[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 22 | Beds in 90s |
2 | Kelly Minnick [minnick@j | 28 | DMV |
3 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 11 | Seasons Greetings |
4 | Dixon Kenner [dkenner@em | 27 | Re: This & That |
5 | Jimmy Patrick [jimmyp@ck | 19 | Weber Carbs |
6 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 127 | Re: Decarbonizing |
7 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 40 | Re: Weber Carbs |
8 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 31 | Re: side panels.. |
9 | chris.youngson@deepcove. | 9 | LAND ROVER |
10 | YVES1@delphi.com | 61 | The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest |
11 | bcw6@cornell.edu (Braman | 11 | Tailgates |
12 | jory@MIT.EDU (jory bell) | 11 | critical mass environmental ratings of cars and light trucks |
13 | sohearn@InterServ.Com (S | 23 | D90 Spare on Bonnet |
14 | Kelly Minnick [kminnick@ | 49 | Fuel |
15 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 20 | GPS popularity? |
16 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 42 | Rover Babe Update |
17 | Mr Ian Stuart [IAN@lab0. | 24 | Re: Rover Babe Update |
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Beds in 90s Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 12:56:13 UNDEFINED .I also am planning to build a bed in the D-90 for a trip to Utah .in late Feb. (I still have not sold this to my wife yet). It looks .pretty straight forward. I will keep you updated as the design gets .a little farther along. I have just spent 3 months living in my 90. I used a sunlounger (one of the ones that folds completely flat. It rested nicely with one of the supports on teh rear wheelbox, the middle resting on the load bulkhead, and the top resting on the steering wheel. Perfectly flat. Perfectly comfy. Only gave it up cos I kept getting pestered by paranoid farmers convinced I was lurking to rustle their sheep! +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kelly Minnick <minnick@joker.chinalake.navy.mil> Subject: DMV Date: Thu, 22 Dec 94 8:07:19 PST RE: Emmisions Yes, California is very picky when you go to do a smog. They had a reference book that had more information than my LR workshop manual. I had to have the actual LR PCV (no $5 aftermarket would do!), the canister, air cleaner (no K&N filters here!), the spark retard switch (valve on manifold actuated by cam on throttle shaft of original 36IVE), vacuum Retard for the distributor, fuel shut-off solenoid, and deceleration dashpot. Since I did not have the original equipment (no matter that the webber might run better), I could not pass go or receive my $200 (i.e. go directly to jail). I was given the #'s of 3 CA certified used parts houses. If they could get the parts, I had to buy them, otherwise I could get an exemption. One of the three said he could get me the stuff and it would cost me $800. come to find out, it was just a 36IV - talk about a rip. and yes, if Webber had a CARB # (calf. air research board) I could use that carb. I think enough people have to complain! I have to go in, get smogged & fail ($35), set up an apptmnt. with the referee, go through this exemption thing...(whine whine). Air bags article was in Machine Design a year or so ago. I'll look, but... unlike my LRO subscription, I toss most old magazines... Kelly Minnick Ridgecrest, CA '73 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Seasons Greetings Date: Thu, 22 Dec 94 15:28:38 GMT Merry Christmas,and a Happy New Everyone.Yours Truly is now buggering orf until Jan 3rd.(Well,more like clattering orf ectually,and in about another hour,but the thought's there:-)). Cheers(hic) Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 09:22:49 -0500 (EST) From: Dixon Kenner <dkenner@emr1.emr.ca> Subject: Re: This & That On Wed, 21 Dec 1994, maloney wrote: > occasionally see two copies of the same article in the same issue - come to This only happened once. We were spotlighting one of our new writers. Come to think of it, it was your article that caused the problem! :-) As per dates, blame Word Perfect. It doesn't always change the date on the header... :-( > think of it, that was a VERY well written and WONDERFUL article, so I guess > that isn't such a bad thing after all ;-) ). I think it was Mike Rooths article and not yours... :-) Re: LRW, The Toronto crowd is in there, and they are awaiting a copy of the Gearbox. It seems to be a bit thicker, the price is up to 55 pounds, but that is for an 18 month subscription along with a copy of Porters DIY Restoration Guide of the Land Rover (members of BSROA & OVLR get a discount (don't know about other clubs)) Rgds, ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 11:33:25 -0500 From: Jimmy Patrick <jimmyp@cksp.demon.co.uk> Subject: Weber Carbs What types of Weber carbs are common to fit on the 2.25 engine? And where do you get info about these carbs? I have a Weber fitted on my new ('60) Land-Rover, and I