Re: LRO: Overworked and underpaid

From: William J. Rice (jarvis64@juno.com)
Date: Thu May 31 2001 - 19:55:28 EDT

  • Next message: Bryan Hoult: "Re: LRO: Overworked and underpaid"

    Well, now that we're well and good-ly off topic, I'll pitch in my $.02.

    I agree w/ Tom to a point--As an government employee in the U.S. Army
    infantry, I've never felt particularly underutilizied. I think this is
    one of those things that most gov't employees let slide off their back,
    always assuming that the comment is ref. those OTHER gov't employees
    (many DA civilians, for instance) who really are getting over. Kind of
    like officer jokes--I don't get real riled up about them. When the
    enlisted guy doing the ribbing gets his own platoon/company he'll realize
    that the responsibilities and tasks are bigger than he ever could've
    imagined while humping his own ruck and watching his section of the
    perimeter, imagining that the platoon leader is loafing in the middle.

    However, the rest of his missive I find hard to agree with. I certainly
    agree that watchdog/compassion organizations need to exist, but I
    completely disagree that they should be gov't agencies. Though these
    agencies do perform many desireable deeds, regulatory/bureaucratic costs
    (EPA, OSHA, Workman's comp, Social Security, DOT) are an ever-growing
    millstone around the necks of American business and, I believe, are
    largely responsible for our transition from a manufacturing to a service
    economy (which may seem dandy now, but doesn't hold up too well in tough
    times).

    I think that were government not forcing us all to be involved in
    mandatory relief/regulation (via taxation), we would not have blue collar
    workers dying on the streets. We would have a lot more community-based,
    voluntary, EFFECTIVE intervention to help those in need. Before the FDR
    and LBJ this happened a good bit, albeit after some industrial revolution
    nastiness (which was FAR worse in GB where things weren't nearly as
    lazziez faire).

    There are almost always market-based reforms that will be more effective
    and far cheaper than establishment of a regulatory leviathan to oversee
    the crisis of the moment.

    OK, now I'll shut up about this and go see if that nut on my pinion is
    tight.

    bill



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 31 2001 - 21:25:50 EDT