[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | marcus@dcs.qmw.ac.uk | 15 | Re: Howzit to all Landie Owners?! |
2 | Steven M Denis [denis@o | 38 | Re: Leaking Rochester |
3 | William.Grouell@Eng.Sun. | 6 | Re: More LR prices from NZ |
4 | "Russell G. Dushin" [dus | 17 | Problems? |
5 | Keith Steele [75126.1123 | 27 | RE: Galvanized frame |
6 | hiner@mail.utexas.edu (G | 46 | Alternative Parts |
7 | William.Grouell@Eng.Sun. | 24 | Re: Alternative Parts |
8 | jory@MIT.EDU (jory bell) | 45 | RE: Galvanized frame |
9 | llevitt@idcresearch.com | 9 | Re[2]: More LR prices from NZ |
10 | Jon Humphrey [jh5r+@andr | 29 | Re: Galvanized frame |
11 | mb@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca | 26 | [not specified] |
12 | David John Place [umplac | 38 | RE: Galvanized frame |
13 | David John Place [umplac | 28 | Re: Alternative Parts |
14 | David John Place [umplac | 13 | RE: Galvanized frame |
15 | David John Place [umplac | 16 | Re: Galvanized frame |
16 | David John Place [umplac | 8 | Re: stubborn spring bolt... |
From: marcus@dcs.qmw.ac.uk Subject: Re: Howzit to all Landie Owners?! Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 13:55:20 +0000 (BST) > of a '59 Rover 100. The latter has a higher ratio: initial pull off > is slower but open road top end is more relaxed and petrol consumption > is improved. Err...surely this means that you are now unable to use four-wheel drive, since the two differential ratios are now ...err...different(!) which means appalling transmission wind-up, broken shafts etc, etc? Marcus. ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 09:49:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Subject: Re: Leaking Rochester Well I was thinking of using the componets from a GM 2.5 'X" car engine 'cause they is *cheeep* .....the actual adaptation would be to mount the throttle body on the manifold and to find a good location for the water temp. sensor....I also think the 2.2 set-up from the cavalier ete. would work well but you might have to *buy* this stuff as it is newer.... I looked at the 2.2 and 2.5 chrysler(nee bosch) system,but,as much as I love the german stuff,it appears wildly too messy for my tastes.. the other factors involved would be mounting and plumbing a fuel pump,along with the high pressure feed and low pressure return lines, and the adapting of the air cleaner to the Landie... all of which,after the housing to engine interface is worked out,is within the abilities of most LR owners,methinks...... Personally,*I'd* use the bosch EFI-D system,but mounting the injectors is the problem(on a"shade tree" scale) For those that do not know, the throttle body fuel injection system is really nothing more than a high pressure carb.....it tends to look and "bolt on" like a carb,but offers *much* better fuel economy and some power gain....picture a housing with a throttle,and a spray nozzle mounted over it."Presto!" TBFI! another*BIG* advantage is that it will work perfectly in any position so that the offroad shaking and bouncing will not effect the fuel milage and performance....no vapor-lock too! FYI...the vw distributors work in the 2.25 landie..but the rotation is backwards....mechanical"retard" not advance!....still might get ya' home some night! steve..... HEY, NICE JEEP MISTER!...................IT'S "NOTAJEEP" Steven M. Denis <denis@oswego.oswego.edu> PO BOX 61 Erieville,NY 13061 ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 08:54:01 +0800 From: William.Grouell@Eng.Sun.COM (William L. Grouell) Subject: Re: More LR prices from NZ Stop it! You're making us crazy. ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: "Russell G. Dushin" <dushinrg@pr.cyanamid.com> Subject: Problems? Date: Fri, 24 Jun 94 12:10:38 EDT > Land-Rover-Owner List & Land Rover Owner Daily Digest List > Contents: [ truncated by lro-digester (was 12 lines)] > ------------------------------ > END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST ah, was this *supposed* to happen? This was all that came through (and perhaps this was all that was posted during that particular "digest window"). just lettin' you know, (all the others seem ok) rd ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: 24 Jun 94 12:25:53 EDT From: Keith Steele <75126.1123@CompuServe.COM> Subject: RE: Galvanized frame Has anybody here replaced their old frame with one of the new galvanized ones (frame over)? I am considering having it done to my Series III 88. I have a couple of questions. 1. Did you do it yourself or did you have it done. If you had it done not counting parts what was the approximate cost. If you did it yourself how long did it take and what if any special tools were required. 2. How well does the galvanized frame stand up to rust? It snows where I live (just south of Cincinnati OH) and they salt the roads heavily. 