[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Robert Meredith [robm@hp | 32 | 88" sIII Questions |
2 | Richard Jones [rich@amet | 46 | [not specified] |
3 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 44 | Re: 88" sIII Questions |
4 | Keith Steele [75126.1123 | 23 | Fairey Overdrive |
5 | "Keith Coman" [BAKC@gira | 54 | Re: 88" sIII Questions |
6 | Keith Steele [75126.1123 | 15 | RoverWeb Access |
7 | "Keith Coman" [BAKC@gira | 36 | Re: 88" sIII Questions |
8 | phile@stpaul.gov (Philip | 39 | Landrover crash (fwd) |
9 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 21 | Re: 88" sIII Questions |
10 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 18 | Re: 88" sIII Questions |
11 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 20 | Re: Landrover crash (fwd) |
12 | DEBROWN@srp.gov | 26 | Air bag experiences??? |
13 | dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on | 22 | [not specified] |
14 | Bruce Harding [Bruce_Har | 25 | Fairey Overdrive |
15 | azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woo | 19 | Re: POLL-for 109/2.25L petrol owners |
16 | "THE X WINDOW SYSTEM | 44 | RE: Fairey Overdrive |
17 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 67 | Re: 88" sIII Questions |
18 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 49 | Fairey Overdrive |
19 | "THE X WINDOW SYSTEM | 32 | Re: Fairey Overdrive |
20 | William.Grouell@Eng.Sun. | 63 | RE: Fairey Overdrive |
21 | Mike Fredette [mfredett@ | 27 | [not specified] |
22 | mcdpw@pacific.pacific.ne | 24 | Re: Fairey Overdrive |
23 | Mike Fredette [mfredett@ | 29 | [not specified] |
24 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 49 | [not specified] |
25 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 69 | [not specified] |
26 | Mike Fredette [mfredett@ | 60 | [not specified] |
27 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 37 | Re: Landrover crash |
28 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 27 | Re: Fairy Overdrive |
29 | jfhess@bullwinkle.ucdavi | 45 | land rovers and africa |
30 | Roger Sinasohn [sinasohn | 18 | Re: 88 vs 109 |
31 | Craig Murray [craigp@ocs | 22 | Re: 88 vs 109 |
From: Robert Meredith <robm@hpman010.uksr.hp.com> Subject: 88" sIII Questions Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 11:30:16 BST Hi, I've got a 21 year old SIII 88" 2.25l petrol landy that I bought a couple of weeks ago and have a couple of questions for other SWB owners. Has anyone got 750 tyres on their SWB, is this possible? I would like to do this to make the gearing higher and improve the fuel consumption. Fuel consumption: Does anyone have a feel for the improvements with free wheeling hubs, larger tyres, overdrive? I'm getting about 15mpg on a commuting cycle at the moment. Has anyone set up a sleeping arrangement with a board over the passenger seat? I know you'll all laugh and say if you want to sleep in it buy a 109 but I'm only thinking of this for very rare (emergency) situations. What is the usual top speed people are able to obtain on motorway driving with reasonable comfort? Anyway I think this will do for starters I'm off to the spares shop to get a new steering wheel as mine is sheeding black gunk all over my hands on the way to work!! Cheers, Rob Meredith. ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Range Rover tidbits Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 10:55:56 +0100 (BST) From: Richard Jones <rich@amethyst.apricot.co.uk> Rostykus, John writes: none [...] > >There is no good place to mount a CB radio in a R Rover. > >Cutting the wood grained dash is out of the picture (wife problems) [ truncated by lro-digester (was 9 lines)] > This makes it very easy to access the controls, and does not interfere with > the drivers foot (the case on my CB is about 1-1/4" thick). For pre-95 model year vehicles, another possibility, particularly if you only want to have the CB fitted occasionally, but leave no trace of it having been there when not fitted, is to remove the coin tray. This coin tray (the thing in the middle of the dashboard, where the radio speaker was on the early ones - yes I know that any self respecting coin is going to jump right out on the first corner, but I can't think of a better name so I will stick with it) is held in by a couple of screews hidden below the rubber mat. The mat just sits in the try and isn't (or atleast shouldn't be glued in or anything silly like that). Once the tray is removed, it is farly easy to rig up a bracket to mount the CB using the tray mounting holes. There is plenty of space behind the dash to feed the aerial cable through along with all the other wires required. Once you have finished with the CB you unplug the wires, drop them into the hole, remove the bracket and put the tray back until the next time you need it. I literally only takes a couple of minites to install or remove, once you have sorted the bracket and fed the cables through. Regards Rich -- _ __ Apricot Computer Limited Tel: (+44) 21 717 7171 ' ) ) / 3500 Parkside Fax: (+44) 21 717 0123 /--' o _. /_ Birmingham Business Park / \_<_(__/ <_ BIRMINGHAM B37 7YS Email: richardj@apricot.co.uk Richard Jones United Kingdom ..!uknet!apricot!richardj ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: 88" sIII Questions Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 12:39:16 BST > Hi, > I've got a 21 year old SIII 88" 2.25l petrol landy that I bought a couple [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] > Has anyone got 750 tyres on their SWB, is this possible? I would like > to do this to make the gearing higher and improve the fuel consumption. According to the "Repair Operations Manual", SWB machines can be fitted with 6.00,6.50.7.00 or 7.50 tyres.Acceleration suffers(I've got 205.16 Trakcker radials on mine,a little bigger than 6.00,but even so,the loss of acceleration is noticeable.which with a diesel is a bit crucial:-). With 7.50 tyres your speedo will be well out of calibration,but cruising is less stressfull. > Fuel consumption: Does anyone have a feel for the improvements with > free wheeling hubs, larger tyres, overdrive? I'm getting about 15mpg on > a commuting cycle at the moment. none 15mpg seems about average to good on a commuting cycle,FWH are worth having IMO (theyre on my shopping list ever since I had occasion to run without my front prop shaft for a fornight.The difference was noticeable.O/D well worth having,but payback time has to be studied,an O/D is on my "I wish"list. Electric fan may help,too. > Has anyone set up a sleeping arrangement with a board over the passenger > seat? I know you'll all laugh and say if you want to sleep in it buy a 109 [ truncated by lro-digester (was 11 lines)] > a new steering wheel as mine is sheeding black gunk all over my hands on > the way to work!! Try Brasso,followed by spray on furnture polish.Cures the disintegration problem for quite a while,and is cheaper than a new steering wheel. > Cheers, > Rob Meredith. > but I'm only thinking of this for very rare (emergency) situations. none Hope this helps Cheerio Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 27 Jul 94 08:46:08 EDT From: Keith Steele <75126.1123@compuserve.com> Subject: Fairey Overdrive Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am considering having one installed and have several questions. 