[ First Message Last | Table of Contents | <- Digest -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
msg | Sender | lines | Subject |
1 | Mike Rooth [M.J.Rooth@lu | 28 | Re: fuel warning light |
2 | Ketil Kirkerud [ketil@if | 37 | Re: Low Ratio Gearbox |
3 | Mike Fredette [mfredett@ | 28 | [not specified] |
4 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 77 | Exhausts, Fuel Stuff, and Owls Head |
5 | maloney@wings.attmail.co | 29 | Drop Arm Puller |
6 | William.Grouell@Eng.Sun. | 50 | To get off |
7 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 46 | Re: Land Rover Discovery purchase decision??? |
8 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 46 | Re: Land Rover Discovery purchase decision??? |
9 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 9 | Re: 2 wheel rolling road? |
10 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 17 | Re: Land Rover Discovery purchase decision??? |
11 | brabyn@skivs.ski.org (Jo | 9 | Black Rock Desert |
12 | CXKS46A@prodigy.com (MR | 18 | Russell's shirt |
From: Mike Rooth <M.J.Rooth@lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: fuel warning light Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 9:46:43 BST Dale, When the warning light comes on(red,in my case)you've got two gallons left,apparently.Just enough to get back from the pub as long as its not far,the way mine is drinking fuel at the moment.If your gauge doesnt read full when it should,there's summat up with the transmitter for a bet. Whadya mean sixty miles an hour? Sixty? Go on!Surely you mean sixty *kilometres* an hour.*Thats* more like it:-) It*will* go better in cool conditions,you are getting more air in during the inlet stroke.Which is the reason that intercooling is used to cool the air compressed in the turbocharger.Isnt the idea of a turbo to utilise some of the waste exhaust energy, whereas a supercharger requires energy to turn it? Enny road up,I cant say I would relish the thought of what *either* would do to my old three bearing 2.25,although I *have* seen a photo of an Allard turbo fitted to one.History didnt record whether the engine survived.I'd be interested to know whether you've recently had your injectoers set up,and/or the distributor pump retimed,and if so what effect it had on power and emmissions,also fuel consumption. If you can rattle along at sixty,you must have an overdrive,yes? Cheers Mike Rooth ------------------------------[ <- Message 2 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: Ketil Kirkerud <ketil@ifi.uio.no> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 12:16:33 +0200 Subject: Re: Low Ratio Gearbox Subject: Low Ratio Gearbox To: land-rover-owner@stratus.com X-Mailer: LeeMail 2.0.4 I've just bought an 88" series 2 from my dad. It was built in 1971 and he bought it about 8 years ago. The people he bought it from told him that it had a special, low ratio, gearbox and the gearbox does indeed seem to have a very low ratio (40mph at top revs). However, I can't find any mention of such a gearbox in any Land Rover literature and I've started to wonder whether there's something amiss. This sounds like the "all-helical" tranfer box made for the 109" 1Tonne, which was/is supposed to have 9.00"x16 tires. I used to have one of these (tranfer boxes, that is) on my Landy, but I found it a bit tiring to redline the engine all the time (6000 RPM.. not fun...). So : I got myself an old standard tranfer box, complete with mainshaft (the mainshaft is different, between the two cases, so it couldn't be used), and rebuilt the whole thing. Originally I wanted to just install an overdrive, but... as the mainshaft is different, it won't fit (the overdrive, that is). One of my suspicions is that the transfer box might be stuck in low ratio. I hope that's not the case since the freewheeing hubs are currently stuck in the freewheeling position :-( Bit of a worry really. Is there any difference between high and low ? Try to get it up to about 20mph (in low range), which should be something like 4th. Try to shift into high range while moving (yes, this is OK, but you need to double-declutch, probably). You _should_ to notice a difference in gearing.. ---Ketil ------------------------------[ <- Message 3 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Subject: Re: diff locks Date: Tue, 05 Jul 1994 07:09:02 -0700 From: Mike Fredette <mfredett@ichips.intel.com> >I would hate to disagree with you on the ARB diff lock, they are only >likely to blow something up when you need them, If you were going to get [ truncated by lro-digester (was 24 lines)] >Craig Murray 1955 Series 1 86" >mail: craigp@ocs.cpsg.com.au 2.25 desiel (Soon!) Craig, Across the pond here, we don't have quite as many goodies available to us for retro fit as you do in the UK and AUSTRALIA. The ONLY diff lock available here is