3. Any general advise about frame overs in general would be appreciated. As the rover has been living in snow country for only three years the original frame is just starting to rust. Any suggestions concerning how to prevent or slow down rust on the current frame while I save up for a possible frame over? Keith Steele 75126,1123@compuserve.com 72 Series III 88 since new ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 11:44:29 -0500 From: hiner@mail.utexas.edu (Greg Hiner) Subject: Alternative Parts I sent out a note awhile back hoping to whip up some excitement about composing the alternative parts list for the Land Rover - in other words what in your experience will work temp/permanently on a Land Rover in case of an emergency or practicality. I have collected a few things over the last month and they are as follows: FYI...the vw distributors work in the 2.25 landie..but the rotation is backwards....mechanical"retard" not advance!....still might get ya' home some night! Steven M Denis <denis@oswego.Oswego.EDU> (Does this really work???) Indeed. Case in point: Hub oil seals. Use National/Federal Mogul #410694 American-made, *double lipped* (so's not to ride on the distance piece along the same path as the single-lipped OEM's or "GP's"), with sealing compound already applied to the outside face. About $6 at any bearing shop. While we're mucking about the hubs, lock tab washers: International Harvester #860291R1 have a little "foot" to ride in the groove on the hub. <p>Sandy Grice, Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | E-Mail: CXKS46A@prodigy.com FAX: 804-622-7056 |<p> David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> said that a 1970 something brake master cylinder from AMC bolted up to the Land Rover and worked fine. (more info please) Bearings - readily available - just take the old one with you. Shocks - U.S. replacements are Gabriel Gas Ryder Ltd Shocks for your machine. The numbers are G63494 and G63299. The longer ones go on the back. David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Fan belt???? And????More????? engines - diffs (across the Rover line) - If you have anything further to add please let me know - I will put all the additions together and then post to the net (and also archive it). What do you say??? Best- Greg ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 10:37:27 +0800 From: William.Grouell@Eng.Sun.COM (William L. Grouell) Subject: Re: Alternative Parts Transmission oil seals; These are National Oil Seal/Federal Mogul numbers Atlantic Britsh cat. number CR16254 13 output shaft CR19359 12 trans to transfer case CR6143 573 speedo drive plate Wheel hub seal; 410694 330 U-joints AEC Brand AEC 521 HD 286 U-joint 2 15/16" across (late) AEC 504 3092 U-joint 2 7/32" across (early) ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 94 15:05:33 EDT From: jory@MIT.EDU (jory bell) Subject: RE: Galvanized frame >Has anybody here replaced their old frame with one of the new galvanized >ones (frame over)? yes >I am considering having it done to my Series III 88. I have a couple of >questions. [ truncated by lro-digester (was 6 lines)] >not counting parts what was the approximate cost. If you did it yourself >how long did it take and what if any special tools were required. i did it myself. it was in the "shop" for about 2 months (i worked only at night/weekends) but i also did all the paint, and basically tastified the whole rover. special tools? i dunno. air tool swere helpful. the galvanised frame can also make things a tight squeeze, since the galvanisation is done to a "normal sized" frame (getting the springs between the hangers, getting some of the bolts through parts of the frame, etc) >2. How well does the galvanized frame stand up to rust? It snows where >I live (just south of Cincinnati OH) and they salt the roads heavily. >3. Any general advise about frame overs in general would be appreciated. >not counting parts what was the approximate cost. If you did it yourself make sure you use fine thread hardware (you need approximately 250 1/4"-28 3/4" long bolts (i used stainless) and a few dozen others to go through the whole thing right) >As the rover has been living in snow country for only three years the >original frame is just starting to rust. Any suggestions concerning how >to prevent or slow down rust on the current frame while I save up for >a possible frame over? if the originaly frame is just starting to rust, i wouldn't necessarily replace it. oil the inside of the frame... make sure the drain plugs on the bottom of the frame are not plugged... there are also some electronic thingies which help avert the battery-like reaction which causes corrosion (not familiar with these) >Keith Steele 75126,1123@compuserve.com >72 Series III 88 since new ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: llevitt@idcresearch.com Date: Fri, 24 Jun 94 15:47:25 EST Subject: Re[2]: More LR prices from NZ > Stop it! You're making us crazy. Makes me want to cry! ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 16:35:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Jon Humphrey <jh5r+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: Galvanized frame Jory writes; if the originaly frame is just starting to rust, i wouldn't necessarily replace it. oil the inside of the frame... make sure the drain plugs on the bottom of the frame are not plugged... there are also some electronic thingies which help avert the battery-like reaction which causes corrosion (not familiar with these) I had a thought about the frames rusting from the inside out. Has anyone ever considered or tried urethane expandable foam to completely fill the inside of the frame and sealing out any water. I think this stuff absorbs moisture as it cures which would probably get most of what is in there. I don't know how it might work in this application, but I have used it in other situations and the stuff is amazing. I think I will try an experiment over this winter. I'll get a piece of box channel, fill it with this stuff and put it at the side of the road until next year. Just so it could get the full treatment of salt and weather. Maybe even find some old channel that's already rusted and see what happens there. I would like to be pretty sure what was going to happen before I ever did this, cause once it's in there it ain't coming out. Any body had any experience on this. Thanks Jon ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: stubborn spring bolt... From: mb@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (Michele Bertrand) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 23:47:34 -0400 Well, hello everyone, I have a technical problem. I was working on my 109 SW ex-NADA, (Rudolph's cousin) doing a complete rebuild today (frame was done last year) starting by the rear springs. I haved removed one without any difficulty and was stopped in the process of removing the other one by a stubborn bolt (the last one remaining, of course). It's the bolt that holds the front of the rear spring to the chassis. I have removed the nut on the inner side, but can't even turn the bolt itself. I tried heating it, an impact driver, hammer and punch, jacking up the spring to relieve pressure. Nothing. Rien pantoute. (french expression). It looks, by the feel of the bolt when I try to move it with a ratchet that it's seized to the inner casing of the bushing. (The ratchet springs back, after trying to turn the bolt a little. Any ideas, suggestions, anybody....please...Thanks in advance, I'll keep in touch with you guys for the rest of the rebuild.... Michel Bertrand, Ottawa... -- Michele Bertrand, mb@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca FourFold Symmetry, Nepean, Ontario, Canada ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 20:10:40 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: RE: Galvanized frame Re frame rust. I live in Canada and in central Canada to bbot where it snows and it snows. Temperatures get to -40 F. The first thing we find out here is don't put your vehicle in a heated space in the winter. You will rot your frame jig quick. I am driving a 1964 with like new frame because I always wash it with the power washer and if you are able get some LPS or WD40 inside the frame through the holes. The frames rust from the inside out in most cases. There are some areas you have to watch very closely to keep the frame good. The worst spot from my experience is the bracket holding the under seat gas tanks on the 88. Not only snow and mut build up but stones get in there and rub through the tanks. If you keet this area and the area of the main rear cross member clean and oiled you will have no problems. One other thing I always do to any used Land Rover I buy, is paint the frame everywhere I can reach with black enamel. I use the best paint I can get, like Rustoleum or similar. I first power wash the frame at the car wash and then I use a wire wheel or sand paper and in some cases for heavy dirt a paint scraper. Be very careful around the gas tank because wire wheels give off sparks and you know the result! I have only just touched up a spot or two with welds in any of my 8 Land Rovers which have been taken care of this way. By the way, you really don't have to change the frame unless it is a basket case. You can buy sections as large as 1/3 the vehicle and weld them on. It does however take some work to be sure the frame is perfectly aligned but my buddy has done a number for club members, and they have been very successful. One thing he says is don't put