[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 27 | Re: '56 Series I 107 5-door for sale... |
2 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 24 | Re: Prices of Land Rovers in US |
3 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 16 | Re: Rover Names |
4 | Vel Natarajan [nataraja@ | 36 | Re: EPA's Imports Hotline |
5 | Mr Ian Stuart [Ian.Stuar | 35 | Re: V8 hybred - "Taylor" like question. |
6 | Andrew Grafton [A.J.Graf | 28 | Disco transmission whine |
7 | Stephen Thomas [stephen. | 22 | Re: Disco wipers |
8 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 18 | Pink Panther |
9 | Easton Trevor [TEASTON@D | 10 | I really should be working |
10 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 47 | Re: DAP Enterprises |
11 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 23 | Building my own Pink Panther |
12 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 15 | Popeet frame extender |
13 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 16 | Another Famous Owner |
14 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 19 | Re: Building my own Pink Panther |
15 | "Tom Rowe" [TROWE@AE.AGE | 36 | Re: Building my own Pink Panther |
16 | "Ahmad Ijaz" [AIJAZ@alst | 8 | U.S. Imports |
17 | Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus [A | 21 | Re: Building my own Pink Panther |
18 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 20 | Re: Building my own Pink Panther |
19 | Guydell@aol.com | 16 | RR headliners |
20 | RICKCRIDER@aol.com | 51 | Selling My 109" |
21 | Guydell@aol.com | 14 | RR headliners $ quote |
22 | cs@crl.com (Michael Carr | 40 | Re[2]: EPA's Imports Hotline |
23 | cs@crl.com (Michael Carr | 32 | Re: U.S. Imports |
24 | "Guzelis.Pete" [guzelis. | 25 | RE: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
25 | jhong@haiku.com (John Ho | 35 | Re: DAP Enterprises (long) |
26 | jhong@haiku.com (John Ho | 35 | Re: DAP Enterprises |
27 | David Rosenbaum [rosenba | 29 | D90:Steering Groans (fwd) |
28 | RICKCRIDER@aol.com | 23 | Re: headliner |
29 | RICKCRIDER@aol.com | 13 | Selling my 109" Correction |
30 | [Glen_Rees@parlon2.ccmai | 24 | SERIES LR SEATBELTS |
31 | Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk | 41 | RE: Brake Flex Lines |
32 | Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk | 30 | RE: 7.50x16 Tyres |
33 | cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | 21 | Farewell... |
34 | grea@net.gov.bc.ca (Gord | 19 | LRO Celebs. |
35 | LANDROVER@delphi.com | 35 | Re: DAP Enterprises (long) |
36 | Mark Ritter [70472.1130@ | 18 | Isuzu Diesels in U.S. |
37 | Lloyd Allison [lloyd@cs. | 22 | N. Spain |
38 | mtalbot@InterServ.Com (M | 26 | Re: Customs parts vehicle |
39 | Spenny@aol.com | 38 | Re: DAP experiences |
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 01:40:59 -0700 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: '56 Series I 107 5-door for sale... > then $3000 finding original parts and repairing, then sell for $5500, > netting $300 for my 3000 hours of labor, blood, sweat, and tears? I would say that $5500 is awful low for a restored, rust-free 107". That's the cost of a good condition 88" hereabouts. I would guess that 10K would not be unreasonable, if you restored it both mechanically and decoratively. Possibly even more. Certainly something like $7500 would sell it quick. But, $3K may be a bit optimistic for the restoration cost. I dunno. Even so, if you put $5200 into it, then sell it for 10,200, you make a $5000 profit, which (at 3000 hours) is $1.66/hour. As an investment, it's not a good idea. But, you don't buy Land Rovers with your calculator. Go for it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 01:41:08 -0700 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: Prices of Land Rovers in US TeriAnn invests wisely... > Roger I paid US$350 for my 109 two door. Considering it has a good body, [...snip...] > suspect she would be worth over US$10K. Not bad for an initial $350 > investment > What do I care what she is worth, I never plan to sell her anyway, so the > value is meaningless. Guess that means she's priceless. (Same story on my 109") --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Rover Names Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 9:40:45 BST > To change subscription write to: Majordomo@Land-Rover.Team.Net [ truncated by lro-digester (was 21 lines)] > +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge > +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. > cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England How 'bout LeXiC? Short for Dyslexic.Well,anything with Lucas aboard....... Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Vel Natarajan <nataraja@cig.mot.com> Subject: Re: EPA's Imports Hotline Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 03:57:11 -0500 (CDT) Michael Carradine writes: Talking at length with the local San Francisco office, as far as EPA is concerned, the engine is the car! That is, putting a 1980 engine into a 1968 vehicle will put you into 1980 EPA standards. The engine will have to be complete with all the emmissions and exhaust as req'd for 1980. They don't care about the body style (other agencies do!). What you say makes sense, and I would have figured that it would be the engine that would decide the year as well. Maybe I was a bit too hasty. I should have asked additional questions in more detail, and do plan to call them back. I know california has it's own set of rules on this. Could it be specific to the California EPA? Maybe the lady you spoke with assumed you were replacing the engine with a like model (?), of course I wouldn't even bring it up. ~$~ When I asked my question, I figure she would have said something like "As long as it's the same year or earlier". I didn't expect her to say "Not at all". But it would be pretty silly of me not to go into further detail before trying to ship a non- standard vehicle back. BTW, What other agencies care about the body style on a pre-68 vehicle? (as long as the VIN is the same?) I thought it was perfectly legal to import a coil sprung SII, for example. (If not, I have a lot more research to do...not that I necessarily want a coil-springer...or is that coil-sprunger) ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mr Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 08:46:29 +0000 Subject: Re: V8 hybred - "Taylor" like question. On 27 Jul 95, DEBROWN@srp.gov wrote: > My thoughts are to make the 109 into a camper/tow vehicle and tow the > "real-rough and ready" 88 to use on the trails. Would towing (no trailer, > just tow bar) a LR be harmful for it? (Locking front hubs.) We have several people who tow SWBs to trials. The trick is to free the free-wheeling hubs, stick the gearbox AND TRANSFER BOX into neutral and tow the LR with an A-frame: # /----- A-Frame which goes from a single ball on the #@-***\ | back of the tow-car to two balls on the towed # ****\ LR. # | **-@ # ****/ #@-***/ #| |\--- One of two tow-balls (mounted in front of the chassis rails) > "real-rough and ready" 88 to use on the trails. Would towing (no trailer, > just tow bar) a LR be harmful for it? (Locking front hubs.) \--- Front bumber This system keeps the LR fairly rigidly behind the tow-car, and stops it from 'snaking' behind you as you drive. PS don't forget to unlock the steering :-) ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> or <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Andrew Grafton <A.J.Grafton@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Disco transmission whine Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 10:24:25 BST Friend has a 6 month old Disco with 5K miles on it. It has a whine coming from the transmission - happens about 40-60 mph (varying in pitch and intensity), in gear and in neutral, with the clutch in or out. He claims the noise has appeared relatively recently, and that a recent service produced no changes to it. Any ideas? Is this normal - it doesn't sound _bad_; just a little louder than one would like. It's not tyre noise, as you can hear that changing with different road surfaces. The noise disappears below 40 and above 60 is drowned out by air and engine noise. The dealer/service place claims that there is no noise... typical. All the best, Andy A.J.Grafton@lut.ac.uk ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 07:50:56 -0400 From: Stephen Thomas <stephen.thomas@tridom.com> Subject: Re: Disco wipers John asks: >2.) A friend has a '94 Disco and his front wipers freeze in the middle of >their arc when they're on the intermittent setting. He says they freeze for [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >silence a squeak. Any thoughts on what might me the culprit? Loose wire or >fried relay? Lucas strikes again? Been there, done that. Bad relay. (And the service department did mention that my Disco wasn't the first they had seen with the problem.) --Stephen ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Thomas AT&T Tridom Phone: (404) 514-3522 840 Franklin Court Fax: (404) 514-3491 Marietta, GA 30067 USA Email: stephen.thomas@tridom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: Pink Panther Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 08:11:00 DST Ben Smith writes At the risk of falling into a sarcastic trap Remember, Ben, we met at Owls Head. The English chap Blue 88 SW, wife Mary long haired brunette. Personal experience dictates, when communicating with an Englishman (me) whether electronically or otherwise always assume sarcasm first. PS When kitted out with all that gear and powered by the 2283 four "Pink Slug" would probably be more appropriate. See August LRO mag for nice resto. Trevor Easton (Do I feel another limerick about to emerge) ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Easton Trevor <TEASTON@DQC2.DOFASCO.CA> Subject: I really should be working Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 08:34:00 DST An SAS type in Tobruk Said " To hide we won't go by the book. With our cute coat of paint, thought pooftahs we ain't, in our Panthers we'll sure have the look ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 07:29:58 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: DAP Enterprises Michael, > My experiences with DAP Enterprises have always been very positive, As I said in my post, my experiences, also, were always postive. In