1. How reliable is it. Is it any more prone to problems than the transmission/transfer case already installed in the Series III? 2. How much work and modification is required? Does it just bolt into the power takeoff hole or is extensive modification required? 3. How much does it change the gearing. In other words can I cruise at 60 MPH with approximately the same engine RPMs that I now experience at 45 - 50 mph. Thanks Keith Steele 75126,1123@compuserve.com '72 Series III 88 since new ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Keith Coman" <BAKC@giraffe.ru.ac.za> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 14:58:08 GMT+0200 Subject: Re: 88" sIII Questions > I've got a 21 year old SIII 88" 2.25l petrol landy that I bought a couple > of weeks ago and have a couple of questions for other SWB owners. > Has anyone got 750 tyres on their SWB, is this possible? I would like > to do this to make the gearing higher and improve the fuel consumption. none Can't comment except that the effect of fuel consumption by switching tyres will probably only be measurable over many, many miles: extended payback. Switching tyres on a Landie seems to be attractive only for specific applications (eg. lot of off-road work, beach\sand, etc.) What might be interesting is to fit a set of conventional light truck tyres -- reduced rolling resistance = better petrol consumption. (Akin to fitting "slicks" on a mountain bike in place of "knobblies".) > > Fuel consumption: Does anyone have a feel for the improvements with > free wheeling hubs, larger tyres, overdrive? I'm getting about 15mpg on > a commuting cycle at the moment. 15mpg is about right for this unit in urban commuting. The best I've ever got in my SWB 2.25l was around 22-23mpg -- steady 45-47mph, no headwind, over very flat stretch of motorway. Free-wheeling hubs are, in my view, a sensible addition to improve fuel economy -- one certainly seems to rev the engine less and for shorter periods when they are disengaged and when pulling away up to cruising speed -- definite reduced engine load. (Akin to air conditioner "off" versus "on".) Overdrive -- probably very good if yr vehicle does a fair bit of long range cruising on paved surfaces, but no personal experience. > Has anyone set up a sleeping arrangement with a board over the passenger > seat? I know you'll all laugh and say if you want to sleep in it buy a 109 > but I'm only thinking of this for very rare (emergency) situations. > to do this to make the gearing higher and improve the fuel consumption. Hammock: fitted diagonally across the cab and loadbed. Foot end attached to the front corner in the top angle of the passenger door and windscreen; head end into the opposite angle aft. Works sweet with a hard-top roof, rolls up into a small space, and jolly comfortable --- short arses only tho!! Cheers, Keith Coman > What is the usual top speed people are able to obtain on motorway driving > with reasonable comfort? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > Rob Meredith. > * Dept of Management, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 27 Jul 94 08:51:55 EDT From: Keith Steele <75126.1123@compuserve.com> Subject: RoverWeb Access I would like to access the RoverWeb and so far have unable to do so. I use Delphi for internet access. If anyone of you Internet experts could give me explicit instructions on accessing the RoverWeb via Delphi I would be eternally gratefull. Thanks Keith Steele 75126.1123@compuserve.com '72 Series III Since new. ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Keith Coman" <BAKC@giraffe.ru.ac.za> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 15:18:08 GMT+0200 Subject: Re: 88" sIII Questions Oops, missed these 'uns... > > What is the usual top speed people are able to obtain on motorway driving > > with reasonable comfort? In stock condition: flat out is around 60mph. Fast cruising: =\- 50mph. Comfortable cruising: 45-47mph. Noise and steering attention become niggles at high speeds. Also the old SII's brakes can give you a few hairy moments at really high speed crash-applications in traffic emergencies...! Drive within the limits --- practically 45- 50mph. > > > > Anyway I think this will do for starters I'm off to the spares shop to get > > a new steering wheel as mine is sheeding black gunk all over my hands on > > the way to work!! What you can try is to get an old knife and really scrape all this sticky crud off the surface -- an amalgam of decaying plastic and years of finger goozie -- until you get down to hard plastic. Sand it down smooth. Buy a 2-pack polyurothane(sp) black paint at yr hardware store. Give it 3-4 coats: letting dry in between and light sand down. Dries as hard as nails and looks like its brand new. Did mine back in '85 and still looks immaculate after daily use. Costs only a few readies and easily done over a weekend. (You can also get different colours --- howzabout a Dayglo Orange Series II steering wheel?!!) Cheers, Keith Coman * Dept of Management, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: phile@stpaul.gov (Philip J Ethier) Subject: Landrover crash (fwd) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 08:35:11 -0500 (CDT) I Forwarded this message from british-cars: --------------- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 13:47:29 BST From: bryan@roborough.gpsemi.COM (Duncan Bryan) Subject: Landrover crash Hello Landrover fans, A friend of mine told me about his land rover driving friends recent accident. He skidded on an oil patch and consequently drove straight through a dry stone wall at 50 mph. His SWB landrover demolished the wall, hit a BIG rut and turned over (at about 25 ), ending up on one side. After climbing out he somehow managed to get the