OK lets try three mile island, 23rd anniversary was last week. If the
operators had let the automated controls handle it, it would have been no
problem. Not much radioactive release but very close to core melt.
Chris hall
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:18:21 -0700 "Faure, Marin"
<Marin.Faure@PSS.Boeing.com> writes:
> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 15:09:23 -0300
> From: john.cranfield@ns.sympatico.ca (John Cranfield)
> Subject: Re: LRO: Power (was wasted youth)
>
> >However to all those who try to assure us that nuclear is non
> poluting
> have you so soon forgotten Chernobyl.
>
> The problem with using Chernobyl as an example of the nuclear power
>
> generation industry in action is that the Chernobyl plant was a
> shining
> example of how to do everything wrong in designing, operating, and
> maintaining a nuclear power plant. If that type of plant was
> state-of-
> the-art in nuclear power plants, then I would agree nuclear's not a
> good
> way to go. But in fact, a nuclear plant can be designed, operated,
> and
> maintained to be as reliable and safe as any other form of power
> generation
> except possibly hydro.
> ___________________________
> C. Marin Faure
> (original owner)
> 1973 Land Rover Series III-88
> 1991 Range Rover Vogue SE
> Seattle
>
> _________________________________________
> C. Marin Faure
> Producer/Director, Boeing Video Services
> telephone (425)393-7721
> mobile (206)650-5622
> fax: (425)393-7741
> e-mail: marin.faure@boeing.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 06 2001 - 00:12:37 EDT