[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 27 | you can trust your Land Rover |
2 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 35 | 1001 uses for Waxoyl |
3 | William Caloccia [calocc | 53 | '69 S.IIa 88" for sale |
4 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 17 | DOT 5 |
5 | Spenny@aol.com | 40 | Re: off the deep end |
6 | "Christopher E.J. SPEIGH | 13 | LRO Mailing List |
7 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 22 | Re: Vinalhaven Rover |
8 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 32 | Re: cross country trip; misc |
9 | "Stefan R. Jacob" [10004 | 16 | Status of TeriAnns 109 |
10 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 35 | Touble Dialing in Sgt Major |
11 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 18 | Is it car or truck |
12 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 22 | Re: Defender Questions |
13 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 18 | Re: Defender Questions |
14 | Mark V Grieshaber [mvgri | 33 | Re: DOT 5 |
15 | S|ren Vels Christensen [ | 34 | Re: Is it car or truck |
16 | "Mugele, Gerry" [Gerry.M | 29 | DMV Classifications |
17 | DEBROWN@SRP.GOV | 31 | '70 Series 2A for sale in Arizona (USA) |
18 | Brian Willoughby [BAWILL | 46 | Land-Rovers in Missouri |
19 | Russell Burns [burns@cis | 14 | 24v light on defender 90 |
20 | Morgan Hannaford [morgan | 11 | Finally, Oct. LRO |
21 | lloyd@indy14.cs.monash.e | 13 | free wheel hubs |
22 | "T.F. Mills" [tomills@du | 34 | Re: LRW US national decoded |
23 | "T.F. Mills" [tomills@du | 44 | Re: painting LRs (and armour) |
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: you can trust your Land Rover Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 11:03:16 UNDEFINED /I wanted to get onto the roof of the house but all /3 of my ladders were 100 miles away at a remodeling /project (yeah, that *is still* going on). I needed /to get some plastic off that was covering the /chimney (do this every summer). We wanted to have /a fire and watch the US election results. What /to do? Backed LULU up to the house and it /was like walking up stairs -- bumper, bonnet, rooftop /and roof. Worked great. Yep. They're great for seeing over crowds (just put a sunlounger on teh roof adn relax in comfort to teh hate-stares of all those round you who cant see....) Or for picking all teh best fruit no-one else can reach... Or for finding out where the hell you are........ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: 1001 uses for Waxoyl Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 11:09:41 UNDEFINED /it on. After my first unsuccessful attempts at spraying (it was /like oozing snot on a wand) I looked more carefully at the instructions. /Ahhhh,"shake well before using" and "may be diluted with 10% mineral /spirits" were written on the can. I took a long hard look at the /stuff in the can and decided it needed more than a shake (and all /attempts at shaking seemed to do little good)....so I marched up /to the house, threw on a large kettle of water, heated it up on /the stove, removed the heat, and tossed the can into it. 20 /minutes later it was free flowing and could even be shaken. Back /out to the field (Nigel's workspace), crank up the pump, oozing snot /again at first, then like magic it sprayed just like it was supposeed This is the favorite way to get it on thick. Boiling water in a bucket. Alternativel;y, thin it about 50/50 with diesel. I use method one for teh annual chassis spray,an keep a hand flower-sprayer full of method 2 for on teh fly touch ups. /to. Threw a total of two gallons onto the boy's frame, springs, axles, and assorted other underparts, being careful to get it into those nooks and crannies so often filled with rust and crap. Grapped a rag You can get a VERY useful little accessory for teh pressure pump. It's like a 4 foot tube with a nail in the end. You shove it into every hole you can find in teh chassis, the nail spreads teh fan out perpendicular to teh tube, so you can spray the INSIDE of all teh chassis members too. