> Subject: RR fuel economy - why so bad? >> Author: jib@big.att.com (Jan Ben) at smtpgateway > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 19 lines)] >> Otto cycle is the same for US and UK vehicles, must be the creature comforts on >> the RR: AC/stereo/cell-phone ? (trolling... trolling...) >> Author: jib@big.att.com (Jan Ben) at smtpgateway > [ truncated by lro-lite (was 19 lines)] ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:23:48 -0800 From: jcwhite3@well.com (John C. White, III) Subject: Re: Disco Woes In general I agree with you, Duncan, but as long as the vehicle is on warranty I see nothing wrong with whinging to the dealer about getting these things fixed. This provides valuable feedback to LRNA and, I would hope, Solihull (and Munich?) on areas that need better quality control. If *YOU* reread this list you will see that 5 out of the 6 problems are electrical. Screwed up electrical systems have been part of English cars', er, charm since I can remember being aware of English cars. What I also remember hearing was that the first thing you do with English cars is rip out the #@$%! Lucas electrical system and put in Bosch. If this is true, maybe the best thing that BMW could do for Land Rover is Germanize the electrical system. Cheers! John '95 Discovery with problems 1 and 4 (but the left rear directional) Nevertheless, I still like my Rover and don't have any buyer's remorse. San Francisco, California At 16:43 10.11.95 -0500, Duncan Brown wrote: >To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 63 lines)] > Duncan, trying not to sound like a holier-than-thou 1960 SII owner, > just talking common sense. ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 15:57:58 -1000 From: Alan Smedley <alans@mpx.com.au> Subject: Re: RR fuel economy - why so bad? >Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 12:10:40 -0800 >From: russ burns <burns@cisco.com> [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] >Russ Burns >91 D-90 >94 R-ROver I posted a question about fule consumption on Range Rovers a few days ago. Comparing an '87 3.5 RR with a '92 3.9 RR I went from 400Kms per tank to 300Kms with similar load and same style of city driving. So there has to be more to it than just the size and shape of the vehicle. No matter what I do I am unable to get any better than 320-325Kms around the city. I have had near to 600Kms on a long trip which is what I was able to get on the '87 RR. I am still awaiting suggestions as to how best to improve on the fuel consumption. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 11 Nov 95 22:36:13 EST From: Mark Ritter <70472.1130@compuserve.com> Subject: Disco Reliability I,ve got just shy of 30,000 on my 94 Disco and no major problems to report. The small itemswere a squeaking handbrake, sticking sunroof, loud starter (dealer replaced even though it still worked fine) and a intermittant hot transmission light (bad sensor). None of these items affected the drivabilty of the car. some folks would say that 4 item on 30K miles is a lot, but in comparison my wifes Lexus GS300 had DIED 3 times in 3 years necessitating a tow each time. The dealer called it "electrical problems". My Disco may have a few rough edges but it has aleways gotten me home. BTW it has a LOT of off-road miles on it as I am writing a guide book to trails in the N. GA, E. TN and W. NC area. My 91 Toyota MR2 Turbo (old car) ate through the inside edge of the rear tires in 8000 miles because the suspension was misset at the factory, and it had a serios safety recall. Come to think of it our Lexus had a recall item as well on the steering (serious). All in all the Rovers doing pretty Goddamn good! Mark Ritter 94 Disco Still happy. ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: jpappa01@interserv.com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 95 18:13:05 PST Subject: Re: Tired of Consumer Digest to Mr. Novey and others expressing concern over Disco: - Why is it a peculiarly U.S. trait that we can have one or two rotten apples in a bushel basket of golden delicious poison us. Is it because we have lately become conditioned to expect and look for the worst in every situation. No wonder with things like the OJ trial. Don't blame us. However... - The Discovery has had more positive publicity garnered upon it that *ANY* other SUV sold in the U.S.! It won the J.D. Power survey in 1994 for best overall truckline. Four Wheeler of the Year for 1995 by 4-Wheeler. Best of what's new for Popular Science. Top Ten All Stars Automobile magazine. In fact, the 4-wheeler braking test determined that Disco beat the rest of the field by 30% and had *the best brakes* This goes on ad nauseum. Conclusions? Didn't it occur that if ten reports give very similar positive and glowing remarks about the car and that one (the microwave oven testing magazine - yep - same one) says it's so bad - over all of the specialty magazines focusing solely on automobiles and in particular w/4-Wheeler - four wheel drives, that *something* is wrong? Either with the particular test vehicle? Were the pads o.k.? How many miles were on the tires? Was there any oil on the asphalt's surface. How controlled were the test parameters as far as repeatibility. How many braking runs were done by the other vehicles before the Discovery was tested? Do we ever hear these things? Frankly, the basic problem with the CR article was (apparently) the author of the report. This same fellow in a different publication lambasted the Discovery also. To the point that he retracted part or all of the article after Land Rover threatened legal action on the basis of unsubstantiated test data!!! This is fact! So now he resurfaces at CR! Why do we never question a bogus test article?? Why would someone get a legitimate (at least at my store) and objective presentation and test drive and then trash it all because of some journalist? One rotten apple. Yes, if the press is *uniformly* bad and the prospect's impression of the vehicle matches same. Then, one might legitimately question the validity of a product as a viable one. Does *ANYONE* build the perfect car? Nope. Do Land Rovers break? Yep. Can they literally last a lifetime with proper care. Absolutely. I've owned my 88 since 1971! I never get rid of any of `em `cause they never really look like they need to be disposed of! We sell 35-40 Discoveries a month at Metro West. That's a lot of new Land Rovers. The vast majority of owners absolutely *love* these cars. We've already had repeat customers and the referrals are constant. The product is constantly improving and QC and reliability along with it. BMW is quite serious about the U.S. and its long-term future here. I'm still waiting to see the first Discovery across the street at the Jeep dealership. I'm still waiting to see the first Discovery down Rte. 9 at Natick Ford. We have had four Toyota Land Cruisers traded here in the past 2 months. On Discoveries! Not Range Rovers! What's the point of all this. They are still real Land Rovers. They're chunks. Built to last. Things break. But LR is serious here! Most of the woes thread concerns (c`mon - let's be objective) dinky stuff. Squeaks. Funky didly stuff. I don't see a whole lot about major component failure. Never a posting about poor performance off road. Why do most of us on this digest buy Land Rovers? To go to the store? Not. I humbly suggest that you go drive the product. Listen to the presentation objectively. Consider the test reports that are out there. *CONSIDER THE SOURCE(S)* And in the final analysis. Go with your gut. Why must someone tell you what's good? Sheesh. You be the judge. In the end, the customer always is. The journalists just move on to the next trend. As was pointed out in a distant past flame war in this digest, a quick shot from the keyboard can do lotsa damage. Discovery is a superb four wheel drive. It doesn't matter that I sell them. I see the competition regularly - cause we drive them at the training sessions with our own Land Rover product - and we get `em all in trade all the time. There ain't nothing else out there that really even comes close. As soon as I can pay off Shotgun's Dodge Intrepid, it's gone and we will start looking for a Disco for her. To drive one is to love it! cheerz Jim - tired of journalistic dweeboids who drive around in `73 Ford Pintos `67 2A 88 5.0L hybrid `67 2A 109 5.0L hybrid `68 2B 110 F/C diesel `70 P6B 3500S `90 Range Rover County `93 D110 (#457/500) `95 D90 #1958 ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Inkornoink@aol.com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:08:01 -0500 Subject: Re: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids Dave, you are correct not to have the kids in the front...also when they are very tiny you should have the car seat facing backwards........your car seat should have come with guidelines.........safe driving! Hank Gregory 1990 RR c Inkornoink@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 11 Nov 95 20:31:57 EST From: "William L. Leacock" <75473.3572@compuserve.com> Subject: Diesel idle adjust Kerry. The idle speed on ser 2 and 3 diesels is adjusted by a stop screw situated under the lever at the side of the distributor pump. The lower screw adjusts idle and the uper screw which was capped off and wirelocked when the pump was new adjusts max throttle travel Bil Leacock Limey in exile. ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Inkornoink@aol.com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:08:04 -0500 Subject: Re: RR fuel economy - why so bad? In a message dated 95-11-10 21:06:22 EST, breakfield.ernest@smtpgateway.centigram.com (BREAKFIELD ERNEST) writes: Yesterday "breakfield.ernest@smtpgateway.centigram.com," wrote: snip: > now i don't feel so bad about having to slog around in the Jeep! > 190 hp, 230 ft/lbs... and 16-23 mpg! As a former Jeep Owner, and a current Rover Owner, I say: if you enjoy slogging in our Jeep...more power (and gas mileage) to you.... ....Achhem, dork, say what? Hank Gregory 1990 RR c Inkornoink@aol.