[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | "T.F. Mills" [tomills@du | 30 | Re: Movie Alert! |
2 | "T.F. Mills" [tomills@du | 23 | 500,000th Land Rover? |
3 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 11 | crumple zones |
4 | Spenny@aol.com | 57 | Names List Final |
5 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 41 | Elephants & Rovers |
6 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 41 | Thanks, Helper Springs and Movies |
7 | "BENJAMIN G. NEWMAN" [71 | 40 | ADVICE |
8 | "R. Pierce Reid" [70004. | 28 | Thanks |
9 | K Schmidt [s20845@hp.rmc | 17 | carb question |
10 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 69 | R. Pierce & Ben Newman questions |
11 | [DAVE@andataco.com> | 20 | remove me from your mailing list. |
12 | William Caloccia [calocc | 106 | [not specified] |
13 | Tim Harincar [soc1070@12 | 30 | RE: Hello and some newbie questions |
14 | "The X Window System | 16 | Re: quick brake fluid question... |
15 | Steven M Denis [denis@o | 21 | Re: Bull Bars/LR Safety |
16 | Steven M Denis [denis@o | 17 | Re: Weekend jaunt/clutch woes |
17 | Steven M Denis [denis@o | 24 | Re: crumple zones |
18 | Steven M Denis [denis@o | 20 | Re: ADVICE |
19 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 32 | Re: Land Rovers and charging rhinos... |
20 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 41 | [not specified] |
21 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 26 | Re:Rovernet stickers |
22 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 15 | Off the subject |
23 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 22 | Re: carb question |
24 | "TeriAnn Wakeman" [twak | 64 | Re: PORTLAND ABFM |
25 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 47 | Re: lromail volume |
26 | Joseph Broach [PC7170@UT | 21 | More Info: Rattles and Rumblings from Sid |
27 | David John Place [umplac | 17 | Re: Movie Alert! |
28 | David John Place [umplac | 11 | Re: LOCKED WHEELS |
29 | David John Place [umplac | 8 | Re: carb question |
30 | Vance Chin [vance@xnet.s | 18 | Re: PORTLAND ABFM |
31 | Benjamin Allan Smith [ra | 66 | Ben & Bill's Excellent Adventure |
32 | Benjamin Allan Smith [ra | 22 | [not specified] |
33 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 24 | [not specified] |
34 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 27 | [not specified] |
From: "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> Subject: Re: Movie Alert! Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 01:44:51 -0600 (MDT) Jan Fisk writeth: < Does anyone remember what it was? At the last Oscars round, we came up with our own extensive list of LR Oscars/Emmys/GoldenGlobes... Maybe we need a master list for the FAQ, along with celebrity LROs, etc.! Sandy Grice mentioned the upcoming (next month, I think) Stallone&Stone (barf!) "The Specialist". The trailers show a flaming 110 flying through space. Somebody else recently mentioned Harrison Ford's "Clear and Present Danger" in which the bad guys drive RRs. < I'm still upset that Blockbuster does not carry "The Gods Must be Crazy"!!! < Let me know if you see it coming on at anytime on cable. I would appreciate < it. I've seen it in independent video stores. Did the sequel have Rovers? (Still haven't seen it.) T. F. Mills tomills@du.edu University of Denver Library 2150 E. Evans Ave. Denver CO 80208 USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> Subject: 500,000th Land Rover? Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 01:56:21 -0600 (MDT) Some time ago Robin mentioned something about the 500,000th Rover coming off the production line in 1966. I didn't catch the end of that thought. Since my 109 is a 1966, I'm curious if one can determine somehow the day and/or month any particular car rolled off the assembly line, and what its production number was. Furthermore, I understand that the first three digits of 1962-79 chassis numbers indicate model and specification. My prefix is 254 -- what does it mean? I'd hate for Sali to miss her own 30th birthday out of sheer ignorance. (Rovers give new meaning to "over the hill".) T. F. Mills tomills@du.edu University of Denver Library 2150 E. Evans Ave. Denver CO 80208 USA ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: crumple zones Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 10:30:40 UNDEFINED /Try this simple experiment at home. Tape a brick to your head and /ram it into a wall at a fast walk. Then try this same test with a /foam pillow taped to your head. Go ahead, I'll wait... I prefer to run my brick into a pillow. Doesnt damage the brick............ ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Spenny@aol.com Date: Wed, 07 Sep 94 07:17:54 EDT Subject: Names List Final for the last time, the voting rules: Voting will start Mon, Sept 5 @ 6:30 am, when I will post a final edition of the list, and will end Mon, Sept. 12 @ 6:30 am, one week from the posting of the final list. I will post final results no later than Wed, Sept. 14 e-mail me at spenny@aol.com put BALLOT in the Subject header Here is the list of names as of 2:00 am EST 9/3/94 PLEASE NOTE: that the last option is no name for the club, just continuing to use the internet mail address 1.) Land Rover Owners Club 2.) Rover nets 3.) Low Rangers of the Information Superhighway 4.) L.R.O.I Land-rovers on the internet (info hiway) 5.) RoversNet 6.) IL-RIC - International Land-Rover Internet Connection 7.) ILRN - International Land-Rover Network 8.) Rovers in the Ether 9.) Roving through the Ether... 10.) Land-Rovers, Internet & Beer, a virtual community. 11.) low-box net surfers 12.) Ledgendary Land Rovers International 13.) Rover 4X4s of the electronic highway 14.) Raving Rovers! 