the ARB unit, and at that, it's a pretty penny. $629.00 US for the diff and another $225.00 US for the bloddy compressor! So at almost 900 dollars a crack, not too many takers I'm afraid. We've never even heard of the other two units you mentioned above, how do they compare price wise to the ARB unit? Perhaps you could pass on some info as to price, addresses for availability, etc. I'm sure many of the US contingent on the net would be interested as the only other manufacturer here is the Detroit Locker unit for the Jeep, Bronco, Blazer, Toyota crowd (retch, gag), and I don't believe they make an application for the Landy. Correct me if I'm wrong all you folks out there who know for sure. I certainly didn't know of the ARB's shortcomings, I had heard it was a tough, trouble free addition to the capabilities of the Landy. rgds Mike Fredette mfredett@ichips.intel.com Portland, Oregon ------------------------------[ <- Message 4 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Date: 6 Jul 94 02:07:35 GMT Subject: Exhausts, Fuel Stuff, and Owls Head Exhaust System: This weekend I installed a new exhaust system on my 88. I bought the system 2 years ago on sale from RN, but the existing system hadn't given me problems till now. The jury rigged system in place exited out the right, and I ordered a RH system. I noticed it came with an extra bracket not illustrated in the Land Rover Parts books. I planned on returning it on my next VT trip. Once I had it bolted up I found that it didn't quite sit right exiting out the right. After referencing all my books and manuals I realized that this frame was set up for a LH exit exhaust. After letting my brain boil for a few minutes it occured to me that Lanny had included this bracket for a reason. Upon examination I discovered that the bracket was a mirror of the hanger for the RH side of a LH exhaust. Again I poured through my books and photo albums and figured that this should go somewhere on the outside of the frame opposite the inboard RH hanger bracket, but I could find no holes to mount it. A call to RN was of no help on Saturday AM (they must have been closed for the holiday weekend) so I positioned it to provide the closest tailpipe proximity to those I had seen in the books and photos and drilled and tapped my frame (5/16 Coarse for strength in the fairly thin framewall). It seems OK and everything hangs fine now. I was a bit put off at first having to drill my frame (old but sound) but then I realized that the LH exiting exhaust is about $25 more than the RH, and seems to be freer flowing (no hairpin turns). The job took me the better part of a day, mostly due to my replacing the manifold-to-headpipe studs (I pulled the manifold, then replaced the gasket and hardware). They were badly corroded on the nut end, but did unscrew without snapping with some effort. I guess the Permatex Antiseize really does work on manifold hardware. I searched for stainless replacements locally with no success, and used some new hardware that I had left over from another job. Researching the bracket location took some time too. When I took it on the road I almost wished I hadn't replaced it. The smell of the aluminizing burning off running with the soft top rolled up was enough to make my eyes water. God it was awful. The first trip of 30 miles was horrendous. I coughed and sneezed my head off and I could feel my chest filling up. The second trip of 10 miles was better, and after a few more runs it is faint but still noticable when stopped. So, if you install an new genuine aluminized exhaust system, make your first run with the top secured, windows open and vents open. And don't stop. Fuel Stuff: On Monday I helped a friend install a tune up kit on his 88 that had been sitting for years. We had gotten it started 2 weeks ago but now it wouldn't fire, even with the new ignition kit. I sprayed brake parts cleaner into the carb as he cranked it and it fired right up, then died. I worked the fuel pump priming lever with the hose off the carb and got no fuel. I felt it had to be the pump but it primed just fine 2 weeks ago when we tried it the first time. I pulled the bowl off and found 1 1/2" of brown sludge. Yuk. Cleaned and replaced it. Pumped the primer. No good. Pulled the pump. The screen was blocked solid. Cleaned it and now the pump was working on the bench. Reconnected the line from the tank to the pump and worked the primer. The bowl began to fill with dark yellow fluid, and some black stuff that looked like a snake and moved like mercury. I've never seen anything like it. The black stuff rolled around the bottom of the bowl like it was alive, but didn't mix with the other stuff. Dumped the bowl and shot carb cleaner in the bowl. Then brake parts cleaner. The yellow stuff (Varnish?) wouldn't budge. I had to wipe it off with a paper towel. Sometime this week he will drain his tank and hopefully we can try again with fresh fuel next weekend. I hate to admit it but I really enjoyed doing all this. It must be a sickness. Owl's Head; If anyone went to Owl's Head please let us know it was. Things like turn out, air show, LR vendors vending, interesting vehicles, and of course, personality clashes. Bill Maloney maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 5 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