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 06:19:11 -0500 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@sw.stratus.com> Subject: '69 S.IIa 88" for sale 1969 Land Rover Series IIa 88" (short wheel base, 3 doors), 56,500 mi $3000. Mechanically good condition (Inspected, registered, etc. in NYS) Part-time Four Wheel Drive w/ Free Wheeling front hubs recent mechanical bits: water pump, GM altenator, exhaust various: tie-rod ends, wheel bearings, brake lines, & wheel cyl. radiator cleaned & repaired, hoses ,etc rebuilt fuel pump, replaced fuel line from tank, (used) rear diff needs: footbox/bulkhead welding work, (both footboxes and door posts included) Solid frame recent frame work: outriggers p.o. frame work: spring hangers Body: blue/limestone top, black painted trim, a couple of minor dings (one on the wing, & a not-quite straight rocker panel) Station wagon hard top (sliding side windows, rear bench seats, interior trim) complete with Tire w/ Jack, Hand crank & monster lug wrench Extras: Ignition kill switch Hood Lock (medeco key, from inside) am/fm radio (neither I nor the previous owner(s) could decide where to fix it, so you can attach to whatever you want) Assorted spare parts History: Owned by a VW mechanic in Allston, Ma for the first 18 years, second owner used it to pull his fishing boat, third owner owned an S.III in college, and found he like the idea of owning a rover more than he did working on it. I've had it for five years. Reason for sale: I'm in the U.K. and it isn't. Availability: Now, vehicle in Troy, NY Contact: Bill Caloccia (caloccia@team.net) (in UK) [If interested, I'll put you in touch with someone who can show you the Rover.] ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: DOT 5 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 11:13:24 UNDEFINED /Anyone have big objections to running dot 5 silicone in the brakes and /clutch? I do on my Tiger and the soon to be new to me rover has it now. Wouldnt touch the stuff. It's more spongy than 3 or 4, adn can rot brake lines adn seals unless they are designed for it. No great advantage unless you run your brakes red hot all teh time anyway. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Just another roadkill on the Information Superhighway +++++++++++++++++++++++ None-%er #1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Spenny@aol.com Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 06:31:09 -0500 Subject: Re: off the deep end TeriAnn writes This is the longest we have been separated since I purchased her in '78. Staring at her, I suddenly realized she is both a dream machine and a freedom train. TeriAnn, i can sympathize I heard my rover make noise for the first time in close to 2 years sunday, my just fix a few things quickly turned into a nightmare project, & I live in an apartment with little space to work on my rover so another rover friend has been kind enough to let me have my beast sit in his yard for the last two years. I am looking forward to some of the same things, but since the wayback machine is my only vehicle, I am also looking forward to not having to walk to work in the snow and rain, and not borrow cars from friends to go to the supermarket. the best part of finishing the wayback machine (very soon) is i'm going to park it on top of the cars of my friends that told me that I was crazy, It would never run again, etc. One of which drives a shitbox that breaks down and leaves him stranded once a month. Living off the deep end in MA Spenny Spencer K. C. Norcross Spenny@aol.com Haverhill, Mass. USA 508-373-1788 (W) 508-521-4093 (H) 508-521-1380 (FAX) ===--===---===---===---===---===---===---===---===--=== 1969 IIA SWB Bugeye - The Wayback Machine Land Rovers on the Information Superhighway! What will they think of next! ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Christopher E.J. SPEIGHT" <SPEIGCEJ@charlie.aston.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 12:13:17 GMT+1 Subject: LRO Mailing List Please include my address on your EMail Mailing list for Land Rover Information Thanks Chris Speight speigcej@sun.aston.ac.uk ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 10 Nov 94 08:28:22 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Vinalhaven Rover Gregory Brown wonders: >While I am writing I want to pose a question to the digest. Is a Land >Rover a Car or a Truck? In my opinion anything that wades through Neither; it's a sort of agile tractor where you can sit in the dry when it rains (well, more or less...). Actually, Mercedes (you know, the folks who make these ridiculously overpriced cars) went the right way by calling their 4x4 truck UNIMOG, an acronym for "UNIversal-MOtor-Geraet", which translates simply to 'universal motor-driven appliance' - in other words, it's got a motor, and you can use it for all sorts of things ... even for driving. I believe the same applies to the Land Rover. Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 10 Nov 94 08:29:10 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: cross country trip; misc John Hess (jfhess@ucdavis.edu) asks: >6 cyl 2.6 engine. I would feel better adding a lead substitute to the gas >so as to minimize the chances of burning a valve. Any suggestions? My suggestion: Throw out the 6 cyl. and get a V8; much more power, much less consumption, and no need for lead-related hanky-panky. But then that's your decision. If you're happy with the six-banger... >Can I bypass a broken brake booster with a length of brake line and a >connector if I need to? I did in my tiger but it's just a touch lighter. DON'T !! The servo master brake cylinder has totally different ratings and measurements than the non-assisted master, even if they 'look' the same from the outside. If you use the the servo master 'raw' without the booster, you might as well wrap a japanese bandana round your head and go downhill screaming "BANZAI" ... |-> Simply changing to a non-servo assisted master won't do, either. You would need to change the entire pedal bracket/suspension-setup, as angles, rod lengts, travel etc. are different between the two systems. Land Rovers may be simple, but not *that* simple (not the S.III, anyway). Take care, Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 10 Nov 94 08:27:29 EST From: "Stefan R. Jacob" <100043.2400@compuserve.com> Subject: Status of TeriAnns 109 ... >I was standing out in Scotty's shop, talking to him and looking out at my >green 109 facing me in the rain. I was thinking how nice she looked with the >... This elegy is definitely a serious candidate for the lro-faq, possibly under a heading like "A Bad Case of Land Rover Blues", or perhaps "Psychopathology of the Land Rover Owner - A Case Study" <bg> Stefan <Stefan R. Jacob, 100043.2400@CompuServe.com> ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 10 Nov 94 08:51:05 EST From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Touble Dialing in Sgt Major Folks: For the first time, I am having some trouble dialing in the carb on the Sgt. Major ('62 IIa88 Military w. Solex-built Zenith-designed Carb). My problem is this: acceleration is nil if I do not have the choke pulled out. It sputters and gasps. When the choke is out about 1/3rd the way and engine revs come up just a bit, it works perfectly. Then, when at cruising speed, I can push in the choke and it has good power. It cruises beautifully at 65 and will do so all day... It's only when accelerating from a stop that I have a problem. I rebuilt the carb earlier this fall, the accelerator pump is good (shoots a good stream of gas when I depress the accelerator). The timing also seems to be good, though it does sputter a bit on decelaration... no backfiring, just kind of a phut phut which it has always done. The only thing I can think of is that the engine is not getting warm enough to go off choke... it has the double-core radiator, 8-blade "africa" fan and an oil cooler -- and my recent addition of a heater has not helped. It was a setup perfect for Houston but not exactly what I would choose for Ohio in Winter. I think a Radiator muff is in order. Anyone have any tips on what is going on? Is my carb adjusted wrong? I thought I had it right, but, after all, it's a Land Rover and "right" is a relative thing. Can anyone suggest a setup procedure that might work? Thanks for any advice or help. R. P. Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 10 Nov 94 08:55:54 EST From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Is it car or truck Car or Truck?? In fact, the 109 Safari Wagons were registered in Great Britain as a bus at one point because it seats 12 people. Without the middle seat in front, it seats only 11 and was MOT'd as a car or truck and cost far more to register. Rover made a conscious decision when they were developing the SerIII Wagon to leave the seat in the front so that it fit in the bus MOT category. I don't know what they might have been thinking of replacing the seat with... console, I suppose. Regards, R. P. Reid (Looking forward to the Last Gasp rally this weekend... bring on the mud!) ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Defender Questions Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 6:37:04 PST Bill, The demo was 25900 with a soft top. I wanted yellow, but the Blue was $3000 cheaper. After all most of the color washes off in a few years anyway. Other than the full hardtop there were no options. I did use some 1.25x1.25" square steel tube to raise the drives seat. This was a big improvment. Even my wife likes it higher. Last night I got a few yards of Dynomat and soundproofed the rear cargo area, and the doors. This is a big improvment as I can now here the radio at 70 MPH. I will have to order some more to do the front floors, transmission hump, and bonnet. If it was not so expensive I might even consider applying it to the soft top..... Russ none ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Defender Questions Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 7:40:24 PST Bill, For 12 years my wife and I have been trying to get a red car/truck. what we have found is that Red is $2k to $3k more expensive than the same model in blue. so our last 4 vehicles have been blue. When the Rover dealer had this demo advertised we knew our red or yellow defender would be blue. Since blue trucks are allmost becoming a tradition in our household it seems a shame to buy any other color. (we bought our first couch because we both aggreed it was ugly) Russ ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mark V Grieshaber <mvgrie@shute.monsanto.com> Subject: Re: DOT 5 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 9:46:50 CST Andy Woodward said (referring to DOT 5 Silicone fluid): > Wouldnt touch the stuff. It's more spongy than 3 or 4, adn can rot brake lines > adn seals unless they are designed for it. > No great advantage unless you run your brakes red hot all teh time anyway. none I have used it for a year now in my Black 1978 Datsun 280Z. I detect *zero* feel or performance difference in brake and clutch systems between it and my other 1978 280Z which is still on DOT3 fluid. No leaks, no rotting brake lines. Though I don't run the brakes red hot *all* the time, I did choose Silicone fluid for its minimal moisture absorbing properties. Both of my Zs are in great shape, and I plan on keeping them for many years, so I wanted to protect the brake components as much as possible. Literature I have read states that DOT5 Silicone fluid is compatible with *all* brake system components (various rubbers, metals usually found in such hydraulic systems). Were it not for the stock of new Castrol LMA I have waiting, I would put DOT5 in my Land Rover as well, for the same reasons. And for those red hot brakes. ;) Just another data point. Mark mvgrie@shute.monsanto.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 17:25:04 +0200 (METDST) From: S|ren Vels Christensen <velssvch@inet.uni-c.dk> Subject: Re: Is it car or truck Depends on the colour. -On the licence plates. Over here (Denmark) we have two different licence plate colours. White: White is for regular cars. Vehicles with back seats, mainly for transportation of passengers. Yellow: Is for cars (trucks) with only front seats. Annual road tax (by weight) is about one third of cars. No persons in the back. Not even when camping. Any car can be registered as a truck (with the back seats out). With the weight and fuel economy af a Land-Rover, most LR's are registered as trucks. But there is a price to pay. Everey second year, MoT --==<<(( INSPECTION ))>>==-- Thats why most LROs over here has a nice tan on the legs, and on the torso and arms a maggot-white colour with oil-black, dirt-brown, rust-red dots. Mine is a truck, but i usually refer to it as a Land-Rover. +----------------------------+--------------------------------+ | Soren Vels | 1976 sIII 109" 2.25 petrol | | velssvch@inet.uni-c.dk | "Lawrence of Arabia" | ((|||)) | Royal Danish Air Force | Dansk Land-Rover Klub no. 3564 | ((|||)) | Communications Specialist | DL-RK: Approx. 1000 members. | ((|||)) +----------------------------+--------------------------------+__((|||))______ ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Mugele, Gerry" <Gerry.Mugele@wellsfargo.com> Subject: DMV Classifications Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 08:35:00 PST Don't know why anyone would rely on the DMV to determine the appropriate category for their Land Rover. That's not an organization normally associated with brilliant/clever/reasonable decision making. Here in California there was recently a minor scandal: seems the DMV spent $54+ million on a new computer system from Tandem Systems. After 3+ plus years of effort they have been unable to get it to work and now have dropped the project as a throw-away. So anyway, my first L-R, a '69 88" Hardtop was, in the estimation of these people, a sedan. And so the registration indicated for the first 20+ years of its life (it's now in Washington State). My second L-R, a '67 88" pickup, was reckoned to be (big surprise here) a pickup truck and was so registered. My current beastie, a '72 88" hardtop, was much less fortunate. The brutal savages at the DMV didn't just slander us, they made it permanent: on the registration tag, under the label TYPE, it clearly says (arrgghhhh) JEEP. Conclusion: I don't trust the DMV to tell me a turnip is not a motor vehicle and it's only luck that they get "Land Rover" spelled correctly. And the appropriate label is simply "Land Rover" Gerry RM - ** What if there were no more hypothetical situations? ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 09:41:48 MST From: DEBROWN@SRP.GOV Subject: '70 Series 2A for sale in Arizona (USA) FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist * Mapping Services & Engr Graphics PAB204 (602)236-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 SUBJECT: '70 Series 2A for sale in Arizona (USA) I didn't know if it's appropriate to post LR's for sale, but since there are not that many in the US, and some were already listed, here goes... I was came across this, looks like a fair deal. 1970 IIa LR red color with white roof, roof rack, light guards, 2.2 engine, weber carb, "Rover-Drive", new frame, new brakes. $6000 (US) e-mail me if interested, and I can get you in touch with him. Dave Brown - debrown@srp.gov - '94 Disco - Phoenix Arizona (USA) In reference to the "looking for love" thread... Wanted: Driveway mate for newborn Disco, 1 month old. All Land Rovers and Range Rovers welcome. Both myself and my Disco are single, I have kids, but the Disco is too young to be dropping anything yet... #=====# Never doubt that a small group of individuals |___|__\___ can change the world... indeed, it's the only | | | | thing that ever has. ""O""""""O"" -Margaret Mead ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 12:28:54 EST From: Brian Willoughby <BAWILL01@UKCC.UKY.EDU> Subject: Land-Rovers in Missouri Ray Harder caught me. I guess that I over-generalised and assumed that all Land-Rovers were registered in the same fashion in Missouri. Everbody I know that has their's licensed, has it licensed as a car (those ugly red plates that say "Show Me State" at the bottom and have the renewal sticker dead centre, for those of you who've never seen one.) You see, before I came to the University of Kentucky, I was working in St. Louis and that is where I bought the car and had it inspected. Ray lives in Columbia and as I recall does not have to take the same test to get a license as the folks in St. Louis and Kansas City do. It has something to do with combatting air polution in urban areas of the state. Out-state, you do have to pass a safety inspection that makes sure that your headlamps, wipers, turn signals, brake lights, horn and brakes all work. For newer cars, post-'68 I believe, you must be able to pass an emissions test. L.R. is so old that he is grandfathered in and does not have to worry about that. The safety inspection was fun. The mechanic couldn't figure out how to do anything with it. I was in their waiting room expecting to be called out which is exactly what happened. I had to start it for them, flip on the lamps and wiper motors and sound the horn. I'm glad they deferred to me to do all of this; it seems that this is an easy way to get your car damaged. Anyway, the inspection station decided that L.R. was a car. And that is what he got licensed as. Of course, he has no seat belts and if I can help it, never will. I have him insured as an antique car, and therefore insurance, if it can be as such, is rather reasonable: about $50 a year with a mileage limitation of 2500. It's really not bad if you don't use your Land-Rover for anything other than fun on the weekends. As many of you know, I am in the process of restoring L.R. to as new condition. My desire is to have him look the way he did when he rolled off the line 34 years ago in Solihull. And that is why I don't want seatbelts; they are not original. (I always wear them in my cars that do have them installed, by the way.) So any way, that is how my Land-Rover came to be a car in Missouri. Rather arbitrarily, I presume. I guess that it may also have something to do with the fact that it is titled, incorrectly, as a Jeep. Having never owned one, I don't know how the state licenses them, though as I recall, most I have ever seen were registered as cars (in reference to CJ's, of course.) This really has muckied up