thing back on its wheels. OK the windscreen had gone and the wings were a bit mangled, and the cab roof was worse for wear. He got back in, turned the key.. it started. He drove it to his usual bodywork garage who told him that the chassis was still straight and that only a few panels needed replacing. Total cost < 200 pounds. The moral of the tale is, if you want to drive through 2 foot thick dry stone walls and still use the vehicle afterwards then buy a landrover. This same friend used to go sledging in his Austin Princess ( 1982) but that's a different story. Happy wall smashing. Duncan ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: 88" sIII Questions Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 16:10:59 UNDEFINED >> Has anyone set up a sleeping arrangement with a board over the passenger >> seat? I know you'll all laugh and say if you want to sleep in it buy a 109 >> but I'm only thinking of this for very rare (emergency) situations. > Hammock: fitted diagonally across the cab and loadbed. Foot end >attached to the front corner in the top angle of the passenger door >and windscreen; head end into the opposite angle aft. Works sweet >with a hard-top roof, rolls up into a small space, and jolly >comfortable --- short arses only tho!! Or sunlounger running along the sideboxes adn over the bulkhead fits nicely down the driver's side (so you dont need to move it to drive, just fold up the head section adn it doesnt obscure your rear vision). I'll be doing this game soon. Moving out of teh flat, and cant be bothered with the hassle renting somewhere else. We have some really beautiful laybys up in the hills.......... ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: 88" sIII Questions Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 16:15:33 UNDEFINED >> > What is the usual top speed people are able to obtain on motorway driving >> > with reasonable comfort? My 90 n/a deisel did 85mph flat out on the stock Avon Traction Mileage 6.50s. I fitted the 205 radials to get better fule consumption. The fuel consumption went up from 31mpg to, er 31mpg!! The top speed dropped to about 65mph! But the Avons wore out in 15k, the radials have 30k on and still 10mm of tread!!! I cruise at 50 to be gentle to the engine. It'll hold 50 up most places. 88s'd do much the same? ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: Landrover crash (fwd) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 16:20:38 UNDEFINED > The moral of the tale is, if you want to drive through 2 foot thick >dry stone walls and still use the vehicle afterwards then buy a landrover. A while ago, there was a smash on a fast A road on Anglesey. One of teh local farmers had done the usual Anglesey trick of pulling out from a sideroad without it occurring to him that there might be anything else on the road....... The else was a Volvo doing about 60mph. The Landrover (a 110 van) was severely dented. Looked like a good few hours with a hammer and paintbrush to make it look nice again. The Volvo was only recognisable as such from the turret backwards. ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 08:29:27 MST From: DEBROWN@srp.gov Subject: Air bag experiences??? FROM: David Brown Internet: debrown@srp.gov Computer Graphics Specialist AM/FM - PAB204 X-3544 - Pager:6486 External (602)275-2508 #6486 SUBJECT: Air bag experiences??? A friend of mine is doing some research on air bags, and I thought I'd help him out by asking for responses from anyone that has had the opportunity to have one employed. Please answer the following if you have: 1. Do you believe that it prevented you further injury? 2. Do you believe that it saved your life? 3. Were you injured by the air bag itself? 4. Given a choice, would you opt to have one in the vehicle you currently drive. (if you don't already have one.) 5. Any other comments on air bags, good or bad. Please respond to me at... debrown@srp.gov Thanks, *** **** **** "Some men see things as they are and say why? * * * * * I see things as they never were and say why not?" * **** **** *** * * * -Robert Frost ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: POLL-for 109/2.25L petrol owners From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 10:25:09 -0500 "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com> writes: > I'm interested in knowing what kind of gas milage people are getting in 109s > with 2.25 petrol engines, and what carb they are using. The 109 seems to get a bit better than fifteen to the gallon & is using a weber carb. Michel Bertrand recently checked his 109 pu and it was averaging about seventeen on the highway with a newly rebuilt engine & weber carb. Rgds, Dixon -- dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, Nepean, Ontario, Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 09:35:11 PST From: Bruce Harding <Bruce_Harding@ccm2.hf.intel.com> Subject: Fairey Overdrive Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am considering having one installed and have several questions. 1. How reliable is it. Is it any more prone to problems than the transmission/transfer case already installed in the Series III? >> I've had one in mine for 2 years...no problem. 2. How much work and modification is required? Does it just bolt into the power takeoff hole or is extensive modification required? >> You got it. You need to cu a hole in the ttanny tunnel >> for the linkage. 3. How much does it change the gearing. In other words can I cruise at 60 MPH with approximately the same engine RPMs that I now experience at 45 - 50 mph. >> I think it something like 22%. >> In general, I'd be hard to live without an O/D once you had one. >> GO FOR IT!!! >> Bruce_Harding@ccm.hf.intel.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: azw@aber.ac.uk (Andy Woodward) Subject: Re: POLL-for 109/2.25L petrol owners Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 17:25:43 UNDEFINED >> I'm interested in knowing what kind of gas milage people are getting in 109s >> with 2.25 petrol engines, and what carb they are using. > The 109 seems to get a bit better than fifteen to the gallon & is > using a weber carb. Michel Bertrand recently checked his 109 pu > and it was averaging about seventeen on the highway with a newly > rebuilt engine & weber carb. Havent got one myself, being a tightfisted Yorkshire-bred skinflint. But folk reckon that you'll get 22mpg with an overdrive, a Weber, free-wheel hubs and road tyres. These are Proper British Gallons and Proper British Miles. ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 13:41:32 EDT From: "THE X WINDOW SYSTEM: A VMS FOR THE 90S" <brandenberg@wrksys.enet.dec.com> Subject: RE: Fairey Overdrive Keith >Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am >considering having one installed and have several questions. I did this last winter on a IIA and sent an account of the procedure to the net for hopeful eventual inclusing in the FAQ. This should be applicable... >1. How reliable is it. Is it any more prone to problems than >the transmission/transfer case already installed in the Series III? Well, as a new piece of equipment, it *doesn't* leak oil. I've heard that they begin to experience serious wear at 50-60K miles but I can't say from personal experience... >2. How much work and modification is required? Does it just bolt >into the power takeoff hole or is extensive modification required? I'll forward the details. On the IIA (and I assume on the III), you remove a backing plate, bearing, and transfer gear from the back of the transfer box and, more or less, bolt this on in place. Need a hole in the transmission tunnel for the gear shift. And some diddling for the shift linkage. >3. How much does it change the gearing. In other words can I cruise >at 60 MPH with approximately the same engine RPMs that I now experience >at 45 - 50 mph. Again, I'll answer for the IIA since I don't have the III rations at hand. You can, however, infer the ratio from the following: 4th gear normal: ~15 mph/1000 rpms 4th gear OD: ~19.8 mpg/1000 rpms I do 65 on the highway with an occasional jaunt over 70 though the vibration gets to be a bit much at that speed. monty ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 11:20:10 -0700 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Re: 88" sIII Questions >I've got a 21 year old SIII 88" 2.25l petrol landy that I bought a couple >of weeks ago and have a couple of questions for other SWB owners. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 15 lines)] >seat? I know you'll all laugh and say if you want to sleep in it buy a 109 >but I'm only thinking of this for very rare (emergency) situations. >What is the usual top speed people are able to obtain on motorway driving= =20 >with reasonable comfort? >Anyway I think this will do for starters I'm off to the spares shop to get [ truncated by lro-digester (was 8 lines)] >the way to work!! >Rob Meredith. If it's not too late to say so, I've always solved the sticky steering wheel= =20 very satisfactorily by simpy adding a leather steering wheel cover. Only=20 problem is that you need one for a large-diameter steering wheel. One for a= =20 'truck' will work or one for an old Jaguar (such as XK-120-150, look in back= =20 of Road & Track mag for ads for parts for old Jags, e.g. Moss Motors). This= =20 addition makes the steering wheel a lot nicer to use, too, even in=20 comparison with a new, hard plastic rim. A friend of mine has a simple arrangement for sleeping using three pieces of= =20 plywood which can be easily removed. The rear ones can be left in place=20 when driving, the front one removed and quickly replaced. I don't know how= =20 tall you are but make sure you will have enough room before you go to all=20 that trouble! The hammock (Keith Coman's reply) sounds like a neat idea,= too. I've generally always had FW hubs on my Rovers and it probably helps with=20 the mileage (I,ve never been able to make an accurate mileage check because= =20 I've never had a Rover with a working odometer!) But a caution about these= =20 hubs: I,ve read several times that you should leave them locked as much as= =20 you can (I only unlock mine for long highway runs) because otherwise the=20 hubs (and maybe the swivel balls) will not get adequately lubricated;=20 Land-Rover's 'closed-knuckle' front axle depends upon the rotating axle=20 shafts to move the lubricant around to all the parts which need it. Regarding 7.50x16s: I have run them and found that they will make you a bit= =20 overgeared unless your engine is really strong (like, really fresh, with=20 headers and a two-barrel Weber carb set-up). Also, I found that my steering= =20 stops needed to be adjusted slightly to keep the tires from rubbing the=20 wheel wells (ironically I didn't have that problem with 12x15s!) I think=20 that the best part about going to 7.50s is the increase in ground=20 clearance--something I never seem to have enough of. Do use radials! I=20 believe that the Goodyear Wrangler MT is available in 7.50x16 and I also=20 think that the Firestone Steeltex ATX 23=B0 is. Serious tires (if you want= =20 real off-road capability. Me, I'd rather have Michelin XCLs, if one could= =20 still get them here, but not a tire for commuting!) Have fun! ------------------------------[ <- Message 18 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Date: 27 Jul 94 18:27:52 GMT Subject: Fairey Overdrive Keith, Re your Fairy Overdrive questions: none 1. How reliable is it. Is it any more prone to problems than the transmission/transfer case already installed in the Series III? none Generally they are pretty reliable if treated with care. Use it only for top gear cruising. It's not strong enough to use with lower gears. The internal components are nowhere near as substantial as those of your main gearbox. The thrust bearing rollers are only slightly larger than the lead of a woodend pencil (those were what whent on one of mine). Change the oil as frequently as that of the engine. It doesn't hold much and it's the only way to purge condensation sludge or water ingestation (if you wade at all). none 2. How much work and modification is required? Does it just bolt into the power takeoff hole or is extensive modification required? none The unit itself just bolts onto the back of the transfer. There are a couple of nuts that need to be threaded before you seat the OD all the way in, so don't tighten any nuts until all are threaded on the studs. The hardest part is to cut the hole for the engagement lever in the right spot. Start with a small hole, then enlarge it until you get it right. none 3. How much does it change the gearing. In other words can I cruise at 60 MPH with approximately the same engine RPMs that I now experience at 45 - 50 mph. none The OD reduces your gearing by 15%. It does make a difference in engine noise on the highway. Much more pleasant. If you want the OD to save gas, payback will take a while unless you do really serious mileage. If you want quieter more relaxed cruising, go for it. Rovers North seems to have the best price at the