Re: LRO: LightWeight vs Regular frames

From: Hope Peter (hope_peter@bah.com)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 13:34:18 EDT

Next message: Erik Barr: "Re: LRO: another engine GRRRRR!!!"

Previous message: Rich & Lori Williams: "LRO: Intro to Range Rovers 101"
In reply to: HeirPhoto@aol.com: "Re: LRO: LightWeight vs Regular frames"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Pete,
> The Lightweight body is 60" wide. Same as a Series I and a good bit
narrower
> than a Series II or III.
> Best,
> Tony

Thanks for the data. The IIa body is 64.5" wide, the frame is 62 at it's
widest point.
Pete

Next message: Erik Barr: "Re: LRO: another engine GRRRRR!!!"
Previous message: Rich & Lori Williams: "LRO: Intro to Range Rovers 101"
In reply to: HeirPhoto@aol.com: "Re: LRO: LightWeight vs Regular frames"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 26 2001 - 04:19:20 EDT