LRO: RE: Re: 95 Rangie and on...

From: Perrone Ford (ford_p@nettally.com)
Date: Tue Jul 03 2001 - 00:12:30 EDT

  • Next message: Jeff Berg: "Re: LRO: 101's and RR's"

            Marin, I agree with most of what you said, but I'd have to disagree in the
    last paragraph about avoiding a LWB. I truly feel that these are some of
    the best bargains out there for those who want family luxury. The primary
    problems with these models are the suspension and the flexy engine.

            The first problem can be sorted with a conversion kit to coils. If you do
    the labor yourself, that is a $500 change. The second problem can be
    ameliorated somewhat by adding some cross bracing along the bottom end. A
    good machine shop should be able to do this without too much trouble, so I
    would bet on about $800. LR had sorted a lot of the issues with the
    electrics by this point, and the ride is pretty good. This means that for
    about $1500 invested, you could get an AWESOME highway cruiser for about
    $15k. That's a pretty good deal in my book. And there are PLENTY of
    motivated sellers out there who simply cannot justify the high dealer costs
    of maintaining the air suspension and other small issues.

            Certainly not for everyone as you have to be willing to get your hands
    dirty and let people work on your vehicle for tricky things, but certainly
    not the money pit some people would have you believe.

    -Perrone

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-lro@Works.Team.Net [mailto:owner-lro@Works.Team.Net]On
    > Behalf Of C. Marin Faure
    > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:44 PM
    > To: lro-digest@Works.Team.Net
    > Cc: ccray@showme.missouri.edu; ";;;;ronward"@synovustrust.com;;;
    > Subject: LRO: Re: 95 Rangie and on...

    > And as long as we're on the subject, steer clear of the Range
    > Rover 4.2 LWB
    > in general. Not only is the engine a repair bill waiting to happen, but
    > the LWB has Land Rover's first generation air suspension. This is the
    > system that Rover used to learn how NOT to design an air suspension. The
    > second generation air suspension, introduced on the "new model"
    > in 1995, is
    > much more reliable. Of course, if you get a coil sprung model, you will
    > never be presented with an air suspension repair bill at all.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 03 2001 - 00:49:21 EDT