moment. Bill Maloney maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 19 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 15:11:24 EDT From: "THE X WINDOW SYSTEM: A VMS FOR THE 90S" <brandenberg@wrksys.enet.dec.com> Subject: Re: Fairey Overdrive Bill Maloney writes: >1. How reliable is it. Is it any more prone to problems than the >transmission/transfer case already installed in the Series III? [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] >frequently as that of the engine. It doesn't hold much and it's the only way >to purge condensation sludge or water ingestation (if you wade at all). I think I'll have to disagree with the top gear cruising remark above. Unlike other overdrive units, this device is not an on/off unit but a full-blown, two-speed synchromesh transmission. It has a mainshaft fed from the interior spline, a layshaft, and output shaft that drives the exterior gear that mates with the middle transfer gear, and a proper fork selector, synchros, etc. Torque is *always* transmitted through the overdrive unit and onto the layshaft so the above, which would apply to, say, an MG overdrive, doesn't apply to the LR. Another benefit I forgot to mention in my original mail... If you have a IIA transmission, you can avoid having to do a double-declutch downshift into second. (A process made difficult by the fact that the 2.25l engine will mostly ignore a throttle 'blip'...) Put the OD into neutral, quickly select second, re-engage the OD. Will not grind the gears, though it does make a very positive 2nd gear engagement. Realize that the OD's synchros *are* doing work so this isn't a complete win.... monty ------------------------------[ <- Message 20 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 13:22:14 +0800 From: William.Grouell@Eng.Sun.COM (William L. Grouell) Subject: RE: Fairey Overdrive > >Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am > >considering having one installed and have several questions. none Here's some of my old mail on this subject, well worth what you paid: When I bought my overdrives several years ago, the general opinion was that the Toro unit was better than the factory approved, Fairey overdrive, because the Toro holds more oil and is less subject to overheating. I have not heard anything that changes this theory, and have had no trouble with my Toro. Which ever you choose, I think you will discover that oil "pumps" from the transfer case to the overdrive and then blows all over the rear window. This can be overcome by running a tube from the O/D overflow plug to the transfer case overflow plug. Or, connecting the air vents of the O/D and transfer case with tube. When I first got my Rover, there was no sign of oil leaking from the swivel balls either, so I didn't check it right away, and, that's right, there was no oil in them to leak out. I soon learned how to replace wheel bearings and stub axles. and I have had a Toro overdrive on my '64 SIIa-88" for about four years and 40K miles. ELEPHINO has been over the Sierra Nevadas many times in blizzards and sub zero tempretures and on many Black Rock Desert trips trough sand, mud in 115 F temps. carrying; two weeks supplies, four full Jerry cans, my Air Camping tent, me, wife and three kids, and the dog. No problem. When I first installed the OD the oil was "pumping" out of the transfer case into the OD. This was discovered when I found 90 weight oil sprayed on the rear after runs on the freeway. The OD was getting full and pushing oil out the vent hole. I installed a drain tube from the OD to the transfer case by just replacing the oil level check plugs with hose barbs connected with a length of 3/8" fuel hose. This was in place for about a year and several adventures. On one of the desert trips after a long run on the hyway I smelled HOT 90 weight, so I stopped to check it out. The dip stick was missing from the OD and it was low on oil. I filled it up, made a plug for the hole and continued the trip. The oil had run into the transfer... down the tube, due to driving up and down steep hills in hot temps. The dip stick must have been blown out, as it was a snug fit with an "o" ring. This occurrence made me think that the oil wasn't pumping but was being forced by air pressure from the transfer to the OD. I removed the "drain tube" and installed a vent tube between the OD and the transfer case and the atmosphere. This has been on for three years and now the oil in each section stays there. The vent tube is up high and I can install a cap for very deep wading. I disagree that the Toro is a kludge, The extra oil capacity is an advantage. Both brands of OD will give good service if they are kept full of oil. I suspect that many ODs have died because they have been run dry. I have the remains of two Toros that were given to me. Both are fried due to lack of oil. I hope to get one complete, working unit from this pile of parts, for my 88 PU. CONSUMER NOTICE: Because of the "Uncertainty Principle," It Is Impossible for the Consumer to Find Out at the Same Time Both Precisely Where This Product Is and How Fast It Is Moving. Regards, Bill G. ------------------------------[ <- Message 21 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: Fairey Overdrive Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 13:48:31 -0700 From: Mike Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> >Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am >considering having one installed and have several questions. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 18 lines)] >75126,1123@compuserve.com >'72 Series III 88 since new Keith, I just installed the Fairey unit 3 months ago on my 72 Ser lll. In a word, wonderful. It makes the car a true highway driveable machine. I used to be winding upwards of 3200-3500 RPM and only be going 52-55 MPH. Of course that was going downhill, on the staight and level, 50 tops, uphill forget it, maybe 40. Now add 15 MPH to all the above with overdrive and you get the idea. It now cruises comfortably at 65 MPH and gets 17 MPG with the WARN hubs disengaged. It was EXTREMELY easy to install, unbolt the PTO cover, bolt on the overdrive. The most time consuming part was properly locating, marking, and cutting out the hole for the shift lever in the transmission tunnel. Reliable is all in how you treat it. Change the gear oil semi regularly, and only use it in 3rd and 4th gear, should be bullet proof. Rgds Mike Fredette 72 Ser lll 88 Portland, Or. ------------------------------[ <- Message 22 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 15:38:23 -0700 From: mcdpw@pacific.pacific.net (Granville Pool) Subject: Re: Fairey Overdrive >Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am >considering having one installed and have several questions. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 13 lines)] >at 60 MPH with approximately the same engine RPMs that I now experience >at 45 - 50 mph. I have installed one for another owner and found that the directions and templates or whatever led me to cut the hole for the shift lever in slightly the wrong place. I had to "oval" the hole and then make an escutcheon to cover the goof. Otherwise it was pretty easy. My friend is quite happy with it as are most others I have known who have had them. At least two of the owners that have had the Fairey overdrives installed for awhile split-shift in all gears and don't seem to have had problems as a result. One concern that I would have about installing any overdrive is that I recently read (I'm not sure where) that, due to the fact that the drive will always go through an extra set of gears, there is potential for more slop in the drivetrain. Always a problem with mine but, if your Land-Rover is fresh and tight, it should work fine. Good luck! ------------------------------[ <- Message 23 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: All British Field Meet Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 16:03:44 -0700 From: Mike Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> John, Portland All British Field Meet The Field Meet is indeed on Labor Day weekend and this year is special. For the first time, Rover/Land Rover is the featured marque, much to the disgust of the Jaguar folks. The Pacific Coast Rover club is helping host this with the aim at putting together the largest gathering of Land Rover products in the country. Bottom line we're telling everyone is, if it says Rover/Land Rover/Range Rover on it, bring it. Running or not, bring it. We have received permission to camp out Sat night at the Field meet, there will be demonstrations of the new Disco and Defender on a driving/wading course set up on the grounds. Ex-Camel Trophy competitors will be on hand to show off or sign autographs or other silly whatevers. The Starbirds, Tony and Linda, will be hosting thier traditional barbeque at thier fantistic farm overlooking the valley. The swap meet will hopefully be filled with Landy goodies etc. Basically, it's going to a Land Rover smorgasborg, tons of fun for any self respecting 90 weight lover. As I said, if you've got a Rover product, better try and make this rally. Rgds Mike Fredette 72 Ser lll 88 (not for long) Portland, Oregon ------------------------------[ <- Message 24 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 20:07:11 -0400 From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> For those following my pinion nut/leaking new rear diff nightmare: First off, thanks to those who made suggestions. Several of you suggested just heating it. Steve Denis made comment of a yoke that was an available bit, and a couple of others suggested just making one up or "shibing" one. (For those of you from forein soils, the terms shibing, or shibe, or shibish, or any derivation thereof, all stem from the infamous auto painter, the late Earl Shibe, who would paint your car for twenty bucks, but wouldn't use masking tape. Lets just say you'd get what you paid for.) One netter, Steve (?) from Hessen (??), seconded and thereby confirmed my suspicion that I could brace a breaker bar up against the rear leafspring, throw it into front wheel drive (rear prop off), and edge forward. The yoke trick failed me- managed to make up a good "do-it-earl" tool, got plenty of torque on it, used my legs on the yoke and my arms on the nut, all with two two-plus foot long bars on each, pulled, strained, grunted, and got a wicked cramp in my calves. Was outa propane on the torch, got edgy, and went for the brace it up against the spring method. Worked first try, no problem, no slamming, bashing, or four letter words uttered. Guess Nige is a much better man than I. The sad story is, that even after replacing the seal, the gasket on the retainer, and putting the prop shaft back on, the damned thing *STILL* leaks. I am baffled. Drove through deep grass to clean it all off, jacked up the rear, threw it in fourth, ran it awhile, looked underneath-no leak. Take it for a drive-leak city. You might think it easy to tell just where the leak is coming from, but the entire rear diff is dripping wet. Sounds dumb, I know, and as though any fool could fix it, but this fool hasn't (yet). Don't think it is coming from the housing-casing mating surface (went through that awhile ago-the gasket was *completely* dry when I took it apart and resealed with permatex just in case), absolutely NOT coming from the breather (it's the only dry spot there!), nor the hub seals (no "spokes"). Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe the leak is coming from the filler spout- the copper ring could be hanging up on the lip, but does not appear to be doing this by close visual inspection. Then there is always the chance that I've got a hairline crack in this thing somewhere. Dixon suggested I should attach it to a buoy, sink it in Lake Champlain, and tell RN where they can find it! (no, no, I *am* making this up, and have nothing at all against our pals in Westford, Vt.) We shall overcome, rd/that leaking nige thing. ------------------------------[ <- Message 25 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 20:14:26 -0400 From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> > Has anyone got 750 tyres on their SWB, is this possible? I would like > to do this to make the gearing higher and improve the fuel consumption. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] > free wheeling hubs, larger tyres, overdrive? I'm getting about 15mpg on > a commuting cycle at the moment. Nigel (a '60 SII 88) has 7.50 x 16 Michelin Radials all about, Fairey OD, Warn Hubs (ie all of the above), Roach-ester carb. He cranks. Keeps up with NYC commuter traffic no problem (so long as we are on a flat or heading downhill). I think only Monty will keep up with him. Speedo is surely off with the high profile tyres, and Nige has pegged it on occasion, but is more comfortable at lower speeds (like 60-65, indicated). Since fixing the wheel wobble problem (Railko bushes) I have no qualms about running with the Lexus and Beemer crowd (just don't ask me to stop!....now knowing that he'll cut straight through rock walls and volvos I feel even more confident in the strength of his stride, but I s'poze I shouldn't let it get to my head). Mileage? What I gained in mileage I gave up to top speed.....I get in the 12-17 range, depending on just what me and Nige do after work. If we trotted instead of cantered about, I am sure we'd blow through the 17 mark, maybe even hit 20 (ya right). IMHO, the biggest advantage of ODs is that you basically get an extra gear in between all the others and then one more on top. Makes for interesting driving. You'll find that uphills are more fun to navigate than downhills....first, second, second OD, third, third OD, fourth-oops, third OD, crest the hill, fourth OD, etc. You may even want to become a trucker after working one. Forget about the gas savings...you will blow it just like I do (on more speed-ie just keeping up with traffic). You will get where you are going slightly faster (what is it, 15-22% or so?) than you would otherwise. > Has anyone set up a sleeping arrangement with a board over the passenger > seat? I know you'll all laugh and say if you want to sleep in it buy a 109 > but I'm only thinking of this for very rare (emergency) situations. I have dreams and plans but nothing built just yet. I am thinking along the lines of the 3 chuncks of plywood that someone else mentioned. Would like to maintain relatively free access to the rear bed, set aside a space for tools and bits, and have the front piece (which would cover the passenger seat and a little more) hinged to the rear section, with some sort of hangers that could attach to the top of the dash for front support (oh, but you got a SIII-sorry, won't work). Ideally, the driver should still be able to drive while a passenger snoozes (assuming they can take the bumps without waking up-I can NO problem, I can sleep anywhere- EXCEPT in a hammock! Good place to rest, though, but I wouldn't want to spend a week in one (have before-never again)). But, if this is only for emergency situations, you could always curl up in the front seat or the rear bed if you had to. I once spent the night in the front of an 88 *with* a friend, in sub-US-zero temperatures, and we survived. Heck, wasn't even an emergency. I was a little shorter then, though. > Anyway I think this will do for starters I'm off to the spares shop to get > a new steering wheel as mine is sheeding black gunk all over my hands on > the way to work!! The patented Mike Rooth brasso/lemon pledge method works fine, for a time. I'd paint mine if I were more ambitious, but I might get carried away and paint the whole thing. and Nige wouldn't be Nige without the flakey paint job. chow, rd/danige ------------------------------[ <- Message 26 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Land Rover 4 Sale Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 17:20:38 -0700 From: Mike Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> OK folks, Don't let this happen to you. There is a disease out there amongst us, the UK folk have been exposed longer so they've built up an immunity to it that the rest of us don't have. Defender 90itis. This disease takes only a few minutes of exposure to be fatal. I made the mistake of taking the demonstrator Defender 90 from the local dealer for the day. A big expensive mistake. It took a hot 15 minutes to fall in lust for this car. Mind you it's not everyone's cup of tea, but it sure comes close if you like Landies. So, I took the employee profit sharing check, sold some stock, sold my 3 month old son Mitchell, and worst, my Land Rover, and came up with a down payment that makes me retch to think about, but keeps the monthlies to a manageable level. It's Coniston Green and I pick it up on Friday, and I can't stop grinning. I watched what Doug Shipman can do with one on some of the same trails we had our Northwest Challenge on. We went out last weekend and it was truly amazing what this vehicle can do. It doesn't do anything my old Landy can't do, it just makes it a LOT easier to do it. Anyway, to business. It's kind of like shooting your own dog, nobody else can do it, so here goes. 72 SER lll Land Rover 88 Tan in color,WARN winch,WARN hubs,Fairey overdrive(new),lamp guards front and rear,rear mud flaps,new seat cushions,90 style cubby box with my 89 Range Rover's casette,CB radio,seats and belts for 7 idiots,Weber carb,new brakes,new brake hydraulics,new clutch hydraulics,new battery,new tires 235/75 15 on 5 newly painted rims,new alternator, new distributor,all new hoses,military style pintle hitch and tow shackles,new swivel pins,new universal joints,new hub seals all around,new seals everywhere I could find a leak ie. everywhere,new rear axles,new spring bushings all around,interior is just about perfecet,exterior has a few dents but don't they all. Door seals don't leak water, neither do the vents, new spare front grill, tailgate for those that prefer to go topless, spare standard towing jaw assy, couple spare swivel pins and other bits. I swear on whatever, that it only has one 90 weight leak now, transfer case to tranny junction. Too hard to get at easily.The engine runs perfectly, NO leaks, burning a quart of oil per 400 miles or so. The heater heats, the wipers wipe(at both speeds no less), the blinkers blink etc. If it's electrical it works. The clutch is in great shape, smooth with no jumping, the transmission/transfer is also in great shape, no nasty noises, all synchros smooth, no jumping out gear. A small spot of rust on the rear crossmember at the drain holes that has been fixed, rest of the frame and bulkhead is fine.I've done all the above to it in the last twelve months, getting it to the point where it's great to drive every day, then Land Rover sent the Pestilence over to North America. Those in the Pacific Northwest know Doug Shipman's reputation as an honest Land Rover lunatic. 