15.) The Net Rovers 16.) Rover Rangers of the Infobahn 17.) LROC of the Internet 18.) The Wired Rovers 19.) Space Rovers 20.) Cyberspace LAN'd-Rovers 21.) LROC of the Internet 22.) CyberLand Rovers 23 ) Land-rover Users Group (LUG) 24 ) Land-Rover Owners Virtual Register (L-ROVR) 25 ) Land-Rover Owners Virtual, Internet Group (L-ROVING) 26 ) Syberspace Land Rover Owners Club 27 ) Society for Landies United Together {Maloney Baloney ; ) } 28 ) LUGNUTs (Landrover Users Group Network UniTed) or 29 ) SCREWs (Society of Cybernet Rover EnthusiastS)? 30 ) Car List Rejects 31 ) NO NAME - Keep LRO@Team.Net Spenny Spencer K. C. Norcross Spenny@aol.com Haverhill, Mass. USA ===---===---===---===---===---===---===---===---===---=== 1969 IIA SWB Bugeye - The Wayback Machine Land Rovers on the Information Superhighway! What will they think of next! ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 1994 07:57:46 -0400 From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Subject: Elephants & Rovers Mike writes: none I've got a bit of some TV program on videotape about some chap studying elephants. Most of it is pretty mundane but there is one part that is real good. They were "darting" young bulls and fitting them with radio collars to track thier movements. The tricky part is they have to administer a antidote to the tranqualizer because it's not good for the elephant to be down too long in the heat. The guy was trying to inject the antidote when the matron noticed what was going on. The next bit of footage gets real exciting as the guy jumps back into the 88 and starts backing it up at a very high rate of speed. Not fast enough however, because the matron charges the Rover and actually rams it a number of times. The camera was bouncing around *quite* at bit, but you do get a glimpse of a badly bent steering wheel! none Several years ago I was watching a segment on CBS called "Dangerous Moments in Photography" or something like that. They showed a segment that was somewhat similar. The photographers were in a topless IIA 88 with the camera bolted in back facing forward. I've forgotten whether they were just photographing or tagging the animals, but they find themselves facing this big bull. The animal starts to charge and thrusts his (her?) tusks through the radiator and pushes (running) the Rover backwards for quite a ways . It's like you're sitting in the Rover with one very pissed off elephant's tusks through the radiator running at you and the brush/trees are moving by at high speed away from you (very exciting footage). I don't remember if it flipped the vehicle on it's side or not but after the animal had left they surveyed the Rover. It was declared a total loss. The other interesting non-Rover footage I recall was that of killer whales swimming up onto the beach to snatch seals on the sand. They then wiggled and rolled back into the surf. Real amazing stuff. I haven't seen it since but would be sure to tape it if it comes around again. Bill maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 07 Sep 94 08:54:44 EDT From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Thanks, Helper Springs and Movies Greetings. First, thanks to Bill for the advice on the carb... that agrees with Rovers North diagnosis, so I guess my thought about the coil may be off... I ordered one anyway, so it'll probably end up in the spares box. Second, someone asked about movies... One with lots of Rovers in it is called A Crack in the World (or was it Earth??)... a really bad sci-fi movie, but worth the rental to see the Land Rovers. Another movie that starts Friday is called "A good Man in Africa" and has Sean Connery driving a gorgeous IIa Pickup 109. I can't believe Blockbuster does not have the Gods Must be Crazy... You sure it is not under foreign films? It was made in South Africa. Of course, the fact that it came from S.A. (and was made before apartheid ended) may keep some stores from carrying it, but I have seen it at other Blockbusters... Finally... My add-a-leaf kits arrived last night and I will be installing them over the weekend. The kits, though ordered through J.C. Whitney, are by Hellwig, which has a good reputation for quality. The springs are quite robust looking and have a strong curve to them, which accounts for the lift they claim they will give the vehicle. The front springs are easy to install, as the helpers fit between the retaining clips, and do not require that the retainers be removed. the rear ones will be a bit more challenging, and require that the spring pack be totally disassembled. From experience, I know I'll need to heat the retaining clips (Propane torch is ok, as they are made of malleable steel) and the re-bend them once the spring-pack is back together. I'll let everyone know how the project goes parts ordered, etc. This looks like an easy suspension modification. I plan on picking up some film and photographing it, too, so I may pot together an Aluminum Workhorse tech piece. Cheers, R. Pierce Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 07 Sep 94 08:57:28 EDT From: "BENJAMIN G. NEWMAN" <71773.3457@compuserve.com> Subject: ADVICE FELLOW LRO As you know from previous correspondence, I have a 6-cylinder, 1966, 109 NADA station wagon. The engine is not the original engine but, in fact, we have determined it is a 1955 to 1959 Rover automobile engine. Because of potential problems I am having with this engine, I am considering replacing it with a Turner rebuilt 4-cylinder, 2.5 liter, high-performance engine. I am also considering, while replacing the engine, putting in a rebuilt Series III transmission. I found a fellow in Europe who rebuilds transmissions to military specifications who tells me the Series III rebuilt is as good as, if not better, than a late-model Series IIA and, of course, it is syncromeshed. My question is, what are the advantages and disadvantages of changing out the differentials and putting in a 3.5:4 differential in the front and rear? I was told since I will be reducing my horse power by