[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 18 | Re: Hummers(Hummve) |
2 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 15 | Re: Diesel woes!!! |
3 | Jimmy Patrick [jimmyp@ck | 21 | LR homepage |
4 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 28 | Re: Wheels/Tyres... and no end in sight |
5 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 32 | Re: Solihull |
6 | BAWILL01@UKCC.UKY.EDU | 14 | U.S. Army Land-Rovers |
7 | Bill Yerazunis [crash@ic | 48 | Drover vs. Hummer |
8 | labranch@sybase.com (Jas | 22 | Speedometer Replacement |
9 | RLZiegler@aol.com | 9 | Hess 6cyl. oil adaptor gasket |
10 | stephen.thomas@tridom.co | 97 | Land Rover Rally in North Georgia, USA |
11 | UncleBrad@aol.com | 26 | Military Surplus Rover news |
12 | Kelly Minnick [minnick@j | 23 | Misc |
13 | "George S. Reiswig" [ger | 34 | Defender 90 |
14 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 18 | Re: Defender 90 |
15 | bfreeman@heartland.bradl | 15 | For Sale |
16 | taylors@hubcap.clemson.e | 23 | Series III 88 SPECS WANTED |
17 | Benjamin Allan Smith [be | 26 | [not specified] |
18 | "WILLIAM L. LEACOCK" [7 | 35 | Wednesdays digest. |
19 | Steve Firth [steve@firth | 17 | Stealth Forces? |
20 | mtalbot@InterServ.Com (M | 34 | Re: Problems with brake lights |
21 | Andrew Steele [ad158@day | 29 | Re: Problems w/ brake lights |
22 | "T.F. Mills" [tomills@du | 33 | Re: Matchbox Land Rover Fire Engine |
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Hummers(Hummve) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 9:57:52 GMT > miles on a Military hummve. I spent 4 years in the U.S. Army and drove > the sh*t out of my hummer. Don't take this as a slag on Rovers, god [ truncated by lro-digester (was 27 lines)] > ha ha.....;) > Cheers from Pittsburgh > Russ Oh,great.So you try to pass yourselves off as *us*.Then we get the flak. Isnt that taking the "Special Relationship" a bit *too* far? I mean,you chaps could always try to join the SAS,you know.No need to just *play* at it:-) Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Diesel woes!!! Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:07:59 GMT Dear woefully pissed off.... There used to be a process called metal spraying.It involved the deposition of new metal on worn areas.I once,many years ago,had a steering worm built up this way.I dont know whether the process is still in use,or whether its any good on cast iron,but it would seem to offer some hope if it is,in fact still available. Cheers Mikw Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 07:29:02 -0500 From: Jimmy Patrick <jimmyp@cksp.demon.co.uk> Subject: LR homepage Lloyd, My homepage has a picture of Mabel, my 1960 Series II. It also has a picture of Jon Ward's Rover that I stole from someone else's page. It is at: http://www.netpress.com/jimmyp/ Take a look. I will be going on a Land-Rover camping trip in Wales this weekend. I will take some photos of the other rovers and add a page with those photos next week. -- CKS|Partners 0344-382114 Advertising & Marketing Communications fax 0344-303192 ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 08 Feb 95 09:17:04 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Wheels/Tyres... and no end in sight > Are the "1-ton" rims that you are talking about the 101 rims, > because they don't fit standard Series Land Rover hubs. The Series > have five wheel studs whereas the 101 (just to be different) had six. No, no... nothing to do with the 101 Forward Control. There used to exist a S.III 109 HCPU cab truck 1 Ton, very rare specimen, probably never made an appearance Stateside. It had rims that stuck out more. These rims, in a slightly modified form (6.5" as opposed to 5.5" on the 109 HCPU), are nowadays used on the Defender 130 HCPU, the parts number of those rims is ANR1534 or ANR1534PM ('PM' meaning that they are finished with black primer). They fit on any Series hub without a problem, except that it does put a bit more strain on the bearings and, in the absence of power steering, require a bit more muscle. *However* , when suggesting 9.00 tires as a possibility for 16" rims I forgot to warn that on anything else than a Lightweight you would be required to put HD springs & shocks all around and have to cut away part of the front fender to allow for wheel articulation, alternatively to lift the frame by _at_least_ 4" by means of longer shackles and spring mount brackets, plus distance pieces under the rubber frame bump stops. That is, if you want to maintain full off-road articulation capabilities. Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 09:44:16 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: Solihull On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Lloyd Allison wrote: > Am I correct in thinking that Land-Rover import > Range Rovers, Discoveries and D90s (which are a special variant) > into the USA but not D110s or D130s ? Correct. > Can anyone tell me what dates the various imports (re-)started? Stopped: LR = 1974 RR = Never imported into USA = 1971 (Canada) Started LR = 1992 (Defender 110, 525 units to USA/Canada) RR = 1987 (USA) 1989 (Canada) (two years later than USA) Above is official stats. Lots (100-1000+) of LR's were imported into Canada between 1974 & 1992 by various governments, mining & oil companies et cetera. > Are V8 D90s still being imported? Yes, for another year or so. Rgds ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: BAWILL01@UKCC.UKY.EDU Date: Wed, 08 Feb 95 10:15:54 EST Subject: U.S. Army Land-Rovers For those interested, in the 29 December 1992 edition of "The Times" (London) an article appeared entitled "Land Rover Wins Order For 48 Special Operations Vehicles From U S Army." The article, located on page 4D, includes a rather nice photo of the model as well as an explaination as to why the Yanks wanted the Land Rovers and what was modified upon them for this role. Most major universities subscribe to The Times and your best hope of finding this article is to check the microfilm archives since most institutions do not yet have the newspaper on CD-ROM. ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Bill Yerazunis <crash@icad.com> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 11:07:26 +0500 Subject: Drover vs. Hummer Well, I went through the "disco vs. hummer" battle last April, when I needed a new 4WD. I test-drove 'em both- new vehicles only. The disco accellerated like a midsize sedan, maybe a little better. At 80 MPH on the Interstate (that is, keeping up with traffic) the noise level inside was quite acceptable (important for prevention of driver fatigue). The seats were comfortable; I could sprawl out in the back. Off-road, the disco was, well, weird. It would go anywhere inside my "courage limit" (unlike my previous 4WD). No grinding, no revving the engine and modulating torque with the clutch to keep traction. It just sorta _went_. Quietly. Gently. The hummer, on the other hand, was loud. It was loud standing still and even louder on the road. It could barely make 80 MPH with a mile-long running start. Interior noise was intolerable at 80- now I *know* why military convoys are typically going only 55- it's so the passengers can hear themselves think! And you think a 109 has a big turning circle- the Hummer is worse! And the hummer was huge, but there was no space inside! Instead, there's a center console the size of a large coffee table or maybe a coffin, and it makes the vehicle clearly a 4-seater at best. The station-wagon version had space in the back, but not a lot- only about three and a half feet vertically- not what you'd expect from a vehicle requiring a seven foot roof clearance! The Hummer had somewhat better ground clearance, but this was only demonstratable with the salesman at the wheel- I refused to attempt the path he suggested. { Courage limit, anyone? } The final straw: a friend who'd spent four years in the Army suggested that if I wanted to drive a Hummer, I'd better sign up for a tour of duty as a Humvee mechanic, because that was the only way I'd be able to keep one running. Everything about the critter is weird, you need special tools for just about everything. "They work great- but when it breaks, you need a humvee mechanic. Really" And the Disco cost $10,000 less. :-) -Bill (white 94 Disco, 27Kmiles in 9 months!) ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 09:20:08 PST From: labranch@sybase.com (Jason LaBranch) Subject: Speedometer Replacement Hey Nuts, Has anybody ever found/looked for a replacement speedometer for the series workhorses -- I mean a good cheap replacement as apposed to the $170 Land Rover one. (ouch) Mine is shot. I oppened it up and it actually is defective from the factory. It worked for 18 or so years but non the less has a production flaw. While we are on the subject, what are the requirements for the speedo. Measurements? Ratios? etc... I have 31" tires. One last comment. Wouldn't it be nice if the LandRover speedo's odometer went up to 999,999 miles rather than 99,999? Jason LaBranch | To find your way, look within! Parallel Products Group | -- AAA Road Atlas Sybase Engineering (510) 922-4690 | ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: RLZiegler@aol.com Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 12:51:16 -0500 Subject: Hess 6cyl. oil adaptor gasket >From parts cat. #4781 (dated 1966) there are 2 gaskets involved between the adaptor and the 6 cyl. block: Joint washer front #274609 and Jt. washer rear #274104. Both will need to be replaced. ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 14:27:14 -0500 From: stephen.thomas@tridom.com (Stephen Thomas) Subject: Land Rover Rally in North Georgia, USA Fellow LR Owners: I have no affiliation with the following, but I do plan on attending. >From a flyer: First Annual Batesville Land Rover Rally in The Beautiful North Georgia Mountains March 5, 1995 You (or anyone else you know who likes to have a good time and is lucky enough to drive a Land Rover) are cordially invited to attend the 1st (yes 1st) Annual (optimistic, aren't we) Batesville (Good Morning America proved that there is a Batesville) Land Rover Rally. (Well, it's really just a bit of a bumpy drive through the beautiful, scenic National Forest.) If will be held on Sunday (the only day the Hennesey [local LR Dealer] guys can make it) March 5, 1995 (rain or shine, sleet or snow, unless it's really bad). We plan to meet between 8:00am and 9:00am at the Batesville General Store (intersection of SR 197 and GA 255, 12 miles northeast of Helen, Georgia) for breakfast. (The best anywhere around. You pay.) Then we will leave between 9:30am and 10:00am and take a beautiful trip (some mountain highways, some single lane dirt). Nothing too rough, just a bit challenging. The entire trip is about 50 miles long. We should arrive back in downtown (ho ho!) Batesville about 3:00pm. (Just in time to grab a burger or bowl of chili. You gotta pay again.) Refreshments will be served approximately half way through the trip (included in registration expenses). So, if you can come, (and we sure do hope you can) then just fill out the enclosed form and return it to us by Friday, February 17, 1995. If you have any questions, please give us a call at home 404-343-8283. We look forward to "rovering" with you, Margie and Don Directions: If you nee more details, just give us a call. Get to Helen, Georgia the best you know how. Then follow the signs to Unicoi State Park and once there, continue northeast on SR 356 until it comes to an end and runs into SR 197. Turn right onto SR 197 and go 1 mile. The Batesville General Store will be on the right just past the first stop sign. The phone number at the store is 706-947-3434 (just in case). Other Suggestions: The city of Helen is one of the number one tourist attractions in Georgia. How about coming up early and spending the weekend. The number at the Welcome Center is 706-878-2181. (Remember to bring your camera.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Please cut along dotted line ane mail to the address below.) I or We would like to come have some fun. _____ YES _____ NO There will be _____ adults _____ children _____ four-legged friends I'm enclosing a check to cover expenses. How about $5.00 for adults and $2.50 for children. Children under 12 and puppies (dogs) come for free. I'd also like to order some stuff to remember the fun I just know we're going to have. So I am including the extra $$$$$ to have these doodads ready when I get there. Tee Shirts ___S ___M ___L ___XL ___XXL @ $15.50 (+ $2.50 for XXL) = $_____ Sweat Shirts ___S ___M ___L ___XL ___XXL @ $25.50 (+ $3.00 for XXL) = $_____ Caps ___ @ $8.00 = $_____ TOTAL = $_____ Please make your checks for expenses and stuff payable to: Don or Margie Nelson 4010 Camden Way Alpharetta, HA 30202-4454 We look forward to seeing you and the fun of experiencing what the north Georgia mountains are about Ya'll come ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Thomas AT&T Tridom Phone: (404) 514-3522 840 Franklin Court Fax: (404) 514-3491 Marietta, GA 30067 USA Email: stephen.thomas@tridom.