503 252 5566 and he can give an opinion on my truck that is trustworthy. I'm asking 6000 US for it or the best offer I get between now and the end of August which is when the thieves at Rassmussen Range Rover want the thier pound of flesh. Rgds Mike Fredette mfredett@ichips.intel.com 503 696 8037 office 503 645 4034 home Portland, Oregon ------------------------------[ <- Message 27 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Re: Landrover crash Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 12:05:55 EST > I Forwarded this message from british-cars: > --------------- [ truncated by lro-digester (was 36 lines)] > Happy wall smashing. > Duncan A few years back, I saw 110 v8 that had hit concreate bridge head on at 100 kph. From behind the bulkhead, the vehicle was fine, and the driver walked away with a fractured hip. I would not have like the guys chances had he been in any other brand of four wheel drive, if he was, I think he would have had a little more than a fractured hip. Also in LRO a while back, they had a story of how a Canadian learned to stop is 109 from 40MPH to 0 in 6 inches, when he hit a power poll. The snaped, and as he hit strait on one of the dumb irons, the vehicle only needed a little chassie straitening, and a new radiator and the vehicle was fine again. The only thing that I like to stop my Series 1 with is brakes, which needed 4 pumps last I drove it in February, I think it needs new drums shoes, and could probably do with some new snails, and a couple of brake lines, and the master cylinder might need over hauling, other than that the brakes are fine! Also a question to owners of 2.25 diesels, how long do you generally need to glow the motor, and did it need glowing longer just after a rebuild? ============================================================================== Craig Murray 1955 Series 1 86" LROC of Victoria Australia 2.25 diesel (Soon!) email: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au ------------------------------[ <- Message 28 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Re: Fairy Overdrive Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 12:11:47 EST > Has anyone installed a Fairey Overdrive in a Series III 88. I am > considering having one installed and have several questions. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 21 lines)] > 75126,1123@compuserve.com > '72 Series III 88 since new My parents Series III wagon had an over drive. It worked fine with the 2.6, but only lasted a couple of months when they (stupidly IMHO) put a 3.3l nissan diesel in, this just made the bearings in the overdrive and the main shaft of the gear box, absolutely shit them selves. I have also been warned that they should only be used as and overdrive, and not to use them inbetween gears. But if you spend most of your time on the road, why not just get a set of 4.1:1 high speed diffs. ============================================================================== Craig Murray 1955 Series 1 86" LROC of Victoria Australia 2.25 diesel (Soon!) email: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au ------------------------------[ <- Message 29 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 21:41:21 -0700 From: jfhess@bullwinkle.ucdavis.edu (john hess) Subject: land rovers and africa >From the August 1994, National Geographic, stolen for the amusement of Land Rover addicts: Qoute- The lions became totally at ease with our ragtag vehicle--its doors and roof removed to accomodate tripods and allow easy exit in an emergency. Its frame has been bashed by elephants. It once nearly carried us into the hereafter when we followed lions across a small brush fire. Picking our way over glowing red coals was eerie, like driving on Mars. Suddenly we looked at each other--we both smelled fuel. I hit the brakes, luckily stopping in an area free of flames and coals. A stump had disconnected the gas line in the undercarriage. We fixed it and drove on. unqoute. My wife read the above passage and proclaimed "THESE ARE LAND ROVER PEOPLE !!". Any doubt that they were driving a Land Rover? From the little bits of email I bring home printed out, she's decided that Land Rover people are a whole lot more fun than the Sunbeam Tiger club members. She's even gone so far as to say we could fly to portland and buy the 88 recently advertised and drive it home. I just don't know how I got so lucky; she agreed to the purchase of a Sunbeam Tiger, a car with no heater in the winter and a blast furnace in the summer, and now is willing to go along with a Land Rover! Some guys have all the luck :-) !. While I'm posting, I want to say that I checked a book out of the Davis library about east african wildlife. The book was definitely geared for people who intend to travel there, loaded with pictures and useful information. It also had pistures of Land Rovers. One was a green short wheel base with 2 cheetahs on the hood and two people (standing up through a hole in the roof) snapping photos of them. The second was a picture of two 4 door 109s driving down a dirt road. Also in this book is a photo of (I think) a convertible volkswagen bug driving on the most incredible RED dirt road. Greenish yellow grass is on each side and the road is fresh iron oxide red/orange. The car is quite away and small so it could be something else, but I don't think it's a rover. Bye for now, john f hess phd (wow, really?) jfhess@ucdavis.edu from home via modem ------------------------------[ <- Message 30 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 22:25:27 -0700 From: Roger Sinasohn <sinasohn@crl.com> Subject: Re: 88 vs 109 > But teh 88 is more nimble offroad; and makes a > far better towing platform - which is why all the farmers go for em. Why is it that the 88 is better for towing? My sister, the horse fiend seems to think that bigger is better for towing. (Like the Chevy Suburban which is simply huge.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates San Francisco, California ------------------------------[ <- Message 31 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Craig Murray <craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au> Subject: Re: 88 vs 109 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 15:37:05 EST > > But teh 88 is more nimble offroad; and makes a > > far better towing platform - which is why all the farmers go for em. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 16 lines)] > sinasohn@crl.com that none but madmen know." > Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates > San Francisco, California This is easy. It is way easier to back a trailer with a shortie, than a long wheel base, as the shortie is more manovurable(spelling?). I have got so used to backing my 86" that I am absolutly hopeless at backing anything longer, even small cars! ============================================================================== Craig Murray 1955 Series 1 86" LROC of Victoria Australia 2.25 diesel (Soon!) email: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au ------------------------------[ <- Message 32 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940728 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.