putting in a 4-cylilnder engine, that this will increase my speed at a very minor cost of power. I also have been told that with the change of differentials that I would no longer need an over-drive. Since I already have an over-drive that is brand new in my vehicle, what effect would I have by keeping the over-drive or should I get rid of it? Of course, if there is not much difference in changing out the differentials, I prefer not to do so, because of the obvious expense. Comments about this proposal from around the world are anxiously welcomed. Also, does anyone have a good source for these differentials? To Michael Loiodice: Thank you for your comments. Finally I was able to lock in the front wheels. I do not know what kind of locks I have. I know I have to pull down a bar and turn it before you can lock them in. There are two bars per wheel. I have noticed the past few days there is a little oil dripping from the hub of my front wheel. Does this mean I need a new seal or do we live with this problem? Benjamin G. Newman,MD 1966 109 series llA NADA wagon 1962 88 warwick4X4 rebuilt to series lll specs ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 07 Sep 94 09:28:40 EDT From: "R. Pierce Reid" <70004.4011@compuserve.com> Subject: Thanks Bill: Thanks for the pointer... I'll give that a shot. Last night, I tried to find a leak on the carb by spraying carb cleaner along the gaskets, etc. but had no luck. I have ordered a gasket kit for the Zenith (Genuine, from Rovers North) and will start with that. I may also grab a piece of glass and some 400 grit emery paper and see if I can spot a warp on the top-plate. Your idea that the O-Ring may be part of the problem, though is interesting... that would explain why the carb seems to seal well and won';t react when the seals are sprayed. I assume there is a replacement O-Ring in the gasket kit. Since I had a friend rebuild and reset my carb a year ago when I last re-did it, I am not familiar with the Zenith (I had no trouble tearing it down and "think": I have identified each piece) but just for my record... the mixture screw, I assume, is the one at the bottom of the carb, near the adaptor plate and sort of sitting at about 7 O'Clock as you face the front of the vehicle? Thanks again for the help... I'll let you know how it turns out this weekend! R. Pierce Reid ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: K Schmidt <s20845@hp.rmc.ca> Subject: carb question Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 9:51:48 EDT I now have a solex on my 62 IIa 88. I'm not happy with the fuel consumption. Has anyone heard of conversions to Rochesters? Any ideas of a model number or a donor vehicle that might have one? Any comments on performance, fuel consumption or potential problems with such a conversion? Thanks in advance for any ideas you might have. kurt s20845@sv1.rmc.ca ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 1994 11:28:37 -0400 From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Subject: R. Pierce & Ben Newman questions R. Pierce & Ben, My header didn't give me an accurate return address so I couldn't respond directly, so... R. Pierce writes: none I have ordered a gasket kit for the Zenith (Genuine, from Rovers North) and will start with that. I may also grab a piece of glass and some 400 grit emery paper and see if I can spot a warp on the top-plate. none That's the best way to do it. I just don't have the patience and opt for the file... carefully (I did try it though - seemed to take forever). none Your idea that the O-Ring may be part of the problem, though is interesting... that would explain why the carb seems to seal well and won't react when the seals are sprayed. I assume there is a replacement O-Ring in the gasket kit. Since I had a friend rebuild and reset my carb a year ago when I last re-did it, I am not familiar with the Zenith (I had no trouble tearing it down and "think": none Yup, a new O ring is included. If your friend pulled it apart without replacing the O ring, the O ring may not seal properly due to tearing or being just plain hard as a rock. none I have identified each piece) but just for my record... the mixture screw, I assume, is the one at the bottom of the carb, near the adaptor plate and sort of sitting at about 7 O'Clock as you face the front of the vehicle? none Yes, that's it. You may find the replacement needle too oversized (tight) to be able to feel it bottom out. Reuse the old if that's the case. Ben Newman writes: none Finally I was able to lock in the front wheels. I do not know what kind of locks I have. I know I have to pull down a bar and turn it before you can lock them in. There are two bars per wheel. I have noticed the past few days there is a little oil dripping from the hub of my front wheel. Does this mean I need a new seal or do we live with this problem? none Now I know what kind of hubs you have, but I don't know what they're called. I've got them on my 88 and when locked, they do seep oil from the two locking shafts that the bars pivot on. I have had them apart and the O ring seals seem OK. I don't worry about it. To lock them if they won't both lock at the same time I lock one then turn the steering wheel to lock one way or the other. I move the Rover forwards or back slightly then get out and try again. It may take a couple of tries but this will work. If you don't turn the wheel both wheels turn at the same rate and the locking mechanism will never line up. Or you can cheat and lock the first hub that will then jack up the other wheel and rotate it until the locking shafts will engage. Have fun! Bill maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: <DAVE@andataco.com> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 08:21:52 PST Subject: remove me from your mailing list. Thank you for the information on your net. I no longer have the time to filter the info. Yours in Better Service, W. David Sykes President Andataco 10140 Mesa Rim Road, San Diego California 92121 619-453-9191 ext 1200, 619-453-2676 (fax) dave@andataco.com The best kept secret in the industry?????? ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: reminder mail: list administrative stuff Date: Wed, 07 Sep 94 11:49:39 -0400 From: William Caloccia <caloccia@sw.stratus.com> Here is the text currently being sent out to new subscribers... >Subject: Welcome to the land-rover-owner mailing list// digest !!! Last Rev 7 Sept 1994 Hi ! Welcome to the land-rover-owner list: You should receive one copy of this message, directly. For questions to or submissions to the list (which will also be received by the digest readers) send mail to: land-rover-owner@team.net OR lro@team.net All list adds are now being done to the lro-digest, see below for information on how to contact the automated digest-server, or how to contact me about the real-time list. At present the number of subscribers is over 150. We presently have subscribers from the AU,CA,DK,FI,IS,IT,NL,NO,NZ,ZA, US and in the UK, who have Rovers ranging from a '52, military light-weights, to current Defenders, Discos, Range Rovers, and a 101FC kit. (How about a 127" ? ) Feel free to post an introductory note about you and/or your truck. Traffic on this list tended to be moderate (less than 20 messages per day, with a daily digest of ~500 lines and 23KB.) until about August 1994, now messages are 30-70 per day, and the daily amount can exceed 100KB. --bill caloccia@Team.Net caloccia@Stratus.Com Stratus Computer Ltd tele: +44 81 570 4433 Central Hse, Lampton Rd fax: +44 81 569 4755 Hounslow, Middx. TW3 1HY; UK N R 1 3 2 H "Land Rover's first, becuase | +--|--| | | Land Rovers last." '69 Mk.IIa 88" OD 2 4 4 L land-rover-owners-request@Team.Net Ps thanks for waiting, I'm doing list add requests once every couple weeks. --------- Land Rover Owner Mailing List Digest ------------------------ With respect to administrative stuff (subscribe/unsubscribe) the list and the digest are handled very differently. For administrative stuff (Info, Digest subscriptions, etc), send mail to: Majordomo@Chunnel.UK.Stratus.Com With the body or text of the message with lines such as: help info lro-digest subscribe lro-digest user@host.domain.name unsubscribe lro-digest The Digest is produced daily, at 8AM, UK in the US (eg. GMT + 7 hours). The Digest is not moderated, but it IS filtered to remove: (1) lengthly forwarded passages (which are annotated in a typical fashion), (2) excess headers, and (3) errantly inserted control characters. After filtering the Digest is distributed. Many people prefer the Digest as: they are swamped by the interactive mail, or they typically log on only once per day, or they are paying for mail storage, and the digest takes up less space and thus costs less. Note: __ALL__ new additions to the list are being added to the Digest Form. --------- Land Rover Owner Mailing List Digest ------------------------ For LRO list administrative stuff (subscirptions, etc), allow two weeks (as this is done by a human, me) and send to: land-rover-owner-request@team.net OR lro-request@team.net People may be moved from the real-time list to the digest-list if there is evidence that their host, or intermediate hosts are not accepting mail in a prompt manner. This will allow the real-time list to remain in real-time for those users who have adequate mail services. --------- Land Rover Owner Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) ----------- A subscriber to the list, Dixon Kenner has an assembled some FAQ documents for (potential/) Land Rover Owners. It focuses on older North American vehicles and includes a bibliography and list of North American clubs and dealers, some in the U.K. These FAQS are available from the FTP site triumph.cs.utah.edu (155.99.208.4) [login "anonymous", and use your mailing address as the password] Current files include: pub/sol/Land_Rover_FAQ.txt -Land-Rovers: Introduction and buyers guide. landrover.faq -Land-Rover FAQ (New files may appear from time to time.) ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 1994 11:32:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Tim Harincar <soc1070@128.101.63.1> Subject: RE: Hello and some newbie questions Thanks to everyone who responded to my questions. Last evening, I removed the Zenith carb and took it apart (well, I took the top & bottom half apart). The o-ring was in good shape. Next, I checked the float - bingo! The float was set way off. When holding the top half upside down, Haynes says the float max distance from the body should 1 5/16". This was set to less than 1" - about 15/16" (actually, the float would stop when it bumped into the body!). That would account for the flooding - since it was set low, when floating on the gas it wouldn't have enough travel to fully close the needle valve, and/or would allow too much gas into the float chamber. I checked the fit of the halves, and it was pretty good. The carb isn't that old, only about a year, so it doesn't appear that it has warped. I was able to get it running with a jump (generator problems are next), just to make sure it was working, but I haven't got into the fine tuning yet. I still need to clean all the plugs (I have new ones and just might replace them), as well as check the gap on those and the points. Thanks again -- tim harincar soc1070@vx.cis.umn.edu or harincar@internet.mdms.