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: UncleBrad@aol.com Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 15:01:22 -0500 Subject: Military Surplus Rover news I think the guys I finally ended up talking to are South American mafia types. After going around about the DOT & EPA requirements, I got the sense that they were uncomfortable talking more about these Land Rovers. Like maybe I was some sort of government spy trying to catch them in some illegal activity. I got a call back later saying that the vehicles are NOT in the country and are NOT for sale in the country and would I please NOT pass out their phone numbe (That's why I haven't given it out). Maybe they are worried that they could get into trouble even selling these vehicles here. Even later, I got a call from someone else telling me that he had called them up trying to arrange some sort of international deal and was told pretty much the same thing. He said that those guys mean serious business. I don't think they trusted him either, after being interrogated by me so recently, so he lost the opportunity to work anything out with them as far as I know. Bottom line on that avenue is "dead end". (I hope that's not an unfortunate choice of words.) See ya! Brad ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kelly Minnick <minnick@joker.chinalake.navy.mil> Subject: Misc Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:07:18 PST RE: Misc questions/comments I have some misc. questions/comments: 1. Most of the people I know are running stock Rover rims without tubes. This has not been a problem for me in the last 5 or so years. Are they suppose to leak? Maybe you shouldn't have told me! 2. Bladder for the 88" side tanks? If I get hit that hard from a side impact, will I still be alive? 3. Starter leads. I only have two. One ground wire and one to the relay. 4. Seems to me that if I only change the diffs from 4.7 to 3.54 I will have a 30.1 overall in first. (compared to 40:1) I've found in rough rock heaps that I need even slower than 40:1 to keep from tearing the vehicle up. Traction seems to be the problem, hence my ARB locker dream. You can have the torque to pull the 30:1, but I wouldn't want the limitations on slow-speed crawling. (hence back to my RR trans/transfer & diffs!) It's not easy, but it's FUN! Kelly Minnick '73 88" Safari Ridgecrest, CA ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 14:46:06 -0700 (MST) From: "George S. Reiswig" <gereiswi@NMSU.Edu> Subject: Defender 90 Hello, all. Forgive me for signing up prematurely, but I may own a Landy someday. I was hoping to find out a bit more about them from the experts, who are bound to give me their objective, unbiased opinions! My current vehicle does very well off road, and on road as well. I test drove a D90 in Colorado Springs at Christmas, but could not take the thing anywhere where challenging terrain presented itself. My Isuzu has a rear locking dif, 500 mile range with the stock tank, an apparently tighter turning circle, and is more comfortable on-road. The D90 was more comfortable on the tiny amount of dirt we DID find. I also like the utilitarian demeanor of the beast. So, all you D90 owners...why should I plop down such an exhorbitant amount of money for the D90? The salesman said that lockers or limited slips were unnecessary, due to the wheel travel. Well, maybe I shouldn't believe a claim like that from a salesman...what do you think? Also, how available are additinoal parts for it, such as a larger fuel tank? I will appreciate all input. As I am in digest mode, it would be most kind of you to e-mail me directly. Thanks again in advance. _______________________________________________________________________________ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ George Reiswig - '90 Isuzu Amigo Red Rock Four Wheelers ARB Rear Locker, Warn XD9000 Winch Southwest 4WD Association 32X11.50-15 BFG Moab MT, air tank Las Cruces 4WD Club Body armor and scratches WANTED: V-6 conversion, front limited slip, transfer case modification for lower final "God is dead..." - Neitzsche drive ratio. "Neitzsche is dead." - God +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Defender 90 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 14:25:13 PST 1: It will pull a trailer. 2: I drover an 88 Isuzu trooper around the canyon lands, and my Range Rover could drive circles around it. I plan to test the d-90 in march. 