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: KKelly6788@aol.com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 19:25:56 -0500 Subject: Defender 90 There is an article on driving the Defender 90 with Daphney Greene (from the U.S. Camel Trophy team) at the Hollister off road park in this months (Nov.) GQ magazine. ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 11 Nov 95 20:31:54 EST From: "William L. Leacock" <75473.3572@compuserve.com> Subject: Broken half shafts. The variuos methods for removing the bits of broken half shaft without removing the diff should only be considered a short term fix. By removing the rear differential one is able to "ensure" that ALL the pieces of the half shaft are removed. Granted many of the small pieces will flow out with the oil when it is drained ,but there is a barrier at the rear of the axle casing formed where the diff cover is welded to the axle. it is not unknown for debris to become lodged behind this barrier and to come out when offroading and destroy a few teeth on the diff wheel. I have also personal experience of the pieces being ejected through the casing. The broken end can be extremely difficult to remove, particularly if you have driven home on front wheel drive with the broken half shaft ends rubbing together. It is possible for the rod which is being used to eject the broken piece to bend at the end( if you use this technique I recommend a piece of hardened steel, or better still a larger dia piece with a forked end so that it fits either side of the planet gear shaft ) and become trapped behind the planet gear shaft, making removal of the shaft a difficult job which is easily fixed by flame cutting the diff out of the axle casing. I off roaded regularly with a 109 diesel in the days before Salisbury axles. and used plenty of half shafts. The long way is the safest and can easily be accomplished in an hour, providing you can get the broken piece out of the diff without having to change the planet gear. This adds a half hour to the job. Regards Bill Leacock Limey in exile. ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 14:34:52 -0800 From: Doug.Forehand@Eng.Sun.COM (Douglas W. Forehand) Subject: Snow chains for Discos Does anyone know why the snow chains for the Discovery are so expensive ( >$500 US at British Pacific, Oct LRO-International ad from LR lists at 410pounds ) ? In contrast a good set (for 2 tires) of chains here in the USA from one of the discount auto parts stores will set you back only $50 or so. The other confusing thing is that the NAS Discovery owner manual says to never use snow chains, yet Land-Rover sells them for the Discovery. Part number STC8518. Has anyone every had occasion to use snow chains on a Discovery? The stock Michelin M+S tires (235/70-16) look like they would do a pretty good job by themselves. Of course a nice deep mud puddle with a slick clay bottom might plug them up pretty quick. Thanks Doug ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 13:41:26 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Exterior Sun-Visors > As far as fabricating one goes, I am sure its possible, but would it be birmabright > and would the side braces be galvanized? Get a used one if you can find it, or > spring for a new one while they still exist. I suggested fabricating one. If I were fabricating one I'd have it made from stainless, which is what I'm going to do since I need another one. The price difference for that amount is tiny. Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 13:46:45 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Yoshio Koseki/magazine subscriptions I got this reply when I e-mailed an IP address that Dixon came up with (which incidentally was formatted incorrectly so I wonder if they really wanted to be contacted) In reference to your FAX sent on Mon, 06 Nov 1995 10:31:26 CST, regarding (Fwd) junk mail : ***************Message follows*************** We regret to inform you that the phone number you attempted to reach is not currently being served by a remote printer operator. We hope to have coverage in this area -- perhaps you know somebody who could operate a remote printer server? Regards, Mr. Arlington Hewes The TPC.INT Subdomain ************************************************** *** *** *** FOR GENERAL INFORMATION *** *** Mail to tpcfaq@info.tpc.int *** *** *** *** FOR A LIST OF CURRENT COVERAGE *** *** Mail to tpccover@info.tpc.int *** *** *** ************************************************** ***************End Message********************* Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 11:02:40 -0600 (CST) From: wilsonhb@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu (Henry B. Wilson) Subject: Disco duning; 4wd systems Nice explanation of 4wd systems; I've saved it for my files! Regards, Henry B. Wilson http://vumclib.mc.vanderbilt.edu/~wilsonhb henben@aol.com (currently most reliable) or wilsonhb@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu ____ /[__]\___ | | | \ '94 Disco '59 AHY 100-6 |---|__|___\____ |o _|= |= |o_ }O _____/_______ [|_/ \__|___|/ \_}| [/ \_____/ \__} \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ '95 D90 SW (within 2 weeks) "The Healey's clean; the Rover's filthy. Life is perfect." P.S. I wave ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 11:02:19 -0600 (CST) From: wilsonhb@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu (Henry B. Wilson) Subject: side steps on Series or Defender I have seen those nifty folding side steps on the series vehicles. Can they be fitted to the Defender? The rocker panels seem shorter on the Defender. Henry B. Wilson http://vumclib.mc.vanderbilt.edu/~wilsonhb henben@aol.com (currently most reliable) or wilsonhb@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu ____ /[__]\___ | | | \ '94 Disco '59 AHY 100-6 |---|__|___\____ |o _|= |= |o_ }O _____/_______ [|_/ \__|___|/ \_}| [/ \_____/ \__} \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ '95 D90 SW (within 2 weeks) "The Healey's clean; the Rover's filthy. Life is perfect." P.S. I wave ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: KKelly6788@aol.com Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 11:08:24 -0500 Subject: Range Rover Drag Coefficient >11/10/95 Russ Burns <burns@cisco.com> wrote >RR fuel economy - why so bad? The weight, and telephone booth aerodynamics have >a lot more to do with the MPG than the engine. I was reading in a book on Range Rovers that the addition of the front spoiler made the RR more aerodynamic, but the drag coefficient was still to bad to print. Does any one know what the Range Rover drag coefficient is? ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 11:02:35 -0600 (CST) From: wilsonhb@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu (Henry B. Wilson) Subject: Re: D-110 on blocks. Bla bla bla. Someone will use it like it's supposed to be used, eventually. If they want to masturbate over it in their garage, let them. Sounds like that poor Rover is in need of a gun rack (just for the look), some mud, and a 12 month stint at "Four-wheeler" for a real run-in. Henry B. Wilson http://vumclib.mc.vanderbilt.edu/~wilsonhb henben@aol.com (currently most reliable) or wilsonhb@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu ____ /[__]\___ | | | \ '94 Disco '59 AHY 100-6 |---|__|___\____ |o _|= |= |o_ }O _____/_______ [|_/ \__|___|/ \_}| [/ \_____/ \__} \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ '95 D90 SW (within 2 weeks) "The Healey's clean; the Rover's filthy. Life is perfect." P.S. I wave ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Series III Diesel - What engine Oil? Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 11:31:05 GMT > To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > What engine oils are people out there using in their Series III diesels? > Thanks Kerry. Straight 20/50.As per manual.These engines have *huge* oilways,and can cope with the thicker oil. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Danny Phillips <danny@tlpgate.lonpar.co.uk> Subject: bicycles Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 12:25:07 GMT dear all, sorry if this has been posted, but apprently in france you can get a disco special called a raleigh, which comes with his and her mountain bikes. ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 07:44:26 -0500 From: Gary Mitchelson <garym@cais.cais.com> -- [ From: Gary Mitchelson * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- > Subject: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? > I just bought a new Discovery and having problems fiquring out where to mount > some ham radio and cell phone antennas. On my Discovery I have my ham antennas on a Comet RS-81 mount. This attaches to the to lip of the rear door, I have it on the far right side. The mount adjusts in all 3 planes so that the antenna can be mounted vertical no matter what. The matching Comet antenna ( 60" 144/440) has a fold over hinge that will allow a quick lay down of the antenna with nothing protruding higher than the roof. Comet makes antennas for everything from HF to 2400 mhz that will fit the mount. The cable assembly is made of very low loss 5 mm cable with a 12" very thin teflon lead in coax that allows the cable to be fed thru the door with no problem. My cable then enters the vents that are above the speaker right at the door edge and feed unseen all the way to the center console where my dual band HT resides on a mount. With this set up I have worked simplex over 120 miles with 5 watts Diamond makes similar antennas and mounts and Maldol makes similar antennas but their mounts offer an electric/remote fold over. As far as cellular goes I have a Motorola micro phone velcroed to the ash tray. The antenna is down and I have not had a problem with coverage. -- Gary Mitchelson garym@racalrecord.com N3JPU ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Trefor Delve <delve1t@nectech.co.uk> Subject: Diff Locks Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 13:21:00 GMT All, Does anyone have any experience with or knowledge of LockRight automatic differentials ?. This may well be limited to the UK market as they are based (according to their sales blurb) in Lancashire. Thanks. Trefor tdelve@nectech.co.uk ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Land Rover Bicycle Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 08:25:00 EST Two wheel drive bikes suffer from the same problem as non centre diff 4x4s, namely that the front and rear wheels want to turn at different speeds except when going in a straight line. The wind up in the transmission (Fat speedo cable!) results in very awkward shifts of load between front and rear which are disconcerting and destabilising for the rider. Now how about a designer coming up with a durable limited slip drive to eliminate this problem? If anyone is interested I have a few ideas. Trevor "mad inventor" Easton ------------------------------[ <- Message 41 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: They don't make 'em like they used to Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 08:24:00 EST Patti Burke wrote "One of the reasons I bought a Land Rover product was because I saw REALLY old, beat-up Land Rovers still running on the same beaches I hope to travel for many years to come--"they don't make 'em like they used to??" They do make 'em like they used to, it's just that the old beat up Land Rovers belong to a bunch of dedicated individuals, like us, who put up with the faults and quirks because of the basic "homeliness" (Not the word I really want) of our vehicles and the fact that even if they don't run well they usually get you home. Welcome to the ranks. Trevor Easton, 1962 SWB SW "Miss Golightly" ------------------------------[ <- Message 42 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "David McKain" <MCKAIN@cemr.wvu.edu> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:13:34 EDT Subject: Unique Sighting Series LR Fire Engine in a BP gasoline commercial. Something like "For reliability in using our gasoline". Where did they get it from? Also, the LR's in Ace Ventura were obviously just painted, probably some old klunkers with lots of bondo. The Jeepster Commando they destroyed was not fully repainted on the top which was pretty obvious. Still makes you sad to see them get wrecked. Later, David McKain 1966 SIIa Petrol mckain@cemr.wvu.edu (304) 599-0120 Morgantown, WV USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 43 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Brian Neill Tiedemann <s914440@minyos.xx.rmit.EDU.AU> Subject: where are you?? Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 01:20:21 +1100 (EDT) whats happened to us? I indexed the list and 11/11 was the last digest filed...? I have not seen any since. hmmmmmm BT. ------------------------------[ <- Message 44 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:18:36 -0500 From: chrisste@clark.net (Chris Stevens) Subject: Shuddering In Second The problem has been solved! Some of you may recall that my SR IIa 88" was experiencing a shuddering, vibrating sort of thing in second and third gears. I thought it was the clutch or clutch adjustment at first. While crawling underneath the machine on Saturday I discovered--to my horror--that the four flange bolts on the rear propeller shaft were very loose. I tightened them up and all is quiet again. Check your fixings. Chris Stevens Beckett Klay 100 West Road Suite 300 Baltimore, MD 21294 USA (410) 583-6146 (410) 583-1935 (FAX) chrisste@Clark.net ------------------------------[ <- Message 45 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:31:01 -0500 From: rvirzi@gte.com (Robert A. Virzi) Subject: Re: Vulnerable Disco Insoo Bay Wrote: "It is one of the my habits looking at the undercarrage of the vehicle from time to time, spcecially after off road. Recently, I have noticed that steering damper was slightly bent after easy rocky terrain." I trashed mine too, with the result that I couldn't turn left until I disconnected it. Replacement was easy, and so was the decision not to get a Bilstein. The damper is just too vulnerable. I was talking to the folks at Safari Gard and they may have some solutions to help. I think they make skid plates for the disco. It may be a package with the replacement bumpers. I'll post when I get more info. (Anyone have one of their front bumpers installed? I'd love a report.) -Bob rvirzi@gte.com Think Globally. === +1(617)466-2881 === Act Locally! ------------------------------[ <- Message 46 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Movie sightings Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 08:34:00 EST There was a show on the other night about movie special effects, this edition was about pyrotechnics. In the segment about an upcoming movie where they blow up a church and antique store in a Canadian town, the scale model of the set that they were planning the explosion on had a 109 station wagon as the only vehicle in it. Anyone see this and remember the name of the movie? Does this indicate a possible upcoming sighting? Trevor Easton ------------------------------[ <- Message 47 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:06:06 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: C'mon folks, buy a Sun Visor. > Apparently Sandy needs about four (?) more orders for a minimum order. > Sandy states that they are exact duplicates of the original, but even better. > Galvanized brackets and all. $70.00 each, or $60 to ROAV Club members. Sandy, I'd be caredul about advertising that you are making and selling exact duplicates of the LR sun visor. There's such a thing as patent infringement that Land Rover/BMW may not be to happy about. Given the recent thread about BMW's attitude to using the name with clubs etc., I wonder about their attitude on this matter. Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 48 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 07:14:54 -0800 From: jcwhite3@well.com (John C. White, III) Subject: HELLO...Hello...hello... Is it me, or is there an echo on the List? I seem to get three copies of everything sent. Usually the copies arrive two together in the same distribution, then another will arrive a day later. Cheers! Cheers! Cheers! John John John ------------------------------[ <- Message 49 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:16:56 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Mail in 2-fold or 3-fold. Why? > Lately I do receive some mailings in two-fold or even worse, in three-fold :-( > Are there any list-members who also do suffer from this problem? Does anyone [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > Lucas-wired? > Or are there just some members with tremor on there SEND-MAIL-ONLY-ONCE-FINGER? One reason is that some members of the list reply to an individual and cc the list, or vise-versa. Seems unwarranted to me, but then I get a lot of mail and every extra message is just one more to wade through. Maybe it's done with the thought that the digest receipients won't want to wait for a reply. If that 's the case, maybe people on the digest that are in a hurry could ask for a direct reply and if they don't, we can assume they aren't in a hurry. Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 50 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 14:34:52 -0800 From: Doug.Forehand@Eng.Sun.COM (Douglas W. Forehand) Subject: Snow chains for Discos Does anyone know why the snow chains for the Discovery are so expensive ( >$500 US at British Pacific, Oct LRO-International ad from LR lists at 410pounds ) ? In contrast a good set (for 2 tires) of chains here in the USA from one of the discount auto parts stores will set you back only $50 or so. The other confusing thing is that the NAS Discovery owner manual says to never use snow chains, yet Land-Rover sells them for the Discovery. Part number STC8518. Has anyone every had occasion to use snow chains on a Discovery? The stock Michelin M+S tires (235/70-16) look like they would do a pretty good job by themselves. Of course a nice deep mud puddle with a slick clay bottom might plug them up pretty quick. Thanks Doug ------------------------------[ <- Message 51 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:09:06 -0700 From: David Dodell <david@dental.stat.com> Subject: Re: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids At 08:08 PM 11/11/95 -0500, Inkornoink@aol.com wrote: >Dave, you are correct not to have the kids in the front...also when they are >very tiny you should have the car seat facing backwards........your car seat >should have come with guidelines.........safe driving! Actually, I'm getting conflicting reports. I have a call into Landrover NA and one of the engineers is suppose to call me back today. --- Internet : david@dental.stat.com WWW : http://www.stat.com/~david Telephone: +1-602-860-1121 FAX : +1-602-451-1165 ------------------------------[ <- Message 52 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:12:03 -0700 From: David Dodell <david@dental.stat.com> Subject: RE: Dual Airbags/'96 Discovery/Kids At 12:19 PM 11/10/95 -0800, a-robw@microsoft.com wrote: No message came through ... however, you are the ham that I corresponded with before. Where did you install your ham antenna again on the discovery? david --- Internet : david@dental.stat.com WWW : http://www.stat.com/~david Telephone: +1-602-860-1121 FAX : +1-602-451-1165 ------------------------------[ <- Message 53 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:53:30 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Welcome Home > Majordomo Bill > Thanks for all the god work you did with the Digest whilst on holiday in in I know that some of us worship our land rovers, but this is going to far maybe? Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 54 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: a-robw@microsoft.com Subject: FW: Isuzu/Landie contest Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 15:55:44 -0800 Resent due to mail server problems (that should be resolved by now) ---------- >I understand from the Off-road list that 2 Isuzus and a Disco went out >somewhere in US NW, as a results of one of the Isuzu owners mouthing off [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >one. Nothing about it on this list? Uh-oh... bad news? Or did I miss >a report here also? ------------ I was the defending LRO in this "contest" and I haven't got around to posting the trip report, so I guess I should quit procrastinating. I should point out, that it wasn't a contest at all, rather some friendly hetero-vehicular off-roading. I met with the the Isuzu drivers near Mt. St. Helens, Washington for a day of bouncing around in the mountains. The roads we found were [unfortunately] pretty tame for the most part (some were even PAVED :-( ) but we did find some opportunities for comparison. While this area [the Pacific NW.)might be a mecca for such yuppiemobiles as the Discovery, Explorer & Jeep G. Cherokee, they are incredibly scarce once you leave the highway, well, once you leave the shopping mall for that matter. I think George's challenge was more to get someone to take their Disco off-road so he could see one "in action" in a sort-of "side-by-side" type of comparison. The local LR Dealerships seem to resist/avoid these type of opportunities for some reason. Since I owed my kids a camping trip it seemed like a good opportunity to kill two birds with one stone. We all had a good time and came back deciding that I really need to get a rear locker (maybe I could talk to Santa...). George Reiswig, maker of the original "challenge" wrote the following report after the outing." <begin trip report> Subject: Re[6]: A challenge is offered!! FUN FUN FUN! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Well, we did it! Sunday, October 22nd, Marc Davis (Isuzu Trooper), Bob Watson (LR Discovery) and I (Isuzu Amigo) got together near Mount St. Helens, Washington for the hallenge I offered some time ago. You may recall that I suggested that my Amigo might go anywhere a Landy could, and that I'd sure be interested in seeing a Rover in action on some interesting trails. Well, Bob took me up on it. The results: Everybody won! We had a great time exploring around on numerous roads in the area. The devastation caused by the eruption 15 years ago is not going to be erased anytime soon, and yet nature is coming back with renewed vegetation in the rich new soil. The only real challenge we found involved some very loose soil and large, hard rocks in a quarry. The bulldozers had created some good slopes and obstacles, and we took advantage of the opportunity to find out how our respective vehicles worked. Watching the Landy's suspension work really inspired my envy. My IFS just doesn't move much, and Bob crawled over some obstacles that really crossed up his axles. He got his frame and trackbar mount caught on a rock and had to back off of one obstacle, and it was obvious that Bob wasn't afraid of making his Disco work. Marc and I pulled up on the grill guard while he put his tranny in reverse, and he was unstuck. Most of the roads we tried were just dirt roads, so we made our way back to the quarry to play more seriously. There was one section of large (1' - 6' diameter) rocks which had been bulldozed together, so we decided to deem a section of that an obstacle to be overcome. I pulled up to it first, and then stopped and got out for the trickiest section of the route. After some hemming and hawing, I got back in and went on with it. I engaged my rear locker for the last part of the obstacle, because I didn't want to slip off to my left and beat my door up on the boulders. There was loose soil on top of the obstacle, and I was afraid that my front tires wouldn't grab enough to pull me up, but they did, and I made it. Marc tried it next, and he might got to the point where the really large rocks started. Just then, his clutch decided that it didn't want to play any more. His progress ceased, but his engine went on. I've never seen a clutch slip like that. After hooking up a tow strap to his rear (well, his truck's rear), Bob pulled up behind him and pulled him smoothly (automatic tranny) off the rocks until he was free. So much for the second stuck of the day. Bob decided that he didn't really want to try anything like that until he had better tires and a locker or two. He and I talked for a bit, despite the sound of an engine roaring uselessly somewhere in the background.... "Uh, guys....I'm stuck again." It was Marc calling over the radio. He was halfway up a steep, loose hill, and had somehow managed to make it so that there was nothing but hill in front of him, and nothing but really big rocks behind him. The only thing keeping him from rolling back was his tailpipe hitting one of the rocks. We managed to remove two of the three rocks by hand, each of which weighed 250 lbs. or so. The third one was firmly wedged under his bumper and against his tailpipe, and we couldn't do anything about it. So, I drove up to the crest of the hill and hooked him up with the tow strap. (The guys still don't believe that I actually have a Warn winch on the mount up front, because I'm so hesitant to use it!) After pulling him up to the top, it was time to head for home. In short, the challenge was to get people with different vehicles together in an environment which fostered curiosity about (and appreciation for) how different vehicles work, respect for other's vehicular taste and driving ability, and to leave the "my truck's better'n yours" attitude to others. The result was that everyone had a good time. George "I still haven't seen a D-90 on the trails" Reiswig <end trip report> _____ /|__|_\___ Bob Watson | | | \ a-robw@microsoft.com |---|___|___\____ Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA | _|= |= |o_ }\ [|_/_ \__|___|/_\_}| '95 Beluga Black Discovery \_/ \_/ N7UMU ------------------------------[ <- Message 55 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: sreddock@VNET.IBM.COM Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 16:51:45 GMT Subject: Hippie trail to India Hi all, greetings from Germany. I can still bombard you with mail even is I am un-subscribed at the minute. I was back in England for the weekend and happened to see a program on BBC2 about a man who is retracing a route he took 30 odd years ago to India. This time he is driving a Jeep (pass the soap, I need to wash out my mouth). While driving across the desert he got bogged in soft sand. No problem, I thought, out with the high lift and use the sand ladders, or failing that put some rocks under the wheels. Instead he got out his recovery kit and started digging, WITH A GARDEN TROWEL!! This guy has no idea, who would venture into the desert in a one vehicle convoy armed with only a trowel? Luckily a Toyota driving bedouin pulled him out. I wonder how long he would have been there for otherwise. Also whilst reading last months top gear magazine I read a comparative test of the new RR, a Jag XJR and a Merc soft top. They tried to get the wheels muddy on the RR and at one point even contemplated putting it into 4 wheel drive! Apologies if this has already been done to death, but as I have limited access to a suitable terminal at present I have had to unsubscribe. Happy Land Rovering (and carry the right kit!), Steve (slumming it in an Audi!) ------------------------------[ <- Message 56 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 09:04:52 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Head rebuilt. > I just rebuilt Aurens' head due to a burnt exhaust valve. New valves, > springs, seals, a new guide and a new cam follower kit. Aaack! Nigel's disease strikes again! I hadn't even read this message (had only downloaded it) when I started hearing a ticking noise in the engine, and had little power. Luckily, I had only gone a couple of blocks so I turned back and called Scotty. btw, don't bother holding a celphone in the engine compartment; it doesn't help. Scotty said bring it up, but if it sounded bad, or anything, stop and have it towed. I rung up HP and told 'em I wouldn't be there and headed for Concord. When I got there, Scotty knew right away that I had broken a valve spring. But that would be too normal for me! What actually happened, is that a non-stellite (inferior) insert had been put in, and it had slipped out, so the valve was clattering against it. I was running on three cylinders, which was evidenced by the way the engine was jumping around. Well, now it seems that the hole where the valve goes in may be too worn (too big) to fit even stellite inserts. Which means I need to find another Head. Anyone have a spare they don't need (4cyl 2.25l petrol)? tia! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 57 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:22:09 -0800 From: brutus@jurassic-45.Eng.Sun.COM (Bruce Curtis) Subject: Re: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? > I just bought a new Discovery and having problems fiquring out where to > mount some ham radio and cell phone antennas. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 16 lines)] > isn't flush, and I'm concerned that this will be a potential vandal > problem (bend the antenna) > SO what is everyone else doing? I mounted a trunk-lid mount 2m/70cm antenna in the middle of the hood (near the window), was worried about obstructed vission, but turned out to not be a probelm, performance good, vandel potential??? (but it's hard to reach). Also, i installed a secondary power cable in the cabin by running some 10 gauge cable attached to the main battery cable in the under hood fuse block (also check those other connections, as i had a couple that did tighten up a bit (the alternator screw was about an eight of a turn lose)) through a manual reset circuit breaker, through the firewall cable whole, to a insultated power strip with multiple taps mounted to the rubber issolated tray under the drivers seat. I installed the transceiver on the tray, remote mounted front pannel above the center console towards the driver, and the mike next to the power window switches next to the driver. All in all, has worked out great. Later, Bruce. 95' Disco (with custom off-road pin stripping) -- Bruce W. Curtis brutus@Eng.Sun.COM SunSoft, Internet Engineering http://www.toaster.net/~brutus 2550 Garcia Ave, MS MTV05-44 (415)336-2652 Mountain View, CA 94043-1100 FAX:(415)336-6015 --- After November 15th --- Bruce W. Curtis brutus@Eng.Sun.COM SunSoft, Internet Engineering http://www.toaster.net/~brutus 2550 Garcia Ave, MS MPK17-202 (415)786-5147 Mountain View, CA 94043-1100 FAX:to-be-assigned > One other note, how do you get on the list format of this mailing list, > I've been sending requests to majordomo@land-rover.team.net with the [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > FAX : +1-602-451-6135 > WWW : http://www.stat.com/~david ------------------------------[ <- Message 58 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> Subject: Re: Unique Sighting (Ace Ventura) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:10:02 -0700 (MST) David McKain writes: Also, the LR's in Ace Ventura were obviously just painted, probably some old klunkers with lots of bondo. The Jeepster Commando they destroyed was not fully repainted on the top which was pretty obvious. Still makes you sad to see them get wrecked. Eight restored LRs were commissioned for the film (most doubling for each other). The restorer had the director's assurances that the LRs would not be harmed (the movie company purchased them and planned to resell them), but in actual fact five of the eight were damaged beyond salvageability. The 3 survivors have been sold. Reliable sources say that Jim Carrey had to learn stickshift for the movie. One can't help but wonder how many of his stunt doubles were killed during filming the Rover sequences. I suppose we all have to see it for ourselves, but I found the film revoltingly tiresome and stupid (very few of the gags are funny), and the Rover action disappointingly brief. The best way to see this one is to wait for it to show up on tv, and capture the Rover sequences on tape (if you can stomach either Carrey or what happens to the vehicles). T. F. Mills tomills@du.edu University of Denver Library http://www.du.edu/~tomills Denver CO 80208 USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 59 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 13 Nov 95 14:34:13 EST From: <Chris_Browne@us014-boston-minet.ccmail.compuserve.com> Subject: re Airbags and safety of children A while ago NHTSA (800 424 9393) issued warnings not to place a child in a rear facing seat facing an airbag because the airbag will tip the seat over using the seat belt as a pivot. the child is pushed into the back of the seat and may not bounce back causing suffocation. secondly, recent deaths of young children in airbag equipped passenger seats are under investigation. the problem there is that the airbag deploys at very high speed using explosive like qualities causing facial injuries especially when the child leans forward close to the dash. My boss had an airbag deploy when he rear ended a car. unfortunately he had a notepad on the steering wheel with a plastic backing. the plastic was converted into shards of razor sharp knives and the pad made a distinct outline on his face that lasted for several days. David, enjoy your 96 disco mine is 11k miles strong and getting quicker every day. mileage is about 16-18mpg though i did have 12 in the depth of winter when doing 5 mile trips! also it proved very good at dragging a tree down my street after the storm last weekend. who says only defenders can be made to work for a living!!!!! regards Chris browne, minet gallagher associates boston Chris_browne@minet-usa-bos.ccmail.compuserve.com http://www.minet.tech.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 60 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 11:45:01 -0800 From: matts@cacilj.caciasl.com (Matt Snyder) Subject: Diff lock light When you put the shift lever in diff lock position, there is often a delay before the diff lock actually engages. I don't know if the process is mechanical or electrical or some combination, but the lock doesn't engage until the gears line up properly. Under certain conditions, the delay can be quite long. When the sensor for my light was broken a few years ago, I once got myself severely stuck in a snowy ditch only 10 feet from my back porch, utter embarassment! But the lock was not locked, and I didn't know it, and of course once a wheel is spinning there's no way to get the thing locked. If the lock is indeed locked and the light isn't working, I recommend you get the light sensor serviced by someone who does not tell you it's normal. -Matt ------------------------------[ <- Message 61 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 20:04:49 -0600 (CST) From: "Soren Vels Christensen" <velssvch@inet.uni-c.dk> Subject: Re: Blocked rear brake November 6, 1995 In message Sun, 12 Nov 1995 20:19:20 +0100, lopezba@atnet.at writes: :: :: Jacked up front axle. Put two axle stands under frame. Axle sagged :: again= :: after jack was removed, barely providing enough clearance for wheel :: removal. *Question:* When jack goes under bottom plate for spring, where :: does the axle stand go? And if the jack goes under the frame, at least :: mine will not= :: lift the axle sufficiently for an axle stand. Any tricks? I jack the wheel under the spring and put axle stand under the frame right behind the front springs. Lift the axle when removing or fitting the wheel. This does require long stands though. Not the usual cheap (short) pair you get in the tool market. At the rear i put the stands on the 5x5 cm surface on both sides of the main section of the rear crossmember. They look taylored for that purpose. One must ensure that the x-member is in good condition though. When the army is having an auction on vehicles and tools, go and get some nice big stands. rgds sv/aurens ------------------------------[ <- Message 62 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 12:02:49 PST From: asmith@BayNetworks.COM (Andrew Smith) Subject: Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery Mark, > If anyone has actually purchased > a 1996 model, what are the significant changes verses the earlier models and > is the 1996 model significantly improved over the 1995 model. I have a '96 US Discovery. I think the only significant changes are the two extra tweeters in the hi-fi and they moved the CD changer to under the right seat instead of the left :-) Oh, and they changed the pollution stuff and increased the cc a bit to compensate. You also get amber turn signals at rear which is a major benefit as it makes the vehicule look more "English" :-) Andrew Smith Palo Alto CA USA '96 Discovery ------------------------------[ <- Message 63 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 13 Nov 95 15:06:59 EST Subject: WHyinhell is it a BREAKFAST, of all things? Would someone pplease share the etymology of this term with me? Aj"It's a GRILLE, doggone it!"r ------------------------------[ <- Message 64 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: JWootton@eworld.com Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:27:46 -0800 Subject: Land Rover Parts in London Hi all, "Folly" is in bits, tiny, tiny bits, each one needing TLC ( and paint) however my shiny new galvanized frame has arrived, along with a big box of goodies, so the theorical project is theoretical no more. More on all this later, as I'm sure I'll need alot of help to fit everything back in its place... My current problem is more practical. Inevitably I forgot to order a few things, and my in-laws are in London ( England) as we speak. I would like to steer them toward a LR dealer ( it being Christmas and all...) but I can't find the address of a supplier in the London area. Perhaps someone on the list can help me out? Keep tuned for more on the rise of "Folly" from the ashes ( although its more like rust than ashes, but no matter...) Cheers, JW '73 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 65 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 22:04:04 +0100 From: sm095re@unidui.uni-duisburg.de (Kurt Reinhardt) Subject: Probs with the list Hi folks out there, I have several problems in getting the daily digest since the 11th. If this is a general problem this would be only one of many mails, but if you are happy enough getting your digest and read this mail, please mail me and attach the missing digests. If it is a problem which only occurs to me, please mail me,too. PS: Dear Bill if I am unsubscribed due to failure please resubscribe me to the digest. Thanks Kurt Kurt.Reinhardt@unidui.uni-duisburg.de ------------------------------[ <- Message 66 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 13:31:08 PST From: Bennett Leeds <bennett@mv.us.adobe.com> Subject: Re: Tired of Consumer Digest First, we've been talking Consumer Reports, not Consumer's Digest. Big difference between them. > Why is it a peculiarly U.S. trait that we can have one or two > rotten apples in a bushel basket of golden delicious poison us. You've seen the TV ads: "Demand Better." We are. ;^) That's the American way. >... No wonder with things like the OJ trial. Don't blame us. ... Well, as a LR salesperson, you appear to have a "don't blame me or LR" attitude. Luckily, that's not what I've gotten from the LR people I've dealt with so far. > The Discovery has had more positive publicity garnered upon it that > *ANY* other SUV sold in the U.S.! Even assuming you had some quantitive numbers to back this up, it mostly only shows how good LR's publicity department is. You can bash Consumer Reports all you want. Bottom line is that they are very experienced, capable automotive testers. They test lots of cars - at least as many as most trade rags, and they don't have to worry about advertisers pulling ads. CR was completely up-front about their test criteria (eg, no weight given to off-road ability, tested SUVs like they test sedans). They did that because that's what their market research tells them their readers wanted. Give them some credit for saying that the Disco "did the best in off-road tests." You ask a series of questions about CR's specific test conditions that you imply remain unanswered (leaving us to infer sinster answers); yet though all CR's articles are uncredited you claim to know that this one was written by a person who wrote a similarly bad article for a commercial mag. What inside knowledge do you have? As far as your last question goes, yes we do hear these things when they matter. If the car wasn't working right, CR would say that so and so malfunctioned and the results in the table are for a fixed vehicle. I don't believe CR would print that the results were surprisingly bad without double-checking beforehand. You go on about CR's bashing of the Disco's brakes, yet you fail to mention that CR's gave it an overall brake rating of "GOOD." > Most of the woes thread concerns (c`mon - let's be objective) dinky > stuff. If it's so dinky, why bother putting it on the car at all? Except for the Defender, LR's claim to fame is the combination of superior luxury side by side with superior off road prowess. Read the brochure. If the luxury doesn't work, LR should face it and improve it. And, there *have* been breakdowns requiring towing (auto trans cable, and electrical cable shorting) on this list. Finally, don't forget that most of the Discos people wrote on have less than 20K miles on them. > Jim - tired of journalistic dweeboids who drive around in `73 Ford > Pintos Come on, Jim. You should know that they were the ones bashing the Pintos for their dangerous gas tank placement. They all drive Honda Accords or Toyota Camrys. ;^) Me? I'm a brand new Discovery owner (236 miles as of 1pm today). I like the vehicle very much - I'm sure it'll suit our needs. But, frankly, I see lots in the CR review that's correct. The minor controls *are* illogically placed (the window controls are quite logical by comparison to the front/rear fog lamps, or to the visibility of the clock, or especially to the workings of the window/sunroof lock-out buttons). It's not quick in the saloom. The gears do whine. CR's complaints about marginal A/C, gas mileage, seat comfort, pedal location, etc. all echo complaints seen on this mailing list from owners. On the good side, LR appears to be pretty responsive. I can state for a fact that the power seats in the '96 are far more comfortable than in earlier years. There's even almost a dead foot rest for your clutch foot. And CR will be happy to know that the '96 owner's manual now tells you to use a locking clip for child seats. - Bennett Leeds bennett@mv.us.adobe.com '96 Discovery SE-7, 5 spd., Altai Silver/grey interior '66 Jaguar E-Type roadster, on the blocks '87 BMW 325is '83 Mazda RX-7, for sale Previous owner of a '76 Triumph Spitfire (best steering of any car in the world, btw.) ------------------------------[ <- Message 67 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:50:03 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: WHyinhell is it a BREAKFAST, of all things? On 13 Nov 1995, Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus wrote: > Would someone pplease share the etymology of this term with me? Because... That's what it is called... That's what we (a number of people on the list and elsewhere) have always called it & heard it referred to... > Aj"It's a GRILLE, doggone it!"r No it ain't... A grille is a grille. The breakfast is the entire radiator support, er, breakfast, that goes between the wings, the grille attaches to it etc... ------------------------------[ <- Message 68 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RICKCRIDER@aol.com Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 17:29:11 -0500 Subject: RE: Sun Visors / Hoof in Mouth In a message dated 95-11-13 10:20:38 EST, Tom Rowe wrote: >Sandy, >I'd be caredul about advertising that you are making and selling [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >wonder about >their attitude on this matter. Ahemmm........ugh......er......Sandy Grice actually hasn't been advertising the Exterior Sun Visors.....per se........ I started the thread in an effort to find one for myself. Sandy answered my posting telling me about the ones that the ROAV club made. My further postings were an attempt to help get enough orders in to warrant a remake of the visors..........purely out of greed. I do want one for myself. So, Sandy, if you read this, hope I haven't caused any concerns your way. All else aside, I still want one for myself, and apparently there are desires among the list members for the visors also. Cordially: Rick .....extracting foot from mouth.....Crider Monroe NC ------------------------------[ <- Message 69 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 18:04:08 -0500 (EST) From: "Francis J. Twarog" <ftwarog@moose.uvm.edu> Subject: Trivia etc. Well, a few folks got the trivia spot on correct - the SA team participated for the first time in International competition under their new flag... the vehicles were: 2 and 4 door Rangies, Series III 88's, 90s, 110s, Discos and even (I believe these were used to scout then were found to be just to damn big) a couple of 130s! Gotta run - no trivia today! Frank Twarog Burlington, VT ------------------------------[ <- Message 70 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Harincar@mooregs.com (Tim Harincar) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:59:54 -0600 Subject: Washer Systems? When were windscreen washer systems installed on LRs? My '66 IIa doesn't have a system, so I was wondering if such a system was not offered or offered only as an option that year (and why would anyone choose *not* to have one?). Anyhow, I'm planning to add such a system, based on parts from RN, and was wondering if anyone else has added one, and what any pitfalls might be. Thanks, Tim --- tim harincar harincar@mooregs.com '66 IIa 88 SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 71 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Trivia etc. Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 15:32:47 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> In message <199511132305.SAA02531@butler.uk.stratus.com>you wrote: > the vehicles were: 2 and 4 door Rangies, Series III 88's, > 90s, 110s, Discos and even (I believe these were used to scout then were > found to be just to damn big) a couple of 130s! More Trivia: Which which vehicles used on the Camel Trophy (for competition) did not have diesel engines? Ben ------------------------------[ <- Message 72 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 13 Nov 95 15:54:24 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Disco woes Oh, for heavens sake... > "squeaky" steering at temperatures of 40 degrees or below, until... Now, with the steering of my '87 RR it's like this: Sometimes it squeaks, and sometimes it dont (something to philosophize about). And with the 109, when the beast gets really horny it actually *groans*, go figure... > the differential lock indicator doesn't always light up, even though > it's definitely in gear (I was told this is "normal" -- why have the > damn light if it doesn't mean anything) "Normal" bull droppings, that is... Due to the technical, er, 'intricaticitalities' of the differential what-zee-ma-jigue, if the indicator isn't lit then either a) the bulb is burnt out, or b) your diff *isn't locked* (Pleeze, *don't laugh*, I had to study for this) [above phrase copyright by Django Edwards, U.S. & int.pat.pend.] Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 73 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 13 Nov 95 15:54:17 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: RE: RR fuel economy > In the future, I'd love to see a BMW engine installed in the Discovery. I > bet it'd not only give better gas mileage, it'd also be quieter and > be less leak-prone. I also bet it would instantly overheat and blow its head off (after having made you incinerate your clutch plate) when being forced to pull you through deep desert sand and up and over 300-ft dunes for several hours at 120 deg.F temperatures. The Land Rover engines have all proven that they can do this. The BMW... I most strongly doubt it. On very hot summer days in Germany, the hard shoulders of the Autobahn are littered with stranded BMW's with burnt head gaskets or blown radiators due to severe overheating from speeding at high temps (something you wouldn't be able to experience in the US before Smokey pulls you over...). And this isn't even off-road yet! I wouldn't put a BMW engine in a Land Rover (or any off-road vehicle for that matter) if you gave it to me for free. Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 74 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 16:37:08 PST From: asmith@BayNetworks.COM (Andrew Smith) Subject: '96 Discovery catalogue .... Bennett, Hope you are enjoying your new toy. No doubt you have found something already that doesn't quite work right but I'm cynical enough not to expect everything to be perfect (maybe 3 1/2 years in the US is not quite enough to turn me into a true US-consumer: in England, everyone would be too embarrassed to complain :-) My catalogue so far (1900 miles, 4 weeks) is: - passenger front door latch intermittent fault: been in 3 times now, still not fixed even though they know it as a "problem" from other vehicles. - some under-bonnet grommets not seated correctly. I fixed these. - transmission whine started after approx 900 miles: "this is a feature, not a bug". - wind noise on drivers front door: got worse after I asked them to look at it. Dealer says they reseated the glass and frame. I daren't ask them again :-( - dealer-installed sunroofs wired incorrectly: they accidentally disconnected interior lamp switch to install sunroofs. Actually, dealer subcontracted installation and the installers misinstalled roof wiring (ran off wrong circuit apparently) and screwed up the lamp. At first attempt, dealer corrected the lamp wiring but disconnected the sunroofs. Second attempt, service engineer remembered that he had disconnected sunroofs for safety because they were wired to wrong (unfused?) circuit and had forgotten to wire them up again, duhh! Now working fine. - dealer-installed fog lamps: forgot one screw fastener on installation. - roof cross-bars are a loose fit and I wouldn't recommend relying on them for a ski-rack. I bought a Thule ski rack (REI sale special - hurry while supplies last!) identical to the L-R official one for 1/4 the price but am now considering buying the gutter-mount posts and bars as the L-R bars rattle around so much. It might just be adequate with skis installed as braces! - irregular range on remote key locking (a real off-road showstopper this one!). Sometimes 20ft, sometimes 3ft. Must be due to ionospheric conditions. Never completely fails though. User-inflicted damage: - encounter with my gatepost: yes, Discovery is wider than an old Cherokee! Score was a tie - gatepost 1: Discovery 1. I think there is a bad blind-spot down there (need those dipping side mirrors!). Time to get some sensible corners containing steel for the rear bumper - the plastic ends give zero protection for the paper-thin rear corner body panels. Small dent on the rear right-side corner. The gatepost suffered similar damage. Why did I go for the shiny black colour .....? Future user-inflicted damage: - sure to crack those plastic trim-strips-that-look-like-steps real soon now! Getting around 18mpg on 92 octane, freeway (including a Tahoe trip). Haven't been off-piste yet but I'm eagerly awaiting some real weather and deep snow. Still looking for snow chains at a sensible price (my old Jeep industrial-grade ones are too small :-() Everything else is just ..... wonderful! Andrew Smith Palo Alto CA USA '60 Healey 3000 Mk.I '96 Discovery P.S. I don't remember any big seatbelt sticker. ------------------------------[ <- Message 75 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 17:01:32 -0800 (PST) From: John Brabyn <brabyn@skivs.ski.org> Subject: Re: Subject: buying 87 90 RR On 10 Nov 1995, Treit Le wrote: > Looking at my service manual, the 105K '95 RR Classic service includes the > replacement of the catalytic converter. Is this normal for all cars? or just > RR's? My general attitude concerning exhaust systems has been to replace them > when they start dragging;). Is there a stainless exhaust for my vehicle and > does it improve power? Funnily enough mine is just due for its 105,000 mile service, but I have no intention of replacing catalytic converters unless they start leaking. I seriously doubt if even the dealers do this as a routine service (I know they don't with the oxygen sensors, which are supposed to be replaced around 82,500). Cheers John Brabyn 89 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 76 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 19:54:50 -0500 (EST) From: "Steven Swiger (LIS)" <swiger@luna.cas.usf.edu> Subject: Kudos to FTP Site Just checked out the LR ftp site that came up in the mail the other day... It is excellent. If you get the chance, check it out! Good Work and great pix OVLR! kudos steve _________________________________ |_______|_______|_______|_______| "Moose" | ____________ | | \\ '73 III 88" | / | \ | | \\ ________ | | | | | | \\ | | | \______|_____/ |______|_______\\___|________|__ |___________________|_______________|---------------\ | [] [] [] | | 0 |) | |--] | | _| / OOOOO | | OOOOO |__ |_|____I OO o o OO ___|_______________|___ OO o o OO ____| 0 OO o 0 o OO OO o 0 o OO OO o OO "Tread Lightly" OO o OO OOOOO OOOOO Florida Rover Canvas Steve Swiger swiger@luna.cas.usf.edu (813) 980-1013 (813) 253-0905 (Work) ------------------------------[ <- Message 77 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 17:05:30 -0800 (PST) From: John Brabyn <brabyn@skivs.ski.org> Subject: Re: Where to mount Ham / Cell Antenna on 96 Discovery? I don't have a Discovery or a cellular phone, but found a glass mount worked fine for a CB. I have the kind that unscrews, so can leave it off (I keep it under the carpet in the back) unless I'm using it. This is advantageous for garages and car washes! Cheers John Brabyn 89RR On Sun, 12 Nov 1995, David Dodell wrote: > To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net > I just bought a new Discovery and having problems fiquring out where to [ truncated by lro-digester (was 30 lines)] > Internet: david@warp.stat.com > FAX : +1-602-451-6135 > WWW : http://www.stat.com/~david ------------------------------[ <- Message 78 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 11:41:22 +0930 From: philr@ozemail.com.au (Phil Rofe) Subject: timing belt actual lifetimes on 200 tdi defender Some help required from those who have endured the experience of a broken timing belt on the 200 TDI DEFENDER. I recently heard of a DEFENDER owner who drove his vehicle up to the very northern tip of Australia (Cape York-nice spot) but 3 days drive from the nearest LR mechanic....guess what? It broke! I'd like to avoid the experience (and probably too the adventure).. Story goes that the Australian LR distributers agreed to pay for the part but not the labour....some A$1300 later! Any advice would be appreciated! Apart from this and after 30 000km of hard driving in the Northern Terrritory of Australia I'm still convinced that if treated kindly they're a great vehicle. (Still love my series 3 SWB tho' even if it does drop oil)) Bye PhilR@ozemail.com.au ------------------------------[ <- Message 79 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Gerald" <g@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 21:03:15 -0500 Subject: Re: Chelmsford, USA >From: Danny Phillips <danny@tlpgate.lonpar.co.uk> asked: >lastly a note to tim macdaniel, is chelmsford in the US more interesting than >the one in the uk? the uk one was once voted 3rd most boring city in the >country, just after coventry and grantham.town I can't answer for tim macdaniel, but I have been to Chelmsford, Massachusetts. No doubt a namesake of Chelmsford, U.K. Its most notable feature is a five way intersection in the center of town. The site of enough small accidents to engender bumper stickers that say "I survived Chelmsford Center." -- Gerald g@ix.netcom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 80 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Gerald" <g@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 22:18:40 -0500 Subject: Automatic electric aerial I picked up a Discovery Accessories brochure in London. It lists a "Fully Automatic Electric Aerial" STC8040. Anyone know if this will work on a U.S. Disco? Seems odd to me that it is not available in U.S. I waved at one RR this morning and the driver acknowledged by nodding her head. Waved at another Disco this evening and not no response though it was dark enough that the driver probably missed my wave. -- Gerald g@ix.netcom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 81 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: CpaulP@aol.com Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 22:34:01 -0500 Subject: Re: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest Have not received any mail (IRO-DIGEST) in last 2 days (Nov.12 &13). Is the system having problems or is it me? Thanks. ------------------------------[ <- Message 82 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 13 Nov 95 22:48:55 EST From: Bill R Parks <74200.240@compuserve.com> Subject: subscribe Subscribe lro-digest ------------------------------[ <- Message 83 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 23:56:41 -0500 From: Matt Neibaur <matt@jax.gttw.com> Subject: Disco Someone asked about Discoveries: I've had my 1995 for about six months. I love it. I think it drives well. It can go places I've only dreamed of in the past. I've hooked up a trailer and pulled it up a mountain top without any difficulty. It has also quit at 8,000 miles. It had to do with the alternator. It was fixed under warranty, and is running fine now. Overall, I like it and I plan on keeping it for a long time. Its a heavy car, so the braking is a little slower than a light car would be. It still feels safe. I think it is a good value. Matt N. matt@jax.gttw.