want to be able to identify which weber it is. How does the choke operate on it? Happy Holidays. Jimmy -- CKS|Partners 0344-382114 Advertising & Marketing Communications fax 0344-303192 ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 12:16:44 -0500 From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Subject: Re: Decarbonizing Jon forwarded: >Jon >I own a 1967 ser 11a 109 NADA wagon whose engine pings like crazy. I use none high >octane fuel and a lead additive with no results. What does decarbonization >mean and when do you know when to return to the origional position? >benjamin g. newman Ben, I'm not too clear about this either. Maybe retarding the ignition timing slightly will result in burning some of the carbon off the valves and piston crowns. I have talked with Bill Maloney about some sort of decarbonizing with water. Sorta steam clean the inside of your engine so to speak. He thought up a scheme to rig up a windshield washer pump and put the hose down in the carburetor and while your going along at 45 or 50 hit the switch and spray a little water in the carb. I don't know when would be enough or too much. I guess just experiment. They use a method like this on aircraft engines for the same purpose. May be we can get Bill in on this conversation I'll cc him on this and possibly he can shed some light. What say you Bill? >mean and when do you know when to return to the origional position? Ben & Jon, What they mean by decarbonizing is to remove the head and scrape/chip/brush all the carbon from the combustion chamber and the piston crowns. Carbon build up can cause 2 problems: 1. Carbon can build to a point where the exposed pieces can glow red hot. This can cause the fuel-air mixture to ignite prematurely. As the fuel air mixture starts to burn and the piston is still on it's way up, the plug fires, igniting/compressing the mixture even more. The fuel burns in a "flame front" that is not unlike a shock wave or the ripples in a pond after tossing a stone into it. Ideally, the flame front should be started at the plug when the piston is close to TDC (specifially, the recommended timing mark). The flame front begins to burn (not explode) pushing the piston down as the pressure in the combustion chamber builds (the flame front travels at about 700+fps-just under mach 1). When the mixture is ignited prematurely or there are multiple ignition sources, the remaining unburnt mixture can be compressed/heated beyond the maximum for normal combustion to the point where it detonates (explodes). This is pinging/knocking/detonation. At the minimum it will raise temperatures and reduce power. At the maximum it can melt/hole pistons and fry valves. 2. Carbon can build to a point where it reduces the usable volume in the combustion chamber, causing the compression ratio to rise. This will increase the octane requirements of the engine. Actually, a little carbon is a good thing, as it improves the seal of the piston to the cylinder and builds the compression ratio slightly. I read a paper a few years ago regarding a study of break in factors which improve performance/economy. The seating of piston rings was a factor, but the majority of the improvements of break in were due to carbon build up increasing the compression ratio and the seal formed by carbon build up at on the sides of the piston between the compression ring and the top of the piston. They determined this by testing identical power plants under identical conditions. They were run though a break in period and beyond. One was stripped, and the carbon was removed from the inside of the combustion chamber. Another was stripped and the carbon was removed from the side of the piston, but the carbon in the combustion chamber was left as is. And so on. The carbon in the chamber made the largest improvement, followed by the carbon seal, and lastly the rings seating in. Whoa! I think I've gotten away from your question. You've got a 67 109 (2.6?) NADA that pings like crazy. 1. Check valve clearances - ESPECIALLY EXHAUST - Keith Steele had the same symptoms on the way down to the Mid-Atlantic rally with his 2.25- one of his exhaust valves had negative clearance and had cooked itself. Pull all your plugs and examine them first. A burnt valve can be indicated by heavy black deposits on the plug. If you've got an NADA 6, I don't envy you doing the exhaust valve adjustment. I can't say I've done one myself, but with the valves in the block, it looks like a pain in the butt. NADA 6s do have a reputation for burning exhaust valves if clearances are set too close. 