LRO: Re: very slight LR content

From: Rich Williams II (richw@nwlink.com)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 16:14:11 EDT

  • Next message: William J. Rice: "LRO: Weird Salisbury leak (again)"

    Easton Trevor A writes:

    > > As one will see from the article having the words "II-series" in the
    title
    > > of a jpeg may get you reported to the FBI. Another new hazard for LROs
    > > http://www.newscientist.com/dailynews/news.jsp?id=ns9999802

    And the above mentioned article states:

    ..."The problem is that the keywords include vague terms including
    "ll-series", "daddo" and "neighbor". Anyone who has an innocent image file
    with this text in its name will be reported to the authorities"...

    Well what if I take a jpeg image of my "neighbor" who is cutting a "daddo"
    into a board on a table saw powered by the PTO on his "ll-series" Land
    Rover? Should I email that image directly to Interpol, Scotland Yard and
    the FBI? What if it was a hot day out and the neighbor was wearing only
    shorts, would there be a disproportionate amount of skin in the image? And
    because of the image content I would obviously name this file
    neighbordaddoll-series.jpg.

    I think I have too much time on my hands. Off to shoot some images for the
    authorities.....

    Rich



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 30 2001 - 17:30:15 EDT