fact I didn't always find DAP to be the cheapest, but I *always* delt with Al (unless he was out of something I needed *now*) because of his attitude. To me service is more important than price, within reason of course. In fact, when it was posted about DAP moving to VT a few months back, I chimed in with my two cents worth on DAP being a business worthy of patronage. > and I'd give them the benefit of the doubt I *was* giving them the benifit of the doubt by allowing plenty of time for a postcard to arrive, assuming Bruce had no luck and was saving the price of a phone call or fax. After all, he said he'd get back to me. >(after all, you're asking them about a *JEEP* part). A part purchaced from DAP, albeit some time ago. >willing to destroy a reputation with a keystroke. I can't do that. If this was an isolated case I'm sure to hear from others like yourself who have had nothing but postive dealings with the new DAP. The net seems to be the best place to find out about the typical dealings with a particular company. Maybe I'm becoming a curmudgeon as I get older, but I don't let businesses get away with lousy service anymore. If DAP is still the business I reccomended far and wide (I kept a stack of Al's business cards to hand out to every Rover owner I met, a lot of whom didn't know about DAP) my appologies. But my first dealing with Bruce lead me to think otherwise. If I turn out to be wrong I certainly will post that also. Tom Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Jul 95 09:00:10 EDT From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Building my own Pink Panther << "fully armed Pink Panthers next" I've bounced around the idea of doing a Pink Panther conversion myself... Can't possibly afford to buy one of the real ones as prices are astronomical. But I could easily (I believe) build one and I may have found a suitably shot donor 109 (interior fire... yuk) Does anyone have any documentation of the modifications, sources for specialized parts (like the Bren Gun holders on the fenders and smoke grenade launchers) and specifics on what the proper kit was... My restoration list is getting short (By Spring, all my vehicles will be done and in good shape -- now what fun will *that* be) and I have sort of been tossing this idea around. Any thoughts? Cheers, R. P. Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Jul 95 09:03:13 EDT From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Popeet frame extender <<< the Popeet Frame Extender/Compresser Can someone send me the quotes on this (or at least the gist of this concept) so that I can include it in the Taylor Q&A set? What a great concept!!! You can have an 88-->109 LR! Thanks, Cheers, R. P. Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Jul 95 09:14:19 EDT From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Another Famous Owner Ian: I believe Jim Carey (of Dumb and Dumber fame) has a Series 88 purchased while he was filming part II of Ace Ventura. Apparently, there are a bunch of Rovers blown up in that movie, and the folks who supplied them at DownEast Rovers mentioned that several case members and crew members had been so impressed with Rovers they had ordered/bought them. Cheers, R. P. Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Building my own Pink Panther Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 14:28:25 BST There's a good article in the current LRO magazine,also I beleive the Dunsfold Land Rover trust have two,and may be able to assist. No Bren's,though.Two,presumably 7.62mm Gp (sorry)GP machine guns,one mounted aft and the other in the commanders position.Tyres 9.00X16 with extended spring hangers to raise the vehicle.All of them I've seen either on film or photo are RHD. No doors,no winshield,spare in crash position on front bumper. I *said* it would come to this........ Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Tom Rowe" <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 08:32:59 GMT -0600 Subject: Re: Building my own Pink Panther > I've bounced around the idea of doing a Pink Panther conversion myself... Can't > possibly afford to buy one of the real ones as prices are astronomical. But I [ truncated by lro-digester (was 17 lines)] > tossing this idea around. Any thoughts? > Cheers, > R. P. Reid Sounds like fun, and cheaper than the people over here that collect tanks. There was a piece on the tube last night about several people that have substaintial collections of restored tanks. As for info. There was a book supossedly published in England by ISO Publications in the late '60's or early '70's called something like "Military Land Rovers". I say "supposedly" because I sent a check for one prior to the publication date but never got it. Anyway, it was directed at modelers, but if it was like their other pubs, it would have had quite detailed photos. Sources I can't help with. PS If you come across the book let me know. I'd still like to get my copy. I even still have the canceled check on the theory that some day I'll locate ISO Pubs. Have fun. Tom Tom Rowe UW-Madison Center for Dairy Research 608-265-6194, Fax:608-262-1578 trowe@ae.agecon.wisc.edu Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck in places even more inaccessible. ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Ahmad Ijaz" <AIJAZ@alston.cba.ua.edu> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 08:53:44 CDT Subject: U.S. Imports I have heard there is a law in the works now that would let anyone import any vehicle as long as the vehicle is 25 year old. ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus <Alan_Richer/CAM/Lotus.LOTUS@crd.lotus.com> Date: 28 Jul 95 10:40:56 EDT Subject: Re: Building my own Pink Panther Wouldn't this be an answer for the BMW problem? Picture, if you will, the wondrous sight of BMW headquarters being leveled by the combined grenade fire of a batch of PP conversions...with the occasional Diesel laying down a protective smokescreen...<grin> Actually, I'd be concerned at the safety/drivability issues inherent in a Pink Panther conversion. Not having doors or a windscreen, as well as the danger of the gun/grenade mounts (who needs bull bars?) would make me think of this kind of conversion as a showpiece rather than a daily driver. Then again, in Boston ommuter traffic, grenade launchers might be a good idea. Anybody got any opinions on this part of the issue? -ajr ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Building my own Pink Panther Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 16:30:02 BST Er...Alan, I think they're *supposed* to be dangerous.But I wouldnt worry about the forward smoke launchers getting bent by a careless pedestrian.The spare wheel sticks out in front, nearly horizontal.If they didnt bounce off the tyre,the wheel would scoop 'em up.They could then be disposed of by the vehicle commander/forward gunner. Strangely enough,I think the only thing the fuzzy-wuzzies would object to over here,would be the lack of doors. Someone corect me if I'm wrong,but it sounds daft enough to be true. Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Guydell@aol.com Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 11:51:47 -0400 Subject: RR headliners The local Land Rover dealer in Walnut Creek (CA) quoted me $399 for a complete headliner replacement for a 90 Range Rover (less 15-20% with a resale number) and no charge for shipping (they ship from the warehouse in TN by truck). I am considering a new one myself. Anyone had experience on installation? Regards, Guy della-Cioppa 90 Range Rover County (Beluga Black) ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RICKCRIDER@aol.com Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 12:40:09 -0400 Subject: Selling My 109" Well.....alas.....guess I can't keep everything. A new baby in the oven, several unfinished Alfa Romeo projects and a ham radio habit tend to eat away at my toy money. I've decided to put Hugo up for adoption. Hugo is a VERY straight 1966 Series IIA, 109" 5 door wagon. (VIN # 826630765) No signs of major collision or repair during his 29 years. Wears size 235/85/16 shoes on his rims, with 90% of their tread remaining. Standard green in color, sports a white tropical roof panel with the oval horizontal windows in the top section. All guages work except for the odometer itself. ( The speedometer works fine.) Excellent oil pressure. Original (except for alternator conversion) and relatively clean under the hood (bonnet, for some of you). Sold, serviced and maintained by Harrell Motor Sales most of his life (one of the first Land Rover Dealers in the US back in the 'old days'......Ted, the chief mechanic, has been with Harrells more than 40 years). Hugo anxiously cranks and runs on demand, is a non smoker, and recently passed the stringent North Carolina DMV inspection with an excellent report card. Has excellent floorboards, NO rust where you'd expect it around the bottom of the bulkhead, the outriggers show some patching but overall the frame passes the hammer and screwdriver test with flying colors. Comes with set of new 'Genuine' door seals, yet to be installed, and other various parts that I've accumulated, including an old original parts manual. So what does he need? Mostly cosmetic stuff.....a set of seats, seat covers, or a new roll of duct tape. Could use a new rear headliner, and a rear exhaust section, and lower sliding window channels. Could use spring mount bushings if your really picky. Right rear taillight lens is cracked. Actually, a type A 'anal' personality could probably quickly spend a grand on trivial toys, goodies and pretty things but Hugo is fully ready and serviceable just as he stands. I need to get $8500. (US) in order to let Hugo leave. Cash or certified bank funds only. Visitors are welcome. If you're seriously interested and have more questions feel free to call (704) 289-6303 or email. Thanks all. Cordially: Rick Crider <rickcrider@aol.com> 111 S. Hayne St. Monroe NC 28112 (Thats near Charlotte NC) ' 66 IIA 109" ' 73 III 88" ' 88 Range Rover (the daily mule) .....and more Alfa's than I'm willing to admit. ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Guydell@aol.com Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 13:11:19 -0400 Subject: RR headliners $ quote I think I goofed on that quote ($399). The Land Rover dealer in Walnut Creek (CA) quoted me $499 (I think) for a complete headliner replacement for a 90 Range Rover. Regards, Guy della-Cioppa 90 Range Rover County (Beluga Black) ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 09:27:39 +0100 From: cs@crl.com (Michael Carradine) Subject: Re[2]: EPA's Imports Hotline Vel Natarajan <nataraja@cig.mot.com> writes: >BTW, What other agencies care about the body style on a pre-68 vehicle? (as long as the VIN is the same?) I thought it was perfectly legal to import a coil sprung SII, for example. (If not, I have a lot more research to do...not that I necessarily want a coil-springer...or is that coil-sprunger) Besides the EPA looking at engine types and emissions, you have DOT for vehicle safety standards (I think they have a 21 year expiry), Customs for duty determination (2.5% passenger cars, 25% for trucks, less a $1000 personal exemption), and of course the State which varies. In California they're sticking with original equipment for all model years (after '67 ?), with imports allowed for only those models specifically designed and equipped for the US (ie, no '75 Series III since they were not officially imported into the US). I've heard of cars here in the US taken back to the UK for a frame restoration, body and engine remake. They have the advantage of the previous US registration and paperwork, "Just bringing the ol' Rover back!" That's a little chancier and not any different than ordering all the parts and doing a rebuild here to the point of keeping just the chassis number. I'm not certain if you wouldn't have to indicate to the DMV that you have a new chassis number at one point(?). I would think that importing a new to you S-II with a NEW chassis would be risky. The DMV can look up the chassis number and not find it, then what? Or does the new chassis have the old number? The vehicle most likely will clear Customs, DOT, and EPA based on the title, but if you can't get plates? Michael Carradine, Architect <cs@crl.com> Ph/Fax 510-988-0900 .plan available _________________________________________________________________________ Mercedes-Benz Unimog 4x4 WWW page at: http://www.crl.com/~cs/unimog.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 09:51:29 +0100 From: cs@crl.com (Michael Carradine) Subject: Re: U.S. Imports Ahmad Ijaz <AIJAZ@alston.cba.ua.edu> writes: > I have heard there is a law in the works now that would let >anyone import any vehicle as long as the vehicle is 25 year old. There already is, In CANADA! In fact, I think it's only 15 years there. As to the US, I can't imagine that after all the work California and other states have put in establishing their tough environmental regulations and emission standards, removing old clunkers from the road, etc. that they would suddenly drop all restrictions on 25+ year old vehicles. For several years California had a rule about not enforcing emissions on cars over 21 years old. I kept my '72 TR6 (with 3 double barrel Webers!) in storage for 5 years waiting for 1993 to roll around.... In the mean time, California revised their statues and are now enforcing emissions for all model years as originally designed FOREVER! (*&$%#@!!) However, if you find any more hard facts on the 25 year rule, please let me know personally. 1997 is not too far away *8) Michael Carradine, Architect <cs@crl.com> Ph/Fax 510-988-0900 .plan available _________________________________________________________________________ Mercedes-Benz Unimog 4x4 WWW page at: http://www.crl.com/~cs/unimog.html ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Jul 1995 10:29:57 U From: "Guzelis.Pete" <guzelis.pete@ssdgwy.mdc.com> Subject: RE: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest Here's one for the books. I ordered a service manual for my '94 Disco from the local Santa Ana, Ca. dealership where I bought my LR for a MERE $80 US. Not bad eh! (Ha Ha). Gets better. Went to pick up the manual and it was handed to me bound in plastic. The obvious ??? - where is the hard cover? Oh, LR has decided not to give hard covers with the manual since there are a number of replacement pages that need to be added (quite logical). OK, I'll just go to my local stationary store and get one. Sorry sir. A 4 ring binder has to be special ordered for only $10 US. Oh well, why not. Got the darn cover the other day after a week's wait. Guess what,the holes don't line up. Return - get the money back and get the official LR hard cover for a lousy $12. Word to the wise for future new LR buyers, get one at the time of vehicle delivery along with the cover. With all the running around, I must have spent $25 for gas. I now have a $117 Service Manual. _______________________ From: Land-Rover-Owner@uk.stratus.com on Fri, Jul 28, 1995 2:19 AM Subject: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest File(s): The Land Rover Owner Daily Dige Text too big (>32K). See enclosure. ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 10:44:08 -0700 From: jhong@haiku.com (John Hong) Subject: Re: DAP Enterprises (long) Michael, I think Tom was asking about DAP *recently* as in "under the new management" (So Tom you bought one of those LW rovers Al brought in) I also have had great service from Al and Skip at DAP but have not had the need to buy anything recently so I can't help with recent feedback. Anybody know what Al is up to? Racing fulltime? I guess Skip is working at another parts place on the Cape? > Michael Carradine writes: > Tom Rowe <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> writes: >>I'd like to hear from people that have dealt with DAP >>Enterprises recently to see if I'm alone in my experience. >>(snip) > My experiences with DAP Enterprises have always been very positive, > and I'd give them the benefit of the doubt (after all, you're asking [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > their consistently low prices (nearly 30% less than RN!), and if > nothing else, to keep the other vendors in line. > I have to agree with Al somewhat in considering net-users exceeding > the worst gaggle of old wo/men chattering away; and I add, willing to > destroy a reputation with a keystroke. > Michael Carradine, Architect <cs@crl.com> John Hong Haiku Systems Notes Business Partner Consultant jhong@haiku.com 408-249-8340 ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 10:44:14 -0700 From: jhong@haiku.com (John Hong) Subject: Re: DAP Enterprises Michael, I think Tom was asking about DAP *recently* as in "under the new management" (So Tom you bought one of those LW rovers Al brought in) I also have had great service from Al and Skip at DAP but have not had the need to buy anything recently so I can't help with recent feedback. Anybody know what Al is up to? Racing fulltime? I guess Skip is working at another parts place on the Cape? > Michael Carradine writes: > Tom Rowe <TROWE@AE.AGECON.WISC.EDU> writes: >>I'd like to hear from people that have dealt with DAP >>Enterprises recently to see if I'm alone in my experience. >>(snip) > My experiences with DAP Enterprises have always been very positive, > and I'd give them the benefit of the doubt (after all, you're asking [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > their consistently low prices (nearly 30% less than RN!), and if > nothing else, to keep the other vendors in line. > I have to agree with Al somewhat in considering net-users exceeding > the worst gaggle of old wo/men chattering away; and I add, willing to > destroy a reputation with a keystroke. > Michael Carradine, Architect <cs@crl.com> John Hong Haiku Systems Notes Business Partner Consultant jhong@haiku.com 408-249-8340 ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 10:51:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rosenbaum <rosenbau@u.washington.edu> Subject: D90:Steering Groans (fwd) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 06:52:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rosenbaum <rosenbau@u.washington.edu> Subject: D90:Steering Groans Thank-you for your message in the LRO digest yesterday. I have a '94 D90 that I bought at the end of 1993 (now has 18,000 miles). As I was driving o the dealer's lott, it groaned and the service manager listened and said the would replace the steering box under warranty but that the noise "wasn't serious." After a couple of months, the dealer said a new box had arrived, and mine was replaced. The noise persisted, and has since. No change over 18K miles. It happens when I am starting up, pulling out of a parking space or backing up, and **turning the wheel hard to left** as you mentioned in your notice. It isn't constant, but happens during a portion of the wheel-turning circle, like so: groan______groan______g-r-o-a-n (lasts longer if I turn the wheel slower). I've gotten used to it, but first timers in the D90 ask "What's that?" and passers-by look over. [Maybe my Land Rover is telling me its name...] Does this sound like the groaning due to steering pipe resonance? If so I'll try the dealer again. Thanks again for your help, and happy Land Rover -ing! David Rosenbaum ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RICKCRIDER@aol.com Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 14:23:51 -0400 Subject: Re: headliner Regarding the sagging headliner......... It's at least comforting to know someone else is p#$^ed about theirs......The only thing holding mine up are the dome lights and the sun roof retainer strip. Think mine was a result of lot's of driving with all windows down and the tailhatch up...allowing it to increasingly billow in the wind. Shame such a nice (and expensive) vehicle sports a headliner of Ford Pinto quality. Considered shooting a photo and sending it to LR.....but....alas....lifes to short. Anxious to see the responses to tsrowlans query. Regards... Rick Crider <rickcrider@aol.com> ' 66 IIA 109" ' 73 III 88" ' 88 Range Rover..........with sagging headliner..........sigh...... ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RICKCRIDER@aol.com Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 15:05:29 -0400 Subject: Selling my 109" Correction Sorry folks.......I really feel like an idiot........The VIN # that I listed in my posting is actually the North Carolina title #, and it is the correct title #. Dixon Kenner was nice enough to tip me off on my goof up. The VIN # is 26408075 C. Confirmed and verified. Thanks Dixon for your help. Regards...... Rick Crider <rickcrider@aol.