2. Check timing if you haven't already. If it's too far advanced it will ping. Retarding it will alleviate the problem at the cost of power (what power) and economy 3. Check for vacuum leaks 4. Is it running hot (does your temp gauge work)? A thermostat could be a problem 5. Check your fuel filter/fuel pump for proper fuel delivery 6. Richen the mixture by lowering the jet or raising the needle (SU?) 7. Re: Decarbonizing using water- temporarily disconnect the outlet tube from your windshield washer pump and tape it to the inlet of your carburetor (you may need to remove the filter ducting temporarily). Take the vehicle out on the road and get it up to speed. Activate the washer pump momentarily. Listen to see how it sounds. Do it again for a little longer and listen. If it's not making unhappy noises continue longer and longer so you can do it continuously under power. The only way this should be able to harm anything is if you give it enough volume to cause hydraulic lock. At the output of most windshield washer motors, that shouldn't be an issue, but better to try it in stages. What you are doing is steaming the carbon off the inside of the combustion chamber. High performance piston engine aircraft use water injection for short term power increase (it cools the combustion process and allows higher combustion pressures). A side benefit of this is that it steams out the carbon (if you've ever seen the inside of a head where the gasket blew allowing coolant into the combustion chamber of one of the cylinders, you'll understand how thoroughly steam can clean carbon). To be honest, I would suspect it has something to do with timing or burnt exhaust valves. Once you have finished the adjustment, do a compression check. More than you ever wanted to know. Good luck and have a very Merry Christmas! Bill maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 94 10:46:06 -0800 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Weber Carbs In message <9412221633.aa21729@post.demon.co.uk> Jimmy Patrick writes: > What types of Weber carbs are common to fit on the 2.25 engine? And where > do you get info about these carbs? I have a Weber fitted on my new ('60) [ truncated by lro-digester (was 16 lines)] > CKS|Partners 0344-382114 > Advertising & Marketing Communications fax 0344-303192 Changing the subject just a little... I noticed your .sig is uk and assume you have a right hand drive car. When I was putting my 2.5 L engine together, I (just for the fun of it) checked the fit of a TR3 intake manifold. The intake ports line up as do some of the mounting holes. With a little bit of work one could put a pair of SUs on the Land Rover engine. I didn't try it because the steering box was in the way. But I suspect you would have increased performance and increased petrol milage. My TR3 was getting about 30 MPH with 2.2L (87mm pistons) engine. If you want to go Weber, try a TWM intake manifold for the TR engine and a pair of 45DCOEs. It should be an easy fit on a right hand drive car. Can you imagine poping the bonnet at a Land Rover meet exposing a pair of DCOEs sitting above a 4 tube header? Sorry for the noise but I couldn't help myself TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 94 10:46:34 -0800 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: side panels.. > On Wed, 21 Dec 1994, Steven M Denis wrote: > > I posted once before but I don't know if it made it... > > Wanted! 109 2 door roof side panels......with or w/o windows(in North > > America please) none I had dirt poured down the oil filler cap of my 109 by someone who wanted the ones on my car very badly. I would be happy to sell them to him fairly soon after hell freezes over. If they are this hard to find, I guess I'll hang onto them when I do my top swap. But I guess I'll have to hide them & lock them down Sorry Steve TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: chris.youngson@deepcove.com Date: Thu, 22 Dec 94 14:12:54 Subject: LAND ROVER Being new to this list I thought I would introduce myself. My name is Chris Youngson, I live in West Vancouver, British Columbia. I own a 1965 IIa, Three door 109. 73 ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: YVES1@delphi.com Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 20:22:42 -0500 (EST) Subject: The Land Rover Owner Daily Digest >Subject: Land Rover antennas >Re: antennas [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >Much better solution: glassmount antennas! Larsen makes glassmount antennas >for CB and Ham, and just about everybody makes a glassmount cellphone Hi folks, I've been a radio ham since 1953 and have experimented with mobile receiving and transmitting antennas at all frequencies on lots of vehicles..... including a 1961 88" Safari SW, a 1969 88" wagon, and my current 2 door 109. This beastie sports 6 different antennas, covering from 192 kHz (long wave) on up to UHF. (receiving and transmitting antennas/aerials/whateveryouwannacallem! The glassmount antennas are VERY practical, no doubt about it. A tremendous biz for the antenna mfrs, more and more are being sold...... BUT they are extremely inefficient! The RF coupling through the windshield falls short of the ideal 100% transfer (depending on materials and how mounted) and the radiation patterns usually suffer drastically. In