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 12:29:44 EDT From: "The X Window System: A VMS for the 90s" <brandenberg@wrksys.enet.dec.com> Subject: Re: quick brake fluid question... > I picked up some Castrol GTLMA instead of the usual LMA brake fluid > this morning (only thing they had worth buying). Counterbeing thought > it was fine for natural rubber seals but I thought I'd ask if anyone > has used it yet... none To answer my own question.... New packaging confused me. The old stuff was also GTLMA, just with the bits moved around. Damned marketing people just can't leave things alone.... :-) m ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 13:16:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: Bull Bars/LR Safety Actually, land rovers in this country are at the fore in saftey...most of them don't run!...only kidding folks.....but,isn't this list a form of safety .....While we're inside on the net....our rovers are parked in the drive *not* crashing into anything....(I wonder if we could get a club discount on insurance....) truly sorry,won't happen again...really steve..... "HEY! NICE JEEP,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." "NOTAJEEP"-1967 109 Station Wagon Steven M. Denis " "-1957 107 Station Wagon PO Box 61 " "-1964 109 Pickup Erieville,New York USA " "_1967 109 NADA SW 13061 ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 13:29:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: Weekend jaunt/clutch woes The disc is rusted to the flywheel.... start it up in gear with the clutch pedal pushed in....it will go "pow" and release....you may have to give it some wellie,and push on the brake with your third foot....but once it comes loose,it is fixed...untill the next toyota come to town.. steve... "HEY! NICE JEEP,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." "NOTAJEEP"-1967 109 Station Wagon Steven M. Denis " "-1957 107 Station Wagon PO Box 61 " "-1964 109 Pickup Erieville,New York USA " "_1967 109 NADA SW 13061 ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 13:49:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: crumple zones "HEY! NICE CRASH,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." On Tue, 6 Sep 1994 llevitt@idcresearch.com wrote: > Uh, perhaps I've been spending too much time in Volvos (boxy but > safe) but the discussion of rover stoutness versus crumple zones [ truncated by lro-digester (was 10 lines)] > foam pillow taped to your head. Go ahead, I'll wait... > OW! my head hurts! Really the experiment backfired...with the brick atached,my head went *through* the wall,and the energy was absorbed in the breaking /displaced wall board....the point is that inertia does play a major role here...if I hit a ford fiesta (1500lbs) with my 109sw (4000lbs) *somebody* is going to get more than their share of deceleration....("oh no,really,I*insist* that you slow down more quickly than I...) with the greater mass of our vehicles,we have the responsability to drive carfully....the the rest of the world *should* get out of the way,but they all failed physics...... steve.... ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 13:57:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: ADVICE Those hubs are Dual-Matics....do your self a favor and lose them... the detent ball that holds the arm in place rusts up and then the arms fly out, breaking off and making the whole affair quite useless.....they also tend to leak (they *were* land Rover approved...) Over drive and 3.54 are *way* too "tall"....even with a Ford V-8...don't ask....really...... steve....... "HEY! NICE JEEP,MISTER!"..........."Look,Kid,it's a ..Oh never mind..." "NOTAJEEP"-1967 109 Station Wagon Steven M. Denis " "-1957 107 Station Wagon PO Box 61 " "-1964 109 Pickup Erieville,New York USA " "_1967 109 NADA SW 13061 ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 11:39:55 -0700 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: Land Rovers and charging rhinos... In message <T3X4Rc4w165w@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca> writes: > Something that has been discussed before here... > I was going through some old issues of the ALROC magazine [ truncated by lro-digester (was 24 lines)] > dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca > Ottawa Valley Land Rovers / FourFold Symmetry, Nepean, Ontario, Canada OH OH!!! I guess this means the courts will throw out my copyright to that phrase. Well there goes the millions in royalties and invitations to national talk shows. I guess I need to ring Ophra and tell her to cancel...sigh But... does the add mention field stripping in the jungle with a screwdriver and crescent wrench?...flicker of hope (Hmm that sounds like what happens when you use a Lucas light switch). Honestly, I don't remember looking at a Land Rover add in the sixties. I don't think I even knew what a Land Rover was then. sigh TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards LINK: TWAKEMAN 408-974-2344 TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, Land Rover 109 - 164000561 ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: 500,000th Land Rover? From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 94 13:03:06 -0500 "T.F. Mills" <tomills@du.edu> writes: > Since my 109 is a 1966, I'm curious if one can determine somehow the > day and/or month any particular car rolled off the assembly line, and > what its production number was. If one wants to sort through factory records, it is possible to determine this information (assuming it has not been lost). Beyond that, it is impossible to determine what year a IIA Land Rover was built in from the serial number. By what bits and pieces are on it, it is possible to narrow it down to within a year or two, assuming it is original. > Furthermore, I understand that the first three digits of 1962-79 > chassis numbers indicate model and specification. My prefix is 254 -- > what does it mean? Latest FAQ that I posted has this information. Basically, 254 means it is a left hand drive export model 109 with a petrol engine, basic configuration (Station Wagon was 264 prefix). > I'd hate for Sali to miss her own 30th birthday out of sheer > ignorance. (Rovers give new meaning to "over the hill".) Original registration will give that to you, though it is very possible that it might be a year older. Rgds, Dixon -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, | Ottawa Valley Land Rovers Nepean, Ontario, Canada | 1016 Normandy Crescent, Nepean (OVLR's InterNet site) | Ontario, Canada, K2C 0L4 ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 13:02:37 -0700 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Re:Rovernet stickers > Granville handed out window/bumber stickers he designed > having a Land Rover Information Highway logo on it. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >Granville, are these stickers available for sale, rent, lease? >Spenny I plan to refine the signs a little and actually include a Land-Rover logo (hope that doesn't get me in trouble with Solihull P.D.). I hurriedly threw something together for the show (Portland Meet) which was just on paper and card stock. I may alter the text a little as I refine this and add a logo (or maybe a graphic image of a Land-Rover). Will post a message when they are ready. I will not charge for card signs (SASE only) but will have to charge nominal amount for sticker versions (to cover cost of transfer film). Will let you know. I'm flattered by your interest. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ Granville Pool <mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net> >>5 Land-Rovers (4-88" 1-80" ] [ 2601 Road I,#0, Redwood Valley, CA 95470 Phone: (707) 485-7220 ] [ Net-Rovers leave a trail of mud & oil on the information superhighway! ] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 16:38:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Off the subject I hope I don't make anyone in the group mad at me but I have one question that is not Rover oriented. I was hoping in the collective knowledge of this group that some one might be able to give me a clue. Anyway, The question is; does anyone know where I might get any information on a 1927 American La France 6 cyl fire truck. I haven't the foggiest idea about the engine. If you do have any info please send it to me direct at jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu. I don't want to use up our space here. Thanks for any ideas Jon ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 14:15:11 -0700 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: carb question In message <199409071351.AA09309@g8.rmc.ca> K Schmidt writes: > I now have a solex on my 62 IIa 88. I'm not happy with the fuel > consumption. Has anyone heard of conversions to Rochesters? Any [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > kurt > s20845@sv1.rmc.ca The Rodchester would need to be the one from the Chevy iron 4 cylinder engine that came in some cars in the sixties. Fuel consumption is higher in most cases (all that I'm aware of. The larger venturi is supposed to add a little more horse power. TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards LINK: TWAKEMAN 408-974-2344 TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, Land Rover 109 - 164000561 ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 14:15:33 -0700 From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> Subject: Re: PORTLAND ABFM In message <9409062008.AA19037@pdx242.intel.com> Mike Fredette writes: > HI ALL > apart. And Terriann, looking at John Benhams canvas water bag, they're > supposed [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > Rgds > Mike Fredette Mike! wait a minute, I had a canvas water bag on the nose of my 109. I've had it for years. Genuine large size flax desert bag with cork stopper, modified with bailing twine strap when the original one rotted. I was commenting on the things that others had said on the mail list. I too had a wonderful time at the Portland meet as always and renewed friendships. Bear got to play with his shadow again (Black Newfoundlands look a lot like white Pyrenese). Got to look at the pile of '90 parts that was recently shipped over from the UK in a big box...Amazing!!. Bear says to say Thanks to all of you at my table at the Sat BBQ who contributed bones for him. He thought they were VERY tasty. Camping at the meet was lots of fun.. especially since there were slightly more than 40 Land Rovers worth of people overnighting there with me. Maybe they will let us do it again... Except I prefer the Tony & Linda hosted BBQ. I got some excellent ideas on how to make my Land Rover a better camper and currently plan to head north this winter to pick up Doormobile parts :*) The off road course looked like fun but I decided that if I didn't want all my camping gear to be evenly distributed throughout the car, I would need to unload it first. I took one look at all the bungie mounted boxes and stuff and decided it was too much work. The only bad part about the trip was coming home. The lay shaft in the gear box broke on the way home from Portland on Monday. I had filled the car with petrol in Ashland, stopped at the California border check point and the transmission went BANG as I was pulling out of the checkpoint. Luckally I still had fourth gear (hi & low) and full tanks. I took the car to Scotty's house in Concord and got a ride home. He will fix the transmission for me and locate the strange engine noise that has plagued me since he rebuilt the engine. I hope to get the car back around mid Oct (when I have some $$ gathered to pay for the transmission work). I discovered that the Land Rover will go from Ashland to Concord (near San Francisco) in one petrol load (2 underseat tanks). The transmission had 16,700 miles on it after a rebuild which reused the old layshaft. Of course, I went up with Vance, problem free (except for needing to tighten the wiper arm), and had problems coming back alone. Oh well. It was still fun & Thanks Vance for providing company on the way up! TeriAnn Wakeman Large format photographers look at the world