From: maloney@wings.attmail.com (maloney) Date: 6 Jul 94 05:42:03 GMT Subject: Drop Arm Puller Has anyone heard of or used a "Drop Arm Puller" for removing the arm from the steering box? I seem to recall one in an ad in LRO but cannot find it in the last few issues. The box in my IIA seems to be leaking alot. I replaced the side and bottom cover gaskets and it's not leaking there. As far as I can tell it's coming through the splined shaft hole and I would like to try replacing the O-ring. I had tried a heavy duty gear puller on my III steering box when I had the engine out, but it just wasn't enough. I didn't try to lever it off for fear of damaging the ball bearings or races. If anyone could let me know where and how much I'd really appreciate it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I called Anne Cornwall at the LRO bookshop to order the Land Rover Experience and some other books this morning. She always seems so amused that I call so early in the morning ("wot's the matter love, can't sleep or something?"), and that most of the US customers call later in the day. I'm amused that anyone would wait until after 7:00AM and pay the standard (maximum) instead of economy rates. I'll post how long it took once I get it. Bill Maloney maloney@wings.attmail.com ------------------------------[ <- Message 6 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 10:55:50 +0800 From: William.Grouell@Eng.Sun.COM (William L. Grouell) Subject: To get off for administrative stuff, send to land-rover-owner-request@stratus.com OR lro-request@stratus.com OR Just use this, aim at ceter of screen!! ^ | | @#####@ (### ###)-. .(### ###) \ / (### ###) ) (=- .@#####@|_--" /\ \_|l|_/ (\ (=-\ |l| / \ \.___|l|___/ /\ |_| / (=-\._________/\ \ / \._________/ # ---- # # __ # \########/ It's also rude to blame others for your own ignorance. (___) (___) (o o) (o o) /-------\ / /-------\ / / | ||O / | O~ ||O * ||,---|| * ||,---|| ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Bull A-bomb-in-a-bull No-bull Regards, Bill G. > From car-list-rejects@transfer.stratus.com Fri Jul 1 07:26 PDT 1994 > To: lro@stratus.com [ truncated by lro-digester (was 24 lines)] > Beverly, MA 01915-5510 U.S.A. > ________________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------[ <- Message 7 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 11:34:58 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Land Rover Discovery purchase decision??? In my humble view after researching all the available 4x4's in the US a Land Rover of one version or the other is of course the only way to go. None of the others are seriously designed for off-road use. The Toyota is probably one of the better ones in terms of ground clearance and reliability, but terrible in terms of ride and suspension travel, being nothing more than a warmed over pickup truck. On your first four wheeling trip in a Disco or RR particularly, and to some extent Defender, you will notice yourself running circles around the Toyotas and others as they rattle themselves to bits at a snail's pace on any sort of rough surface. For serious four wheeling you'd have to modify any non-Land Rover product; in the case4 of a Toyota I'd imagine diff locks would be essential due to the negligible wheel travel and stiff sway bars. Look underneath the various available vehicles and you will notice the difference in robustitude, so to speak; Land Rovers use a 14 gauge box section frame (all others use weak channel section), and heavy, fully floating axles (equivalent to a 1-ton US pickup). No doubt the antilock brakes, airbags, etc are nice, but the basics that make the LR so superior off-road are more than skin deep. Regarding expense -- I do think you're right of course and logically we should all get something cheaper. However, you only live once! What about a 87-89 RR (I got an 89 second hand); their prices are getting quite reasonable now, and they are better than a Disco off road as well as being "loaded" (this may send up a wail of protest on the net!!). All RR's up to 90, the '91 Hunter, and the '92 non-County model, are sans sway bars and will beat a Disco in rock crawling traction, as well as having a bit smoother ride overall. Sway bars compromise off-road ride and traction, despite what any advertising literature says. Reliability is probably not equal to