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Jul 95 15:09:34 EDT From: <Glen_Rees@parlon2.ccmail.compuserve.com> Subject: SERIES LR SEATBELTS More seatbelt wittering I had a conversation with a traffic cop a few years ago when installing belts to my 86" utility. The law (UK) requires that seat belts are worn at all times (if fitted!) However, any seat belt fitted to a SI & SII will not have a fixing point that complies to the relevant BS (British Standard), therefor, even though the belt complies to BS, it can not technically be called a "seat belt" in legal terms, since the whole installation does not comply to BS, and therefor does not have to be worn. This also poses another question regarding the MOT, if fitted they must work. But if the fixing does not comlpy to BS, should it fail the test? Having said all that, what sort of bozo would not wear it, since some protection is better than none! Glenn ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 22:01:41 PDT From: Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk Subject: RE: Brake Flex Lines Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 21:39:36 PDT From: Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk Subject: RE: Brake flex-lines - any idea as to the thread on the end No, I've never seen a Land Rover brake hose with a female thread. Must have been thinking of my '56 Morris Minor.... But then again the moggy doesn't have any such hoses. Where did I get this idea from? Obviously a case of brain fade! ------------------------------------- Tony Chapman E-mail: Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk HAWTEC Tel: 01905 723200 Haswell House Fax: 01905 613338 St. Nicholas Street Mobile: 0973 316835 Worcester WR1 1UW Date: 04/22/95 Time: 09:26:25 This message was sent by Chameleon ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- Tony Chapman E-mail: Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk HAWTEC Tel: 01905 723200 Haswell House Fax: 01905 613338 St. Nicholas Street Mobile: 0973 316835 Worcester WR1 1UW Date: 04/22/95 Time: 09:26:25 This message was sent by Chameleon ------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 21:45:13 PDT From: Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk Subject: RE: 7.50x16 Tyres The steering stop on each front wheel formed of the foremost bolt on the swivel housing oils seal reatiner. This has a lock nut to stpo it coming undone and to hold the retainer in place. The head of this bolt mates with the toe of an "L" shaped bracket secured to the foremost of the bolts holding the swivel housing to the axle casing. What size rims are fitted? Land Rover specify different rims for these tyres compared with those for the standard SWB using 6.00x16 tyres. I understand that these have greater offset which might overcome the problem. The rims normally have part numbers. If you mail these to me I might be able to identify them. ------------------------------------- Tony Chapman E-mail: Tony@hawtec.demon.co.uk HAWTEC Tel: 01905 723200 Haswell House Fax: 01905 613338 St. Nicholas Street Mobile: 0973 316835 Worcester WR1 1UW Date: 04/22/95 Time: 09:26:25 This message was sent by Chameleon ------------------------------------- ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 22:42:34 +0100 From: cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (Charlie Wright) Subject: Farewell... Hasta y'all. I'm off to finish my the panic of moving back Stateside, thanks for keeping the spare minutes interesting. I'll be offline/unsubscribed for a little while, until I get a local dialup connection. Email won't change for awhile, but I won't answer reliably after Sunday. I should hope I will be reunited with my 109 and the list in about a month.. Cheers to all, Charlie C. R. Wright Dept. of Genetics +44 (0)1223 333970 telephone Univ. of Cambridge +44 (0)1223 333992 telefax Downing Street, Cambs. cw117@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk CB2 3EH, England ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 15:19:12 PDT From: grea@net.gov.bc.ca (Gordon Rea 660-0216 (NTO Vanc.)) Subject: LRO Celebs. >from: chris.youngson@deepcove.com >Date: Thu, 27 Jul 95 10:13:25 >Subject: Famous LRO's >Regarding famous LRO's, I have an interesteing story: >I live in West Vancouver, BC where alot of famous people have houses to get out >of the states for a while. BTW , Brian isn't just anouther rich 'merican escaping to Vancouver. He was born and raised in North Vancouver and has a house and recording studio in West Van. Also, the celebrity list shows Micheal J.Fox as (US). He's anouther Vancouver native. G. ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: LANDROVER@delphi.com Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 19:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: DAP Enterprises (long) Tom Rowe recounts his experiances and asks.... > I'd like to hear from people that have dealt with DAP > Enterprises recently to see if I'm alone in my experience. / His question dealt with a rebuild kit for a Jeep master cylinder installed on his Land Rover... > On his recommendation I bought my modified Jeep master cyl. from him. I / Problem #1. Jeep Part. Land Rover Parts supplier. I've only dealt with Bruce once and had no problems at all. I sent a fax requesting a quote on some prices for *LAND ROVER* parts and got a fax back the same morning. I subsequently ordered the parts. Again, no problems. I would assume that the previous owner (Al) had his own list of substitute parts for things like the Jeep master cylinder and Bruce may have decided not to follow that practice. It would have been nice if he could have told you straight away that he couldn't help you - if that was the case. Cheers Michael Loiodice E-MAIL landrover@delphi.com 166 W.Fulton St. VOICE (518) 773-2697 Gloversville NY, 12078 1965 Ser IIa 88 Petrol ("Sidney") 7 1972 Ser III 88 Petrol ("Fern") #:-}> 1971 Ser IIa 88 Petrol (Parts is Parts) ------------------------------[ <- Message 36 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 28 Jul 95 23:56:53 EDT From: Mark Ritter <70472.1130@compuserve.com> Subject: Isuzu Diesels in U.S. >From reading the land rover mags from the UK it seems that an engine of choice when it comes to a transplant is the Isuzu 2.8 turbo. While I don't believe that this engine is available in the US the 3.9 turbo is. many of the delivery trucks use this mill and i believe that General Motors has some sort of agreement with Isuzu as this engine also appears in some GMC trucks. I recently read an article in LRW about an Aussie LR that was equipped with this engine. I believe it was a 110. I was wondering if anyone new of a conversion kit for this engine to mate it to a LR gearbox, and will it fit in an 88? I think a coil sprung 88 with this engine would be great and parts would be no problem. If LRNA won't sell me a TDi 90 then I'll just build it myself! Mark Ritter 94 Disco what can be concieved can be created ------------------------------[ <- Message 37 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1995 14:14:46 +1000 From: Lloyd Allison <lloyd@cs.monash.edu.au> Subject: N. Spain Nick Hayden is going to N.Spain and asks ... --- ) From: pbeecher@pavilion.co.uk (Phil Beecher) ) I'm Nick Hayden (c/o friend Phil) Brighton, England. ) ... LWB SW 2.6L ... ) I am also ) planning a return trip to spectacular mountains in N Spain (Picos de Europa ) - Asturias ... try search under Speleology for info) and would be glad to ) hear from anyone who may care to join a drive/walking party. ) with regards, Nick ) Phil Beecher pbeecher@pavilion.co.uk (home) --- Lloyd ------------------------------[ <- Message 38 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 21:24:28 PDT From: mtalbot@InterServ.Com (Mark Talbot) Subject: Re: Customs parts vehicle All, Can anyone tell me what the US customs dept accepts as a "Parts Vehicle". The reason why is this. A friend of mine wants to bring in a 1986 Land Rover 110 v8 that he has in the UK. My understanding is this Land Rover is in need of repair, rear x-member gone, dented panels, rusting frame. He called customs and asked them and they could'nt really give him a straight answer. The 110 is a pre EFI V8. He wants to know if he takes the engine and g'box out, removes the glass and the odd door, removes the rusted x-member, then does this then mean its a parts vehicle. My understanding is that he has a 109 in need of a new frame and wants to take the coil sprung chassis and other "goodies" off the 110 and transplant them into his 109. Any one have any ideas on wht he should do. BTW, this is not me that is "the friend", even though the idea does seem like a good one. Thanks Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 39 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Spenny@aol.com Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1995 02:25:32 -0400 Subject: Re: DAP experiences Regarding DAPs reputation: I cant speak from personal experience, but I will relate the experience of a friend. my friend ordered a zenith carb from DAP (pre merger, things may be different now) the carb arrived with parts rattling in the bottom of an unlabled box, whomever my friend spoke to at DAP (i assume Al) was unwilling to take return, exchange or otherwise give my friend any satisfaction. after seeing that experience I would sooner buy parts from the LR *Dealership* than risk dealing with Al & DAP (again, with the merger it may be different) anyway Michael Carradine, Architect writes.... I have to agree with Al somewhat in considering net-users exceeding the worst gaggle of old wo/men chattering away; and I add, willing to destroy a reputation with a keystroke. well *Dad*, if you dont like the chattering (which incidentally, is why this mailing list is in existance) you can unsubscribe, until then you can chatter away *offline* with your good friend Al. I will also add: that is the most pompous remark i have seen posted to this mailing list to date spencer ------------------------------[ <- Message 40 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950729 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST Input: messages 38 lines 1522 [forwarded 116 whitespace 383] Output: lines 1255 [content 713 forwarded 80 (cut 36) whitespace 366]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|