the waters a bit. Though I thought that it might end some of the confusion. Brian Willoughby bawill01@ukcc.uky.edu 1960 Series II Station Wagon 88", goes by the name of H.R.H. L.R. Rafiki ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Russell Burns <burns@cisco.com> Subject: 24v light on defender 90 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 10:39:47 PST I just noticed one of my dash lights on the Defender 90 has a picture of a battery and 24V inside of it. Do they build this beast for 24V ?. Just curious Russ Burns 91 Range rover 94 Defender 90 ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 14:39:54 -0800 (PST) From: Morgan Hannaford <morgan@nature.Berkeley.EDU> Subject: Finally, Oct. LRO I got the October LRO yesterday. A full week after Roger got it and he lives nearby. "bitch, bitch, bitch!!!" Morgan Hannaford Berkeley, CA '69 88" ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 94 10:10:34 +1100 From: lloyd@indy14.cs.monash.edu.au (Lloyd Allison) Subject: free wheel hubs there are several reasons to engage FW hubs from time to time - the front prop-shaft slip-joint can wear oval if it is not rotating The upper steering bearing/bush needs the oil The front diff can rust above the oil-line unless it has an oil-film. (?tried them on RR or discovery ?-) Lloyd ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> Subject: Re: LRW US national decoded Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:07:59 -0700 (MST) Dixon writes: < December LRW arrived in Ottawa yesterday, or at least my < neck of the Ottawa region. I do like the colour photo [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] < the British Invasion at Stowe (p. 111). It has, er, < character. Next time, I'll remember there's an easier and surer way to get my car/truck/lorry/vehicle/beast in LRW! < AN excellent article. Were the photos that you supplied on slides, < or were they on paper? Photos were Kodachrome, mostly using a polarizing filter which enriches the colours and contrast. (The camera is a 20 year old Canon SLR on its last legs. It has been up the Matterhorn, down the Grand Canyon, and almost smashed by an East German border guard. The photographer is a 40 something fruitcake who doesn't mind getting smashed on occasion, but still views the world right side up.) I don't know about nowadays, but it used to be that publishers preferred working from slides. I sent a sheet of 20 slides to LRW and they used eleven of them. rgds... T. F. Mills tomills@du.edu University of Denver Library 2150 E. Evans Ave. Denver CO 80208 USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> Subject: Re: painting LRs (and armour) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:37:33 -0700 (MST) Soren of Arabia Vels writes: < If you plan on going to ex-Yugoslavia DON'T PAINT IT WHITE!. The bosnian < serbs will think it belongs to UN peacekeeping force and will let you taste < a few one-o-fives. When you crawl out of the smoking wreck, the snipers will < get the rest of you. That reminds of a small article that appeared in Sept/Oct AMERICAN PHOTO (p.12). Here's the full text: CHAUVEL'S ARMOR: THE LATEST THING How hazardous has the situation become for photojournalist working in the free-fire zone that is Bosnia? With bullets flying in every direction and snipers posted throughout the tortured land, photographers who've gone there to document the war are veritable targets. Famed war correspondent Patrick Chauvel, who's been injured many times while covering other conflicts--and who is considered one of the most daring photojournalists around--has gone so far as to buy (with his agency, Sygma) a used British army armored personnel carrier for his travels around Bosnia. "If Chauvel thinks he needs armored protection, you know it's a bad place," says photojournalist Chris Morris, who has also spent a great deal of time dodging bullets in Yugoslavia. Chauvel bought the truck, which had been used by the British army in Northern Ireland, from a collector in Great Britain. Reportedly, other photojournalists have also been using armored-car protection of their own. --David Schonauer [end of article] accompaying photo shows an armored LR being painted WHITE. And there's no doubt this LR is a babe magnet: Elle Macpherson is on the same page, also in white. T. F. Mills tomills@du.edu University of Denver Library 2150 E. Evans Ave. Denver CO 80208 USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 941111 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|