the side riggers on over the old frame. Cut out a space in the exizting frame and weld it in. If you don't, rust builds up between the two layers and rusts out jig quick. The fellow in our club who does this kind of work gets vehicles shipped in from all over the US and Canada, but mostly he does very old and expensive sports cars. He just completed a complete ground up rebuild with a Land Rover in a box as it were from Merseyside and it runs and looks like new. Cheers Dave VE4PN Just a thought, has anyone tried sacrificial anodes like you use on boat engines to slow down the rust. Dave ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 20:23:31 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: Alternative Parts Re more American parts. The windshield wiper motors used on most boats ( can get the name of mine if you want it) work great for the rear wiper set up on the stationwagon. I sent some pictures to Dixon Kenner and he can tell you how great they look. The have self parking wiper arms as well and the wiper blades are available at any boat shop. The are great replacements for the from individual motors and 1/8 the price of Land Rover and these actually work unlike the Land Rover ones. The brake cylenders I mentioned are from 72 Hornet, 68 Ambassador or 66 Classics. The work very well on the power assisted brake units in the Land Rover. They have the advantage of being dual system so you can mix or put fron or rear on one system etc. The best alternator repalacement is the Delcotron which has a built in regulator so you don't have to worry about the condition of the old Land Rover one. They are readily available at any junk yard in the US. Parts to make soft tops are always available at boat top places. The nylon slides, clamps etc fit regular conduit. To make the front attachment for the windshield, go to a trailer shop and order a piece of aluminum canopy track. It is the kind roap slides into on the side of a trailer. It is better than the original because it is not only waterproof, but winds wont get under it when you are on the highway. I am still checking on the exact name and number for the great weather seal I found for the doors. It is much better than Land Rover and does not require the rivets. It comes pre glued and it sticks like your own skin! Hope this helps, I will get the rest of our list together. Cheers Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 14 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 20:36:53 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: RE: Galvanized frame The battery like reaction is Galvanic and it can be stopped by using the sacrificial anodes I mentioned. There are also some sophisticated electronic circuits which can stop Eddy Currents and Galvanic action in metals. I wonder if anyone else has heard that the British found that + earth vehicles don't rust as fast and that is why they started to build behicles this way. I am a Ham Radio type and I am sure I read this in one of my QST mags some years ago. Salt, a little current, and presto you have a hole in your frame. It might be worth looking into. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 15 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 20:42:09 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: Galvanized frame Re expandable foam. Don't do it. One of the guys tried it on another part of the vehicle and he was sorry. The stuff must by hydroscopic because it got wet between the metal and the foam and it was a mess. Getting it off was terrible. The old WD40 or better still LPS using a garden sprayer or if you are really lucky usning your air compressor and the spray wand with the hose pickup normally used for power washing is the way to go. Whoever said keep the drain holes clean really has the right idea. They are a good place to spray in ghe oil. When Rob my rebuilder does a frame over, he tilts the frame up and sprays in oil and leaves a a few days till he sees it come out the other end and then he knows it is done. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 16 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 20:46:54 -0500 (CDT) From: David John Place <umplace@CC.UManitoba.CA> Subject: Re: stubborn spring bolt... Try dry ice. It may shrink the metal and allow you to remove it. Machine shops sometime use the technique to shrink metal for resistance fit units, it might just do the trick. Dave VE4PN ------------------------------[ <- Message 17 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST[ First Message | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940625 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Back | Forward | |
---|---|---|
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved. Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
|