Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?

From: Alan J. Richer (mrchurchill109@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jan 26 2003 - 12:47:22 EST

  • Next message: Jason Pitcher: "[lro] RE: Is a Series an SUV?"

    --- jimfoo <jimfoo@purplemountain.net> wrote:
    >
    > A quote from Land-Rover The Unbeatable 4X4: " If the
    Land-Rover team were to
    > bend their
    > ideas towards a more prestigious vehicle it could never
    > be called a
    > Land-Rover, and could certainly not resemble a Land-Rover
    > in appearance."

    And what then do they call the bleedin' Range Rover?

    If I remember correctly, the old project name for the Range
    Rover was "Road Rover" (not to be confused with the
    thankfully short-lived cartoon of the same name).

    They were definitely aiming upmarket - a utilitiarian
    vehicle with a less utilitarian fit, finish and comfort
    level.

    When last in the UK I had the pleasure of meeting one of
    the Velar prototype Range Rovers (YVB163H I believe) and
    its owner. The comfort level was definitely better than a
    Series landy station wagon of the time, even though you
    likely still could have cleaned it out with a garden hose.

    It may never have been called a Land-Rover but it was
    definitely cut from the same cloth.

    Methinks they were making way too myuch stew from that
    oyster.... -ajr

    =====
    The journey is the destination. Anything else is illusion.

    Please ignore the following advertising.....
    Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
    http://mailplus.yahoo.com
    _______________________________________________
    LRO mailing list
    LRO@land-rover.team.net
    http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 12:53:43 EST