a Toyota if we're honest, but not bad either. Anyway, hope this helps you internally justify a certain amount of extravagance!! John Brabyn Mill Valley, Ca 1989 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 8 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 11:34:58 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Land Rover Discovery purchase decision??? In my humble view after researching all the available 4x4's in the US a Land Rover of one version or the other is of course the only way to go. None of the others are seriously designed for off-road use. The Toyota is probably one of the better ones in terms of ground clearance and reliability, but terrible in terms of ride and suspension travel, being nothing more than a warmed over pickup truck. On your first four wheeling trip in a Disco or RR particularly, and to some extent Defender, you will notice yourself running circles around the Toyotas and others as they rattle themselves to bits at a snail's pace on any sort of rough surface. For serious four wheeling you'd have to modify any non-Land Rover product; in the case4 of a Toyota I'd imagine diff locks would be essential due to the negligible wheel travel and stiff sway bars. Look underneath the various available vehicles and you will notice the difference in robustitude, so to speak; Land Rovers use a 14 gauge box section frame (all others use weak channel section), and heavy, fully floating axles (equivalent to a 1-ton US pickup). No doubt the antilock brakes, airbags, etc are nice, but the basics that make the LR so superior off-road are more than skin deep. Regarding expense -- I do think you're right of course and logically we should all get something cheaper. However, you only live once! What about a 87-89 RR (I got an 89 second hand); their prices are getting quite reasonable now, and they are better than a Disco off road as well as being "loaded" (this may send up a wail of protest on the net!!). All RR's up to 90, the '91 Hunter, and the '92 non-County model, are sans sway bars and will beat a Disco in rock crawling traction, as well as having a bit smoother ride overall. Sway bars compromise off-road ride and traction, despite what any advertising literature says. Reliability is probably not equal to a Toyota if we're honest, but not bad either. Anyway, hope this helps you internally justify a certain amount of extravagance!! John Brabyn Mill Valley, Ca 1989 RR ------------------------------[ <- Message 9 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 11:37:03 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: 2 wheel rolling road? Just as a point of information -- Discoverys do not have a viscous coupling in the center differential, they have a manual lock. John Brabyn ------------------------------[ <- Message 10 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 12:02:27 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Re: Land Rover Discovery purchase decision??? Note also that should you choose the used RR route to save $, the rear suspension ion is better than a Discovery due to the load levelling device which allows soft softer springs to be used. This combined with no sway bars adds up to a big difference in traction in extreme articulation conditions. In the California and Nevada deserts (never been to Arizona) I've seldom found the bushes to be thick enough to worry about scratches -- perhaps you've found otherwise?? Good luck John ------------------------------[ <- Message 11 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 94 13:51:18 PDT From: brabyn@skivs.ski.org (John Brabyn) Subject: Black Rock Desert I was up in the Black Rock Desert over the rebellion day weekend but saw no other Land Rovers. Where is everybody??!! John ------------------------------[ <- Message 12 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 1994 16:55:27 EDT From: CXKS46A@prodigy.com (MR ALEXANDER P GRICE) Subject: Russell's shirt Russell...I don't have your E-mail address, so I have to post this to the net. I've got a long-sleeved T-shirt waiting for you. My regards to Nige, my recent clutch work notwithstanding. Jan: T-shirt two went out today. *----"Jeep may be famous, LAND-ROVER is Legendary"-----* | | | Sandy Grice, Rover Owners' Association of Virginia | | E-Mail: CXKS46A@prodigy.com FAX: 804-622-7056 | | Voice: 804-622-7054 (Days) 804-423-4898 (Evenings) | | 1633 Melrose Pkwy., Norfolk, VA, 23508-1730 USA | *------------------------------------------------------* ------------------------------[ <- Message 13 -> end | Table of Contents | <- Digest 940706 -> Archive Index | <- Browser -> ]
END OF LAND ROVER OWNER DIGEST
Photos & text Copyright 1990-2011 Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.
Digest Messages Copyright 1990-2011 by the original poster or/and Bill Caloccia, All rights reserved.