twakeman@apple.com upside down and backwards LINK: TWAKEMAN 408-974-2344 TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, Land Rover 109 - 164000561 ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Re: lromail volume Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 17:40:26 EDT > As message traffic increases in this group, I am for the first time > deleting some without reading them. I read less than 10% of some [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] > describes your message (rather than being left over from an unrelated > thread). Please note that in some cases it is either impractical or impossible (?) to include a subject line in an outgoing message. If I use the standard "mail" command and type "Subject: some subject" on the first line a subject line appears for you and all to scan (no doubt this is an "automated" feature in many of your mailer programs). HOWEVER, I am then VERY restricted to what I write in that I can ONLY edit the line I am typing on and none of the above lines (remember my snowy nigel picture, for instance??). Hence, I do most of my postings by sending a file first created in vi.....but then I cannot (or have not figured out how to??) include a subject line. If I try to include "Subject: some subject" in the first line of my vi'd file it doesn't work....somehow a blank line is inserted in the process and that "Subject:etc" line comes out on line two. Perhaps there is an easier solution to the only one I've got (which is to copy and paste into the "standard mail" method after manually including a subject line....a tad of a pain in the arse). WRT excessive volume and the recent complaints about "multiple responses" that could be consolidated. Good point, but I think that there is a tendancy to respond in multiple messages because: a) many mailer programs have the "reply" feature that automatically inserts the ">" sign to let you know what was responded to but this cannot (or again, I and others don't know how) be done with several messages at once (without saving them to a file, then resending it to yourself: arg!) b) many persons may read one at a time and respond as they go. c) in some instances (but not for paying customers, I suppose) the inclusion of the subject line to key us in on what the message is all about is advantageous. But hey, many of these problems can be solved with the DIGEST and some good text searching techniques, no?? With all the volume and no time to read it that's where I'm heading.....fast. rgds, rd/nigel ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 94 19:31:04 LCL From: Joseph Broach <PC7170@UTKVM1.UTK.EDU> Subject: More Info: Rattles and Rumblings from Sid First I would like to thank all that responded to my first post. The popping is the (virtually gone) front spring bushings. Now: * The rattle at 2500+RPM has proved difficult to track. * It can be produced in neutral or in gear. I don't think it is engine related because its worse in 2wd/hubs locked than any other combination. * All fluids are at max. I'm hoping that it may just be some loose linkage on a lever or something. Any more suggestions?? On a more positive note I drove 100 miles w/ no trouble this weekend. About 25 miles of very fun offroad, treading lightly of course. -Rgds, Joseph '67 ser IIa 88....."Sidney" ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 21:33:04 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: Movie Alert! The movie was Delta Force II. It featured a chase scene with IIAs and some 109 Ser III. Lots of action. Stars were Chuck Norris and it is only about 1991, so it is up to date as it were. Dave VE4PN On Tue, 6 Sep 1994 JFisk1120@aol.com wrote: > The other day someone mentioned another movie that had alot of Rovers in it. > Does anyone remember what it was? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 14 lines)] > Springfield, Missouri > '64 Land Rover IIA > '91 Range Rover County ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 21:39:12 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: LOCKED WHEELS I don't think you want to run with only one hub on for very long. It is very hard on the differential. I also run Warn locking hubs, and they are easy to overhaul. Just take out the bolts and wash out the old goo and put in fresh grease. Bits of sand get on the scroll area and they don't want to slide in and out. Dave VE4PN X ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 21:50:53 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: carb question Re the Rochester. I run one with a #48 Jet or at least solder drilled out to #48 jet and it works very well. Good milage perhaps 16 and you can get them from old 1952 Chevy engines etc. Lots of them around. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 20:36:06 PDT From: Vance Chin <vance@xnet.ssl.Berkeley.Edu> Subject: Re: PORTLAND ABFM Sorry TeriAnn for not being there when you broke your transmisson, that's what driving together is supposed to be for. I too had a great time at the portland event. I spent the right amount of money (had just enough cash for gas). Bought some cool stickers, tail light lenses, and books. The offroad course was excellent since it was made from a motocross track! My series III managed to go around 6 times with Ron my friend, James Russell, and myself taking turns driving. My side step did not make it though, it got torn loose from it's mountings. Hope to see you all next weekend at the Palo Alto meet for some more rovering. Vance Chin Series III 88 ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: re: Bill and Ben's excellent Adventure Date: Wed, 07 Sep 1994 20:55:25 -0700 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu> Subject: Ben & Bill's Excellent Adventure This is why I got back and wrote to the net before Bill could. That way I could get in a first impression before Bill clouded