Re: LRO: Re: Engine/Trans Swap

From: Mark Pilkington (mark@skywagons.com)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 14:08:56 EDT

  • Next message: WhatsUp129@aol.com: "Re: LRO: Re: Engine/Trans Swap"

    In a current British Land Rover Mag, there is a guy who had a 4.2 Liter Straight
    Six
    Jaguar E-Type (XKE) put in a 1995 110 Pickup. It looks the same, but is very
    fast. Interesting but totally irrellevant to the question being asked.
    Mark Pilkington

    Matt Peckham wrote:

    > what kind of a nightmare would it be trying to fit a newer engine like say a
    > '98 Jeep 4cyl or a 2000 Jeep V6? I figure the electronics would kill you,
    > but I just thought I'd ask... I've seen a couple motors for amazingly low
    > prices lately.
    >
    > Matt
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jean-Leon Morin [mailto:offroaddesign@softhome.net]
    > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:19 PM
    > To: lro@Works.Team.Net
    > Subject: Re: LRO: Re: Engine/Trans Swap
    >
    > Granted, it will happen, but let's say you HAD to always hit a boulder at
    > that RPM to get torque and horsepower from your turbo. TeriAnn, I was just
    > saying that low end torque is really nice to have, and there is simply no
    > replacement for displacement in this case.
    >
    > Of course, you can use the gas pedal, I just don' t like the idea of having
    > to use it all the time. I think some folks have forgotten why I said what I
    > did - Adam, who was discussing an SM420/iron duke swap with a turbo kit, was
    > asking for opinions. I basically said that he'd be better off for off-road
    > with a torquier motor, normally aspirated.
    >
    > Not knocking the Duke swap, it works well, cheap. But if you are planning on
    > running 33" tires, and you want the power that you'd find in a Jeep with a
    > six, why turbo a 4 cyl? All you really want is a 6.
    >
    > J-L
    >
    > From: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>
    > To: LRO list <lro@Works.Team.Net>
    > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:32 AM
    > Subject: Re: LRO: Re: Engine/Trans Swap
    >
    > > > When is the last time
    > > >anyone held a constant 3000 rpms while crawling over a boulder?
    > >
    > > Oh a couple months ago just to get up a steep ramping bolder. First gear
    > > low range 3000 RPM put me at about 4 MPH with gobs of power & torque. My
    > > first gear low range final drive ratio is 70.4 and I have 32 inch dia
    > > tyres. 1000 RPM puts me at about 1.5 MPH with way more torque than the
    > > LR 2.25 produces at peak torque.
    > >
    > > One thing about having power + a very low ratio is I just about have to
    > > drive low range first with the hand throttle. Any bump puts enough
    > > movment in my foot to cause the Rover to jump forward. It takes very
    > > little throttle change to make very quick changes in velocity.
    > >
    > > TeriAnn Wakeman Marigold Ltd.
    > > Santa Cruz, California Web design, site updating, testing
    > > webmaster@overlander.net search engine optimization, graphics
    > > and more
    > >
    > > http://www.overlander.net/Marigold/index.html
    > >
    > >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 12 2001 - 15:20:20 EDT