3: Aluminum does not rust. 4: You can eat breakfast on the flat fenders 5: overbuilt 6000lbs GRVW 6: They have a personality (some blame this on the lucas electronics) Russ Burns 92 Range Rover 94 D-90 ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:20:40 CST From: bfreeman@heartland.bradley.edu (Benjamin Freeman) Subject: For Sale Dear friends I've found a larger LRR4^[[D(opps)Land Rover to replace my 88 with. So I must part with my first pride an joy to pay for the new one. I hope that you'll be able to help me as such here is my ad. '73-SIII 88 Limestone in color it's quite original in condition I have a spare engine for it I've replaced the original seats with Trakkers in Moorland. It;s Limestone in color(tan) and has all the original parts it came with Yes, it's a show winner. So if you or anyone you know is interested please e-mail me or call or wirite write me Ben Freeman (206)3653514 ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: taylors@hubcap.clemson.edu (C. Taylor Sutherland, III) Subject: Series III 88 SPECS WANTED Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:39:01 Hello, I've recently put myself in the market for a Series III 88, and I would like any specs anybody would like to give such as, gross weight, height to top of roof, minimum ground clearance, avaiable instruments. Also I wouldn't mind any pro's and cons about the Series III, just so as any cons are followed by which vehicle would provide a better item. Also, what would be the best year to look for? Thanks. -- One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie. <-> C. Taylor Sutherland, III <-> taylors@hubcap.clemson.edu <-> <-> <-> IRC Nick: NIV <-> taylors@gamma.phys.clemson.edu <-> ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Military Land Rovers Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 15:51:02 -0800 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil> I was picking up some stuff I had bought yesterday at the gov't surplus auction on base yesterday and was talking with one of the fork lift operators. we were commenting on how the two M-151 jeep trailers had been sold for $375 (for one with out a tire and rim on one side, a flat on the other and no tail lights at all) and $400 for a mostly intact one. (IMO they were worth no more than $100). Anyway the fork lift guy was mentioning that Edwards Air Force base was dumping all of their trailers because of they had gotten rid of all of their jeeps and bought Hummers and Land Rovers. Now I did have my Land Rover with me, but I don't think he was ever in the position to be able to read any of the tags that said Land Rover. So as far as I could tell this was a completely unsolicited comment about Land Rovers from a guy who usually works at Edwards. I tried to press him on the matter, but he was called away to deal with another person. I have never been to Edwards, so I can't even attempt to confirm the rumor. -Benjamin Smith ---------------- Science Applications Internation Corporation China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center bens@archimedes.vislab.navy.mil 1972 Land Rover Series III 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 08 Feb 95 19:57:28 EST From: "WILLIAM L. LEACOCK" <75473.3572@compuserve.com> Subject: Wednesdays digest. The 2 litre cylinder diesel cylinder head will fit a 2 1/4 petrol or diesel block, but watch out for the water jacket drain holes, use the head gasket to compare patterns and add the appropriate holes, can't remember which way the drilling is required, it was 20 years ago, the head will not fit with the later timing case cover, the thermostat housing is bigger on the early heads. It is possible to build the 2 litre crank, cam, head, pump, timing cover etc onto a 2 1/4 block, The timing cover of the later 2 litre diesels are sought after by the 2 1/4 racers because they were made from aluminium. The loose hot spot damage to the block is best repaired by changing the block. I have seen a weld repair and liner job done but it is more expensive than changing the block. The petrol and diesel engines use the same block. I have one in Cleveland UK that you can have free. The head can be salvaged by a competent machinist by boring the hole to a larger dia and fitting a sleeve to reduce the bore to take a new hot spot. I did over 50 k miles on an engine with such a repair before selling the vehicle. The Ser 2a and 2B 110 wheelbase forward controls of the sixties and early seventies, the ser 2a and 3 1 ton 109's and the current 130 models were/are fitted with a 7.00 wide wheel rim with the standard 5 stud fixing. The same rim as used on the 101 with a 6 stud nave plate ( i have seen plenty of 101 wheels in which the standard nave plate was fitted to enable the rim to be used on a standard vehicle in the days when 1010 rims were cheap and the FC rims were expensive.) the rims are designed for the 9.00 x 16 tyre but are fitted with a 7.50 x 16 tyre on the 130's In the UK the radial tubes are lighter than the bias tubes Regards Bill Leacock Limey in exile. ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 00:16:10 +0000 From: Steve Firth <steve@firthcom.demon.co.uk> Subject: Stealth Forces? Russell U Wilson <ruwst+@pitt.edu> wrote: >>So I'd say that they were going to do something somewhere that they were >>not supposed to be and needed a vehicle that would not scream HERE COMES >>THE AMERICANS..