everything. :) >As I neared the top I saw a fairly sharp rock imbedded in the >trail. There was no way around it. I was just about to reach >the rock when I began to loose traction. Ben was carefully >spotting me and I followed his hand signs, but I was sure I was >going to lose a tire to that rock. The bedrock protruded at this point in the loose rock trail, causeing a foot or two high ledge across most of the trail. A larde boulder restricted movement on the left side. The path between the two was narrower than out 88s, and bended to the right. Putting the right tyre slightly on the bed rock, was the key to get through. I was easier going up than down. >After we talked for awhile, the most drunken yahoo (the one who >had been blowing his horn the whole time he was in his vehicle) [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >different trail... SPLOOOOSHHH! I turned around and where is >Ben???? Going nowhere fast in the bottom of the mud pit. I had just seen the Land Cruiser go through twice. So it had to be passible. Not the way I went. 1 inch line and another Rover got me out. >It was clear the going down was far more difficult than going up >and Ben waved me off to another trail to the left. First low, [ truncated by lro-digester (was 7 lines)] >bottom well ahead of Ben. His section was really difficult, but >he navigated it with no breaks or dings. Going down is much worse than up. Gravity is working against you and you can't see a bloody thing past the tyre on the hood. I got down the bedrock place, flying mostly blind, and gently easing my 88 by using the breaks and not the engine. My rear bumper hit the bedrock as I went down (I have a diamond plate bumper thing welded on instead of a rear crossmember. 2 owners ago did it.) and my tail pipe it, causing it to crack flush with the muffler. Luck for me I just got it inspected, so I don't have to fix it until July. >I wonder when Ben will turn to make the well used crossing >point then realize that he is continuing upstream! >As Ben heads upstream to spawn I run back to my Rover to get >ahead of him. I find him a few feet from the seldom used exit >point in the river stopped dead. I was having fun, the stream has a small rock bottom and was getting shallower. Just short of shore it died for no apparent reason (it was only a foot deep here) >I have to admit that winch sure came in handy. However, >watching Ben spool the cable back using his fingers around the >drum seemed like kind of a drag. I'll bet that with a working >controller that winch could be downright useful. My controller was stolen along with the winch kit. I get a new controller when I get a job. Until then I have to improvise. Last I heard RN wanted $50-$75 for the controller. Benjamin Smith ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu 1972 Land Rover SIII 88 w/o a working clutch ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Clutch, so far no luck Date: Wed, 07 Sep 1994 20:57:53 -0700 From: Benjamin Allan Smith <ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu> Thanks to all on the advice for the sticking clutch. So far I've tried putting it in 1st low and surging the engine with the clutch down and surging the engine and then slamming on the breaks. No luck so far. I've gotten a lot of strange looks from the other people in the parking lot though. Tomorrow Dad and I will try again. If all fails, I've got 1 inch line and I find a tree on a quite side street. As for the wading plug. I don't have one. I've never had one. Until just before the trip willl Bill I'd never heard of the damn thing. Now I know. Something else to buy. Maybee I'll just take a piece of rubber and make a temporary stopper to plug the hole. (Assuming I can get the clutch/pressure plate/flywheel to break free) Benjamin Smith ranger@ugcs.caltech.edu 1972 Land Rover SIII 88 that once moving can't stop (with out dying. Maybe I should rename it "shark") ------------------------------[ <- Message 33 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: quick brake fluid question... From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 94 22:08:59 -0500 "The X Window System: A VMS for the 90s" <brandenberg@wrksys.enet.dec.com> writes: > To answer my own question.... New packaging confused me. The > old stuff was also GTLMA, just with the bits moved around. > Damned marketing people just can't leave things alone.... :-) Speaking of brake fluid, I have this nice virgin hydraulic system before me in the little earth pig. Now to fill with LMA, or go for the silicon stuff... Rgds, Dixon -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, | Ottawa Valley Land Rovers Nepean, Ontario, Canada | 1016 Normandy Crescent, Nepean (OVLR's InterNet site) | Ontario, Canada, K2C 0L4 ------------------------------[ <- Message 34 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Land Rovers and charging rhinos... From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 94 22:14:16 -0500 "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> writes: > OH OH!!! > I guess this means the courts will throw out my copyright to that phrase. You should have gone for the elephants... The second part about screwdrivers and crescent wrenches... Well, Off hand I am not sure yet, but somewhere I have seen that used too. Maybe in a review of the vehicle in an old car magazine. You might not have originated the phrase, but who cares that you don't get to take Ophra for a 109 ride, you may still end up with the credit when the credits roll... Rgds, Dixon -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, | Ottawa Valley Land Rovers Nepean, Ontario, Canada | 1016 Normandy Crescent, Nepean (OVLR's InterNet site) | Ontario, Canada, K2C 0L4 ------------------------------[ <- Message 35 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940908 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.