Re: LRO: Series IIa on a Defender chassis?

From: Frank Elson (frankelson@felson.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat Jun 09 2001 - 04:11:55 EDT

Next message: John Cranfield: "Re: LRO: galvanized cappings / tri-valent chromium"

Previous message: David Scheidt: "Re: LRO: Acetone and Rain-X"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Ogilvie writes:<<<> Besides, from the problems I've had making the bed
fit on my 109, the 109
> may not have even been a 109. Seems manufacturing tolerances on the
frames
> were more determined by the availability of Guiness than a quality jig.<<<

We have a saying that the Land Rover Ltd tolerances are: 'Plus or minus an
inch(ish)' so 109 and 110 are pretty superfluous anyhow.

Best Cheers

Frank
    +--+--+--+
     I !__| [_]|_\___
     I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV
     "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW

Next message: John Cranfield: "Re: LRO: galvanized cappings / tri-valent chromium"
Previous message: David Scheidt: "Re: LRO: Acetone and Rain-X"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 09 2001 - 05:46:00 EDT