Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?

From: Frank Elson (frank.elson@ntlworld.com)
Date: Sat Jan 25 2003 - 21:41:38 EST

Next message: Todd Schlemmer: "RE: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"

Previous message: Frank Elson: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
In reply to: Rich Williams: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
Next in thread: Frank Elson: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rich writes: >>>Besides the industrial, agricultural or military
applications Series Rovers
> nicely suited, many regular people purchased them for use on the family
> farm/ranch, at the weekend cabin, for camping and hunting, for off-road
fun
> and of course the stereotypical safaris where there was lots of camping
and
> hunting and the like. I guess those are "sporting pursuits".
>
> So the Series Rover CAN be considered a S.U.V., but to be more specific, a
> VINTAGE S.U.V.<<<

Yeah! in fact it's all the others bearing the term that are NOT actually
SUVs in the true meaning.

BTW am I correct in thinking that SUV stands for Sport Utility Vehicle?

Best Cheers

Reverend Frank
    +--+--+--+
     I !__| [_]|_\___
     I ____|"_|"__|_ | / B791 PKV
     "(o)======(o)" Bronze Green 110 CSW
_______________________________________________
LRO mailing list
LRO@land-rover.team.net
http://land-rover.team.net/mailman/listinfo/lro

Next message: Todd Schlemmer: "RE: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
Previous message: Frank Elson: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
In reply to: Rich Williams: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
Next in thread: Frank Elson: "Re: [lro] Is a Series an SUV?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jan 25 2003 - 21:53:44 EST