Re: LRO: LMA vs. DOT 4

From: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus (Alan_Richer@Lotus.com)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 07:23:59 EDT

Next message: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."

Previous message: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus: "Re: LRO: LMA vs. DOT 4"
Next in thread: d.h.lowe: "Re: LRO: LMA vs. DOT 4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I have no idea why yours went belly up.

TeriAnn Wakeman

He's not the only one, as I've stated previously. It's the mineral-oil
rather than vegetable content. Any DOT4 that has petrochemicals in it will
do this - and the DOT spec doesn't say anything about chemical composition,
just boiling point.

Careful with this one...

ajr

Next message: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus: "Re: LRO: uh oh, Jim's at it again..."
Previous message: Alan Richer/CAM/Lotus: "Re: LRO: LMA vs. DOT 4"
Next in thread: d.h.lowe: "Re: LRO: LMA vs. DOT 4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 07 2001 - 08:38:52 EDT