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 84 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 21:28:23 -0800 From: "John C. White, III" <jcwhite3@well.com> Subject: Was: Snow chains for Discos, Now: Echo No, it's not my imagination. I've gotten this message FIVE times now. Cheers! John At 14:34 11.11.95 -0800, Douglas W. Forehand wrote: >To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 28 lines)] >Thanks >Doug ------------------------------[ <- Message 85 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 21:28:55 -0800 From: "John C. White, III" <jcwhite3@well.com> Subject: Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery There are also two models now. The SD and the SE7. The difference between them is that the SE7 has electric seats, the SD doesn't. I stopped by the dealership today to check them out. Found out something else interesting in the process. Land Rover only produces 45,000 Discoveries a year. Of these 20,000 are kept for the U.K. market. According to the salesman, the local dealership has the highest sales in northern California, but can only get 15 Discoveries a month. That's why the wait is so long and the price not discounted at all. Cheers! John '95 Discovery San Francisco, California At 12:02 13.11.95 PST, Andrew Smith wrote: >To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] >> is the 1996 model significantly improved over the 1995 model. >I have a '96 US Discovery. I think the only significant changes are the two extra >tweeters in the hi-fi and they moved the CD changer to under the right seat >instead of the left :-) >Oh, and they changed the pollution stuff and increased the cc a bit to compensate. >You also get amber turn signals at rear which is a major benefit as it makes >the vehicule look more "English" :-) [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] >Palo Alto CA USA >'96 Discovery ------------------------------[ <- Message 86 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 01:01:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Unique Sighting David McKain sez... > Also, the LR's in Ace Ventura were obviously just painted, probably > some old klunkers with lots of bondo. The Jeepster Commando they > destroyed was not fully repainted on the top which was pretty > obvious. Still makes you sad to see them get wrecked. - Now for the interesting part... If you watched the credits, you would have noticed that the movie was filmed in Canada, Texas and South Carolina. There is a safari park in Texas that was used, so the mansion and "jungle" scenes were probably done in SC. Anyone from SC have any idea of where these Rovers came from?? Cheers Mike ------------------------------[ <- Message 87 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 01:01:56 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Fuel Sender Units pos. vs. neg. Jeremy asks... > Does replacing the pos. earth sender with a neg. earth sender pose any > problems? I can't think why it should, and I recall a few posts about > pos to neg. conversions leading to reversal in the fuel guage. Surely > replacing the sender polarity type will cure this? - There is no "polarity" in the sender itself as it is basically a variable resistance with ground (earth). I converted my 1965 IIa to negative earth with no problems - using the original fuel sender. I have heard some mutterings that the older (rectangular) fuel sender contains a voltage stabilizer, but I question that since there is only one wire attached, and that wire goes to the fuel guage. The only guage reversal you will have is on the ammeter, and that is easily corrected by reversing the connections to the ammeter. Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 725-1859 Gloversville NY, 12078 -USA- 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ("Sidney") 7 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol ("Fern") #:-}> 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol (Parts is Parts) ------------------------------[ <- Message 88 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 01:02:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Washer Systems? Tim asks... > When were windscreen washer systems installed on LRs? My '66 IIa doesn't > have a system, so I was wondering if such a system was not offered or > offered only as an option that year (and why would anyone choose *not* to > have one?). - Well.... I just happen to have the "Optional Equipment" book for the Series II and IIa... There actually was an optional windscreen washer offered. I have no details except that the jets were fitted to the windscreen wiper arms. I have a part of a screenwasher - just the pushbutton for the dash panel. It is labled "Kigass Screenwasher" and when you push the button it compresses a small rubber bulb for a pump. Does anyone know if that was part of the original option? On the subject of options, according to this book the interior mirror and passenger-side windscreen wiper were both options. (The mirror was standard on Station Wagons, Hardtops and Cabs.) Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 725-1859 Gloversville NY, 12078 -USA- 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ("Sidney") 7 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol ("Fern") #:-}> 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol (Parts is Parts) ------------------------------[ <- Message 89 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 01:01:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Blocked rear brake November 6, 1 Peter works on his brakes... > *Tip:* If wheel nuts can not be loosened by using the crossbrace, rest > end of crossbrace on jack or axle stand and step on levers. If your > breakfast was sufficiently hearty, nuts should move. - And if you do it wrong, *your* nuts will move.... 8-O > *Question:* When jack goes under bottom plate for spring, where does the > axle stand go? And if the jack goes under the frame, at least mine will > not lift the axle sufficiently for an axle stand. Any tricks? - I've got just a wimpy little jack, so I use a couple of 4x4 wood blocks under the jack to raise it up higher. If you have a nice big floor jack, you can lift the truck from the bottom of the diff. Also, if you have nice big jackstands, you could support the truck from the axels instead of the bottom of the springs. > Pulled off brake drum by tapping it patiently on the protruding outer > edge with a heavy plastic mallet. Took some time, but came off in one > piece. - Here's something to try... You should find that there is a hole in the brake drum with no screw in it. You can fit a coarse thread bolt in that hole. Screw it in until the bolt makes contact with the hub. Then, slowly screw it in further. It will push the brake drum away from the hub. You may need to slack it off and tap around the hub with your mallet so the hub comes off straight. Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 725-1859 Gloversville NY, 12078 -USA- 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ("Sidney") 7 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol ("Fern") #:-}> 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol (Parts is Parts) ------------------------------[ <- Message 90 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 01:07:25 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: Washer Systems? On Mon, 13 Nov 1995, Tim Harincar wrote: > When were windscreen washer systems installed on LRs? My '66 IIa doesn't > have a system, so I was wondering if such a system was not offered or > offered only as an option that year (and why would anyone choose *not* to > have one?). Original eqippment on my 109 SW '64 109 has one. Hand operated pump just above the temp/oil pressure switch. Bottle sits in a holder bolted onto the centre of the bulkhead. Holder fits a beer very well... k ------------------------------[ <- Message 91 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports Ratings on 1995 Land Rover Discovery Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 22:38:47 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> John White wrote: > I stopped by the dealership today to check them out. > Found out something else interesting in the process. Land Rover only > produces 45,000 Discoveries a year. Of these 20,000 are kept for the U.K. > market. That's some interesting (mis)information. According to LRO magazine the factory is producing 1760 Discos/week as of August 1995. It was at 1200 per week before that. I did some calucation on publish production rates (goals) and came up with 87,360 Discos built in 1995. Lately I've heard that worldwide LR sales are dropping. > According to the salesman, the local dealership has the highest > sales in northern California, but can only get 15 Discoveries a month. And in Massachusetts, Jim Pappas mentioned selling 30 to 40 per month at a single dealer. I guess supply differes based on region. Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benjamin Smith------------bens@vislab.navy.mil---------1972 Land Rover SIII 88 Science Applications International Corporation Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, China Lake "...If I were running such a contest, I would specifically eliminate any entry from Ben involving driving the [Land] Rover anywhere. He'd drive it up the Amazon basin for a half can of Jolt and a stale cookie..." --Kevin Archie ------------------------------[ <- Message 92 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 951114 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 90 lines 3958 [forwarded 363 whitespace 996] Output: lines 3138 [content 2008 forwarded 169 (cut 194) whitespace 908]Forward
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.