fact most of the RF transmitted is absorbed by the vehicle body (the way most installers mount them!) and the radiation angle is so skewed as to provide fractional performance. Good marketing gimmick, but the performance sucks! Anyone who runs a comparison with a coax switch, signal strength meter, etc. on a 1/4 wave or 5/8 wave properly mag or through-the-roof, vs. any glassmount, will see the difference immediately. My feeling is even a suction cup rubber ducky loaded whip on the roof will outperform a glassmount. At least the angle of radiation will be effectively low. Cell phones run from the milliwatt range to a couple or more watts and need all the help they can get, especially when you run into hill shadowing and fringe coverage. I suggest going with a through the roof 1/4 wave (nice and compact, excellent omni pattern, only one small hole, minimal installation cost/effort) or 5/8 wavelength if you want the added 3db gain.... for those of us with aluminium hardtops; a front fender mount also works VERY well and the coaxial cable is easy to run from there; and if you switch to a soft top in the summer, coaxial sleeve type gain antennas, side mounted with ball mounts, work very well as there is very little topside metal to mess up the radiation pattern. Larsen makes plenty of all these sorts of antennas, and so does Diamond; plenty of stuff out there to choose from. Of course if you really want to have fun, a set of quad phased yagis mounted through the roof (with a steering wheel for rotator control) will give you plenty of "ooomph" or stacked horizontally polarized "Big Wheels" cloverleaf omnis will really get through the enemy jamming!!! And remember: don't believe everything the salesman says; most of these blokes don't know too terribly much about antenna theory - believe me! Yves Albert (Al {"Al"}) Feder Yves1@Delphi.com W1EOX tcp/ip 44.88.4.14 1963 109 2 Door LR (ex Field Operations Vehicle, Miskatonic University Department of Archaeology] ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 20:43:29 -0500 From: bcw6@cornell.edu (Braman C. Wing) Subject: Tailgates I am looking at an 88" for sale in my area. It has a hardtop with a tailgate, as opposed to the station wagon rear door. I was wondering how difficult it would be to install a regular door in place of the tailgate. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Braman Wing ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 18:54:09 -0800 From: jory@MIT.EDU (jory bell) Subject: critical mass environmental ratings of cars and light trucks >TODAY'S VEHICLES: CLEANEST AND DIRTIEST >Critical Mass has published the first-ever [ truncated by lro-digester (was 60 lines)] > C=GLOBAL WARMING > D=CFC > E=RECYCLING ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 94 21:02:05 PST From: sohearn@InterServ.Com (Stephen OHearn) Subject: D90 Spare on Bonnet A quick one: Does anyone know what would be involved in mounting a spare on the hood? I imagine there is some support structure underneath and the mount itself. I also assume these can be fitted to a U.S. spec Defender. Am I wrong? Is there maybe insufficient space to clear the 3.9ltr's intake plenum??? Thanks, Merry Christmas to everyone, their families, and their Land Rovers! -Stephen +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Stephen O'Hearn 1994 LAND- Tread Lightly | | El Segundo, CA, USA DEFENDER -ROVER on Public and | | sohearn@interserv.com 90 The Best 4x4xFar Private Lands | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Kelly Minnick <kminnick@owens.ridgecrest.ca.us> Subject: Fuel Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 23:00:40 -0800 (PST) RE:SMOG I don't know if anyone has noticed, but I seem to be stuck on this smog issue. Maybe that's because it took lots of $ and lots of time for me to get my beast on the road. In fact, before I took mine in, it had a EGR valve on it. Has anyone seen that on a '73 US version? Well, didn't want them to force me to get the rusted thing working! Wasn't in their smog books, so out it came! To help get a vehicle past emmisions, here are some important tricks: 1. New plugs=clean burning 2. Slightly retarded ignition. Runs like you know what, but runs clean. 3. Oil change. Dirty oil holds unburnt gas byproducts that affect tail pipe emmisions. 