<< Yes,and I hear that the Rangers are tought to only give name rank and serial number in the event of capture, accompanied by the words "Ektually old chep, we are British" -- Steve Firth, '81 109" SIII Safari 2.25 petrol. ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:46:46 PST From: mtalbot@InterServ.Com (Mark Talbot) Subject: Re: Problems with brake lights All, Hear is a real electric problem for you all lucas gurus. Just put a new battery in the SIII and started getting everything connected up. Almost everything works fine !!! except the following : When I hit the brake pedal, the front side lights and brake/side lights come on, when I put the side lights on, all the side lights come on as they should. However, the brake lights also come on ! I have replaced the brake switch and the same things happens. I have had the brake switch out of the housing and manually pressed it, same thing happens. When I connect up the brake switch with the ignition on, all the side lights come on. I have taken the connector off the fuse for the brake and checked the lights, the lights all work fine. I found the lead to the fuse for the brake, took that off and tried the lights. Lights work fine. I'm real puzzled by this. One other thing, the Land Rover is not running when I do all this. It seems as though the brake lights are wired into the lighting system somewhere, although I can't find it. Any ideas ?????? Is there a bullet connector somewhere where this could be connected by mistake ???? Also, does anyone know the colour of the wires to the reversing lights ? My Haynes manual does'nt show reversing lights, I think its Green, but EVERYTHING is @#$%*&^ GREEN !!! even the line to the brakes !!! Mark ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 22:29:34 -0500 From: Andrew Steele <ad158@dayton.wright.edu> Subject: Re: Problems w/ brake lights Mark, The only advice I can offer is a comment, that come next Christmas, if you don't have the problem tracked down yet, that the inclusion of your Rover into the front yard Christmas display is sure to make it a winner in the neightborhood light decoration contest. Otherwise, (no Land Rover experience here) look for: 1) crudded up fuse box/connectors where several wires are grouped together. 2) look for any group of wires close to a heat source that could have melted them together. 3) If all else fails, it's never considered defeat to systematically replace problem wire runs (and grounds) with new colorcoded/labeled wire. (Jeeeze, typing without an editor is a real pain) Andrew Dayton, OH Hello, calling all diesels, would one of you like to come home to Ohio?) ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> Subject: Re: Matchbox Land Rover Fire Engine Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 23:40:49 -0700 (MST) Mad Uncle Roger writes: < Matchbox has come out with a remake of a 1948 Land Rover Fire Engine. It's < 1/43 scale, and costs $26.95. It's only available via mail order, or [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] < The phone number to order or get more info is (800)858-0102. I've ordered < one, and will let you all know when it gets here. For those of you in the US who have "USA Weekend" as the Sunday magazine supplement to their metro daily, this Rover (80" with a trailer) is depicted in all its glory in an advert on Feb 3/5. It purports to be Australian (UK being represented by a Bedford), but none of the models have particular fire dept insignia. It is one of six in the "Official international fire engine collection". The ad offers them on subscription basis at $24.50 each. 1:43 scale is identical to the recent very fine Dinky AA Series I, but this model looks far more detailed and handsome than the Dinky, and certainly more so than the smaller runofthemill Matchboxes. Definitely looks like a superb collectible. Besides the same 1-800 number, ad also gives address: Matchbox Collectibles Inc., Portland, OR 97207-0639. The ad makes no mention of these being available singly. Roger, where did you hear about it? T. F. Mills tomills@du.edu University of Denver Library 2150 E. Evans Ave. Denver CO 80208 USA http://mercury.cair.du.edu/~tomills (under construction) ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 950208 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGESTBack Forward
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.