4. This one you may not want to do, but works great. Run you tank down to almost empty. Put in about 2 gallons of unlead with gasahol (gas w/alcohol). One of my friends then adds methenol or alcohol used in dirt track cars. This burns so clean that you can't hardly measure anything. In fact, they go around and make sure you aren't doing something wierd. I had a friend who told me the tester shut off the machine and re-booted it to make sure things were ok... The draw-back is quite clear if you've ever thrown some of these rubber parts into alcohol - they swell unless they are of the buna-N type rubber. Alcohol also cleans out the fuel system. On older Rovers, this can cause all that junk in the tank to break loose and plug your fuel pump. Alcohol is also caustic to aluminum (pistons...). I take a 2 1/2 gallon tank with me with good premium to add when the test is over. It's your call. P.S. - all my Rovers were towed home and had been sitting for 3-13 years! I had to drop each of their tanks and soak with the dip-type carb cleaner to get the crud out. Before this, I had to change the fuel filter every 5 miles on one trip. Amazing how the sloshing of 4wheeling can loosen all that junk. My Bronco/Land cruiser buddies thought it was great to get all those pictures of me working on my Rover the whole trip! Also, might know of some sides for a 109. Will check and get back at ya! (sorry this is so long, but I must be lonely) Boat shops for closed-end rivets is a good idea. How many boat shops have you passed when cruisin through the desert? Even though I work at "China Lake" and the Navy is out here... the lake is a dry one (except during floods!) and the Navy doesn't have a single boat (except for missile targets). Later. Kelly Minnick Ridgecrest, CA '73 88" SW ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 23:32:40 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: GPS popularity? A couple of people have mentioned GPS's... Do a lot of people have them? I've been lusting after them for several years (comes from working with someone as obsessed with sailing and his boat as I am about Rovers whose wife works at West Marine), but don't expect to be able to afford one any time soon. How useful *are* they here in the states? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 23:32:57 -0800 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Rover Babe Update So far, the high bid is $20 on the 5/92 issues of Playboy with Miss Rover in it. Unfortunately, I (or my !^$@%#@#$!% software) managed to delete at *least* one message with a bid in it. So, if you *didn't* get a response from me about your bid, please re-send it. And remember, the net profits are going to LROA, so bid high and bid often! In other news, Scotty has informed me that there is at least one other pictorial in Playboy featuring a Land Rover. This one had a clothing-challenged young lady on the bonnet or in front of a Rover. Most likely from the mid to late 80's. If anyone knows what issue this is, or spots it, please let me know. And, a bit of a disclaimer... Please don't take offense at my sometimes not exactly politically correct terminology and such. Honestly, I treat women exactly the same as I treat anyone else (and expect them to respond the same), and in reality, don't care what sex, race, color, or what-have-you anyone may be. I am often spouting off about how this media allows us to truly (for the first time in history) ignore any socially-instilled predjudices we might have. You may be male, female, heterosexual, homosexual, black, white, asian, or even a 12-foot venusian dragon, and it really doesn't matter. What matters is what you say and do. Which is the reason for this addendum -- I don't want my terminology (specifically Rover *Babe* and such) taken the wrong way. It's a joke, poking fun at Playboy and that sort of magazine. If anyone has been offended, please accept my apologies. (Sorry to babble so much.) (P.S. When growing up, I made sure my sisters could take out basically any guy their own size, because I didn't want to live/play with a bunch of wusses.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mr Ian Stuart <IAN@lab0.vet.edinburgh.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 1994 08:57:24 +0000 Subject: Re: Rover Babe Update [snip-snip] > predjudices we might have. You may be male, female, heterosexual, > homosexual, black, white, asian, or even a 12-foot venusian dragon, and it [chop] <shiver>"12-foot venusian dragon" - doesn't that sent a shiver of excitement up your spine? Does it make the testostorone stir in your glands (Maloney! - quiet! Thyroids!) Did playboy (un)cover a 12-foot venusian dragon? ----** Ian Stuart (Computing Officer) +44 31 650 6205 Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh University. WWW sites: Work -- <http://www.vet.ed.ac.uk/> Play -- <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~kiz/> #======================================================================# Pessimists are often pleasently suprised by life, |Land Rover owners do optimists find it full of disappointments. | it in the mud. ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST World Wide Web Sites: http://whitman.gar.utexas.edu/roverweb/roverweb.html http://www.cs.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeLand-Rover/ If majordomo barfs at something, and you're convinced he should have understood what you sent him, contact majordomo-owner@chunnel.uk.stratus.com -B[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941222 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|